Author Topic: wikileaks  (Read 18362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85178
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #75 on: October 31, 2016, 05:57:04 PM »
Amaze

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #76 on: November 16, 2016, 05:54:12 PM »

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6962
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #78 on: November 16, 2016, 06:28:16 PM »
@holymeow_ is clearly a kremlin troll. this is rough ridin' crazy. a story about russian intervention has its top comment become a russian account seeking to encourage domestic division. look how well it works too.

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85178
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #79 on: November 16, 2016, 07:48:46 PM »
wow

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #80 on: November 17, 2016, 09:11:49 AM »
Seems as if this could have been avoided if we just secured our crap?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #81 on: November 17, 2016, 09:14:27 AM »
Seems as if this could have been avoided if we just secured our crap?

The Russians were hacking the DNC, which for some strange reason is considered a private entity responsible for their own security. Really, we would be a lot better off if all political parties were considered public entities subject to FOIA, so if anyone wanted the information the Russians were stealing, they would just need to call and ask for it.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #82 on: November 17, 2016, 09:23:06 AM »
Seems as if this could have been avoided if we just secured our crap?

The Russians were hacking the DNC, which for some strange reason is considered a private entity responsible for their own security. Really, we would be a lot better off if all political parties were considered public entities subject to FOIA, so if anyone wanted the information the Russians were stealing, they would just need to call and ask for it.

If the DNC weren't a group of complete fucks then it wouldn't be a big deal now would it?  It seems all wikileaks did was expose corruption and other misdeeds.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #83 on: December 09, 2016, 05:45:40 PM »
Obama gestapo in action. Good riddance to the fascist regime.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/807291023068164096
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9524
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #85 on: November 18, 2017, 11:37:09 AM »
How is that different than keeping and protecting anonymous sources?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
wikileaks
« Reply #86 on: November 19, 2017, 08:29:03 AM »
DNC knew it was hacked, didn’t really do much about it.  DWS has bad guy on staff off loading loads of stuff to personal servers.  DWS freaks out when Capital Cops takes lap tops. 

LOL, what a crap show.

Next up, more hard drives that “fell down the stairs”?

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #87 on: November 19, 2017, 08:42:55 AM »
Infowars/Breitbart link?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #88 on: November 19, 2017, 09:04:17 AM »
Infowars/Breitbart link?

Tapping out already?

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #89 on: November 19, 2017, 09:06:51 AM »
I was just curious where you were getting your information captain cryptic.  :dunno:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #90 on: November 19, 2017, 10:00:32 AM »
You should get outside of your DNC news wire bubble TBT.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #91 on: November 19, 2017, 10:04:31 AM »
So it was Infowars/Breitbart, got it.  :thumbs:

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #92 on: May 25, 2018, 07:06:19 AM »


Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #94 on: June 01, 2018, 10:23:15 AM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52963
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #95 on: June 01, 2018, 10:44:00 AM »
Do LibBots like or hate JA?

I mean he is the guy who said they didn't get the emails from the Russians.

Didn't he also hint (as did Kim Dotcom) that the DNC email "hacks" were an inside job?   But we'll never know since the DNC dumped that vat of bleachbit all over the servers and told the clown car Obama DHS that the DNC didn't need any help . . . bleachbit'ing all their servers.




Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #96 on: June 01, 2018, 10:58:14 AM »
My issue with JA is that I think he chooses what to release in order to exert an influence on politics.  If he was just releasing whatever he gets, I'm relatively fine with it.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19681
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #97 on: June 02, 2018, 10:25:12 PM »
I think assange is a mercenary who didn't care for Hillary/obama


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14934
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #98 on: June 03, 2018, 12:55:18 PM »
Isn’t he a rapist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: wikileaks
« Reply #99 on: July 21, 2018, 11:57:10 AM »