0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
The idea of "known Russian intelligence official" is hilarious, since we're now back to the cold war footing of every Russian is a "known Russian intelligence official". Using that same logic we can unequivocally say that the extensive contacts the Clinton's and numerous members of the DNC, high level Dem apparatchiks, and numerous Dem ranking members of Congress had with Russians were in fact contacts with "known Russian Intelligence" officials. When it's all said and done, we'll probably find out the Russians were pissed that they, through various channels had paid the Clinton's millions of dollars and yet she still acted like she couldn't wait to go to war with them.
We're going on 6 months, and we still can't pin Donald down on the russian voter fraud conspiracy. Despite a seemingly ensless supply of anonymous sources with endless supplies of incriminating evidence.Just a masterful job by Donald. What an alpha.
QuoteIn his town hall talk, Rogers reportedly admitted that President Trump asked him to discredit the FBI and James Comey, which the admiral flatly refused to do. As Rogers explained, he informed the commander in chief, “I know you won’t like it, but I have to tell what I have seen”—a probable reference to specific intelligence establishing COLUSION between the Kremlin and Team Trump.Rogers then added that such SIGINT exists, and it is damning. He stated, “There is no question that we [meaning NSA] have evidence of election involvement and questionable contacts with the Russians.” Although Rogers did not cite the specific intelligence he was referring to, agency officials with direct knowledge have informed me that DIRNSA was obviously referring to a series of SIGINT reports from 2016 based on intercepts of communications between known Russian intelligence officials and key members of Trump’s campaign, in which they discussed methods of damaging Hillary Clinton.http://observer.com/2017/05/mike-rogers-nsa-chief-admits-trump-colluded-with-russia/
In his town hall talk, Rogers reportedly admitted that President Trump asked him to discredit the FBI and James Comey, which the admiral flatly refused to do. As Rogers explained, he informed the commander in chief, “I know you won’t like it, but I have to tell what I have seen”—a probable reference to specific intelligence establishing COLUSION between the Kremlin and Team Trump.Rogers then added that such SIGINT exists, and it is damning. He stated, “There is no question that we [meaning NSA] have evidence of election involvement and questionable contacts with the Russians.” Although Rogers did not cite the specific intelligence he was referring to, agency officials with direct knowledge have informed me that DIRNSA was obviously referring to a series of SIGINT reports from 2016 based on intercepts of communications between known Russian intelligence officials and key members of Trump’s campaign, in which they discussed methods of damaging Hillary Clinton.
isn't the ny post a tabloid? they found that bat boy in the cave, right?
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/868458807797612544And 100% of goE libtards
In December 2016, The Post published a story inaccurately stating that a Russian hacking operation had infiltrated the U.S. electrical grid.
