Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 334203 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2325 on: September 08, 2016, 05:02:17 PM »
I think trump doesn't use email

I guess even if he does use email, it couldn't be any worse than his twitter.

Pretty much, what else could he put in an email that he hasn't been on record saying, "sarcastically" or not, or tweeted. Email hacks would be like burning a house down in the middle of a forest fire.

WikiLeaks guy has said exactly this.  He said they have email stuff on Don too, but it isn't as bad as the crap he says daily.

He can't talk about how he's non-partisan and then allow himself to be the arbiter of what is released.

Why leak something that's already out there? Hillary leaks are great because they are the opposite of what she tells the press and public.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64032
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2326 on: September 08, 2016, 08:22:58 PM »
was in kc today i guess  :dunno:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40519
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2328 on: September 08, 2016, 09:57:58 PM »
@dax, conspiracy theory alt-right
@stunz, alpha male/anti-PC alt-right
@fsd, racist/sexist alt-right
@ksuw, uneducated alt-right

@emo, his kids are hunters alt-right
@yarddog, ??? alt-right
@27, ??? alt-right
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64032
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2329 on: September 08, 2016, 10:02:47 PM »
@dax, conspiracy theory alt-right
@stunz, alpha male/anti-PC alt-right
@fsd, racist/sexist alt-right
@ksuw, uneducated alt-right

@emo, his kids are hunters alt-right
@yarddog, hillary kills people alt-right
@27, cuck'd alt-right
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64032
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2330 on: September 08, 2016, 10:03:10 PM »
shellsquawk is the one i can't figure out
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2331 on: September 08, 2016, 10:18:40 PM »
You sharpshootin' me boy?
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2332 on: September 09, 2016, 02:11:47 AM »
@closeted hilbot

@conflicted posers

@illcheckhilonelectionday

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2333 on: September 09, 2016, 02:17:07 AM »
Oh gosh, ya know he wasn't authorized to delete those messages, shoot (concerned look), darn it to heck.
http://nyti.ms/2coUd5e

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2334 on: September 09, 2016, 08:15:30 AM »
Oh gosh, ya know he wasn't authorized to delete those messages, shoot (concerned look), darn it to heck.
http://nyti.ms/2coUd5e
Well I believe IT guy on his own accord deleted the archived emails and destroyed the 13 blackberries that MG carried for convenience.  But he would never have had to make this choice if Hillary had followed the law.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17592
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2335 on: September 09, 2016, 08:31:24 AM »
I think trump doesn't use email

I guess even if he does use email, it couldn't be any worse than his twitter.

Pretty much, what else could he put in an email that he hasn't been on record saying, "sarcastically" or not, or tweeted. Email hacks would be like burning a house down in the middle of a forest fire.

WikiLeaks guy has said exactly this.  He said they have email stuff on Don too, but it isn't as bad as the crap he says daily.

He can't talk about how he's non-partisan and then allow himself to be the arbiter of what is released.

Why leak something that's already out there? Hillary leaks are great because they are the opposite of what she tells the press and public.

Because he leaks innocent people's personal information and claims that he is just the bringing the information to the public, not deciding where information should be edited.  He shouldn't get to decide if Trump's emails are newsworthy, that's up to the people.  Being for the transparency of your political enemies but not your own party is incredibly hypocritical.


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2336 on: September 09, 2016, 08:34:02 AM »
It took me an hour to get home last night because she was downtown and she had her mafia shut down all my exits and shut off the streets.  :curse:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2337 on: September 09, 2016, 08:53:06 AM »
As far as I can tell:

Alt-Right = Western European Socialism = Libtard Fantasy
« Last Edit: September 09, 2016, 08:58:07 AM by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2338 on: September 09, 2016, 08:57:44 AM »
LOL at the resident alt-righters LOLing at the Hilbots.

