Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread  (Read 379591 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2770
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2200 on: February 24, 2018, 11:37:45 AM »
who is on the 7 line in that bracket matrix fan


Here's what I have.

Butler
Saint Mary's College
Texas A&M
Florida State

I took bracketmatrix projections from last night and tweaked it a little bit this time so some of those teams moved around a little bit.

This is what I'm having a hard time with.  A&M will most likely finish under .500 in SEC but have several tier 1 wins (many tier 1 losses) and have nice SOS but they're only a 1 point favorite at Vandy today.   St. Mary's lost to Washington St. for gods sake.   I think the eye test should count for something?
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2201 on: February 25, 2018, 09:10:02 PM »
Sunday Night Update =


5 seeds - Ohio St, Kentucky, Rhode Island, Gonzaga
6 seeds - Michigan, Houston, Nevada, Florida
* Zags could be a 6 with that weak overall SOS
* Florida has 8/3 Q1-Q2 wins. 6 road/neutral Q1 wins




7 seeds- Arkansas TCU Seton Hall Butler
8 seeds- VTech OU Creighton Texas A&M
9 seeds - Mizzou, NC St, Ariz St, KState
* There is not much separation between these 12 teams.
* Tcu is #26, Cats are 36. But if we win Tuesday, I would have us ahead of them. That's how close it is despite 10 spots.


10 seeds - FSU, Alabama, Providence, Miami
11 seeds - St Bony, St Mary's, USC, Texas, Syracuse, Baylor



« Last Edit: February 26, 2018, 10:20:14 AM by Powercat Posse »

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2202 on: February 26, 2018, 06:52:14 AM »

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22252
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2203 on: February 26, 2018, 08:20:22 AM »
Our SOS dropped after playing OU again? 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2204 on: February 26, 2018, 08:54:28 AM »
Our SOS dropped after playing OU again? 

Yes, slightly. Probably has to do with a lot of the other games as much as anything with the RPI mechanics. Every other metric has us in at least the mid 40s.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2205 on: February 26, 2018, 12:26:08 PM »
It's been mentioned that KState & VTech have similar profiles. Fsu also is strikingly similar to Ksu/VT.
Florida St still gets more love.  They project out to a 8 seed on average by BracketMatrix, while Ksu/VTech are 10 seeds. (Lunardi has FSU 7, Ksu/Tech 10)

Record/ Conference=
Ksu 20-9 9-7
VT 20-9 9-7
FSU 19-9 8-8

NonCon SOS/ Overall SOS
Ksu 323 76
VT 325 75
FSU 317 77

Q1 & Q2 Record=
Ksu 3-8/ 6-0
VT 5-5/3-3
FSU 5-5/2-2

Road/Neutral wins vs Q1/Q2 =
Ksu 5 road
VT 4 Road, 1 Neutral
FSU 3 road

Losses vs Q3 =
Ksu 1
VT 1
FSU 2


VTech has the most impressive Q1 wins (at Virginia, UNC, Clemson).  That's why I think they are ahead of KState.  Fsu has the worst Conference record, the fewest Quality wins away from home, and most Q3 losses. 

« Last Edit: February 26, 2018, 02:42:02 PM by Powercat Posse »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40524
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2206 on: February 26, 2018, 12:48:58 PM »
those q1/q2 records don't really look similar at all.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15222
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2207 on: February 26, 2018, 12:53:36 PM »
Yeah, I am legitimately curious how the committee balances Q1 wins vs Q2 losses.  If KSU keeps that line perfect it would be a great way to gauge.  I'm guessing that this may be one of the hardest years to predict seeding with the new tier emphasis.

Offline cat97

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 250
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2208 on: February 26, 2018, 01:13:27 PM »
Thanks for all of the information in the last half dozen posts or so.   I appreciate the effort that went into these facts.

We look to be in pretty good shape but need one more win to seal a bid and two or three will give us a chance at a higher seed.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2209 on: February 26, 2018, 02:35:11 PM »
There are different ways how to evaluate Q1/Q2 wins.  I tend to look at a Q1 win being equal to 1.5 Q2 wins.  So I think having 3/6 is slightly better that 5/2 on the Q1/Q2 wins.  You can look at exactly who the Q1-Q2 wins are and that may favor one team more in a comparison.

