Author Topic: Marcus Foster  (Read 263353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1675 on: March 31, 2015, 12:28:18 PM »
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.

While no one would be surprised if he did, no one should be surprised if he doesn't, either. He should have plenty of options and I have no idea what SMU's scholarship situation is like.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1676 on: March 31, 2015, 12:39:49 PM »
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.

While no one would be surprised if he did, no one should be surprised if he doesn't, either. He should have plenty of options and I have no idea what SMU's scholarship situation is like.
Yeah, good point.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1677 on: March 31, 2015, 01:09:46 PM »
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.

While no one would be surprised if he did, no one should be surprised if he doesn't, either. He should have plenty of options and I have no idea what SMU's scholarship situation is like.

SMU is very :kstategrad:

Their scholly sitch is a moot point.

 :dubious:
bears are fast...

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1678 on: March 31, 2015, 01:26:53 PM »
Having Foster at off guard and Semi on the wing is downright scary.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1679 on: March 31, 2015, 01:29:13 PM »
In western Kansas we give chocolate jackrabbits.  Marcus would have done better if Shane would have been here.

We? You're not from western Kansas
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 02:13:48 PM by MakeItRain »

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1680 on: March 31, 2015, 01:32:04 PM »
MU has reached out to Foster.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1681 on: March 31, 2015, 01:38:09 PM »

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1682 on: March 31, 2015, 01:38:54 PM »
If he loves oscar, he'll adore Kim Anderson.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1683 on: March 31, 2015, 01:42:50 PM »
Having Foster at off guard and Semi on the wing is downright scary.

Not to mention very convenient for me to make the drive to Moody to see our boy Marcus scorch the nets again...

 :emawkid:
bears are fast...

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36683
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1684 on: March 31, 2015, 02:09:05 PM »
MU has reached out to Foster.

NOOOOOOOOOO!!!O!!O!O!!!!!!

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1685 on: March 31, 2015, 02:13:09 PM »

 :runaway:

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1686 on: March 31, 2015, 02:35:53 PM »
Sorry if I missed it earlier, but Marcus doesn't have to sit out a year since he was "dismissed" right?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1687 on: March 31, 2015, 02:42:31 PM »
The so called run off rule has been modified,  he's likely going to have to sit.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36683
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1688 on: March 31, 2015, 02:46:31 PM »
Also, likely given a 6th yr to be eligible. 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1689 on: March 31, 2015, 02:52:30 PM »
I think there's a "no crap head rule". Similar to why DGB had to sit out.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7565
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1690 on: March 31, 2015, 02:54:32 PM »
I think there's a "no crap head rule". Similar to why DGB had to sit out.
i know you are just wc8'n here but please don't compare what happened to Marcus to what a real life DB like DGB did.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1691 on: March 31, 2015, 02:55:49 PM »
I think there's a "no crap head rule". Similar to why DGB had to sit out.
i know you are just wc8'n here but please don't compare what happened to Marcus to what a real life DB like DGB did.
Yeah, I'm not, but if there was a "cause", then I think they make you sit.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7565
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1692 on: March 31, 2015, 02:57:09 PM »
The so called run off rule has been modified,  he's likely going to have to sit.
i actually read an official NCAA release and I took it more an elimination of the "hardship" appeal process (dying grandma, etc).  Did the NCAA just apply the hardship appeal as an answer to oversigning and coaching changes or was there an actual "run off" rule?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36683
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1693 on: March 31, 2015, 03:00:01 PM »
There was an article linked in this thread or one of the other Holy-crap-Marcus-Is-Leaving threads that stated that the hardship rule and the run off rule were both no longer going to allow immediate play, but could result in the player getting a 6th year so that they don't waste a year of playing time while sitting out from the move.

Offline Catchacold

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 717
  • Z28gY2F0cy4=
    • View Profile
    • wildcatgrowl.com
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1694 on: April 13, 2015, 11:15:13 AM »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1695 on: April 13, 2015, 11:24:21 AM »
Oh, wow!  :love: I'd love to see him with Gonzaga.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1696 on: April 13, 2015, 11:29:44 AM »
Creighton would be disappointing

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1697 on: April 13, 2015, 11:31:18 AM »
Creighton would be disappointing

They were his other finalist with us, so it makes sense.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1698 on: April 13, 2015, 11:33:25 AM »
Good for Marcus. I hope he does well wherever he ends up.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Marcus Foster
« Reply #1699 on: April 13, 2015, 11:34:12 AM »
He made that crazy dunk against Gonzaga and now they want him soooo bad.  :love: