Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4610580 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73050 on: September 19, 2017, 09:02:51 PM »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30351
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73051 on: September 19, 2017, 09:05:03 PM »
Allegedly his slugging percentage at the time of the at bat was the lowest in entire MLB  amongst eligible hitters :lol:
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

The Big Train

  • Guest
The Royals
« Reply #73052 on: September 19, 2017, 09:16:30 PM »
Hence my reference to one shining moment. It's like if Adam Dunn after 250+ K's and a sub .170 BA hit it.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73053 on: September 19, 2017, 10:45:35 PM »
It would basically be like if a relief pitcher hit it in a 17-2 loss, AMIRITE?!?!?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73054 on: September 19, 2017, 10:46:17 PM »
Giancarlo deserved to hit that dong, imho...IMHO
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73055 on: September 19, 2017, 10:53:17 PM »
The worst every day player hitting it pretty much tarnished it. Whatever.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73056 on: September 20, 2017, 07:41:57 PM »
Oh look, unhappy people were in here being miserable last night.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73057 on: September 20, 2017, 07:42:45 PM »
:jerk:

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73058 on: September 20, 2017, 07:43:16 PM »
Mooooooose!

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73059 on: September 20, 2017, 08:18:10 PM »
Junis looks like he's getting better. His curveball was huge tonight, and the changeup had good action.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73060 on: September 20, 2017, 08:18:14 PM »
Tonight, Moose and the Royals have made me happy again guys.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73061 on: September 20, 2017, 10:42:03 PM »

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73062 on: September 20, 2017, 10:43:08 PM »
Tonight, Moose and the Royals have made me happy again guys.

 :thumbs:

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73063 on: September 20, 2017, 10:43:37 PM »
 :royals:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27088
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73064 on: September 21, 2017, 06:44:49 AM »
guys

37 is the final chapter of this era of Royals ball. There's nothing left.

 :cry:

https://twitter.com/sarahinkc/status/910670844103454720

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73065 on: September 21, 2017, 08:19:35 AM »
The guys on 610 were having a great time dissecting his words looking for hidden meanings.

Apparently, Mike is either going to a hr friendly NL park, he is coming back to break the record again, or he just wishes the organization well.


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73066 on: September 21, 2017, 11:41:12 AM »
Guys, still a 1.8% chance at the WC!

3 games back in the loss column and 11 games left.

How dumb am I for having a slimmer of hope left?

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73067 on: September 21, 2017, 12:55:35 PM »

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73068 on: September 21, 2017, 12:55:51 PM »
Lol at 37 HRs being the club record

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73069 on: September 21, 2017, 01:20:51 PM »
They don't play in a sandbox like other teams that I know of.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39115
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73070 on: September 21, 2017, 01:21:13 PM »
wacky  :lol:

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73071 on: September 21, 2017, 01:35:55 PM »
They don't play in a sandbox like other teams that I know of.
They have near identical left-center, center, and right-center dimensions. No one hits HRs right down the lines at the foul poles anyways so those measurements don't matter. I'd venture to say that Kauffman is a more HR hitter friendly park than Yankee Stadium but the talent gap is so great that it seems opposite.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk


Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30351
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73072 on: September 21, 2017, 01:44:14 PM »
What on earth.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline schreds21

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1391
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73073 on: September 21, 2017, 01:54:49 PM »
They don't play in a sandbox like other teams that I know of.
They have near identical left-center, center, and right-center dimensions. No one hits HRs right down the lines at the foul poles anyways so those measurements don't matter. I'd venture to say that Kauffman is a more HR hitter friendly park than Yankee Stadium but the talent gap is so great that it seems opposite.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
:Crazy:

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #73074 on: September 21, 2017, 02:17:37 PM »
They don't play in a sandbox like other teams that I know of.
They have near identical left-center, center, and right-center dimensions. No one hits HRs right down the lines at the foul poles anyways so those measurements don't matter. I'd venture to say that Kauffman is a more HR hitter friendly park than Yankee Stadium but the talent gap is so great that it seems opposite.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk


yankee stadium
The dimensions of the new Stadium are identical to the old one: 314 feet down the right-field line; 385 to right-center; 408 to center field; 399 to left-center; and 314 down the left-field line

kauffman
Left Field – 330 feet (101 m) Left-Center – 387 feet (118 m) Center Field – 410 feet (125 m) Right-Center – 387 feet (118 m) Right Field – 330 feet (101 m)

Id say 15-20 feet down each line is significant in this case