0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: troubledscribe on February 02, 2017, 10:01:49 AMQuote from: Steffy08 on February 02, 2017, 08:21:32 AMQuote from: troubledscribe on February 02, 2017, 07:01:56 AMI'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.I think that Barnes is better, but I agree with scribe somewhat in that I don't think the difference between the two is as pronounced as their stats would suggest. Against TCU and A&M, Silmon was just a stud. I'm glad we have both, and I think both will get plenty of carries and yards next year. Steffy gets it.Neither of you have ever gotten anything
Quote from: Steffy08 on February 02, 2017, 08:21:32 AMQuote from: troubledscribe on February 02, 2017, 07:01:56 AMI'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.I think that Barnes is better, but I agree with scribe somewhat in that I don't think the difference between the two is as pronounced as their stats would suggest. Against TCU and A&M, Silmon was just a stud. I'm glad we have both, and I think both will get plenty of carries and yards next year. Steffy gets it.
Quote from: troubledscribe on February 02, 2017, 07:01:56 AMI'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.I think that Barnes is better, but I agree with scribe somewhat in that I don't think the difference between the two is as pronounced as their stats would suggest. Against TCU and A&M, Silmon was just a stud. I'm glad we have both, and I think both will get plenty of carries and yards next year.
I'm saying right now, that at the end of next season Silmon will have more rushing yards than Barnes.