Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4682333 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85333
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41725 on: July 29, 2015, 03:26:41 PM »
people complain about verlander sucking now but if I was the royals I would consider taking him off their hands if they paid 99% of his remaining contract and gave us a prospect or two.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41726 on: July 29, 2015, 03:35:04 PM »
Does not look good naked. No deal.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41727 on: July 29, 2015, 03:35:43 PM »
12-8 in Gutty starts. 10-6 in Young starts. 36% off our wins with Guts/Young starting.
Royals record for the other starters:
Volquez: 15-6 (We scored 0 or 1 runs in 4 of the losses)
Duffy: 9-5 (5-1 since return from DL)
Vargas: 7-2 :surprised: :frown:
Ventura: 6-9 (Lost 7 of 8 at one point, with the W being vs Cueto)
Blanton: 2-2 :dunno:
Pino: 0-1 :ROFL:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41728 on: July 29, 2015, 03:36:24 PM »
Does not look good naked. No deal.
Kate Upton disagrees.

Offline i poo crabs

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41729 on: July 29, 2015, 03:47:44 PM »
Does not look good naked. No deal.
Kate Upton disagrees.

speaking of kate upton.  look at her hashtags for this photo ...




Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41730 on: July 29, 2015, 03:48:15 PM »
Adorable!


Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41731 on: July 29, 2015, 03:49:39 PM »
I don't like Hoch. I mean, I always root for him, but he's too much of a reminder of the past.
Hopefully Aaron Crowchevar will get it together. May need him for a few outs in October.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41732 on: July 29, 2015, 03:51:11 PM »
Does not look good naked. No deal.
Kate Upton disagrees.

speaking of kate upton.  look at her hashtags for this photo ...


:surprised:
Quote
#bruceweber

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27091
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41733 on: July 29, 2015, 03:54:32 PM »
IMO Hoch is 7th on our reliever pecking order. HDH, Madson, Morales, Medlen all give me more confidance. Sucks because he had just started to be 2013 Hoch again, but today was awful.

Who cares about Guts.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27091
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41734 on: July 29, 2015, 03:55:57 PM »
Really hope Price heads to the NL. He's a bad matchup for us if he ends up in NY or Houston or something

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41735 on: July 29, 2015, 03:58:43 PM »
Does not look good naked. No deal.
Kate Upton disagrees.

speaking of kate upton.  look at her hashtags for this photo ...


:surprised:
Quote
#bruceweber
I clicked on that link and will probably get fired now. So, to make it worthwhile, could somebody with some decent photoshop skills put Alex's ass on that picture?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41736 on: July 29, 2015, 03:59:36 PM »
I would like to see him go to the NL somewhere other than LA - they have too many stud pitchers and talk of them adding one is pretty scary.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41737 on: July 29, 2015, 04:03:25 PM »

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41738 on: July 29, 2015, 04:12:04 PM »
Our 0-7 scale needs to be adjusted to 17-38 :love:

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41739 on: July 29, 2015, 04:19:17 PM »
That's a seeing eye double bit of fun.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41740 on: July 29, 2015, 04:24:23 PM »

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41741 on: July 29, 2015, 04:30:49 PM »
Fantastic

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41742 on: July 29, 2015, 04:40:40 PM »
Does not look good naked. No deal.
Kate Upton disagrees.

speaking of kate upton.  look at her hashtags for this photo ...


:surprised:
Quote
#bruceweber
I clicked on that link and will probably get fired now. So, to make it worthwhile, could somebody with some decent photoshop skills put Alex's ass on that picture?
I opened it on work device also.  Not worried.

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41743 on: July 29, 2015, 05:03:28 PM »
I love these guys.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41744 on: July 29, 2015, 05:40:28 PM »

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41745 on: July 29, 2015, 06:02:12 PM »
12-8 in Gutty starts. 10-6 in Young starts. 36% off our wins with Guts/Young starting.

Young 16 starts.
10 of those starts have an "In game ERA" of under 3.75
In fact 9 of those 10, its been under 2.25 (9-1 record)
5 of his starts, his In-game is 5.00 or over

Guts 20 starts
8 of those are below 3.75 "In-game ERA"
12 starts are 5.00 or above
Guts just gotten better run support on days he gives up 4 runs

If Young has s fatigued arm, but him in Pen
But stats above show why Guts really shouldn't be #5

2.25 ERA or below is very good start, but its been shown we do well (46-9) if we just get under 3.75.
60% of Guts starts, he is above 5.00 ERA.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30411
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41746 on: July 29, 2015, 06:39:56 PM »
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41747 on: July 29, 2015, 06:41:41 PM »
I know it's rare in the majors, but what about piggy-backing Medlan and Young? I'm assuming Medlan is still on a fairly strict pitch count, so start him and when he reaches that number bring in Young. Keeps both fairly rested.

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 11589
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41748 on: July 29, 2015, 07:19:58 PM »
Adorable!


YES!

Amazing. I want to lock Cain up to a long term deal just to continue these interactions.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #41749 on: July 29, 2015, 09:29:13 PM »
Our 0-7 scale needs to be adjusted to 17-38 :love:

 :D
@Trogdor_gE