Author Topic: teabonics  (Read 11936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2010, 10:35:15 AM »
"cracking wise"

lol
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20487
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #26 on: April 02, 2010, 11:02:57 AM »
I remember getting cussed out on old kstatefans when I posted after a war protest in '02/03 when a couple women basketballers (Wecker/Kane?) honked for the protest.

Blew minds.  (make fun of me now)

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19724
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #27 on: April 02, 2010, 11:14:30 AM »
wow.

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: teabonics
« Reply #28 on: April 02, 2010, 12:04:27 PM »
Tea Party people were in Omaha yesterday.  Drove by there gathering on the way home.  They have a bus that travels around having big parties or something where everyone holds up signs and yells.  I kind of don't get it because they are all on the same side and are holding up signs and yelling at each other the entire time but if that turns them on power to them.  My first experience with this stuff. 

You should have seen the Shenanigans by the anti-war protestors down on the Plaza.  You know back when there was a war to protest (I guess everything is cool now).  I almost hit those morons with my car a couple times, I guess they thought they had "right-of-way" in the middle of Broadway.  Totally oblivious, in more ways than one.

meh, I don't get worked up over either group.  a lot of people are naturally attracted to large gatherings and groupthink. 

Just pointing out how stupid it is to pick one person from a group of thousands, and then stereotyping the whole group based on that one person.  Of course if anyone cared to realize that Jon Stewart wouldn't have much of a show.

P.S.
I can't stand protesting in any form.  It's annoying, f's up traffic, and the people never pick up after themselves (including the so-called environmentalists)


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85294
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #29 on: April 02, 2010, 12:10:03 PM »
Tea Party people were in Omaha yesterday.  Drove by there gathering on the way home.  They have a bus that travels around having big parties or something where everyone holds up signs and yells.  I kind of don't get it because they are all on the same side and are holding up signs and yelling at each other the entire time but if that turns them on power to them.  My first experience with this stuff.  

You should have seen the Shenanigans by the anti-war protestors down on the Plaza.  You know back when there was a war to protest (I guess everything is cool now).  I almost hit those morons with my car a couple times, I guess they thought they had "right-of-way" in the middle of Broadway.  Totally oblivious, in more ways than one.

meh, I don't get worked up over either group.  a lot of people are naturally attracted to large gatherings and groupthink.  

Just pointing out how stupid it is to pick one person from a group of thousands, and then stereotyping the whole group based on that one person.  Of course if anyone cared to realize that Jon Stewart wouldn't have much of a show.

P.S.
I can't stand protesting in any form.  It's annoying, f's up traffic, and the people never pick up after themselves (including the so-called environmentalists)

It's like you tried not to go off on a crazy person rant but you couldn't help yourself and fell into it  :users:

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #30 on: April 02, 2010, 12:19:54 PM »
 :lol:

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29241
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #31 on: April 02, 2010, 01:00:27 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The rough ridin' rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.


Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7632
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #32 on: April 02, 2010, 02:47:57 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



Redneck/hillbilly!!!!!   :runaway:

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #33 on: April 02, 2010, 05:41:13 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20487
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #34 on: April 02, 2010, 06:10:49 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19424
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: teabonics
« Reply #35 on: April 02, 2010, 06:14:15 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.
Next you'll tell me that the USSR weren't really republics!  And that North Korea isn't Democratic at all!

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #36 on: April 02, 2010, 06:22:17 PM »
Not every group can get pre-printed astroturf signs for rent-a-mobs to hold.

 :confused:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #37 on: April 02, 2010, 06:27:08 PM »
I'm morbidly fascinated by their inability to spell socialism.

Thank you public education.

Or is it individual responsibility...  Hard to identify which ideology to apply at which time isn't it?

Lollers.  Thread over, KK wins again.
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline Goldbrick

  • American by birth, Republican by the grace of God
  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 226
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #38 on: April 02, 2010, 07:05:41 PM »
I'm morbidly fascinated by their inability to spell socialism.

Thank you public education.

Or is it individual responsibility...  Hard to identify which ideology to apply at which time isn't it?

Not really.

We have data that shows how badly our public education system is failing us.

