Author Topic: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)  (Read 137681 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15255
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #950 on: December 16, 2017, 08:19:50 AM »
Enough to trickle down to some suckas

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #951 on: December 16, 2017, 08:22:24 AM »
I honestly didn't think they would get it done, but apparently the republican desire to consolidate wealth at the top is greater than their desire to let people die in the street if they get sick.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #952 on: December 16, 2017, 08:36:26 AM »
I honestly didn't think they would get it done, but apparently the republican desire to consolidate wealth at the top is greater than their desire to let people die in the street if they get sick.

Yes, they can't agree on much, but at least the GOP is still uniformly in favor of letting people keep more of their money!
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #953 on: December 16, 2017, 08:38:03 AM »
I honestly didn't think they would get it done, but apparently the republican desire to consolidate wealth at the top is greater than their desire to let people die in the street if they get sick.

Yes, they can't agree on much, but at least the GOP is still uniformly in favor of letting people keep more of their money!

Yep. That and raising the deficit.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #954 on: December 16, 2017, 08:56:06 AM »
I honestly didn't think they would get it done, but apparently the republican desire to consolidate wealth at the top is greater than their desire to let people die in the street if they get sick.

Yes, they can't agree on much, but at least the GOP is still uniformly in favor of letting people keep more of their money!

It's something everyone should agree upon.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #955 on: December 16, 2017, 09:45:15 AM »
Does it still take more of winner's money (LLC owners) and give it to losers (W2 employees)?

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15100
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #956 on: December 16, 2017, 10:28:02 AM »
Without a doubt the biggest winners are:

1. People who make over $600k in regular wages

2. Top corporate executives

3. Old money

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #957 on: December 16, 2017, 10:53:23 AM »
What about midwesterners with lots of dependent kids and a high enough wage that they never qualified for the CTC before? Those (me) might be bigger winners that just people with super high wages. The higher the wage, the more likely those folks live in a high tax state so their gains in reduced marginal rate will be at least somewhat offset by dramatically reducing SALT deduction.

Man I'm winning so hard right now. But I'm definitely not tired of winning yet.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85175
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #958 on: December 16, 2017, 11:09:57 AM »
https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/941811846071373824

$2k a month for a daycare for dogs maybe. If you want your kids survival rate to be above 50% you’re paying a lot more than that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #959 on: December 16, 2017, 11:32:09 AM »
You only have to pay for daycare for a few years. Then you get 13 years of free daycare, courtesy of taxpayers with no kids.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30237
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #960 on: December 16, 2017, 11:56:42 AM »
The taxpayers benefit greatly from educated kids entering the workforce
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #961 on: December 16, 2017, 11:57:58 AM »
Childless taxpayers could really help me out by picking up private school tab

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9524
    • View Profile

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #963 on: December 16, 2017, 12:06:41 PM »
I didn't mean to sound like a Scrooge itt.  We rely on you 9-5 lunch pailers to get the dirty work done.  Ignore my previous comments about W-2'ers

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15255
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #964 on: December 16, 2017, 12:12:34 PM »
What about midwesterners with lots of dependent kids and a high enough wage that they never qualified for the CTC before? Those (me) might be bigger winners that just people with super high wages. The higher the wage, the more likely those folks live in a high tax state so their gains in reduced marginal rate will be at least somewhat offset by dramatically reducing SALT deduction.

Man I'm winning so hard right now. But I'm definitely not tired of winning yet.

Neither is David Beaty...which is about what this win amounts to for the administration.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #965 on: December 16, 2017, 02:23:05 PM »
Without a doubt the biggest winners are:

1. People who make over $600k in regular wages

2. Top corporate executives

3. Old money

4. Everyone who pays income tax
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #966 on: December 16, 2017, 05:43:28 PM »
Daycare is for losers that just refuse to live within their means and pimp the woman they supposedly love off to help scrape up enough bucks to run their campsite.  Then they turn their children over to some oxy-fueled trash outfit to nurture them.  Awful people with mixed up priorities iyam.  :frown:
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #967 on: December 17, 2017, 09:53:25 AM »
Daycare is for losers that just refuse to live within their means and pimp the woman they supposedly love off to help scrape up enough bucks to run their campsite.  Then they turn their children over to some oxy-fueled trash outfit to nurture them.  Awful people with mixed up priorities iyam.  :frown:

Are you suggesting that a family doesn't need two brand new suv's (0 down, 84 month note) to make ends meet?  :nono:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #968 on: December 17, 2017, 09:56:13 AM »
Daycare is for losers that just refuse to live within their means and pimp the woman they supposedly love off to help scrape up enough bucks to run their campsite.  Then they turn their children over to some oxy-fueled trash outfit to nurture them.  Awful people with mixed up priorities iyam.  :frown:

Are you suggesting that a family doesn't need two brand new suv's (0 down, 84 month note) to make ends meet?  :nono:

I have those but mrs stone hasn't worked since second little stone came

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #969 on: December 17, 2017, 10:12:44 AM »
The funny thing about the daycare contingent is the family paying $36k per year for daycare with one of the spouses hauling in $46k in pretax salary. They literally lose money on their job.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #970 on: December 17, 2017, 10:46:07 AM »
No one actually makes that lol

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #971 on: December 17, 2017, 12:13:36 PM »
Daycare is for losers that just refuse to live within their means and pimp the woman they supposedly love off to help scrape up enough bucks to run their campsite.  Then they turn their children over to some oxy-fueled trash outfit to nurture them.  Awful people with mixed up priorities iyam.  :frown:

Are you suggesting that a family doesn't need two brand new suv's (0 down, 84 month note) to make ends meet?  :nono:

I have those but mrs stone hasn't worked since second little stone came

Why did she work with one kid but stay home with two kids?
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30237
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #972 on: December 17, 2017, 12:22:05 PM »
Daycare is for losers that just refuse to live within their means and pimp the woman they supposedly love off to help scrape up enough bucks to run their campsite.  Then they turn their children over to some oxy-fueled trash outfit to nurture them.  Awful people with mixed up priorities iyam.  :frown:

Are you suggesting that a family doesn't need two brand new suv's (0 down, 84 month note) to make ends meet?  :nono:

I have those but mrs stone hasn't worked since second little stone came

Why did she work with one kid but stay home with two kids?

Twins, it's him being clever
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #973 on: December 17, 2017, 12:40:42 PM »
No one actually makes that lol

Lol, kcmo is so broke

Quote
Kansas City, Missouri Income and Salaries
The income per capita is $27,282, which includes all adults and children. The median household income is $45,376.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #974 on: December 17, 2017, 12:53:28 PM »
Daycare is for losers that just refuse to live within their means and pimp the woman they supposedly love off to help scrape up enough bucks to run their campsite.  Then they turn their children over to some oxy-fueled trash outfit to nurture them.  Awful people with mixed up priorities iyam.  :frown:

Are you suggesting that a family doesn't need two brand new suv's (0 down, 84 month note) to make ends meet?  :nono:

I have those but mrs stone hasn't worked since second little stone came

Why did she work with one kid but stay home with two kids?

She wanted to