Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 333006 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2950 on: October 24, 2016, 10:49:40 PM »
has this been mentioned yet? something for all the original bernie supporters to consider...

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/790612325237534721

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40509
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2951 on: October 24, 2016, 11:07:08 PM »
Damn

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

here's one.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2952 on: October 25, 2016, 12:49:50 AM »
:horrorsurprise:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790384693384474624

The issue here isn't what's being inferred, Clinton buying her way out of an indictment, that's flimsy at best. The bigger issue is that an entity was able to donate $675,000 to influence an election, how incredibly gross and an complete affront to democracy.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2953 on: October 25, 2016, 01:37:55 AM »
Your boy Soros has his grubby little hands in every voting machine.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40509
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2954 on: October 25, 2016, 04:48:04 AM »
The issue here isn't what's being inferred, Clinton buying her way out of an indictment, that's flimsy at best. The bigger issue is that an entity was able to donate $675,000 to influence an election, how incredibly gross and an complete affront to democracy.

it's too bad this wasn't a cns post.  this would be a great one to highlight.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53202
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2955 on: October 25, 2016, 06:45:58 AM »
Fantastic set of reading this last few pages.

All the Hilbots and closeted Hilbots were fantastic. 


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2956 on: October 25, 2016, 06:51:02 AM »
Closeted trump supporters are pretty cute too dax  :shy:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53202
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2957 on: October 25, 2016, 07:09:06 AM »
Not really.


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2959 on: October 25, 2016, 07:55:58 AM »
If you're looking for volume, trump would be great, you're right dax  :thumbs:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36664
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2960 on: October 25, 2016, 09:11:52 AM »
The issue here isn't what's being inferred, Clinton buying her way out of an indictment, that's flimsy at best. The bigger issue is that an entity was able to donate $675,000 to influence an election, how incredibly gross and an complete affront to democracy.

it's too bad this wasn't a cns post.  this would be a great one to highlight.

I am out of steam.  This election is wearing me out. 

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2961 on: October 25, 2016, 09:21:00 AM »
Why are CNS and sys so flirty?  What did I miss?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36664
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2962 on: October 25, 2016, 09:24:18 AM »
He pointed me out as being an angry irrational hill hater a while back, and notes as I post as such.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15214
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2963 on: October 25, 2016, 09:24:21 AM »
:horrorsurprise:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790384693384474624

The issue here isn't what's being inferred, Clinton buying her way out of an indictment, that's flimsy at best. The bigger issue is that an entity was able to donate $675,000 to influence an election, how incredibly gross and an complete affront to democracy.

MIR obviously trying to pivot and avoid talking about the actual real issue this leak raises: RUSSIA! :curse:

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2964 on: October 25, 2016, 09:32:21 AM »
Why would someone make the leap to irrationally hating Hillary, when there are so many rational reasons to hate her?  Lazy?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36664
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2965 on: October 25, 2016, 09:36:36 AM »
Man, that would have been a good one too.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53202
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2966 on: October 25, 2016, 09:49:05 AM »
Why would someone make the leap to irrationally hating Hillary, when there are so many rational reasons to hate her?  Lazy?

The classic Hilbot feels shame for their choices, so they have to lash out and make people feel bad for discussing what a horrible human being their choice for president is . . . it's sad, but true.


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2967 on: October 25, 2016, 11:46:27 AM »
The most irrational thing about this election is the attempt to discredit copies of original emails on the basis that Russians hacked them, or that the publisher of the emails doesn't like hilltard. Just stupid.

When wikileaks was exposing the Bush2 admin the libtards were all "white knight" and "heros" and  :love:. Now they're trying to reignite a cold war to deflect their malfeasance and corruption. Just pathetic.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53202
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2968 on: October 25, 2016, 11:54:37 AM »
#russians  :curse:


Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51464
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2969 on: October 25, 2016, 03:47:05 PM »
john dougie talking hip hop is wonderful

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7633
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2970 on: October 25, 2016, 04:30:36 PM »
I know how to Dougie

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2971 on: October 25, 2016, 08:02:02 PM »
Colin Powell is voting Chillery Coolton

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36664
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2972 on: October 25, 2016, 08:04:02 PM »
Even after being tossed under the email bus.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29144
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2973 on: October 25, 2016, 08:04:50 PM »
i have it on good authority that he sucks ass at the piccolo

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20495
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2974 on: October 25, 2016, 08:14:25 PM »
Why would someone make the leap to irrationally hating Hillary, when there are so many rational reasons to hate her?  Lazy?

The classic Hilbot feels shame for their choices, so they have to lash out and make people feel bad for discussing what a horrible human being their choice for president is . . . it's sad, but true.

Dax- many, MANY people on here have plenty of time for the perpetual war machine critique of Hillary.  If you haven't done so, you should listen to Jeremy Scahill on Chapo Trap House podcast this week, he is an incredible resource for charting the disturbing trends that Obama has strengthened of drone warfare.

Glenn Greenwald and the Intercept do incredible work on this issue as well. 

I have plenty of disdain for MSNBC, for the endless stream of reasons why Hillary's candidacy is flawed and disappointing from the secrecy and short-sighted greed, the incestuous DC cess pool to the Henry Kissinger foreign policy.

What everyone on here also understands is that you are over everything else committed to the idea that despite your stated beliefs about foreign policy, you will contort any fact to make the case that the Democrats are worse than Republicans.

Hillary Clinton is basically pursuing the foreign policy of Henry Kissinger and the very first thing you will do is attempt to make the case that Macnamara and LBJ were worse.