Individual responsibility being diminished is an obvious result of increasing welfare and nanny states.

The left promotes placing our eggs in the government basket that fails us here and makes it easier to be a burden on society with no productivity or responsibility. People are flawed, they abuse systems, they abuse welfare, they demand socialistic programs to stay that way.

So a little of both, with the source of the problem stemming from the left's lack of thought.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2010, 09:54:55 PM by Goldbrick »

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20487
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #39 on: April 02, 2010, 09:55:21 PM »
I'm morbidly fascinated by their inability to spell socialism.

Thank you public education.

Or is it individual responsibility...  Hard to identify which ideology to apply at which time isn't it?

Not really.

We have data that shows how badly our public educations system is failing us.

Individual responsibility being diminished is an obvious result of increasing welfare and nanny states.

The left promotes placing our eggs in the government basket that fails us here and makes it easier to be a burden on society with no productivity or responsibility. People are flawed, they abuse systems, they abuse welfare, they demand socialistic programs to stay that way.

So a little of both, with the source of the problem stemming from the left's lack of thought.

By your logic, public education would be vastly improved by dropping mandatory attendance.  I guess it all goes back to first order values then doesn't it?

Offline Goldbrick

  • American by birth, Republican by the grace of God
  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 226
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #40 on: April 02, 2010, 10:06:28 PM »
I'm morbidly fascinated by their inability to spell socialism.

Thank you public education.

Or is it individual responsibility...  Hard to identify which ideology to apply at which time isn't it?

Not really.

We have data that shows how badly our public educations system is failing us.

Individual responsibility being diminished is an obvious result of increasing welfare and nanny states.

The left promotes placing our eggs in the government basket that fails us here and makes it easier to be a burden on society with no productivity or responsibility. People are flawed, they abuse systems, they abuse welfare, they demand socialistic programs to stay that way.

So a little of both, with the source of the problem stemming from the left's lack of thought.

By your logic, public education would be vastly improved by dropping mandatory attendance.  I guess it all goes back to first order values then doesn't it?

It goes back to people wishing to pursue self-interests. If a lack of a public education were to lead to certain failure, that would promote getting an education since success is dependent on it.

If people want to ditch school, perhaps they deserve next to nothing as a result of producing next to nothing.

Instead, we allow people that can work to not work and yet receive money from the government. People get incentives not to make too much for fear of higher taxes. People who are perfectly healthy will soon pay a large percentage of their income to cover junk food eating deadbeats who head to the doctor every other week.

I don't want people to fail, I wish everyone could be provided for. But it isn't practical. And it sets up a system of government in which there is no innovation and the productivity of the few is exploited for the others. If I know a safety net is below, why not go ahead and fall?

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #41 on: April 02, 2010, 10:36:17 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Prove it wrong.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #42 on: April 02, 2010, 11:42:08 PM »
I srsly don't understand why we all can't just enjoy stupid protesters of any stripe.  :dunno:
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20487
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #43 on: April 03, 2010, 07:08:36 AM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Prove it wrong.

The burden of proof is on the affirmative.

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #44 on: April 03, 2010, 08:13:20 AM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Prove it wrong.

The burden of proof is on the affirmative.

Nice cop out.


Disprove it then.


Nevermind, I'll do your work for you.  From the dictionary.

Quote
also Na·zi·ism (-s?-?z'?m)
n.
The ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy.


Quote
so·cial·ism
? ?/?so????l?z?m/ Show Spelled[soh-shuh-liz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.[the state]
2.
procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3.
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

As we all (should) know, marxism is internationalist, based on classes rather than nation-states.  That's internationalist.

Either way, its statism.  That old model of right and left are gone anyway.  Its big government vs small now.

btw...I hear there was a major bust of pirates in the Indian Ocean.  Lose any friends?

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22239
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #45 on: April 03, 2010, 03:52:56 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Prove it wrong.

The burden of proof is on the affirmative.

Nice cop out.


Disprove it then.


Nevermind, I'll do your work for you.  From the dictionary.

Quote
also Na·zi·ism (-s?-?z'?m)
n.
The ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy.


