Texas Tech Today

[everyone shut up]

That ref has a nice rack

[Duncan]

I'm guessing its so the defense can know who is eligible for a downfield pass

They need to be on the los so the defense knows the 5 guys not playing ol or qb can catch the ball?

The two ends on the line are eligible - if the defense wasnt paying attention, they may think one of the 'ends' is eligible when he really isnt, and puts them in an unfair situation where they pay attention to a guy when they really dont need to? idk, I'm probably getting this interpreted wrong.

[WildcatPower]

Wait.... we actually converted a 3 and 15?

What.  The.  Hell?

[SdK]

Here's and idea. The center can't catch the ball. The two guys to his left cannot catch the ball. The two guys to his right cannot catch the ball. Those 5 have to be on the LOS. Wgaf if the offense wants to have 6 guys in the backfield.

[Whisker Biscuit]

This play by play guy is the worst

[WildcatPower]

I looked on the NCAA Scores and I see this gem...

Missouri 28
Florida 3

[star seed 7]

Here's and idea. The center can't catch the ball. The two guys to his left cannot catch the ball. The two guys to his right cannot catch the ball. Those 5 have to be on the LOS. Wgaf if the offense wants to have 6 guys in the backfield.

That means a lot of trick formations would be made illegal

[michigancat]

Here's and idea. The center can't catch the ball. The two guys to his left cannot catch the ball. The two guys to his right cannot catch the ball. Those 5 have to be on the LOS. Wgaf if the offense wants to have 6 guys in the backfield.

Well you can have an unbalanced line. Also I always thought the rationale for having a minimum number on the LOS is because the defense can't immediately engage an offensive player off the LOS. Also for eligible receiver clarity.

[SdK]

Gmafb on this call.

[IPA4Me]

eff you big 12 refs

[star seed 7]

This is just getting ridiculous

[SdK]

Here's and idea. The center can't catch the ball. The two guys to his left cannot catch the ball. The two guys to his right cannot catch the ball. Those 5 have to be on the LOS. Wgaf if the offense wants to have 6 guys in the backfield.

Well you can have an unbalanced line. Also I always thought the rationale for having a minimum number on the LOS is because the defense can't immediately engage an offensive player off the LOS. Also for eligible receiver clarity.

This engagement issue makes sense. The rest of it is still stupid imo.

[star seed 7]

It's very easy to stay within legal formations, a receiver just got confused

[star seed 7]

Look at the huge difference between those two targeting calls

[IPA4Me]

Now that is targeting. Ouch. Snapped his neck back hard.

[CHONGS]

http://mentalfloss.com/article/31657/time-teddy-roosevelt-saved-football

[SdK]

They are clearly going for Deltons head. eff Kliff

[Duncan]

whoa

[michigancat]

Kliff is worse than GP

[michigancat]

Delton should honestly sit but that was a pretty throw

[IPA4Me]

Welp. Time for my nap.

[WildcatPower]

Look at the huge difference between those two targeting calls

I agree. KSU's call was subjective because to me it looked like he hit the guy in the shoulder pad, whereas TT's clearly hit Delton in the head.

[fatdamon]

wow, that was some ridiculously dirty crap.

[everyone shut up]

eff ryan gosling and his sexy shades

[SdK]

http://mentalfloss.com/article/31657/time-teddy-roosevelt-saved-football

“boy-killing, man-mutilating, money-making, education-prostituting, gladiatorial sport.”

Not a new opinion it appears.