Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 333487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40513
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2775 on: October 09, 2016, 04:50:17 PM »
i don't even know that it is lying.  does everyone not accept that a politician's expressed policy preferences are some amalgam of their own thoughts, party orthodoxy and the expressed will of the electorate?

i'm happy to see that she, at least at times, is willing to articulate thoughts more in line with my own than with her party's orthodoxy and the generally ignorant opinion of the unwashed masses.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20496
    • View Profile

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53261
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2777 on: October 09, 2016, 05:32:29 PM »
Link?  LOL, you dumbasses haven't seen the articles on Clinton's biggest contributors?  You been stoned or under a rock.


Meanwhile Hillary "we will bring them to heel" Clinton goes full Harrison, AR

Via WL:

 "The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half of a chance (Jews*, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks** and Roma***, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances. The biggest group of humanity can be found somewhere between these two extremes – the perennial overachievers and the professional never-do-wells.”

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64018
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2778 on: October 09, 2016, 05:34:20 PM »
I would like a point by point link as well please
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64018
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2779 on: October 09, 2016, 05:35:10 PM »
And no infowars sources dax, I know your games
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2780 on: October 09, 2016, 06:32:05 PM »
Link?  LOL, you dumbasses haven't seen the articles on Clinton's biggest contributors?  You been stoned or under a rock.


Meanwhile Hillary "we will bring them to heel" Clinton goes full Harrison, AR

Via WL:

 "The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half of a chance (Jews*, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks** and Roma***, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances. The biggest group of humanity can be found somewhere between these two extremes – the perennial overachievers and the professional never-do-wells.”

Who said this highly racist stuff?  Podesta or Hill
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44889
    • View Profile

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2782 on: October 09, 2016, 10:13:47 PM »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2783 on: October 09, 2016, 10:38:19 PM »
Link?  LOL, you dumbasses haven't seen the articles on Clinton's biggest contributors?  You been stoned or under a rock.


Meanwhile Hillary "we will bring them to heel" Clinton goes full Harrison, AR

Via WL:

 "The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half of a chance (Jews*, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks** and Roma***, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances. The biggest group of humanity can be found somewhere between these two extremes – the perennial overachievers and the professional never-do-wells.”

Who said this highly racist stuff?  Podesta or Hill
You should read outliers.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2784 on: October 09, 2016, 10:42:16 PM »
Russian hackers said all that, truat Her
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3441
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2785 on: October 10, 2016, 02:54:09 AM »
It's like the resident 'pubs are so knee-deep in this crap that they can't see the writing on the wall. It's just rough ridin' insane, really.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53261
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2786 on: October 10, 2016, 06:50:56 AM »
I read Hillary's emails and I see her male doppelgänger





Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53261
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2787 on: October 10, 2016, 06:59:11 AM »
Gosh, more proof that Hillary is a pandering fraud, no one but Hilbots are surprised. 

Sadly, Bernie has sold out to the machine. 

http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-emails-clinton-private-speech-trade-2016-10

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2788 on: October 10, 2016, 07:18:39 AM »
Does 2+2 still equal 4? Let me get my calculator.

Just checked. 2+2 does still equal 4. Good.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2789 on: October 10, 2016, 08:47:57 AM »
Saintly virtue is the standard Hillary is trying to establish to be President. Kennedy, Nixon, Johnson, Clinton B would not be president if they were held to Hillary's standards.  I hear no apologies from Hillary about the damage Obamahillary policies have hurt millions.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7636
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2791 on: October 10, 2016, 04:57:10 PM »
:surprised:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/785529594778615813

If you read through the whole chain, that must have been the time when they were trying to make the foundation a legit looking charity.


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2793 on: October 10, 2016, 11:12:10 PM »
10 internet points for whoever guesses the nefarious foreign government the dnc accuses okeefe of being affiliated with.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2794 on: October 10, 2016, 11:32:53 PM »
I have a good feeling about indictment this time around, guys.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40513
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2795 on: October 10, 2016, 11:44:27 PM »
what are the chances that whoever loses this election is imprisoned within the next year?  it's not zero.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64018
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2796 on: October 10, 2016, 11:46:01 PM »
what are the chances that whoever loses this election is imprisoned within the next year?  it's not zero.

Trial maybe, but the justice system isn't fast enough for conviction
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40513
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2797 on: October 10, 2016, 11:48:43 PM »
trial should count, as long as they eventually end up imprisoned.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64018
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2799 on: October 11, 2016, 08:06:49 AM »
Yes, and the acorn guy. This is going to be underwhelming
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite