Author Topic: Trump owns Russia (Read 767637 times)

The Big Train · « **Reply #2700 on:** July 21, 2017, 10:23:26 PM »

What's wrong with talking to the Russians just a little bit, there is no crime with that.
- Dax

chum1 · « **Reply #2701 on:** July 22, 2017, 03:25:19 PM »

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/888840792898404352

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #2702 on:** July 22, 2017, 03:31:02 PM »

Trump will have a chance to man up to Russia!

bucket · « **Reply #2703 on:** July 22, 2017, 04:08:21 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on July 22, 2017, 03:31:02 PM

Trump will have a chance to man up to Russia!

He has to because it'll be veto-proof. Maybe he'll give back the Russian compounds before they vote on it, Tuesday.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #2704 on:** July 22, 2017, 04:49:26 PM »

He's not returning the compounds because he's a man

steve dave · « **Reply #2705 on:** July 22, 2017, 08:05:43 PM »

LOL if Trump bows to russia on ccompounds or this

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #2706 on:** July 22, 2017, 08:27:16 PM »

He won't bow to any man

bucket · « **Reply #2707 on:** July 23, 2017, 10:23:35 AM »

Quote

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) pointed to his House counterpart Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) for the narrative that former national security adviser Susan Rice improperly "unmasked" or revealed the identities of Americans swept up in intelligence reports.

"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes, and I'll wait to go through our full evaluation to see if there was anything improper that happened," Burr told CNN in comments reported after his committee interviewed Rice in a closed session on Friday.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/343219-burr-nunes-created-unmasking-allegations-against-rice

Burr is too moderate for Dax, so he can't be trusted.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2708 on:** July 23, 2017, 10:34:09 AM »

Quote from: bucket on July 23, 2017, 10:23:35 AM

Quote
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) pointed to his House counterpart Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) for the narrative that former national security adviser Susan Rice improperly "unmasked" or revealed the identities of Americans swept up in intelligence reports.

"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes, and I'll wait to go through our full evaluation to see if there was anything improper that happened," Burr told CNN in comments reported after his committee interviewed Rice in a closed session on Friday.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/343219-burr-nunes-created-unmasking-allegations-against-rice

Burr is too moderate for Dax, so he can't be trusted.

This after I just post the Greenwald article about how Dems are teaming with Neo-Cons?

That group thinks that anything short of total war is being a pussy.

Why secretly bring in rules that allow intelligence to be distributed to anyone with clearance if you didn't have nefarious intentions? Why is a UN ambassador involved?

bucket · « **Reply #2709 on:** July 23, 2017, 10:59:59 AM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 23, 2017, 10:34:09 AM

This after I just post the Greenwald article about how Dems are teaming with Neo-Cons?

That group thinks that anything short of total war is being a pussy.

Why secretly bring in rules that allow intelligence to be distributed to anyone with clearance if you didn't have nefarious intentions? Why is a UN ambassador involved?

We get it, Russia is an innocent flower and we should sit on our hands and do nothing.

Also, I believe you meant National Security Advisor, not UN ambassador.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2710 on:** July 23, 2017, 11:01:10 AM »

Quote from: bucket on July 23, 2017, 10:59:59 AM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 23, 2017, 10:34:09 AM
This after I just post the Greenwald article about how Dems are teaming with Neo-Cons?

That group thinks that anything short of total war is being a pussy.

Why secretly bring in rules that allow intelligence to be distributed to anyone with clearance if you didn't have nefarious intentions? Why is a UN ambassador involved?

We get it, Russia is an innocent flower and we should sit on our hands and do nothing.

Also, I believe you meant National Security Advisor, not UN ambassador.

And UN ambassador.

Nice enraged tapout NeoCon

Sad

bucket · « **Reply #2711 on:** July 23, 2017, 11:05:47 AM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 23, 2017, 11:01:10 AM

Quote from: bucket on July 23, 2017, 10:59:59 AM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 23, 2017, 10:34:09 AM
This after I just post the Greenwald article about how Dems are teaming with Neo-Cons?

That group thinks that anything short of total war is being a pussy.

Why secretly bring in rules that allow intelligence to be distributed to anyone with clearance if you didn't have nefarious intentions? Why is a UN ambassador involved?

We get it, Russia is an innocent flower and we should sit on our hands and do nothing.

Also, I believe you meant National Security Advisor, not UN ambassador.

And UN ambassador.

