Author Topic: RANKINGS...  (Read 129886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27090
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22245
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #701 on: January 10, 2017, 11:29:54 AM »
Finished the season 26th.

3 voters had us at 18 (including the Capital Journal's Matt Galloway)
1 had us at 20
3 had us at 21 (including Brett McMurphy and Sam McKewon of the Omaha World Herald -- Sam's always been pretty EMAW when it comes to voting)
2 had us at 22 (including Joe Walljasper of the Colombia [MO] Tribune)
4 had us at 23 (including Jimmy Burch of the Ft. Worth Star Telegram and Mitch Vingle of the Charleston [WV] Gazette)
7 had us at 24 (including Kirk Bohls of the Austin American Statesman; Chuck Carlton of the Dallas Morning News; and John Shinn of the Norman [OK] Transcript)
4 had us at 25


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #702 on: January 10, 2017, 11:32:00 AM »
We finished unranked

Got it, thanks.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #703 on: January 10, 2017, 11:35:40 AM »
Finished the season 26th.

3 voters had us at 18 (including the Capital Journal's Matt Galloway)


I went to school with him from kindergarten through high school
:adios:

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #704 on: January 10, 2017, 11:40:01 AM »
Miami, Utah, SDUS, Tenn all go from not ranked to the top 25.  rough ridin' Auburn, .......rough ridin' auburn...., is still ranked.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #705 on: January 10, 2017, 11:45:26 AM »
Auburn being ranked is weird.




Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19424
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #706 on: January 10, 2017, 11:46:03 AM »
Miami, Utah, SDUS, Tenn all go from not ranked to the top 25.  rough ridin' Auburn, .......rough ridin' auburn...., is still ranked.
Why not?

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #707 on: January 10, 2017, 11:51:24 AM »
While weekly ranking are usually a 'what have you done for me lately' kind of experiment, these end of year ones usually try to get some season long perspective (maybe 60/40 weekly weight?).  Arguably Auburn should have been dropped before their bowl game.  But the last 3 games of their season bad losses, especially the woof performance against Oklahoma.  The last 4 have been seriously trending down, sorry I don't respek Vandy.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22245
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #708 on: January 10, 2017, 11:51:58 AM »
John Wilner of the San Jose Mercury voted Auburn at 12th.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39127
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #709 on: January 10, 2017, 11:55:42 AM »
SNOWBRAG has Auburn at #24; KSU at #40

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29144
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #710 on: January 10, 2017, 11:56:10 AM »
seems about right

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #711 on: January 10, 2017, 11:56:54 AM »
Ya, auburn's schedule was a cakewalk.  Clemson, bama, LSU, OU?  What a joke

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22245
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #712 on: January 10, 2017, 12:01:00 PM »
lol that jon wilner guy actually bumped auburn up two spots after their loss to OU.  what a joke.  he has the cats at 23 though so he's not a dud IMO.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 12:04:36 PM by Dlew12 »


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #713 on: January 10, 2017, 12:14:38 PM »
SNOWBRAG has Auburn at #24; KSU at #40
I'm lost on the nick name, help please?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22245
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #714 on: January 10, 2017, 12:16:05 PM »
Scores need work but results are good


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19424
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #715 on: January 10, 2017, 12:17:07 PM »
Auburn beat
SNOWBRAG has Auburn at #24; KSU at #40
ChiPOTLE had Auburn at #23 and KSU at #48.  Not too different.

« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 12:21:54 PM by Chingon »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #716 on: January 10, 2017, 12:47:43 PM »
Auburn ranked in the top 25  at 8-5 and with 1 win vs a ranked team all year? :horrorsurprise:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46462
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #717 on: January 10, 2017, 01:00:14 PM »
Auburn ranked in the top 25  at 8-5 and with 1 win vs a ranked team all year? :horrorsurprise:
meanwhile we basically only lost one game


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #718 on: January 10, 2017, 01:01:17 PM »
Auburn ranked in the top 25  at 8-5 and with 1 win vs a ranked team all year? :horrorsurprise:
meanwhile we basically only lost one game

And basically beat 3 ranked teams

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #719 on: January 10, 2017, 01:06:19 PM »
9-4 > 8-5

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #720 on: January 10, 2017, 01:12:39 PM »
Auburn was the best 5 loss team in the country (ranked #13 by footballoutsiders combined metrics). Meanwhile we were the 11th best 4 loss team (#34).

I get it, Auburn played a tough schedule and played some really good team close as well as the win over LSU (the best 4 loss team). But there is something about losing your last 3, 1 to a bad team and two not close to really good teams, that makes me think maybe they shouldn't be ranked. Not necessarily the Cats over them, but still not ranked.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #721 on: January 10, 2017, 01:13:54 PM »
I don't see why any 5 loss team should be ranked. Period.

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #722 on: January 10, 2017, 07:17:26 PM »
John Wilner of the San Jose Mercury voted Auburn at 12th.

dlew, that gets my dander up. i tell you, it really does.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30378
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #723 on: January 10, 2017, 07:38:21 PM »
Where did we end up in the 2017 way to early preseason rankings?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #724 on: January 10, 2017, 07:47:17 PM »
Seen 16, 17, and 18 so far.