Quote
so·cial·ism
? ?/?so????l?z?m/ Show Spelled[soh-shuh-liz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.[the state]
2.
procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3.
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

As we all (should) know, marxism is internationalist, based on classes rather than nation-states.  That's internationalist.

Either way, its statism.  That old model of right and left are gone anyway.  Its big government vs small now.

btw...I hear there was a major bust of pirates in the Indian Ocean.  Lose any friends?

While that's all well and good (by 1941, Hitler himself admitted Marxist socialism and his national socialism was basically the same), no one associates Hitler with socialism in this day and age.  People driving by and seeing a hitler mustache on the president would make most people think "WTF...those people think Obama is anti-semitic?  Wierdos..."

That kind of thing discredits the entire group.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #46 on: April 03, 2010, 05:57:51 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Prove it wrong.

The burden of proof is on the affirmative.

Nice cop out.


Disprove it then.


Nevermind, I'll do your work for you.  From the dictionary.

Quote
also Na·zi·ism (-s?-?z'?m)
n.
The ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy.


Quote
so·cial·ism
? ?/?so????l?z?m/ Show Spelled[soh-shuh-liz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.[the state]
2.
procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3.
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

As we all (should) know, marxism is internationalist, based on classes rather than nation-states.  That's internationalist.

Either way, its statism.  That old model of right and left are gone anyway.  Its big government vs small now.

btw...I hear there was a major bust of pirates in the Indian Ocean.  Lose any friends?

While that's all well and good (by 1941, Hitler himself admitted Marxist socialism and his national socialism was basically the same), no one associates Hitler with socialism in this day and age.  People driving by and seeing a hitler mustache on the president would make most people think "WTF...those people think Obama is anti-semitic?  Wierdos..."

That kind of thing discredits the entire group.

Just because the viewer doesn't understand their history doesn't make the signholder wrong. 

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #47 on: April 03, 2010, 08:49:31 PM »
My absolute favorites are the ones where the Tea-Paty-types have the Obama pictures with swastikas or Hitler mustaches on Obama. 

The fracking rubes don't understand the difference between communism and fascism...let alone the meaning of socialism.  Christ, the absolute best part of it is what they are advocating is closer to flat-out fascism than the Democrats are to socialism.



fascism is a sort of nebulous term.  The signs in these cases refer to nazi-ism--a shortening of national socialism.  It really differed very little from marxian socialism except for one very distinct difference.  One was nationalist, the other was internationalist.  Either way, they were for massive expansion of the state, and cradle to grave "care," control of means of production, and one party oligarchic rule.

Just because they named their party "national socialist" party doesn't mean they were socialist.  Just because Jonah Goldberg has a thesis about this, doesn't mean that it is an established or accepted theory or historical fact.

Prove it wrong.

The burden of proof is on the affirmative.

Nice cop out.


Disprove it then.


Nevermind, I'll do your work for you.  From the dictionary.

Quote
also Na·zi·ism (-s?-?z'?m)
n.
The ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy.


Quote
so·cial·ism
? ?/?so????l?z?m/ Show Spelled[soh-shuh-liz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.[the state]
2.
procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3.
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

As we all (should) know, marxism is internationalist, based on classes rather than nation-states.  That's internationalist.

Either way, its statism.  That old model of right and left are gone anyway.  Its big government vs small now.

btw...I hear there was a major bust of pirates in the Indian Ocean.  Lose any friends?

While that's all well and good (by 1941, Hitler himself admitted Marxist socialism and his national socialism was basically the same), no one associates Hitler with socialism in this day and age.  People driving by and seeing a hitler mustache on the president would make most people think "WTF...those people think Obama is anti-semitic?  Wierdos..."

That kind of thing discredits the entire group.

Yeah, I hate to strike a blow for that side, but what you said discredits uneducated "people driving by."
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22239
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #48 on: April 03, 2010, 09:26:35 PM »
I understand what you guys are saying, but a Hitler mustache conjures up different ideas, rather than socialism.  It would be akin to throwing a turban and Bin Laden beard on Jerry Falwell and saying "Get it?  They're both fervent about religion!"


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: teabonics
« Reply #49 on: April 03, 2010, 11:18:41 PM »
Question for OK_cat. Are these people racists/hicks also?