Author Topic: Patriarchy  (Read 5207 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #50 on: December 21, 2017, 12:26:11 PM »
maybe get a pocket made of skin, like kangaroos use.

Women already have this
You mean a fat woman don't you?  Store things between wrinkles.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63955
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #51 on: December 21, 2017, 12:41:16 PM »
No, I don't mean the wrinkles
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #52 on: December 21, 2017, 01:01:47 PM »
Good grief

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #53 on: December 21, 2017, 01:19:40 PM »
first they wanted the vote, then they wanted pants, and now it's pockets. is there no limit to feminine ambition?

tomorrow we'll hear that they want to pee without sitting down.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #54 on: December 21, 2017, 01:40:42 PM »
No, I don't mean the wrinkles
Is that possible, I mean for cell phone

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51433
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #55 on: December 21, 2017, 01:43:24 PM »
the hell you need pockets to go to sleep?

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #56 on: December 21, 2017, 01:58:43 PM »
No, I don't mean the wrinkles
Is that possible, I mean for cell phone

Have you seen Orange is the New Black?

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41980
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #57 on: December 21, 2017, 03:08:38 PM »
Form-fitting pants don't have pockets because the design/style of the clothes would be defeated by then trying to jam stuff into them.  Looser pants allow for pockets and stuff in them.  Women's styles are usually form-fitting while men's aren't.  Usually.  My boxer briefs and hypothetical running tights don't have pockets.

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #58 on: December 21, 2017, 03:13:25 PM »
boxer briefs don't have pockets.

Do your other underwear have pockets?

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41980
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #59 on: December 21, 2017, 03:18:15 PM »
boxer briefs don't have pockets.

Do your other underwear have pockets?

My baggy #KSTATEO sleep shorts do.  That's the closest to other underwear that I have.

Go get you some JNCOs.


Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #60 on: December 22, 2017, 10:43:55 AM »
https://www.racked.com/2016/9/19/12865560/politics-of-pockets-suffragettes-women
Much has been written about how sexism dictates whether a garment gets usable pockets. While class unquestionably plays a part, men’s clothing tends to have capacious, visible pockets; women’s clothing tends to have small pockets, if any at all. Content with their pockets, men have little to say about them, but women have been complaining about the inadequacy of their pockets for more than a century.  Plenty of Pockets in Suffragette Suit" reads a 1910 NY Times headline, and pockets aplenty is what you’d expect for a woman with polls on her mind. The suit, the piece explains, has seven or eight pockets, "all in sight and all easy to find, even for the wearer."

THE HILLARY PANTSUIT!!!
« Last Edit: December 22, 2017, 10:50:37 AM by renocat »

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #61 on: December 22, 2017, 10:59:31 AM »
Yes! Exactly what I am saying.

Quote
The less women could carry, the less freedom they had. Take away pockets happily hidden under garments, and you limit women’s ability to navigate public spaces, to carry seditious (or merely amorous) writing, or to travel unaccompanied.

They even make reference to the pocket lib was talking about.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51433
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #62 on: December 22, 2017, 11:15:48 AM »
I'm all for pockets if Mrs. Stone won't buy anymore LV purses

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41980
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #63 on: December 22, 2017, 11:37:23 AM »
The waitress last night had her phone and order-taking notepad tucked in the front of her tights.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14953
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #64 on: December 22, 2017, 11:39:01 AM »
The waitress last night had her phone and order-taking notepad tucked in the front of her tights.

Did you get the Bentley's or 3 mile island?

Offline everyone shut up

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1051
  • “On paper, we feel good.”
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #65 on: December 22, 2017, 11:40:58 AM »
tomorrow we'll hear that they want to pee without sitting down.

they already do. ask a woman about public restrooms.

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #66 on: December 22, 2017, 12:04:53 PM »
The waitress last night had her phone and order-taking notepad tucked in the front of her tights.

Seem unsanitary. Was she wearing any pants?

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41980
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #67 on: December 22, 2017, 04:04:21 PM »
The waitress last night had her phone and order-taking notepad tucked in the front of her tights.

Did you get the Bentley's or 3 mile island?

Pacifico.

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41980
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #68 on: December 22, 2017, 04:05:21 PM »
The waitress last night had her phone and order-taking notepad tucked in the front of her tights.

Seem unsanitary. Was she wearing any pants?

The tights were pants.

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #69 on: December 22, 2017, 06:50:19 PM »
The waitress last night had her phone and order-taking notepad tucked in the front of her tights.

Seem unsanitary. Was she wearing any pants?

The tights were pants.

So, no.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #70 on: December 22, 2017, 10:18:17 PM »
Mrs. Gooch is feisty.  A Republican?  I think she has a good point.  She is educating us doofuses.  I am going to be careful about the outfits I by Renosweets.  No damn pantsuit though.

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #71 on: December 28, 2017, 11:39:46 AM »
I extended a pocket.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41980
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #72 on: December 28, 2017, 11:57:11 AM »
Thigh hernia.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
Re: Patriarchy
« Reply #73 on: December 29, 2017, 11:42:23 AM »
That looks a little too deep. Looks like you would have to go almost elbow deep into your pocket to fish out your phone.