Author Topic: 2016 NSD  (Read 7559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
2016 NSD
« on: February 03, 2016, 07:42:59 AM »
From Crabtree: :Mike McCoy signed, could be one of the biggest steals in big 12 depending on grades.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2016, 07:52:03 AM »
Not to be a downer, but based on past history, I'm not holding my breath.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2016, 07:56:04 AM »
From Kstate Twitter - Welcome to #NSD! We begin w/ 3 from last year's class - Kyle Ball, Brett Bell & Tyler Burns https://t.co/qN8ZlWLWAf https://t.co/FDfhurZrp1


Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2016, 08:15:00 AM »
rivals crashed yet?

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2016, 08:30:50 AM »
A lot of gimmicks happening on social media, etc today. @USFFootball is my favorite so far.

https://twitter.com/USFFootball/status/694869500722814977

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2016, 08:33:44 AM »

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2016, 08:50:33 AM »
Trace Kochevar from Salina KS?

Offline Aggievillian

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2016, 08:56:33 AM »
There is so much heart in this class.  Going to be winning so many dr. peps the next few years.  :ksu: :emawkid:

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2016, 08:58:44 AM »
Barring any surprises, this class is completely underwhelming. Also, I don't know why Mason Barta and Ian Rudzik are both going to be FBs and Tyler Burns is a RB when we a more pressing need at LB and DB.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16749
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2016, 09:03:13 AM »

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2016, 09:05:08 AM »
Barring any surprises, this class is completely underwhelming. Also, I don't know why Mason Barta and Ian Rudzik are both going to be FBs and Tyler Burns is a RB when we a more pressing need at LB and DB.

And WR

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2016, 09:12:13 AM »
Barring any surprises, this class is completely underwhelming. Also, I don't know why Mason Barta and Ian Rudzik are both going to be FBs and Tyler Burns is a RB when we a more pressing need at LB and DB.

And WR

You might not like the WR that we got in this class, but we got 4 of them.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2016, 09:17:54 AM »

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2016, 09:21:36 AM »
Barring any surprises, this class is completely underwhelming. Also, I don't know why Mason Barta and Ian Rudzik are both going to be FBs and Tyler Burns is a RB when we a more pressing need at LB and DB.

And WR

You might not like the WR that we got in this class, but we got 4 of them.

I like Sutton and Pringle

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #14 on: February 03, 2016, 09:28:13 AM »
Barring any surprises, this class is completely underwhelming. Also, I don't know why Mason Barta and Ian Rudzik are both going to be FBs and Tyler Burns is a RB when we a more pressing need at LB and DB.

And WR

You might not like the WR that we got in this class, but we got 4 of them.

I like Sutton and Pringle

I like Isaiah Harris as well. I'm not impressed by Render.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #15 on: February 03, 2016, 09:30:14 AM »
Barring any surprises, this class is completely underwhelming. Also, I don't know why Mason Barta and Ian Rudzik are both going to be FBs and Tyler Burns is a RB when we a more pressing need at LB and DB.

And WR

You might not like the WR that we got in this class, but we got 4 of them.

I like Sutton and Pringle

I like Isaiah Harris as well. I'm not impressed by Render.

I tend to only like players for how sexy they look in a uniform and such, but I really like Pringle, FWIW.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #16 on: February 03, 2016, 09:37:40 AM »
Sounds like we will have 22 signed this year? That included the 3 grayshirts from last year.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16749
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #18 on: February 03, 2016, 10:04:38 AM »
So is KU going to have a better signing day than us?  Would not be surprised.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #19 on: February 03, 2016, 10:08:48 AM »
So is KU going to have a better signing day than us?  Would not be surprised.
No. We're going to beat 3 P5 schools, in recruiting ranking!  :D :ksu: Rutgers, BC, and KU.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #20 on: February 03, 2016, 10:10:28 AM »
So is KU going to have a better signing day than us?  Would not be surprised.
No. We're going to beat 3 P5 schools, in recruiting ranking!  :D :ksu: Rutgers, BC, and KU.

Yea, the ku class is pretty bad even for KU

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2016, 10:11:13 AM »
Can't we beat like Minnesota too?  Or Iowa State?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2016, 10:17:37 AM »
Can't we beat like Minnesota too?  Or Iowa State?
ISU has snagged two 4 stars in the last two days. I think one is a transfer. We're one spot behind purdue and we might still one of their shitty defensive ends today. Minnesota has a top 50 class.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2016, 10:23:52 AM »
I'll give zero shits about recruiting/NSD until we have a staff in place that actually puts some effort towards it and pays more attention to it than their retirement plans.

It's much healthier.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53199
    • View Profile
Re: 2016 NSD
« Reply #24 on: February 03, 2016, 10:39:09 AM »
I'll give zero shits about recruiting/NSD until we have a staff in place that actually puts some effort towards it and pays more attention to it than their retirement plans.

It's much healthier.

Probably a good idea.  As long as we have a NCFOM coaching staff and a head coach who doesn't leave campus and places no real value in recruiting and thinks he's going to 5 heart and scheme his way past OU, Baylor, TCU etc. etc.   There's no use in even worrying about it . . . but I will.