The point with Venables is he is seen as a pretty strong recruiter and frankly that should be our primary focus. We simply can't do it with old men at their last stop.
That's a fair point, and I agree that he would probably recruit better than Leavitt here, but BV also had the luxury of recruiting to OU and Clemson for the last 20 years. I think it's unrealistic to think he could recruit at that level at K-State.
Recruiting is obviously important, but given K-State's inherent recruiting limitations (i.e. i don't foresee us ever being a top 10 recruiting destination), player development is also a huge factor.
BV is still my number 1, but aside from their age difference (which is what, 10 years?) and the assumed recruiting benefits of BV, their experience/accomplishments are basically a wash.
All I'm saying here is that if we were to fall-back to Leavitt, we're still getting a very solid coach. We could do a lot worse.