Author Topic: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)  (Read 7755 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 34982
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #50 on: October 19, 2017, 10:21:22 AM »
If Cruz looked like Rubio, he'd be president right now. Politics aside, I'm dead serious. Combine GOP candidates: Rubio face, shitty brother bush's politics, Trump's over confidence, and Cruz's public speaking. You pretty much get a better GW with all those powers combined, but libs would still be super Hott, because losing.

I think the addiction to porno might derail Cruz

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9081
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #51 on: October 19, 2017, 02:27:54 PM »
Ted Cruz's weird pointy nose is distracting. Honestly I can't look at him and not think of Grandpa Munster.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 34982
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #52 on: October 19, 2017, 03:00:44 PM »
the dude loves to slap it to porn

Online wetwillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16887
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #53 on: October 19, 2017, 05:24:09 PM »
the dude loves to slap it to porn

Voyeur porn no less.  The 2020 moniker trump gives him will be peepin ted or something equally humiliating and torpedo his chances.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 42563
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #54 on: October 19, 2017, 05:54:05 PM »
Jerkin' Ted
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 14976
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #55 on: October 25, 2017, 03:20:44 PM »
If they really take the 401K pre-tax deduction down to $2,400 or whatever they are proposing to pay for a corporate tax rate, it will be interesting to see if KSUW actually willing to defend a tax policy that is almost specifically designed to hurt him as good.
@bentren

Offline The Big Train

  • World Series & FattyFest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22573
  • i wrote stuxnet
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #56 on: October 25, 2017, 03:37:18 PM »
It will be more interesting to see who he blames it on
KU football is a sleeping giant and always has been - beems

If LHC Bill Snyder had been hired at KU years ago, we'd have a national championship in football and a couple more BCS bowls. - beems

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4363
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #57 on: October 25, 2017, 03:45:50 PM »
If they really take the 401K pre-tax deduction down to $2,400 or whatever they are proposing to pay for a corporate tax rate, it will be interesting to see if KSUW actually willing to defend a tax policy that is almost specifically designed to hurt him as good.

This really seems like a KITN for the middle class. Or do way fewer people contribute to 401(k)s than I thought?

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4363
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #58 on: October 25, 2017, 03:47:08 PM »
Are they boosting contribution limits to IRAs to make up the difference? Just seems like that would be putting way more pressure on social security for retirement.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 34982
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #59 on: October 25, 2017, 04:16:13 PM »
SS will be gone

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15486
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #60 on: October 25, 2017, 04:30:35 PM »
If they really take the 401K pre-tax deduction down to $2,400 or whatever they are proposing to pay for a corporate tax rate, it will be interesting to see if KSUW actually willing to defend a tax policy that is almost specifically designed to hurt him as good.

Who is actually pushing for this??? I've only seen people say they don't support it.

Also, odd to see a libtard whining about an $18k per year tax shelter for "high earners".

I wouldn't be opposed to a reduced limit if it came with a substantial reduction in income taxes, and mandatory employer matching (punt the non-qualified garbage) or increase in IRA contribution limits.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8179
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #61 on: October 25, 2017, 07:50:58 PM »
If they really take the 401K pre-tax deduction down to $2,400 or whatever they are proposing to pay for a corporate tax rate, it will be interesting to see if KSUW actually willing to defend a tax policy that is almost specifically designed to hurt him as good.

Who is actually pushing for this??? I've only seen people say they don't support it.

Also, odd to see a libtard whining about an $18k per year tax shelter for "high earners".

I wouldn't be opposed to a reduced limit if it came with a substantial reduction in income taxes, and mandatory employer matching (punt the non-qualified garbage) or increase in IRA contribution limits.

This. Word for word.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 14976
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #62 on: November 01, 2017, 11:54:51 AM »
well at least the unitary Republican government will get Tax Cuts done.  Let's check in on how that is going...

Quote
SCOOP:Trump wants to name tax bill “The Cut Cut Cut Act” but Hill leaders disagree <24 hrs out name still undecided
@bentren

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4363
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #63 on: November 01, 2017, 12:30:28 PM »
Sounds like a stupid name, but I have to admit, if there is one thing I think Trump is actually good at, it is branding.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 27597
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #64 on: November 01, 2017, 01:00:44 PM »
Yeah, I already can't get the cubic cut out of my head.

Offline libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 42563
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #65 on: November 01, 2017, 01:14:27 PM »
Actually trump wants to call it the kut kut kut act...
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 42563
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #66 on: November 02, 2017, 09:47:00 AM »
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8780
  • Delicious 100% Cambodian
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #67 on: November 02, 2017, 10:12:44 AM »
Mortgage interest deduction gone.
"Will is a good shooter"

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 27597
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #68 on: November 02, 2017, 10:15:17 AM »
Mortgage interest deduction gone.

Only for loans bigger than $500,000.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8780
  • Delicious 100% Cambodian
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #69 on: November 02, 2017, 10:19:47 AM »
Mortgage interest deduction gone.

Only for loans bigger than $500,000.
I misheard possibly. I thought they just said under 500k. Which would be another eff you to the middle class.
"Will is a good shooter"

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11497
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #70 on: November 02, 2017, 10:22:09 AM »
It's a eff you to people buying homes on the East Coast and in California.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 27597
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #71 on: November 02, 2017, 10:32:59 AM »
Dropping the medical expense deduction seems kind of shitty.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4363
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #72 on: November 02, 2017, 10:36:49 AM »
Republicans really hate people getting healthcare.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4363
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #73 on: November 02, 2017, 10:37:52 AM »
Otherwise, these seem pretty fair. Getting rid of the interest deduction on big loans makes a ton of sense and I would be on board if that was literally the only thing that passed.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8179
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #74 on: November 02, 2017, 10:46:01 AM »
It's a eff you to people buying homes on the East Coast and in California mainly liberals.

FYP.  :Woot:
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.