All of our losses (except Tulsa) are Q1 losses. VT had 3, FSU had 2 losses in the Q2 Tier.  That's an advantage for us, but I don't think it's a major advantage.




Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2210 on: February 26, 2018, 07:11:08 PM »
Shouldn't Tulsa be a Q2 loss?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15222
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2211 on: February 26, 2018, 07:49:52 PM »
Tulsa counts as a home game, but I think they could still end up as a Q2 by the end of the season.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15222
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2212 on: February 26, 2018, 07:52:38 PM »
Here they are again (just as much for my reference):

[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15222
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2213 on: February 26, 2018, 08:07:09 PM »
Va Tech just locked up a bid for themselves. Pretty wtf meltdown for Duke.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2214 on: February 26, 2018, 08:18:03 PM »
Tulsa counts as a home game, but I think they could still end up as a Q2 by the end of the season.

How the hell is that a home game?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2215 on: February 26, 2018, 08:23:53 PM »
Tulsa counts as a home game, but I think they could still end up as a Q2 by the end of the season.

How the hell is that a home game?

If the school handles the ticket sales, its a "home game" for that school.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2216 on: February 26, 2018, 08:26:59 PM »
JFC, these rules are so easy to manipulate. We need to fite the "schedulers"
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15222
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2217 on: February 26, 2018, 08:36:27 PM »
It will probably mean fewer destination “home” games, but should encourage more home-home scheduling with decent schools.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2218 on: February 26, 2018, 08:38:32 PM »
It will probably mean fewer destination “home” games, but should encourage more home-home scheduling with decent schools.

I doubt it. Its easier to get a lot of these games done if you do the neutral home game. Its the nature of scheduling, teams don't do many true home and home series anymore and I don't think it will change.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2219 on: February 26, 2018, 08:59:36 PM »
tulsa 76 RPI
Tulsa 74 RPI
Yes on paper 1 equals Q2 loss, 1 is Q3 loss.  The committee isnt gonna treat this game much differently with either scenario. If Tulsa had an RPI of 116, then it would be more harmful.  It's not on the Q2-Q3 border.

OU RPI is 31 on ESPN.
Home win over RPI 31 / Home win over RPI 30 .... Little difference ( Q1 vs Q2 win)
Home win over RPI 30 / Home win over RPI 5 .... Bigger difference (same Q1 Tier)

Committee will just see our wins. They will know how good they are.
Home W = 19,31,52,70,97
Road W = 52,62,97,112,118
* Best 5 from each








Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2220 on: February 26, 2018, 10:30:21 PM »
It will probably mean fewer destination “home” games, but should encourage more home-home scheduling with decent schools.

That isn't a new rule

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2221 on: February 27, 2018, 10:28:26 AM »
Quote
Bubble Watch:

Should be in

Quote
Kansas State (20-9, 9-7 Big 12)
(BPI: 50 | SOS: 46 | SOR: 30 | RPI: 60)

The Wildcats would likely have seven or even eight at-large teams taken after them in the bracket if the field was announce today. So yes, the loss at Oklahoma was a missed opportunity, but no, it doesn't detract from the fact that oscar Weber's guys are in a good place.

Certainly, the Big 12 gives its members plenty of chances to improve their seed, and perhaps K-State can do just that with remaining games at TCU and at home against Baylor. A win in either contest would earn Kansas State an above-.500 finish in the nation's strongest conference.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41987
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2222 on: February 27, 2018, 10:41:49 AM »
Tulsa counts as a home game, but I think they could still end up as a Q2 by the end of the season.

How the hell is that a home game?

If the school handles the ticket sales, its a "home game" for that school.

Yep.

https://twitter.com/KStateMBB/status/946804352647393280

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46500
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2223 on: February 27, 2018, 11:25:43 AM »
fellas- sit back, kick your legs up, and enjoy that “should be in” feeling...you’v earned it


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15222
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #2224 on: February 27, 2018, 10:08:35 PM »
Ok, so what has to happen now for the Cats to lock up a non-first four bid?