Author Topic: Bombshell  (Read 78581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17574
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #475 on: February 01, 2017, 02:29:24 PM »

Online DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22239
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #476 on: February 01, 2017, 02:32:37 PM »
I hope it's not barnes.  I'd prefer it be Thompson.  We can scrounge together a serviceable quarterback for 2019.  Barnes would impact us immediately. 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #477 on: February 01, 2017, 02:34:43 PM »
It's not Thompson, HE JUST LIKED MY TWEET! :D
« Last Edit: February 01, 2017, 02:44:41 PM by WackyCat08 »

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #478 on: February 01, 2017, 02:36:42 PM »
If true its probably someone like Warmack.

Offline AtlantaWildcat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 56
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #479 on: February 01, 2017, 02:37:07 PM »
Even E(SEC)PN couldn't even get it right during our bowl game, redshirt and medical are two different things I believe. Thus, giving him two more years at Kansas State  :billdance:

Actually they did get it right, he's a junior. You don't technically get the medical redshirt year until the completion of your senior season.

That seems fair......

Offline That_Guy

  • I'm just, "That Guy!"
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2788
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #480 on: February 01, 2017, 02:38:44 PM »
If true its probably someone like Warmack.

Makes the most sense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22239
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #481 on: February 01, 2017, 02:51:47 PM »
If true its probably someone like Warmack.

Makes the most sense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would completely understand that and also not really care about that (although I do very much like how his name rolls off the tongue).  I just really hope it's not Barnes.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Online ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17574
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #482 on: February 01, 2017, 03:30:00 PM »
Yea, Warmack or Delton would be totally understandable and hardly a bombshell.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #483 on: February 01, 2017, 03:30:37 PM »
Yea, Warmack or Delton would be totally understandable and hardly a bombshell.
Yeah, both very meh if either were to happen.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #484 on: February 01, 2017, 07:06:30 PM »
Delton I'd be bummed but understanding
Warmack meh
Barnes I'd be  :buh-bye:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #485 on: February 01, 2017, 07:25:34 PM »
We don't deserve Barnes

Offline Hurricane Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1358
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #486 on: February 01, 2017, 07:32:37 PM »

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #487 on: February 01, 2017, 08:05:42 PM »
Silmon > Barnes

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #488 on: February 01, 2017, 08:08:18 PM »

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #489 on: February 01, 2017, 09:09:23 PM »

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #490 on: February 01, 2017, 10:10:25 PM »
Silmon > Barnes

We don't deserve Barnes
lol so spot on.  Silmon is avg at best compared to barnes

Negative. Barnes did good in mopup duty against FAU. He padded his stats against Baylor and KU.

Silmon performed well against TCU and Texas A&M.  I know which of these isn't like the other.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #491 on: February 01, 2017, 10:12:36 PM »
 :dubious: One of these guys has NFL size and the other doesn't.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2017, 05:18:45 AM by WackyCat08 »

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #492 on: February 01, 2017, 10:15:09 PM »
Silmon > Barnes

We don't deserve Barnes
lol so spot on.  Silmon is avg at best compared to barnes

Negative. Barnes did good in mopup duty against FAU. He padded his stats against Baylor and KU.

Silmon performed well against TCU and Texas A&M.  I know which of these isn't like the other.
TCU was ass as well, and you conveniently left out OSU(9 carries, 72 yards), which was better than either of those teams.  You can also use your eyes to see that Barnes is bigger, stronger, faster, more agile and more decisive than Silmon regardless of competition.  Don't get me wrong, Silmon is decent, but Barnes is better in every perceptible way, don't know what you see in Silmon that is better, he was often undecisive in his cuts and danced in the backfield a lot early a la Charles Jones.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #493 on: February 02, 2017, 07:01:56 AM »
I'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.

Online joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3755
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #494 on: February 02, 2017, 07:51:57 AM »
I'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.

If you've paid attention to this coaching staff, that is in no way an indication of who's better

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #495 on: February 02, 2017, 08:21:32 AM »
I'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.

I think that Barnes is better, but I agree with scribe somewhat in that I don't think the difference between the two is as pronounced as their stats would suggest. Against TCU and A&M, Silmon was just a stud.  I'm glad we have both, and I think both will get plenty of carries and yards next year. 

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #496 on: February 02, 2017, 10:01:49 AM »
I'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.

I think that Barnes is better, but I agree with scribe somewhat in that I don't think the difference between the two is as pronounced as their stats would suggest. Against TCU and A&M, Silmon was just a stud.  I'm glad we have both, and I think both will get plenty of carries and yards next year.

Steffy gets it.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #497 on: February 02, 2017, 10:43:06 AM »
If true its probably someone like Warmack.
He would have to be dropping to D2 and for what 1 year? He already used his RS.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #498 on: February 02, 2017, 10:43:54 AM »

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: Bombshell
« Reply #499 on: February 02, 2017, 10:56:01 AM »
I'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.

I think that Barnes is better, but I agree with scribe somewhat in that I don't think the difference between the two is as pronounced as their stats would suggest. Against TCU and A&M, Silmon was just a stud.  I'm glad we have both, and I think both will get plenty of carries and yards next year.

Steffy gets it.

Neither of you have ever gotten anything