Let's see some @'s, chum

@dax, conspiracy theory alt-right
@stunz, alpha male/anti-PC alt-right
@fsd, racist/sexist alt-right
@ksuw, uneducated alt-right

Obamacare is working, per chum. So, there's some credibility. Also, a hilbot :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2339 on: September 09, 2016, 09:01:50 AM »
bernie sanders and trump have nearly identical platforms, one is called a "socialist" the other "alt-right", cant we all just agree those are synonyms?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2340 on: September 09, 2016, 09:10:30 AM »
Obamacare is working, per chum. So, there's some credibility. Also, a hilbot :lol:

I don't know what it means to say that it is working, but I would say that it is achieving the result desired by those who supported it.



http://www.vox.com/2016/9/7/12815076/america-uninsured-rate-dropped

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36679
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2341 on: September 09, 2016, 09:34:09 AM »
I think Alt-Right means fear and opinions are always correct and that facts are for muslim loving queers, or something.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2342 on: September 09, 2016, 09:37:43 AM »
Obamacare is working, per chum. So, there's some credibility. Also, a hilbot :lol:

I don't know what it means to say that it is working, but I would say that it is achieving the result desired by those who supported it.



http://www.vox.com/2016/9/7/12815076/america-uninsured-rate-dropped

 :lol: :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2343 on: September 09, 2016, 09:40:26 AM »
I think Alt-Right means fear and opinions are always correct and that facts are for muslim loving queers, or something.

No, it means doing the exact same crap germany and france have been doing for 3 decades. It's an economic isolationist model mixed with neo-nationalism. The latter is characterized as racism when republicans are involved.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2344 on: September 09, 2016, 09:47:36 AM »
What is it classified as when a presidential candidate panders to minorities and illegal immigrants yet her legislative history is voting for fences with lots of barb wire, railing on neighboring countries for not caring about security, rounding up and sending illegals back across the border . . . And when she was First Lady lobbied hard for draconian sentencing legislation that targeted minorities and filled prisons?

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2345 on: September 09, 2016, 09:50:07 AM »
What is it classified as when a presidential candidate panders to minorities and illegal immigrants yet her legislative history is voting for fences with lots of barb wire, railing on neighboring countries for not caring about security, rounding up and sending illegals back across the border . . . And when she was First Lady lobbied hard for draconian sentencing legislation that targeted minorities and filled prisons?

Every Presidential campaign ever.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2346 on: September 09, 2016, 09:53:16 AM »
What is it classified as when a presidential candidate panders to minorities and illegal immigrants yet her legislative history is voting for fences with lots of barb wire, railing on neighboring countries for not caring about security, rounding up and sending illegals back across the border . . . And when she was First Lady lobbied hard for draconian sentencing legislation that targeted minorities and filled prisons?

Every Presidential campaign ever.

Which only points out the hypocrisy and idiocy  of calling non Hillary supporters low educated and misinformed.  Most Hillary supporters have no effing clue what her real track record is.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64032
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2347 on: September 09, 2016, 10:16:54 AM »
Dax's obsession with non-trump supporters is very weird and sad
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2348 on: September 09, 2016, 10:17:05 AM »
I think trump doesn't use email

I guess even if he does use email, it couldn't be any worse than his twitter.

Pretty much, what else could he put in an email that he hasn't been on record saying, "sarcastically" or not, or tweeted. Email hacks would be like burning a house down in the middle of a forest fire.

WikiLeaks guy has said exactly this.  He said they have email stuff on Don too, but it isn't as bad as the crap he says daily.

He can't talk about how he's non-partisan and then allow himself to be the arbiter of what is released.

Why leak something that's already out there? Hillary leaks are great because they are the opposite of what she tells the press and public.

Because he leaks innocent people's personal information and claims that he is just the bringing the information to the public, not deciding where information should be edited.  He shouldn't get to decide if Trump's emails are newsworthy, that's up to the people.  Being for the transparency of your political enemies but not your own party is incredibly hypocritical.

 :clap:
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2349 on: September 09, 2016, 10:18:17 AM »
Dax's obsession with non-trump supporters is very weird and sad

Your obsession with non Hill supporters is typical lib: Weird, a bit deranged and comical.