Orlando shooting. Sad.

[Trim]

And in the refresh, specify the need for a refresh every 10 years or 25 years or whatever.

Yes, I like this.

I hated con law.

Me too.  But First Amendment and crimpro classes made me think that the constitution is pretty groovy in some respects.

Some.  Now we can make it really good.  My takeaway from those classes was that the decision-maker is going to do whatever they want and anything can be justified by spinning the constitution enough.

[DQ12]

And in the refresh, specify the need for a refresh every 10 years or 25 years or whatever.

Yes, I like this.

I hated con law.

Me too.  But First Amendment and crimpro classes made me think that the constitution is pretty groovy in some respects.

Some.  Now we can make it really good.  My takeaway from those classes was that the decision-maker is going to do whatever they want and anything can be justified by spinning the constitution enough.

That's why we only accept the best and brightest for our highest court!

[star seed 7]

Smells like infringement in here

[Trim]

And in the refresh, specify the need for a refresh every 10 years or 25 years or whatever.

Yes, I like this.

I hated con law.

Me too.  But First Amendment and crimpro classes made me think that the constitution is pretty groovy in some respects.

Some.  Now we can make it really good.  My takeaway from those classes was that the decision-maker is going to do whatever they want and anything can be justified by spinning the constitution enough.

That's why we only accept the best and brightest for our highest court!

They can contribute to the creation of Constitution 2.0 - the one in which "arms" doesn't refer to muskets.

[Trim]

Smells like infringement in here

As the real The Manhatter once said, "Sniff, sniff..."

[DQ12]

And in the refresh, specify the need for a refresh every 10 years or 25 years or whatever.

Yes, I like this.

I hated con law.

Me too.  But First Amendment and crimpro classes made me think that the constitution is pretty groovy in some respects.

Some.  Now we can make it really good.  My takeaway from those classes was that the decision-maker is going to do whatever they want and anything can be justified by spinning the constitution enough.

That's why we only accept the best and brightest for our highest court!

They can contribute to the creation of Constitution 2.0 - the one in which "arms" doesn't refer to muskets.

I'll trade you the right to bear arms for the reproductive rights right here right now straight up.  Do we have a deal?

[Trim]

And in the refresh, specify the need for a refresh every 10 years or 25 years or whatever.

Yes, I like this.

I hated con law.

Me too.  But First Amendment and crimpro classes made me think that the constitution is pretty groovy in some respects.

Some.  Now we can make it really good.  My takeaway from those classes was that the decision-maker is going to do whatever they want and anything can be justified by spinning the constitution enough.

That's why we only accept the best and brightest for our highest court!

They can contribute to the creation of Constitution 2.0 - the one in which "arms" doesn't refer to muskets.

I'll trade you the right to bear arms for the reproductive rights right here right now straight up.  Do we have a deal?

No way.  I'm a man of the people.  I gotta check with my constituency (the whole world of america) as to what they want for each thing.

[DQ12]

uncompromising in your #ethics. 

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

[Phil Titola]

Should the constitution still be a thing in 2016?

there's some good stuff in there imo

Sure.  But it's def time for a reboot.  That would be a nice thing to break out by 2026 to celebrate 250 years of usa.

In 2.0, let's not set the expectation that we're forming a more perfect Union...maybe a "better than average" would do?  Also who will we be counting as 3/5ths of a person in 2.0? 

[8manpick]

And in the refresh, specify the need for a refresh every 10 years or 25 years or whatever.

Yes, I like this.

I hated con law.

Me too.  But First Amendment and crimpro classes made me think that the constitution is pretty groovy in some respects.

Some.  Now we can make it really good.  My takeaway from those classes was that the decision-maker is going to do whatever they want and anything can be justified by spinning the constitution enough.

That's why we only accept the best and brightest for our highest court!

They can contribute to the creation of Constitution 2.0 - the one in which "arms" doesn't refer to muskets.

I'll trade you the right to bear arms for the reproductive rights right here right now straight up.  Do we have a deal?

Well that would be worse all around

[treysolid]

jihadis may hate us, but they love our gun laws:

[420seriouscat69]

Nuc them!

[steve dave]

It's weird that people argue more about what the constitution says than if what it says is the best thing for it to say.

[sonofdaxjones]

Psycho Islamic Terrorist Attacks patrons at Gay Bar .  .  . strike down the 2nd Amendment and blame law abiding Americans!

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

FYI retards, the constitution contains an amendment provision.

[Missouriscribe]

Let's hear more about this Constitupedia idea.

[Emo EMAW]

I saw a quote on FB from someone famous (I think).  They made it into a meme but it made a lot of sense to me. 

Something along the lines of there are two reasons to own an assault rifle.

Reason 1) take it every so often to a firing range to shoot targets and get horny (this made laugh) off of the smoke and fire that comes out of it while hollering loudly at its performance.

Reason 2) to kill


My feelings are guns need to be regulated.  I also respect gun owners and their rights to own firearms.  I don't understand why some gun activists get upset over the thought of restrictions on certain weapons. 

I'm probably pretty ignorant and there are great needs that make total sense for Joe Somebody to have the ability to purchase an assault rifle.  I just haven't had it explained to me other than "its my right as an American citizen" or some junk like that.     

This is correct.

[bucket]

I saw a quote on FB from someone famous (I think).  They made it into a meme but it made a lot of sense to me. 

Something along the lines of there are two reasons to own an assault rifle.

Reason 1) take it every so often to a firing range to shoot targets and get horny (this made laugh) off of the smoke and fire that comes out of it while hollering loudly at its performance.

Reason 2) to kill


My feelings are guns need to be regulated.  I also respect gun owners and their rights to own firearms.  I don't understand why some gun activists get upset over the thought of restrictions on certain weapons. 

I'm probably pretty ignorant and there are great needs that make total sense for Joe Somebody to have the ability to purchase an assault rifle.  I just haven't had it explained to me other than "its my right as an American citizen" or some junk like that.     

This is correct.

So can you offer an explanation other than the only one he's heard to this point?

[Tobias]

Smells like infringement in here

[Trim]

What if I promise to keep the word "infringed" somewhere in v2.0?  It might not be in the gun part, but somewhere that it can still be quoted in the pit?

[slobber]

What if I promise to keep the word "infringed" somewhere in v2.0?  It might not be in the gun part, but somewhere that it can still be quoted in the pit?

Like the baby's rights shall not be infringed.


Royals aren't gonna win 'em all

[Phil Titola]

I want to know which grouo is going to be counted as 3/5th a person before I sign off on this going any further

[Emo EMAW]

I saw a quote on FB from someone famous (I think).  They made it into a meme but it made a lot of sense to me. 

Something along the lines of there are two reasons to own an assault rifle.

Reason 1) take it every so often to a firing range to shoot targets and get horny (this made laugh) off of the smoke and fire that comes out of it while hollering loudly at its performance.

Reason 2) to kill


My feelings are guns need to be regulated.  I also respect gun owners and their rights to own firearms.  I don't understand why some gun activists get upset over the thought of restrictions on certain weapons. 

I'm probably pretty ignorant and there are great needs that make total sense for Joe Somebody to have the ability to purchase an assault rifle.  I just haven't had it explained to me other than "its my right as an American citizen" or some junk like that.     

This is correct.

So can you offer an explanation other than the only one he's heard to this point?

Yes.  Will it be heard or considered thoughtfully?  Probably not.

[Asteriskhead]

leave the guns alone, just regulate bullets and their components to death.

on a long enough timeline, all of the NRAtards will have to start hand reloading ever-y-thing if they want a murderdeathkillexplosionboner.