Author Topic: Charlottesville  (Read 27481 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41955
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #175 on: August 14, 2017, 10:41:29 AM »

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #176 on: August 14, 2017, 10:43:07 AM »
How did they decide who got the 'ki torch and who didn't?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #177 on: August 14, 2017, 10:44:04 AM »
No surprise Arkansas is represented.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41955
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #178 on: August 14, 2017, 10:44:51 AM »
How did they decide who got the 'ki torch and who didn't?

I don't know the full pecking order, but pigaggie engineers def got dibs.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #179 on: August 14, 2017, 10:50:01 AM »
He's got a specialized pigaggie torch.   :horrorsurprise:

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15255
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #180 on: August 14, 2017, 10:52:16 AM »
Yes, bad writing. I was trying to say the KKK as a whole, probably make up about .005% of the US population and some ppl have been trying to act like they make up how most Trump voters feel.

Lib has done a good job of breaking up that point.
No ppl haven't.
Jesus, you're so blind to the lib party. The crap is out there, dummy. Look at social media.
I can also find people on social media that think the world is flat and 8000 bots retweet it...doesn't make it "ppl believe the world is flat"

Lol at me being left.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15255
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #181 on: August 14, 2017, 10:55:50 AM »
Here is a perfect example of why people are struggling with Trump response to this.  He couldn't wait to call out the Merck CEO resigning from his group but can't call out the nexus of the problem in VA This weekend. Do you guys really not see that disconnect?


Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41955
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #182 on: August 14, 2017, 10:58:03 AM »
Towns in Kansas don't have any confederate statues to be removed, but if a generally political-focused group tried to hold a "unite the right"-ish rally there and it started getting co-opted by nazis and kkk'rs, what would you all do?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #183 on: August 14, 2017, 11:00:14 AM »
Tell them to kick rocks like a normal functioning human being.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #184 on: August 14, 2017, 11:08:12 AM »
Gee, if only KS had a small radical group out there where we could gauge how the rest of the state feels about their over the top viewpoints. Maybe we could see how libs and republicans would come together in such a situation vs said group. Let me think about this one? Can anyone come up with an example for this?
« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 11:19:18 AM by WackyCat08 »

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #185 on: August 14, 2017, 11:12:16 AM »
D's and R's at the March for Science rally in Wichita. :dunno:

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9524
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #186 on: August 14, 2017, 11:13:36 AM »
Here is a perfect example of why people are struggling with Trump response to this.  He couldn't wait to call out the Merck CEO resigning from his group but can't call out the nexus of the problem in VA This weekend. Do you guys really not see that disconnect?

He has called out attacks before they were even confirmed terror attacks. One time he condemned a terror attack that wasn't even a terror attack.

However, when a mosque is bombed he doesn't respond. When a nazi runs over anti-nazi protesters. He says both sides are to blame.

There are other examples but it seems pretty clear why he's quick to point the finger at one group of people and not the other.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29139
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #187 on: August 14, 2017, 11:13:46 AM »
WBC and Nazis: "Over the top"

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15101
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #188 on: August 14, 2017, 11:18:34 AM »
I just don't see any difference in the crazy white supremacist vs the crazy BLM member that are willing to kill for hateful reasons. That's just me tho. Both major POS.

I am honestly shocked (probably more than I should be) at a lot of conservative folks' response to this deal.  It is like they hear "white supremacist murders someone who protests their point of view" and their knee-jerk reaction is "but Hillary . . ."

I do not really care that in his initial speech Trump did not specifically denounce white supremacist groups, but when it is brought to your attention that these people feel you represent their interests, there is really only one appropriate response if you actually disagree with their movement: "Well then let me make clear right now that I am not going to do a single rough ridin' thing to further the interests of those assholes." 

The sad part is that I don't think Trump refuses to say it because he's racist.  I think he refuses to say it because his fragile ego won't allow him to disown anyone who believes he is doing a good job.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9524
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #189 on: August 14, 2017, 11:31:48 AM »
It appears he's finally going to condemn the klan.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63768
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #190 on: August 14, 2017, 11:41:23 AM »
Towns in Kansas don't have any confederate statues to be removed, but if a generally political-focused group tried to hold a "unite the right"-ish rally there and it started getting co-opted by nazis and kkk'rs, what would you all do?

I don't think this event was co-opted, nazis were the original organizers, but they have sort of co-opted the republican party in general when they got their guy elected as a republican. (and trump gladly legitimizes them)
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #191 on: August 14, 2017, 12:10:34 PM »
Well, Trump's pretty rough ridin' racist. So, that means if you voted for him, like lots of Republicans did, you're okay with racism to some degree.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #192 on: August 14, 2017, 12:31:06 PM »

Should Arkansaw guy be expelled from the college?  He says he was at a legal rally expresting his free speech?  Guys photographed with jobs are likely unemployed today.  I think employers have the right to exercise the right to fire for cause.  College not so sure.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14933
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #193 on: August 14, 2017, 12:35:38 PM »
The why to your question is we voted against Hillary and the far left she represents.
Ok, that explains the general election but what happened in the primary?

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #194 on: August 14, 2017, 01:31:43 PM »

Should Arkansaw guy be expelled from the college?  He says he was at a legal rally expresting his free speech?  Guys photographed with jobs are likely unemployed today.  I think employers have the right to exercise the right to fire for cause.  College not so sure.

I don't think the college can expel him but his fellow engineering students/professors can sure use their right of free speech to let him know what they think of him every minute for the rest of his college career.

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #195 on: August 14, 2017, 02:22:55 PM »
Towns in Kansas don't have any confederate statues to be removed, but if a generally political-focused group tried to hold a "unite the right"-ish rally there and it started getting co-opted by nazis and kkk'rs, what would you all do?

What day of the week?
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #196 on: August 14, 2017, 02:27:23 PM »

Should Arkansaw guy be expelled from the college?  He says he was at a legal rally expresting his free speech?  Guys photographed with jobs are likely unemployed today.  I think employers have the right to exercise the right to fire for cause.  College not so sure.

I don't think the college can expel him but his fellow engineering students/professors can sure use their right of free speech to let him know what they think of him every minute for the rest of his college career.

look at that dude.  Do you think he had a lot of friends to begin with?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #197 on: August 14, 2017, 02:40:54 PM »
No girlfriends, anyway.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #198 on: August 14, 2017, 02:54:38 PM »
Kinda looks like someone who posts here.

KINDA!

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Charlottesville
« Reply #199 on: August 14, 2017, 03:31:19 PM »
This guy gets it!

do you guys ever tire of blaming republicans/democrats for everthing?

14 minutes earlier

@ lib Catastrophe's dumbass post.

16 minutes after quoting CF3

The lib who just quoted what I wrote and somehow is trying to twist it that I said KKK people are reasonable.  WTF?

36 minutes after quoting CF3

Yes, bad writing. I was trying to say the KKK as a whole, probably make up about .005% of the US population and some ppl have been trying to act like they make up how most Trump voters feel.

Lib has done a good job of breaking up that point.
No ppl haven't.
Jesus, you're so blind to the lib party. The crap is out there, dummy. Look at social media.

 :confused: :dunno: