How bad is the left losing thread

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

First person to accuse the other of being "outraged" wins, no second person

[pvegs]

yr president made fun of "tards" and made it acceptable to do so. you don't value human life if you don't prescribe to their worldview. i don't think these things are up for debate because they are facts.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Complicit in russia reconquering the ussr-aok

did Obama handle the Ukraine situation properly?  Looks like he sure did

Respective to Ukraine, he probably did a decent job, I mean, unless the New (Old) War Hawks want to go to war over Crimea (which it sounds like some do).

Respective to Russia in general, did a pretty crappy job.

What did he do that was crappy?

Non-circumstantial evidence of something russia--impeachment 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

yr president made fun of "tards" and made it acceptable to do so. you don't value human life if you don't prescribe to their worldview. i don't think these things are up for debate because they are facts.

If you want to start a thread about the proper way to call someone Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), go ahead. I insist you gtfoott with that Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) crap, however.

[Phil Titola]

Flare gun thread

[pvegs]

yr president made fun of "tards" and made it acceptable to do so. you don't value human life if you don't prescribe to their worldview. i don't think these things are up for debate because they are facts.

If you want to start a thread about the proper way to call someone Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), go ahead. I insist you gtfoott with that Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) crap, however.

i want you to admit humanity. good luck.

[mocat]

the left

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Flare gun thread

I didn't think I had a compelling point, but I did think you could recognize that republicans don't singularly own the principles of economic prosperity, right to life, and rule of law.  Sure we may disagree on where those are most important and how best each of those are accomplished but when you try and claim that those are only conservative values while in the same sentence say liberal values are no more important than cake bakers serving gays and bathroom choices, in your supposedly "serious answer", I thought you could be a little more fair in that comparison.  Either give a serious answer or a gE answer, not combine them.

To your arguments, right to life doesn't end at childbirth, economic prosperity isn't only clearing the way for the 1%, and rule of law...I wouldn't use politicians actions on either side as proof or disproof of that...especially given who are current president is.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

yr president made fun of "tards" and made it acceptable to do so. you don't value human life if you don't prescribe to their worldview. i don't think these things are up for debate because they are facts.

If you want to start a thread about the proper way to call someone Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), go ahead. I insist you gtfoott with that Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) crap, however.

i want you to admit humanity. good luck.

Start a new thread autard, first google search:

[SdK]

Is autard a combination of being autistic and mentally handicapped?

[pvegs]

yr president made fun of "tards" and made it acceptable to do so. you don't value human life if you don't prescribe to their worldview. i don't think these things are up for debate because they are facts.

If you want to start a thread about the proper way to call someone Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), go ahead. I insist you gtfoott with that Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) crap, however.

i want you to admit humanity. good luck.

Start a new thread autard, first google search:

yes, that is comparable. thanks for correcting me.

[star seed 7]

this thread is a treat

Imagine what we'd get if osu was winning sweet 16 games by 30 

[Tobias]

[gatoveintisiete]

Do kk

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Oh, they're losing even worse than I thought

http://theslot.jezebel.com/we-redacted-everything-thats-not-a-verifiably-true-stat-1793571837?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=The_Slot_twitter

How much non-circumstantial evidence is required for a statement to be verifiably true? The world may never know.

[420seriouscat69]

They've all gone mad. 

[420seriouscat69]

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live

[sonofdaxjones]

Just thinking back to 2008 and all the media talking heads going on the Sunday talk show circuit and talking about how they didn't know who the president elect really was, and how he was the "least vetted" Pres elect in modern American history. 

Now they literally micro analyze every word Trump has said and every thing he's done.

A crazed meltdown for the ages.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[star seed 7]

 

[420seriouscat69]

So true

[SdK]

That is true. The media does not like Trump and loved Obama. Trump doesn't make it particularly hard to poke fun though. Do the resident republicans think another R President would be getting the same treatment?

[gatoveintisiete]

All R presidents of my lifetime have dealt with a hostile press, but today's press has morphed into a unscrupulous bunch who no longer even attempts to appear even handed.

[sonofdaxjones]

Sad.

Enraged partisanship is so ugly:  But that's the new (old) left for ya.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gooch]

Media

[Phil Titola]

What should the media be focused on regarding trump? Fox news seems to cover the same ugliness just with softer words