Author Topic: Thread Outing Hillrod Supporters (Read 10796 times)

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #125 on:** June 14, 2016, 01:20:15 PM »

President Obama indicated in his SOU that he supports our troops, therefore he sponsored the Iraq war. Bernie sanders wants help for our vets, therefore he supported the Iraq war.

chuckjames · « **Reply #126 on:** June 14, 2016, 02:56:54 PM »

I can't lie, after being called a party hack many times by Dax and FSD, which I am to certain extent. Watching them blindly defend Trump has been a sight to behold.

chum1 · « **Reply #127 on:** June 14, 2016, 03:32:24 PM »

Quote from: chuckjames on June 14, 2016, 02:56:54 PM

I can't lie, after being called a party hack many times by Dax and FSD, which I am to certain extent. Watching them blindly defend Trump has been a sight to behold.

Somehow, even renocat has been more levelheaded.

chuckjames · « **Reply #128 on:** June 14, 2016, 03:50:08 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on June 14, 2016, 03:32:24 PM

Quote from: chuckjames on June 14, 2016, 02:56:54 PM
I can't lie, after being called a party hack many times by Dax and FSD, which I am to certain extent. Watching them blindly defend Trump has been a sight to behold.

Somehow, even renocat has been more levelheaded.

It's shown Dax believes words don't have meanings.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #129 on:** June 14, 2016, 07:18:48 PM »

Never said that , but they have less meaning then action. It takes a certain kind of stupid to say campaign trail rhetoric and actual executed US policy are the same thing.

michigancat · « **Reply #130 on:** June 14, 2016, 07:25:48 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on June 14, 2016, 07:18:48 PM

Never said that , but they have less meaning then action. It takes a certain kind of stupid to say campaign trail rhetoric and actual executed US policy are the same thing.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #131 on:** June 14, 2016, 07:34:09 PM »

This is a fascinating study. So let's see, what Trump says on the campaign trail is exactly what he's going to do in the White House. Yet, Obama has broken so many of his campaign promises the list is too long to go through. Yet when that is brought up, the resident ProgLibs are all like, "well ya see, ya know, umm, that was just the campaign, EVERYBODY knows politicians will say whatever it takes to get elected, particularly when they're trying to appeal to their base . . . ya see."

It seems the "Oh,, but I don't really like Hillary . . . but I will defend her again and again" crowd in residence just hates the fact that the Dem front runner is a huge Neo-Con, but they hate the fact that Trump talks about maybe being a huge Neo-Con even more.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #132 on:** June 14, 2016, 10:26:52 PM »

The libtards will do whatever the Democrat party tells them to do. They do not give a crap how dishonest and hypocritical the positions they take are. They are very stupid people.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #133 on:** June 14, 2016, 11:27:00 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on June 14, 2016, 07:34:09 PM

It seems the "Oh,, but I don't really like Hillary . . . but I will defend her again and again" crowd in residence just hates the fact that the Dem front runner is a huge Neo-Con, but they hate the fact that Trump talks about maybe being a huge Neo-Con even more.

I think you are starting to get it! I don't like Hillary's past foreign policy and her stated policy positions during this campaign, I have listened to Trump's stated policy positions and think that once in power his decisions would be worse. Its almost like I'm a voter trying to inform myself about which candidate I would prefer to win.

michigancat · « **Reply #134 on:** June 14, 2016, 11:28:32 PM »

for all we know Trump is a muslim-loving dove who wants to take our guns

Trim · « **Reply #135 on:** June 14, 2016, 11:44:39 PM »

This is why we need more of my "teams" idea I posted somewhere in this pit months ago. Candidates should be required to have a lot of their teams lined up as far as who'd be assigned to do what should they win, with those people being under as much scrutiny as the candidates themselves. It'd be a lot easier to gauge how their reigns would go if it's known who'd actually be trying to get crap done. Hell, maybe Trump could prove himself completely qualified if he lined up an executive branch dream team and made it clear he'd just be a lol face of the operation.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #136 on:** June 14, 2016, 11:49:58 PM »

Nice job of ignoring the first part of my post KK. Just admit your pulling the lever for the known commodity that was, is and will always be a war loving Neo-Con.

