spring game

[get_HIT]

hasnt carson looked decent in previoius years spring games?????

[Lamesauce]

I don't recall Coffman ever getting the slightest pressure last night. He looked very comfortable in the pocket and had plenty of time to throw-and he threw strikes. Looked very good. If the O-line can provide him with that much time this season, we'll be okay. Don't recall any blitzes being thrown at him either. Bottom line-you can't take anything away from the spring game. How well Coffman does this season depends on how he handles pressure and blitzes, neither of which he had to do last night.

[I_have_purplewood]

ew2x4 and PP:  wabash wasn't really surprised that Lamur sucks.

You guys just got slammured.

[wabash909]

Carson always looks decent in Spring games when Snyder won't blitz or pass rush.

Unfortunately for Carson, when we play real games against real D-1 defenses that blitz and pass rush and do the things that real D-1 defenses do, it's when we run into problems.

And when I say problems, I mean lose football games to horrible football teams and look like an idiot doing it.

[Trim]

Unfortunately for Carson, when we play real games against real D-1 defenses that blitz and pass rush and do the things that real D-1 defenses do, it's when we run into problems.

Like the experts on Deep Purple said, most of Carson's problems come "post-snap".

[Benja]

Unfortunately for Carson, when we play real games against real D-1 defenses that blitz and pass rush and do the things that real D-1 defenses do, it's when we run into problems.

Like the experts on Deep Purple said, most of Carson's problems come "post-snap".

Ran into Wal-Mart to get one item the other day thinking I could get in and out real quick. Ended up getting stuck behind Carson at self-checkout for like five minutes while he tried to find the bar code on his potato salad.

Granted, Lamur would get lost in the produce section and never find his way anywhere close to potato salad, but this is supposed to be our SMART qb right?

[wabash909]

The coaches "love what they have".  Quarterbacking, self checkout skills and otherwise.

Not worried.

[kstatefreak42]

Im really impressed by William Powell, he showed great vision and good cut back ability.

The Recievers looked impressive to. Brodrick Smith is the go-to-guy. Harper will be a weapon. And Aubrey Quarles looked like a 4 Star Juco WR. granted yes they played against our defense, but they looked good running their routes. Quarles had a sick catch in the endzone. Tramaine Thompson looked nice.

QUARTERBACK- yes i'll admit, I fell for the "hype" about lamur. He had 2-4 balls batted down at the line. Threw i think Two interceptions. And he didnt scramble and show his running ability. Klein was hurt so I still dont know. coffman looked accurate and seemed to have a zip on the ball.
Offensive Line- 4 out 5 startes back, they run blocked very well. And the Pass protection was solid. ( even tho it was our defense).
 
So basically everything i typed seems to make no difference because it was against our defense.........

[Lamesauce]

Not sure why people were impressed by William Powell. Thought Hubert looked much better running against our #1 defense. Powell's kick returns were brutal to watch too.

[doom]

Freeman was there.  Did not see this mentioned.

[get_HIT]

ya he was down talkin to frank....wonder what their convo consisted of....

[jtksu]

ya he was down talkin to frank....wonder what their convo consisted of....

Not sure, but Franks was making the "vagina" sign on his leg during most of the convo.

[Dugout DickStone]

I don't think you can underestimate what actually having 2 legitimate receivers can do for the passing game.  Last year we had zero. 

Seriously, Briscoe made sparkles look amazing even though sparkles threw a worse ball than Coffman. 

That being said, you cannot win the North with Coffman as your QB.  You can't win the north with Lamur as your QB either.  But at least Coffman can throw a ball in neighborhood that Brod or Quarles or even TT can go get and make a move on someone.  Lamur will just get it knocked down/picked.

I guess my point is shazbot! you OB for not getting a good QB cruit. 

My other point is can someone make me a pillow case with Daniel's face on it?  Second time I have asked this.

[Dr Rick Daris]

I don't think you can underestimate what actually having 2 legitimate receivers can do for the passing game.  Last year we had zero. 

Seriously, Briscoe made sparkles look amazing even though sparkles threw a worse ball than Coffman. 

That being said, you cannot win the North with Coffman as your QB.  You can't win the north with Lamur as your QB either.  But at least Coffman can throw a ball in neighborhood that Brod or Quarles or even TT can go get and make a move on someone.  Lamur will just get it knocked down/picked.

I guess my point is shazbot! you OB for not getting a good QB cruit. 

My other point is can someone make me a pillow case with Daniel's face on it?  Second time I have asked this.

coffman was actually hitting moving targets for the most part. it was somewhat impressive. i hate his throwing motion but he's better than gregory was and gregory was one game and about ten batted passes away from winning the north last year.

ed note-please don't mistake this as me saying that coffman is good or that kstate is going to win the north.

[hemmy]

Reesing was also mobile and for the most part made good decisions.  Also, quicker release.

[CHONGS]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

[Dr Rick Daris]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

brandon harold!!! 

[hemmy]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

Didn't you read the "size of our offense" thread? jfc, tard.

[CHONGS]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

Didn't you read the "size of our offense" thread? jfc, tard.

I didn't realize the offense was the whole team, dumbass.  We have a ton of midgets out there that pull the avg waaay down.

[Dugout DickStone]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

ku

[jtksu]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

Which defense, the second stingers who gave up over 700 yards or the starters who gave up just over 100?

[stunz]

so what happens with slamur?  can he pretend to be lamark?

can he play safety?  shame to waste those measurables playing wr.  look at all the safeties that were taken in the draft!

[PowercatPat]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

Didn't you read the "size of our offense" thread? jfc, tard.

I didn't realize the offense was the whole team, dumbass.  We have a ton of midgets out there that pull the avg waaay down.

WTF are you talking about? Our offense is huge, and our defense is probable average or a little under average. I can't really think of anyone on our defense that is really undersized besides Hrebec.

[jtksu]

so what happens with slamur?  can he pretend to be lamark?

can he play safety?  shame to waste those measurables playing wr.  look at all the safeties that were taken in the draft!

I always said I though he would make a nice WR.  Maybe he's not as fast as I expected?  Seems like he could learn enough of the playbook to at least see the field in certain circumstances at WR.

[jtksu]

KSU cannot win the north with the defense I saw last night.

on a side note: I am willing to bet 100s of dollars KSU has the smallest (avg) team in a BCS conference.

Didn't you read the "size of our offense" thread? jfc, tard.

I didn't realize the offense was the whole team, dumbass.  We have a ton of midgets out there that pull the avg waaay down.

WTF are you talking about? Our offense is huge, and our defense is probable average or a little under average. I can't really think of anyone on our defense that is really undersized besides Hrebec.

That ginger is listed at 5'11", 250 lbs.  Not what I would call undersized.  Maybe a couple inches short, but not undersized.