Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pendergast

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 60
51
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Kids
« on: December 31, 2015, 04:13:01 PM »
After the third kid, you find out what kind of parent and (if applicable) partner you are.  Two -> Three is very difficult.  I imagine if you have multiple wives this probably doesn't apply to you.

52
For some reason my wife had to study the flag code and it was pretty LOL to have all the flag code violations pointed out

 :confused:

53
Kansas State Football / Re: Trevone Boykin - Arrested Development
« on: December 31, 2015, 10:52:15 AM »
Nothing good ever comes from assaulting a cop....especially in Tejas.

Indeed. A little off topic but Texas law actually allows a city or county to seize your vehicle and cash without even charging you.

Seems odd.  The same state's laws would allow you to shoot them if they tried.

54
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Official Black Lives Matter Thread
« on: December 29, 2015, 08:05:49 AM »
People affected by a hurt "local economy" (ie people with money) ...

The ignorance is palpable.

Thanks for the contribution, meow meow.

Likewise.  Am I supposed to make an animal sound after my comments?  Let me know.

55
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Official Black Lives Matter Thread
« on: December 28, 2015, 03:31:34 PM »
People affected by a hurt "local economy" (ie people with money) ...

The ignorance is palpable.

56
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: 40 Acres and a Mule
« on: December 28, 2015, 03:20:14 PM »
I don't think you'll have much luck getting any reparations out of those african tribes.

57
Ok, who from the Chiefs railed Dax's mom?

58
Kansas State Football / Re: KU football is hurting
« on: December 24, 2015, 11:52:00 PM »
The irony wears thiner and thiner, every day, on this thread  :frown:

 :D

59
I mean I don't want to come off as intolerant, but I cannot understand most of the football posts now.  I mean if we signed up to support local special needs learning I'm all for it.  I would just appreciate a heads up next time.

60
Kansas State Football / Re: Football Recruiting Thread
« on: December 22, 2015, 02:29:11 PM »
So is Coach retiring or what?

That was probably the extent of his questions.

61
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: star wars
« on: December 16, 2015, 02:05:25 PM »
slip a couple hundred to a few guys near the front (not the front!) of the line to save you seats

or pay a lacky like tonya

62
Kansas State Football / Re: Bryce Brown
« on: December 16, 2015, 01:18:05 PM »
Farm on the over if he gets more than 10 carries.  But he won't; if he fumbles once, he's probably done.  So under.

63
Kansas State Football / Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« on: December 15, 2015, 03:35:33 PM »
Pretty sure that's already slated for the ICE family.

64
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Sensible Gun Measures
« on: December 11, 2015, 09:53:35 PM »
That last one will never happen, FWIW.

WTF?  It already did turbo.

65
Other Sports (Tiger's Back) / Re: Should Wichita Shox Join Big 12?
« on: December 10, 2015, 08:45:00 AM »
It'd be nice if they just gave up on the idea all together.

Honestly they should, that was really the point of my post, that it's not going to happen. Anyone who knows anything about college football and has ever seen WSU's facilities knows that they are a long time and a lot of money away from being able to field a team and even farther away from a competitive one, even at fcs level.

What's best for that athletic department would be focusing on adding soccer (could play at Cessna Stadium) and keeping their current sports and facilities at a reasonable
level.

If the Koch brothers get involved it's an entirely different story.

66
Otherwise known as a punt.  It will have no bearing on gun control, I mean "safety" laws in the near future.  States will do as they please, and nothing will pass at the federal level.

67
The vast majority of persons that are staunchly for 'gun control' have no salient ideas as to what that means.  That's basically because they just want to ban guns.  Oh except for blahblahblah hunting, blahblahblah.  Just complete lack of rational thought.

68
Kansas State Football / Re: KU football is hurting
« on: December 03, 2015, 11:46:41 AM »
We will know they are serious about football when there is a mysterious arson that burns their fb stuff to the ground.  Lawrence loves arson for insurance(from what a few Lawrence bros tell me).  Would be the most likely way for them to actually come up with some money to build, too.

Might be tough to burn down if they have some of that steel fireproofing that was all the rage this year.  Also it's mostly concrete so, gonna take a lot of gasoline to get the dumpster fire hot enough to burn that bitch down.  I bet they can figure it out though.

69
Kansas State Football / Re: Football
« on: December 03, 2015, 11:42:02 AM »
All of those numbers are the rosiest lab numbers you could imagine and thus producing any clinical effect would undoubtedly make them inpractical.  The fact that even the best case increases weight and cost by over 10% highlights how improbable this dumbshit idea is.

I heard magnets cure cancer too, why don't you go run off an google that and share the results with everyone.

I don't think it'll ever work well enough to be a product.  But it's an interesting experiment.  Dismissing things off hand is never a good way to make progress.
WTF are you even doing here, bro?