Trim · « **Reply #137 on:** June 14, 2016, 11:53:15 PM »

I don't think Trump will or could do hardly anything he's talked about.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #138 on:** August 03, 2016, 11:23:10 PM »

Just skimming some threads, we've got some die hard hillbottards:

SkinnyBenny
Lib7 (duh, what a tool)
TreySolid (lol)

MakeItRain · « **Reply #139 on:** August 03, 2016, 11:31:15 PM »

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #140 on:** August 04, 2016, 05:42:59 AM »

Hillary hits consistent 1 .75% GDP growth she'll blow O out of the water in that regard, but leading indicators are she'll walk into a recession right out of the gate.

Meanwhile foreign governments continue to dump US debt at an accelerating pace.

michigancat · « **Reply #141 on:** August 04, 2016, 06:30:46 AM »

I'm going to vote for Hilary. Mostly because she's a woman.

treysolid · « **Reply #142 on:** August 04, 2016, 07:47:41 AM »

FSD, I think you meant to say (((treysolid)))

(also, neither the t nor the s are capitalized)

Canary · « **Reply #143 on:** August 04, 2016, 08:46:30 AM »

Quote from: Kat Kid on June 14, 2016, 11:27:00 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on June 14, 2016, 07:34:09 PM
It seems the "Oh,, but I don't really like Hillary . . . but I will defend her again and again" crowd in residence just hates the fact that the Dem front runner is a huge Neo-Con, but they hate the fact that Trump talks about maybe being a huge Neo-Con even more.

I think you are starting to get it! I don't like Hillary's past foreign policy and her stated policy positions during this campaign, I have listened to Trump's stated policy positions and think that once in power his decisions would be worse. Its almost like I'm a voter trying to inform myself about which candidate I would prefer to win.

I am still trying to figure out exactly what Trump's policy positions are. I haven't heard enough for me to see a plan or course of action. I am not a Hillary defender, but at least she has put a platform out there that thinking people can either support or disagree with.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #144 on:** August 04, 2016, 09:29:58 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on August 04, 2016, 06:30:46 AM

I'm going to vote for Hilary. Mostly because she's a woman.

did you vote for Palin?

gatoveintisiete · « **Reply #145 on:** August 04, 2016, 09:59:16 AM »

Quote from: Canary on August 04, 2016, 08:46:30 AM

Quote from: Kat Kid on June 14, 2016, 11:27:00 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on June 14, 2016, 07:34:09 PM
It seems the "Oh,, but I don't really like Hillary . . . but I will defend her again and again" crowd in residence just hates the fact that the Dem front runner is a huge Neo-Con, but they hate the fact that Trump talks about maybe being a huge Neo-Con even more.

I think you are starting to get it! I don't like Hillary's past foreign policy and her stated policy positions during this campaign, I have listened to Trump's stated policy positions and think that once in power his decisions would be worse. Its almost like I'm a voter trying to inform myself about which candidate I would prefer to win.
I am still trying to figure out exactly what Trump's policy positions are. I haven't heard enough for me to see a plan or course of action. I am not a Hillary defender, but at least she has put a platform out there that thinking people can either support or disagree with.

They are on his website

michigancat · « **Reply #146 on:** August 04, 2016, 10:03:23 AM »

Quote from: Cartierfor3 on August 04, 2016, 09:29:58 AM

Quote from: michigancat on August 04, 2016, 06:30:46 AM
I'm going to vote for Hilary. Mostly because she's a woman.

did you vote for Palin?

No, but she wasn't running for president and I had no issues with her opponent's policies. I don't particularly care for Hillary's stance on foreign policy especially and would normally vote for a third party in this type of election, but the fact that she's a woman plus the risk of Trump getting elected flipped me.

sys · « **Reply #147 on:** August 04, 2016, 10:11:08 AM »

i'm still hillrodding for now, but if trump keeps rough ridin' over his campaign to the point where it's no longer nationally competitive, i'll hop onto johnson and ride him to the finish.

sys · « **Reply #148 on:** August 04, 2016, 10:26:02 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on August 04, 2016, 06:30:46 AM

I'm going to vote for Hilary. Mostly because she's a woman.

you said you were voting for stein earlier, who is also a woman, so i'm not sure if i believe that switching to hillrod is based on her sex.

michigancat · « **Reply #149 on:** August 04, 2016, 10:36:27 AM »

Quote from: sys on August 04, 2016, 10:26:02 AM

Quote from: michigancat on August 04, 2016, 06:30:46 AM
I'm going to vote for Hilary. Mostly because she's a woman.

you said you were voting for stein earlier, who is also a woman, so i'm not sure if i believe that switching to hillrod is based on her sex.

Trump definitely had a big impact. Plus she has a chance, which also makes a difference relative to Stein.