There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.
Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?
I dont know, you fucktards dont seem to care that hillary clinton kept national security information on a toilet server and then repeatedly lied about while destroying some of the contents. That's a helluva lot more concerning in real life.
Yes. That's bad. The practice of using private email should never been allowed to happen by her or past officials. Tech staffers should be there coaching officials on this stuff... The officials doing this obviously aren't t savvy enough to know all the tech risks.
Uh Tech staffers tried to stop what Hillary was doing and were silenced. The women simply doesn't believe the rules/laws apply to her and she knew she and her husband would be selling influence across the globe among other things.
You've made this mistake a few times before, so allow me to help you out since it's obviously not just a typo:
woman=one adult female
women=two or more adult females
There you go, that one's on the house. You may now return to your regularly scheduled tinfoil hatting.
Yes SBmeltdown a typeO on tapatalk, the horror.
I also admit to mis-speaking, when numerous rank and filers at State brought up that was against like, oh, a bajillion rules to use outside servers, and nongov't issued and managed domains, they were told to STFU. DOS IT Security never approved the use of outside email and not only was there little or no direct security on the servers, anti virus and malware was turned off most of the time potentially allowing for an easy backdoor directly into the DOS systems.
Never thought SBmeltdown would be so for corruption.
I