Pointing out your bravado as complete bullshit.  Just because I don't think the idea will make it to market, doesn't make your bullshit any less bullshit.  The fact that you see 10% as prohibitive to anything is asinine.  Just stop.  Any research to improve helmets is a good thing, and that's my point.

70
Kansas State Football / Re: Football
« on: December 03, 2015, 10:02:15 AM »
I don't think it'll ever work well enough to be a product.  But it's an interesting experiment.  Dismissing things off hand is never a good way to make progress.

71
Kansas State Football / Re: Football
« on: December 03, 2015, 09:34:34 AM »
Magnets, how do they work? LOLZ

"The magnets, he says, would put a brake on the impact before it happens."

The added weight of a magnet large enough to repel another magnet when slammed into each other would make them dangerous when striking any other part of the body...

"They are the most powerful commercially available magnets and weigh about one-third of a pound each (football helmets weigh from 3.5 to 5.5 pounds)."

So in other words, three magnets weigh less than the difference in weight between helmet manufacturers.

and the cost associated with all that rare-earth magnet material would make them prohibitively expensive (and probably run the world out of rare earth magnets, if you think about how many they'd need)

"Colello speculates that adding magnets to a helmet would raise the price by $50 to $100. (Professional helmets today can cost several hundred dollars.)"

Or, the opposite of prohibitive, in simple terms.

Also, wearing a high powered magnet on your head, all day, every day would have zero affect on your health.

"Another safety concern is whether the magnets are dangerous to have near human heads. Colello says that a 30 minute- to one-hour MRI procedure produces magnetic fields 10 to 30 times as strong as those in helmet magnets."




Literally all of your statements were refuted.

73
Kansas State Football / Re: Football
« on: November 30, 2015, 03:18:37 PM »

I am not a doctor, but I don't get why the sudden stop isn't an issue.  What is the top speed of an NFL corner back?  Whatever it is, when they reach that speed, their brain is traveling at that speed. When their head suddenly stops, how do you transfer/absorb impact enough over a distance of millimeters(?) to stop their brain from slamming into the inside of the skull? Such a method would have to be inside the skull to work fully.  It's like you in your car.  When you car smashes into someone, you go forward into your airbag/windshield/seatbelt/etc and can get hurt by impacting those things.  If we could design enough impact absorption over such a small space as the distance from the outside of a helmet to the outside surface of the brain, why have we not implemented such things in the much larger distance btwn driver and windshield?

Unless you mean, the sudden start of the brain to move forward after the rest of the body has stopped?  Am I not interpreting what you are saying?

Generally speaking, the deceleration and forces created by such are less than those of the acceleration caused by impact.  In general, the helmet is round.  there are no brick walls on a football field.  The helmet is accelerated in a direction on impact.  It's somewhat semantics, but you're not far off.

As far as Automobiles, air bags are highly sophisticated and save countless lives every day.  I hope you're not implying that technology is sub-par.  Further, drivers would refuse to wear any apparatus, as shown by our less than stellar track record with seat belts.  Automotive engineers are limited to the vehicle, and cannot do much of anything with the occupant.

74
Kansas State Football / Re: Football
« on: November 30, 2015, 02:31:54 PM »
i imagine the problem will be solved by better helmets

Not unless better means different and different means less protective.  Supposedly, the issue is the slight movement of the brain inside the skull.  No matter how hard, protective, or whatevs, you make a helmet, you can't prevent what happens to the brain when the physics of it (once the brain is in motion, it tends to stay in motion) is what it is.  I mean, you would have to fix the brain to the skull, then package that in a helmet that wouldn't cause damage.  That isn't going to happen.

No.  Your physics and kinesiology understanding are bad.

Well, that sucks because the above described is paraphrasing of more than a couple doctor interviews I have heard in the last 2 yrs or so.

I mean, if you have an organ surrounded mostly by liquid inside an enclosure, then take that enclosure and speed it up a bunch and make it come to a sudden hard stop, the organ in the liquid is going to keep moving in that liquid until it hits the inside of the enclosure. 

Tell me why that is wrong using physics and kinesiology.

Momentum can be reduced through engineering/design (the energy transfer can be performed by objects other than the human body).  You can 'absorb' the impact and reduce the acceleration of the skull/brain.  It's not the sudden stop, it's the sudden start.  Generally, the issue is the brain impacting the skull.  But your inclination that it can't be reduced or eliminated is naive and a bit alarmist.

75
Kansas State Football / Re: Football
« on: November 30, 2015, 01:33:58 PM »
i imagine the problem will be solved by better helmets

Not unless better means different and different means less protective.  Supposedly, the issue is the slight movement of the brain inside the skull.  No matter how hard, protective, or whatevs, you make a helmet, you can't prevent what happens to the brain when the physics of it (once the brain is in motion, it tends to stay in motion) is what it is.  I mean, you would have to fix the brain to the skull, then package that in a helmet that wouldn't cause damage.  That isn't going to happen.

No.  Your physics and kinesiology understanding are bad.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 60