Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 329449 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3525 on: March 12, 2018, 10:17:31 PM »
You can't be serious. "Didn't like black people getting rights". A quixotic delusion
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7626
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3526 on: March 12, 2018, 10:43:59 PM »
Is her analysis really that off?

Married women vote the way their husbands tell them?  :Rusty:

Also, Hillary doesn't believe a word of that crap she spewed. She's pathological.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 10:49:57 PM by john "teach me how to" dougie »

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7626
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3527 on: March 12, 2018, 10:55:02 PM »
You would think with that super low center of gravity, she couldn't fall.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76EuMPDCWfs[/youtube]

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3528 on: March 13, 2018, 09:46:47 AM »
Is her analysis really that off?

Yes.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3529 on: March 13, 2018, 09:47:33 AM »
You would think with that super low center of gravity, she couldn't fall.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76EuMPDCWfs[/youtube]

Those stairs don't look like they are ADA compliant, to be fair.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3530 on: March 13, 2018, 11:19:17 AM »
Trump supporters don't like women using stairs, so it makes sense
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3531 on: March 13, 2018, 11:36:01 AM »
Slave men serving her?
Russian nerve poison?
Brain imbalance?
STD from Bill the Thrill kicking in?

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5999
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3532 on: March 13, 2018, 11:52:17 AM »
You can't be serious. "Didn't like black people getting rights". A quixotic delusion

“Let them call you racists. Let them call you xenophobes. Let them call you nativists,” he said. “Wear it as a badge of honor.”

Is her analysis really that off?

Yes.

"Oregon State University assistant professor Kelsy Kretschmer co-wrote a study examining women’s voting patterns. “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology,” she told the Guardian last year."


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3533 on: March 13, 2018, 12:48:09 PM »
Quixotic delusion: a belief harbored by libtards that everyone who isn't a dem is a sexist, racist, _____ist, and must be relentlessly accused as such for purely partisan reasons.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3534 on: March 13, 2018, 12:50:22 PM »
It's not "everyone who isn't a dem", it's everyone that voted for Donald Trump
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7626
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3535 on: March 13, 2018, 12:50:46 PM »
You can't be serious. "Didn't like black people getting rights". A quixotic delusion

“Let them call you racists. Let them call you xenophobes. Let them call you nativists,” he said. “Wear it as a badge of honor.”

Is her analysis really that off?

Yes.

"Oregon State University assistant professor Kelsy Kretschmer co-wrote a study examining women’s voting patterns. “We know white men are more conservative, so when you’re married to a white man you get a lot more pressure to vote consistent with that ideology,” she told the Guardian last year."

I find most women in America do what they want.


Offline Woogy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 424
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3537 on: March 13, 2018, 02:03:24 PM »
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1065912917702499


LOL
"While we find that married white women and Latinas have significantly lower levels of linked fate than unmarried women of the same race/ethnicity, we find no such relationship for black women."

« Last Edit: March 13, 2018, 02:06:25 PM by Woogy »

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5999
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3538 on: March 13, 2018, 02:10:09 PM »
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1065912917702499


LOL
"While we find that married white women and Latinas have significantly lower levels of linked fate than unmarried women of the same race/ethnicity, we find no such relationship for black women."

The most commonly cited explanation for this phenomenon is the “black utility heuristic,” a framework developed by University of Chicago professor Michael Dawson in 1994. More commonly referred to as linked fate, it’s the sentiment among blacks that one’s prospects are ultimately tied to the success of the race. In his seminal book Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics, Dawson argues that because race has been the predominant factor in blacks’ American experience, “it was much more efficient for them to use the status of the group, both relative and absolute, as a proxy for individual utility.” In more practical terms, black voters prioritize the well-being of the group over their individual interests, and consider what’s best for the group as a whole because history has shown them that “we are in this thing together.”

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20444
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3539 on: March 13, 2018, 02:29:18 PM »
you will get no argument from me that Hillary was by far the worst candidate for President in my lifetime. I'm not saying Donald is a better person or is more competent, but he obviously ran a much better campaign.

The fact that Hillary is still in denial is not all that surprising, but she doesn't even have the sense to just shut up.

Offline Woogy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 424
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3540 on: March 13, 2018, 02:29:30 PM »
OSU's Kretschmer was trying to blame focus on married white women though.....

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7072
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3541 on: March 13, 2018, 03:11:00 PM »
Yeah it's been over 16 months since the election and she's still out there Brucecusing it up.  Probably trying her best to remain in the public consciousness and drum up sympathy for another run in 2020.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12793
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3542 on: March 13, 2018, 10:33:03 PM »
Yeah it's been over 16 months since the election and she's still out there Brucecusing it up.  Probably trying her best to remain in the public consciousness and drum up sympathy for another run in 2020.
Trump(71), Hillary(71) and Bernie(73) are all to rough ridin' old to run again.  :th_twocents:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3543 on: March 14, 2018, 07:17:00 AM »
All 3 of these old bitter haters think they are more elite than the common sap especially white ones.  The think that the government is the best thing to solve all problems.  Their religion is the state, and they believe that they are prophets.  Hillary believes us middle Americans are deplorable.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52961
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3545 on: April 12, 2018, 06:19:51 PM »
Look at unilateral Jim Comey trying to cryptically assuage his conscious.




Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52961
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3546 on: April 12, 2018, 06:31:56 PM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/us/politics/hillary-clinton-presidential-campaign-charity.html

Just a little dumpster dive as to why there was an unsecured server, emails went missing and hard drives fell down the stairs.


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3547 on: April 12, 2018, 07:22:58 PM »
James Comey is an idiot. Whoever thought that ass clown should be in charge of anything deserves to be whipped with a chain.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20949
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3548 on: April 12, 2018, 08:08:39 PM »
We oughta loretta lynch that feller.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk


Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)
« Reply #3549 on: April 20, 2018, 12:52:37 PM »
 :emawkid:e
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/20/democratic-party-files-suit-alleging-russia-the-trump-campaign-and-wikileaks-conspired-to-disrupt-the-2016-election-report.html
Dangfloculation woman!  Get over it.  Pepole didn't like you.  You are worse than fungus on a dog turd.