0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 07, 2014, 01:20:40 AMQuote from: Benja on December 07, 2014, 01:17:08 AMOne stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.You really think we were two more players from being 11-1? Because I feel like we were closer to 7-5We weren't anywhere near 7-5... Maybe 8-4 because the OU game was close af and we had a top 20 SEC team in the OOC, but otherwise we just destroyed everybody else we played that we didn't lose to.Auburn and Baylor were winnable games with a few breaks/bounces, or if we had a couple more legitimate studs. How close do you think this team would be to 11-1 if Arthur Brown Jr on the defense and Daniel Thomas in the backfield?
Quote from: Benja on December 07, 2014, 01:17:08 AMOne stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.You really think we were two more players from being 11-1? Because I feel like we were closer to 7-5
One stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on December 07, 2014, 05:03:09 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 07, 2014, 01:20:40 AMQuote from: Benja on December 07, 2014, 01:17:08 AMOne stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.You really think we were two more players from being 11-1? Because I feel like we were closer to 7-5We weren't anywhere near 7-5... Maybe 8-4 because the OU game was close af and we had a top 20 SEC team in the OOC, but otherwise we just destroyed everybody else we played that we didn't lose to.Auburn and Baylor were winnable games with a few breaks/bounces, or if we had a couple more legitimate studs. How close do you think this team would be to 11-1 if Arthur Brown Jr on the defense and Daniel Thomas in the backfield?Without Lockett we lose to Iowa State and Oklahoma. That's pretty damn close to 7-5.
Quote from: MixBerryCrunch on December 07, 2014, 05:12:19 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on December 07, 2014, 05:03:09 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 07, 2014, 01:20:40 AMQuote from: Benja on December 07, 2014, 01:17:08 AMOne stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.You really think we were two more players from being 11-1? Because I feel like we were closer to 7-5We weren't anywhere near 7-5... Maybe 8-4 because the OU game was close af and we had a top 20 SEC team in the OOC, but otherwise we just destroyed everybody else we played that we didn't lose to.Auburn and Baylor were winnable games with a few breaks/bounces, or if we had a couple more legitimate studs. How close do you think this team would be to 11-1 if Arthur Brown Jr on the defense and Daniel Thomas in the backfield?Without Lockett we lose to Iowa State and Oklahoma. That's pretty damn close to 7-5. Goodness these arguments are dumb either way, BBSing or not. With the players we did have we went 9-3 and 7-2. We competed for a conference title up until the final game of the season. We were in the CFB playoff discussion much of the season. And we finished the regular season as one of the top 11 college football teams in the country. In other words we had a damn good season. If I ever reach the point where a season like this isn't good enough I hope someone slaps me in the face.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on December 07, 2014, 05:19:47 PMQuote from: MixBerryCrunch on December 07, 2014, 05:12:19 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on December 07, 2014, 05:03:09 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 07, 2014, 01:20:40 AMQuote from: Benja on December 07, 2014, 01:17:08 AMOne stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.You really think we were two more players from being 11-1? Because I feel like we were closer to 7-5We weren't anywhere near 7-5... Maybe 8-4 because the OU game was close af and we had a top 20 SEC team in the OOC, but otherwise we just destroyed everybody else we played that we didn't lose to.Auburn and Baylor were winnable games with a few breaks/bounces, or if we had a couple more legitimate studs. How close do you think this team would be to 11-1 if Arthur Brown Jr on the defense and Daniel Thomas in the backfield?Without Lockett we lose to Iowa State and Oklahoma. That's pretty damn close to 7-5. Goodness these arguments are dumb either way, BBSing or not. With the players we did have we went 9-3 and 7-2. We competed for a conference title up until the final game of the season. We were in the CFB playoff discussion much of the season. And we finished the regular season as one of the top 11 college football teams in the country. In other words we had a damn good season. If I ever reach the point where a season like this isn't good enough I hope someone slaps me in the face.someone should slap you in the face right now _fan
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 07, 2014, 12:06:28 AMQuote from: MixBerryCrunch on December 06, 2014, 10:24:43 PM6-6 without Lockett...I'm really scared about next year.I think we will be better.Why?
Quote from: MixBerryCrunch on December 06, 2014, 10:24:43 PM6-6 without Lockett...I'm really scared about next year.I think we will be better.
6-6 without Lockett...I'm really scared about next year.
I just appreciate everybody's efforts to meltdown over a 9-3 season when most everybody predicted either 8-4 or 9-3... Good job, guys!!
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on December 07, 2014, 05:28:50 PMI just appreciate everybody's efforts to meltdown over a 9-3 season when most everybody predicted either 8-4 or 9-3... Good job, guys!! Not everbody's efforts, just a few slugs and want-a-bees that have something against LHCBS every since he has came back. We're looking at you MIR and Kimmy.
We have landed the best recruiting class in Bill 2.0 last year. We are currently on the verge of having a better one this year. I think we are progressing, I think we should be happy with the trend.
Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on December 07, 2014, 04:38:08 PMWe have landed the best recruiting class in Bill 2.0 last year. We are currently on the verge of having a better one this year. I think we are progressing, I think we should be happy with the trend.Let's pump the brakes on this. Matching the 2014 class will only be possible if we flip the Davis twins.
This team might have been the easiest team to judge its ceiling, like of all time. Interesting.
Quote from: GoodForAnother on December 07, 2014, 10:54:55 AM9-3 against this schedule at kansas state is nothing to be upset about at allThere are two completely different conversations happening here and I'm not sure if you guys are doing it intentionally or not. Did anyone say they are upset that we're 9-3?
9-3 against this schedule at kansas state is nothing to be upset about at all
For the last time, 9-3 isn't the problem, the fact that now its seems like this type of a season is a ceiling is.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on December 07, 2014, 05:19:47 PMQuote from: MixBerryCrunch on December 07, 2014, 05:12:19 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on December 07, 2014, 05:03:09 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 07, 2014, 01:20:40 AMQuote from: Benja on December 07, 2014, 01:17:08 AMOne stud; 9-3. I mean, LHCBS really is amazing. Three studs, possible national championship.You really think we were two more players from being 11-1? Because I feel like we were closer to 7-5We weren't anywhere near 7-5... Maybe 8-4 because the OU game was close af and we had a top 20 SEC team in the OOC, but otherwise we just destroyed everybody else we played that we didn't lose to.Auburn and Baylor were winnable games with a few breaks/bounces, or if we had a couple more legitimate studs. How close do you think this team would be to 11-1 if Arthur Brown Jr on the defense and Daniel Thomas in the backfield?Without Lockett we lose to Iowa State and Oklahoma. That's pretty damn close to 7-5. Goodness these arguments are dumb either way, BBSing or not. With the players we did have we went 9-3 and 7-2. We competed for a conference title up until the final game of the season. We were in the CFB playoff discussion much of the season. And we finished the regular season as one of the top 11 college football teams in the country. In other words we had a damn good season. If I ever reach the point where a season like this isn't good enough I hope someone slaps me in the face.I wish you would stop ignoring the larger point to pander to bottom level dummies you are smarter than. For the last time, 9-3 isn't the problem, the fact that now its seems like this type of a season is a ceiling is. Most people are incapable of understanding nuance and circumstance, you aren't so can we move past the 9-3 is always good stuff?
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 07, 2014, 10:08:22 PMFor the last time, 9-3 isn't the problem, the fact that now its seems like this type of a season is a ceiling is.Perhaps that's where the nuanced difference lies; I'm not willing to say that 9-3 is the ceiling, especially to say it is a "fact". There is no reason for me to believe that we couldn't have another 2014 type season in the next 5-10 years.