If you are on meds for, and/or have a diagnosis of any kind of mental illness, no gun for you, imo. Like, ever.
that's a violation of their rights, and I'm being 100% serious
expanding on this, are there any other rights the law-abiding mentally ill don't deserve? Freedom of religion? They can be subject to illegal search and seizure?
Ok, how about just those mental illnesses that have led to murder?
I'm sure you could make an argument that every diagnosed mental illness has led to murder. But why should a person with something like diagnosed depression that has never hurt a soul not have access to firearms, as is their constitutional right?
well the only answer then is to take all the guns(that isn't even an answer, though). Also, I don't necessarily think the constitutions intent is for everyone to have a gun. Not unless they are part of an organized militia. Also, the need that the constitution was trying to address is moot at the point in which we find ourselves, in the lack of balance between personal ownership and military level weapons.