Author Topic: Crooked FBI Swamp, Strzok, Ohr, Mrs Ohr, ???  (Read 909 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4877
    • View Profile
Crooked FBI Swamp, Strzok, Ohr, Mrs Ohr, ???
« on: December 04, 2017, 08:33:55 PM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
« Last Edit: December 13, 2017, 06:58:09 AM by renocat »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2017, 08:42:31 PM »
Could we classify those texts as grossly negligent or just extremely careless?


Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19724
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2017, 06:05:59 AM »
Treason

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2017, 07:28:14 AM »
Treason

So grossly negligent in covering up for treason, or just extremely careless in covering up for treason?

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4877
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2017, 09:05:38 AM »
On "Fox & Friends," Kellyanne Conway said it's "disturbing and troubling" that an expert at the heart of the Clinton probe was "decidedly, definitively anti-Trump."

"We know that she lied numerous times, we know that she 'BleachBit-ed' and deleted 33,000 emails, we know that a majority of Americans in all polling say that she was neither honest nor trustworthy," Conway said. "You do hear people constantly asking, 'When will she be held to account?'"

"This is what frustrates people," Conway continued. "It’s very frustrating to many law-abiding Americans who look up and always see a double standard, always see special exceptions for Hillary Clinton."

Online libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 42904
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2017, 09:12:11 AM »
Conway is not very self aware
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2017, 09:20:34 AM »
Grossly unaware or just carelessly unaware?

Online catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4716
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2017, 09:38:44 AM »
Grossly.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4877
    • View Profile

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8407
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2017, 01:38:46 PM »
As Dems try their best to ensnare Trump with a genuine obstruction of justice charge premised on a phony Russian collusion scandal, we are reminded what a real scandal looks like. When the news first broke, weeks ago, that Comey revised his Clinton exoneration memo from grossly negligent to extremely careless - which had direct legal consequences - I wondered who was responsible for that key revision. And it turns out it was this partisan anti-Trump FBI agent. The swamp.

« Last Edit: December 05, 2017, 01:45:17 PM by K-S-U-Wildcats! »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 42904
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2017, 01:42:39 PM »
Dems  :curse:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2017, 05:02:24 PM »
Obstruction of justice?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15678
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2017, 09:29:22 PM »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2017, 04:38:13 PM »
It's really not good that such an openly (and angry) partisan investigator was engaged in this process.

Only lending more credence to the reality that Mueller's team is stacked with DNC'ers, Hillites and major Libs.

SMDH


Online libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 42904
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2017, 04:45:21 PM »
Needs more appardaxchiks
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4877
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #15 on: December 06, 2017, 08:32:20 PM »
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/06/over-10000-texts-between-ex-mueller-officials-found-after-discovery-anti-trump-messages.html

 Strzok is a focus of their efforts. House investigators have long regarded him as a key figure in the chain of events when the bureau, in 2016, received the infamous anti-Trump "dossier" and launched a counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling in the election that ultimately came to encompass FISA surveillance of a Trump campaign associate.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has sought documents and witnesses from the DOJ and FBI to determine what role, if any, the dossier played in the move to direct the surveillance.

Fox News has learned that Strzok also oversaw the bureau’s interviews with ousted National Security Advisor Michael Flynn – who pleaded guilty Friday to lying to FBI investigators in the Russia probe.

He also was present during the FBI’s July 2016 interview with Hillary Clinton at the close of the email investigation, shortly before then-FBI director James Comey called her actions “extremely careless” without recommending criminal charges.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2017, 08:36:52 PM by renocat »

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11743
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #16 on: December 06, 2017, 10:24:52 PM »
There are three congressional investigations into a threat to our democracy by a foreign power. Each is full of Republicans trying their best to muck things up.

In contrast, there were EIGHT congressional investigations of Benghazi.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #17 on: December 07, 2017, 06:18:41 AM »
There are three congressional investigations into a threat to our democracy by a foreign power. Each is full of Republicans trying their best to muck things up.

In contrast, there were EIGHT congressional investigations of Benghazi.

When a US ambassador is dead and they were engaged in smuggling arms with the CIA  and recruiting “freedom fighters” to ship off to another country to try and overthrow another government after inexplicably overthrowing the government of the country they were in.  There’s going to be congressional investigations. 

Particularly when the sitting administration blames the ambassadors death on a YouTube video. 

LOL if you don’t thing Dems weren’t losing their minds trying to stop everything related to Benghazi. 

A big shout out again to Obama and Hillary for giving AQ and ISIS more territory and bringing black slave trade back to the African continent. 

So far there’s no credible evidence that the Russians had any impact on the election outside of the millions in Russian dollars the Clinton’s laundered through their fake foundation to finance themselves as they took over the DNC.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11743
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #18 on: December 07, 2017, 06:41:47 AM »
Sounds like we agree 100% that Republicans are MUCH, MUCH better than Democrats at these bullshit political shenanigans like this one with Strzok.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #19 on: December 07, 2017, 09:59:36 AM »
Sounds like we agree 100% that Republicans are MUCH, MUCH better than Democrats at these bullshit political shenanigans like this one with Strzok.

If the roles were flipped and it came out the lead FBI investigator was a hardcore "Pub and clearly hated the Dem president, Libs would ratchet their usual state of permanent meltdown to 11.


Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11743
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #20 on: December 07, 2017, 12:14:30 PM »


Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11743
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #21 on: December 07, 2017, 12:55:46 PM »

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11743
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #22 on: December 07, 2017, 01:16:42 PM »

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15678
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #23 on: December 07, 2017, 01:31:50 PM »

Whataboutism the Hatch Act  :shakesfist:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22642
    • View Profile
Re: Strzok.
« Reply #24 on: December 07, 2017, 03:12:31 PM »
We're not talking about an FBI agents who hates people who launder money for drug dealers and says so openly.

We're talking about the lead investigator for Mueller having a clear and open bias bordering on a openly hostile state of mind relevant to the president.