Nice enraged tapout NeoCon

Sad

I just wanted it to be clear to everyone that when the unmasking under question took place it was in her roll as the National Security Advisor, well within her power, not as UN ambassador. Innocent mistake on your part, I'm sure.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2712 on:** July 23, 2017, 11:34:11 AM »

Quote from: bucket on July 23, 2017, 11:05:47 AM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 23, 2017, 11:01:10 AM
Quote from: bucket on July 23, 2017, 10:59:59 AM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 23, 2017, 10:34:09 AM
This after I just post the Greenwald article about how Dems are teaming with Neo-Cons?

That group thinks that anything short of total war is being a pussy.

Why secretly bring in rules that allow intelligence to be distributed to anyone with clearance if you didn't have nefarious intentions? Why is a UN ambassador involved?

We get it, Russia is an innocent flower and we should sit on our hands and do nothing.

Also, I believe you meant National Security Advisor, not UN ambassador.

And UN ambassador.

Nice enraged tapout NeoCon

Sad

I just wanted it to be clear to everyone that when the unmasking under question took place it was in her roll as the National Security Advisor, well within her power, not as UN ambassador. Innocent mistake on your part, I'm sure.

Samantha Power was NOT the NSA she was simply on the council (and a huge advocate of the debacle in Libya and subsequent disaster in Syria, what a pig). She left that role in 2013 and started throwing Israel under the bus at the UN. The unmasking issues followed thereafter.

chum1 · « **Reply #2713 on:** July 23, 2017, 11:35:09 AM »

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/889152797974949888

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2714 on:** July 23, 2017, 01:26:49 PM »

If talking to Russians were a crime a substantial portion of the current Dem leadership would be in jail.

SdK · « **Reply #2715 on:** July 23, 2017, 01:40:43 PM »

If loving Russians is wrong, it's definitely not the right.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #2716 on:** July 23, 2017, 03:37:12 PM »

White House supports Russia sanctions:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/23/politics/russia-sanctions-donald-trump/index.html?sr=twCNNp072317russia-sanctions-donald-trump0117PMVODtop&CNNPolitics=Tw

WaPo #fakenews reports otherwise

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/07/23/white-house-offers-muddled-message-on-russia-sanctions-legislation/?utm_term=.f9e28238b2e4

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #2717 on:** July 23, 2017, 04:07:24 PM »

Great job prez!

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2718 on:** July 23, 2017, 04:10:26 PM »

Remember, WaPo sides with the new new NeoCons (whose ranks are filled with Libs). In their world anything just short of DefCon 1 with missiles warming up in the bullpen is pussyfooting around with Russia.

What a diametric change in ideology.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #2719 on:** July 23, 2017, 06:06:41 PM »

WaPo also reported that russia hacked election machines and changed votes or something along those lines completely made up.

bucket · « **Reply #2720 on:** July 23, 2017, 06:23:48 PM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 23, 2017, 06:06:41 PM

WaPo also reported that russia hacked election machines and changed votes or something along those lines completely made up.

Link?

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #2721 on:** July 23, 2017, 06:58:43 PM »

Fusion GPS guy to take the 5th

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/fusion-refusal-co-founder-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-to-plead-fifth.html

bucket · « **Reply #2722 on:** July 23, 2017, 08:03:40 PM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 23, 2017, 06:58:43 PM

Fusion GPS guy to take the 5th

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/fusion-refusal-co-founder-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-to-plead-fifth.html

That's great, but what about that WaPo article you referenced?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #2723 on:** July 23, 2017, 08:10:43 PM »

Quote from: bucket on July 23, 2017, 08:03:40 PM

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 23, 2017, 06:58:43 PM
Fusion GPS guy to take the 5th

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/fusion-refusal-co-founder-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier-to-plead-fifth.html

That's great, but what about that WaPo article you referenced?

Casting doubt at minimum.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/06/were-2016-vote-counts-in-michigan-and-wisconsin-hacked-we-double-checked/

If only WaPo investigated all politicians on a level they investigate Trump.

Yet Trump still invited Bezos to the White House for the business council.

Now on to Fusion GPS. Who is shocked another Dem lackey takes the fifth? Anyone?

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #2724 on:** July 23, 2017, 08:13:46 PM »

I'm not. I wonder what crime he's afraid of incriminating himself in?

And t-y for introducing bucketard to google

Author Topic: Trump owns Russia (Read 767637 times)

The Big Train