Author Topic: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV  (Read 6912 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kstate4life

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 938
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2017, 04:04:30 PM »
Last time we had 3, 20+ scorers was THE Xavier game

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39139
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2017, 04:57:57 PM »
Dang we scored 91, and only 4 came from the bench

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2017, 10:13:56 PM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2017, 10:22:22 PM »
Similar analogy: “Yeah it’s great he pitched a 1 hit complete game, but I can you believe our closer didn’t throw a single strike?”

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30406
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2017, 10:45:52 PM »
we don't have a bench, you can't criticize something that doesn't exist.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39139
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2017, 11:08:22 PM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53784
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #31 on: December 31, 2017, 12:03:16 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Yeah except the bench played 66 minutes. Playing that much I an average paced game and scoring only 4 points is pretty remarkable when you consider how efficient the offense was. It's almost like you'd have to make an effort to not score in that many minutes.

Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39139
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #32 on: December 31, 2017, 01:53:37 AM »
I'm just saying it's crazy weird.

For example, other scores this weekend (bench points in parentheses):

WVU 85 (28)
OSU 77 (16)
TTU 77 (42)
KU 92 (13)
UT 86 (17)
OU 90 (30)
TCU 89 (34)

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #33 on: December 31, 2017, 04:44:42 AM »
I'm just saying it's crazy weird.

For example, other scores this weekend (bench points in parentheses):

WVU 85 (28)
OSU 77 (16)
TTU 77 (42)
KU 92 (13)
UT 86 (17)
OU 90 (30)
TCU 89 (34)

Our win was awesome and fun, but don't those parentheticals just prove that our bench was trash compared to every other team? 

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #34 on: December 31, 2017, 04:57:39 AM »
i did the math and according to my calculations the bench averages 17 points a game which isn't far off that list. scoring points is just one thing though, if they can dominate the play-hard chart that'd be great.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #35 on: December 31, 2017, 08:21:55 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

See above and below your post.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #36 on: December 31, 2017, 08:27:42 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

What about it says our bench is weak? You’d be melting down just as hard if we stopped feeding guys who were making a high % of shots. Again, we’re not talking about a game we won because of amazing defense or a lucky day against ISU. We scored 90+ points.

Why is it all of the sudden bad coaching to say, these dudes are doing a great job offensively, let’s keep going back to them.

How about this analogy: pretty great that Jordy Nelson caught 5 TDs for 200 yards, but sucks our other WRs only caught 3 passes. That sure shows we are in trouble.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39139
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #37 on: December 31, 2017, 08:52:56 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

See above and below your post.
Oh so you were just anticipating the criticism

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21915
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #38 on: December 31, 2017, 09:34:47 AM »
It's the WHO WILL _______ WHEN THE SENIORS GRADUATE!?!? time of year again.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30406
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #39 on: December 31, 2017, 09:40:19 AM »
I like that catastrophe is doubling down on his analogies. Can't wait to see if he pulls out a soccer analogy next.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53784
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #40 on: December 31, 2017, 09:52:54 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

What about it says our bench is weak? You’d be melting down just as hard if we stopped feeding guys who were making a high % of shots. Again, we’re not talking about a game we won because of amazing defense or a lucky day against ISU. We scored 90+ points.

Why is it all of the sudden bad coaching to say, these dudes are doing a great job offensively, let’s keep going back to them.

How about this analogy: pretty great that Jordy Nelson caught 5 TDs for 200 yards, but sucks our other WRs only caught 3 passes. That sure shows we are in trouble.

Are you really this dumb?

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #41 on: December 31, 2017, 11:03:19 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

See above and below your post.
Oh so you were just anticipating the criticism

I think there were some similar posts in other threads as well.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #42 on: December 31, 2017, 11:04:02 AM »
I like that catastrophe is doubling down on his analogies. Can't wait to see if he pulls out a soccer analogy next.

I’m not super proud of them tbh.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15221
    • View Profile
What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #43 on: December 31, 2017, 11:06:03 AM »
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

What about it says our bench is weak? You’d be melting down just as hard if we stopped feeding guys who were making a high % of shots. Again, we’re not talking about a game we won because of amazing defense or a lucky day against ISU. We scored 90+ points.

Why is it all of the sudden bad coaching to say, these dudes are doing a great job offensively, let’s keep going back to them.

How about this analogy: pretty great that Jordy Nelson caught 5 TDs for 200 yards, but sucks our other WRs only caught 3 passes. That sure shows we are in trouble.

Are you really this dumb?

Well I apparently so since I don’t give a crap how many points Joe Walkon scores when we put up 90. Guess I’m just the resident idiot of the South Carolina Gamecocks board. Maybe Brown should have been passing it more instead of driving into wide open lanes?

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #44 on: December 31, 2017, 02:56:41 PM »
we'll be fine with the bench as long as nobody gets injured. even if we had an above average bench, if one of the stud 4 goes down, we're probably just as screwed at getting a deep run.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53784
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #45 on: December 31, 2017, 02:58:05 PM »
we'll be fine with the bench as long as nobody gets injured. even if we had an above average bench, if one of the stud 4 goes down, we're probably just as screwed at getting a deep run.
The shitty bench makes the big four more likely to get injured

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #46 on: December 31, 2017, 03:03:44 PM »
Meh. Depth for us in basketball is probably similar to football. We need our main guys to stay healthy. I don't worry about guys getting "tired" either.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46489
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #47 on: December 31, 2017, 03:22:23 PM »
i fully expect for us to shoot 55% this season which is exactly why I think this team is good


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #48 on: December 31, 2017, 04:08:37 PM »
all the reaching to hate on this team is getting boring :zzz:

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30406
    • View Profile
Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
« Reply #49 on: December 31, 2017, 04:15:02 PM »
Meh. Depth for us in basketball is probably similar to football. We need our main guys to stay healthy. I don't worry about guys getting "tired" either.

seems incredibly unlikely to have all four guys be healthy the whole year, but i will give you that if they somehow do manage to avoid missing any time with one of the 4 guys to injury this team can be good. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best