The Trump Candidacy

[chum1]

There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.

Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?

[wetwillie]

Lock him up

[ChiComCat]

It's a stupid statement but not a crime by any means.  Not that I buy into the usual MSM bullshit but the media feels Trump will attack the first amendment and some of the less reputable press is responding.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Trump says her deleted emails were national secrets or confidential. He hopes a foreign power has said emails or can find them. I don't think risking national security to win a political barb is something many Americans are okay with....but he was making a joke.... So it's okay.

Are you Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). In your mind trump is the one risking national security. Democrats are so rough ridin' stupid

I

Hillary also risked national security with her email server.... A practice not started by her. All of these things are bad. Only dumbasses here are the ones defending Trump because "lol its okay he said it was a joke"

There no national security implication from trump saying he hopes the russians turn over her emails if they have them. You are a delusional Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

[Institutional Control]

The guys says so many things that are stupid and are not jokes, it's a waste of time and outrage to be bothered by something that any reasonable person knows is a joke.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.

Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?

I dont know, you fucktards dont seem to care that hillary clinton kept national security information on a toilet server and then repeatedly lied about while destroying some of the contents. That's a helluva lot more concerning in real life.

[Phil Titola]

It's a stupid statement but not a crime by any means.  Not that I buy into the usual MSM bullshit but the media feels Trump will attack the first amendment and some of the less reputable press is responding.

Yeah I don't think a possible crime is what bothers people, is that a person running for president openly hopes a foreign power has a high ranking officials emails (that he thinks are sensitive).... Rooting for America to possibly be exposed just to win a political fight isn't rooting for America first.... That's what is getting him blowback on that comment.

He just doesn't get the weight of his comments in the world on this stage. Will he learn? His past doesn't indicate he will.

Debates will be a shitshow for Trump

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Like, are you delusional whack-a-doodles really trying to pin the wikileaks hack job on trump? And you want to take it even further to say that he's acting in concert with the russian to make hillarys reckless behavior somehow more reckless, and that makes him somehow culpable for her recklessness?

[chum1]

Like, are you delusional whack-a-doodles really trying to pin the wikileaks hack job on trump? And you want to take it even further to say that he's acting in concert with the russian to make hillarys reckless behavior somehow more reckless, and that makes him somehow culpable for her recklessness?

Just continue to use your imagination about what other people are saying. You're doing a great job so far.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

It's a stupid statement but not a crime by any means.  Not that I buy into the usual MSM bullshit but the media feels Trump will attack the first amendment and some of the less reputable press is responding.

Yeah I don't think a possible crime is what bothers people, is that a person running for president openly hopes a foreign power has a high ranking officials emails (that he thinks are sensitive).... Rooting for America to possibly be exposed just to win a political fight isn't rooting for America first.... That's what is getting him blowback on that comment.

He just doesn't get the weight of his comments in the world on this stage. Will he learn? His past doesn't indicate he will.

Debates will be a shitshow for Trump

OMG, just stop. You sound like a rough ridin' idiot.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Like, are you delusional whack-a-doodles really trying to pin the wikileaks hack job on trump? And you want to take it even further to say that he's acting in concert with the russian to make hillarys reckless behavior somehow more reckless, and that makes him somehow culpable for her recklessness?

Just continue to use your imagination about what other people are saying. You're doing a great job so far.

 

You're backing these retards!

[Phil Titola]

There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.

Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?

I dont know, you fucktards dont seem to care that hillary clinton kept national security information on a toilet server and then repeatedly lied about while destroying some of the contents. That's a helluva lot more concerning in real life.

Yes. That's bad. The practice of using private email should never been allowed to happen by her or past officials. Tech staffers should be there coaching officials on this stuff... The officials doing this obviously aren't t savvy enough to know all the tech risks.

[Institutional Control]

Didn't W have an email controversy too?

[Phil Titola]

Like, are you delusional whack-a-doodles really trying to pin the wikileaks hack job on trump? And you want to take it even further to say that he's acting in concert with the russian to make hillarys reckless behavior somehow more reckless, and that makes him somehow culpable for her recklessness?

No... That's idiotic.

[chum1]

Like, are you delusional whack-a-doodles really trying to pin the wikileaks hack job on trump? And you want to take it even further to say that he's acting in concert with the russian to make hillarys reckless behavior somehow more reckless, and that makes him somehow culpable for her recklessness?

Just continue to use your imagination about what other people are saying. You're doing a great job so far.

 

You're backing these retards!

I admire your creative mind.

[ChiComCat]

I don't think he is working with Russia but I think Russia is actively trying to help him.  He has threatened to pull support of NATO, talked of recognizing Russia's occupation of Crimea, and would almost certainly hurt the US stock market.  It would be more surprising if Russia wasn't doing everything in their power to get him elected.

[chum1]

Russia tries to influence elections on the reg.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/russias-influence-in-western-elections/2016/04/08/b427602a-fcf1-11e5-886f-a037dba38301_story.html

[sonofdaxjones]

There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.

Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?

I dont know, you fucktards dont seem to care that hillary clinton kept national security information on a toilet server and then repeatedly lied about while destroying some of the contents. That's a helluva lot more concerning in real life.

Yes. That's bad. The practice of using private email should never been allowed to happen by her or past officials. Tech staffers should be there coaching officials on this stuff... The officials doing this obviously aren't t savvy enough to know all the tech risks.

Uh Tech staffers tried to stop what Hillary was doing and were silenced.   The women simply doesn't believe the rules/laws apply to her and she knew she and her husband would be selling influence across the globe among other things.

[SkinnyBenny]

There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.

Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?

I dont know, you fucktards dont seem to care that hillary clinton kept national security information on a toilet server and then repeatedly lied about while destroying some of the contents. That's a helluva lot more concerning in real life.

Yes. That's bad. The practice of using private email should never been allowed to happen by her or past officials. Tech staffers should be there coaching officials on this stuff... The officials doing this obviously aren't t savvy enough to know all the tech risks.

Uh Tech staffers tried to stop what Hillary was doing and were silenced.   The women simply doesn't believe the rules/laws apply to her and she knew she and her husband would be selling influence across the globe among other things.

You've made this mistake a few times before, so allow me to help you out since it's obviously not just a typo:

woman=one adult female
women=two or more adult females

There you go, that one's on the house. You may now return to your regularly scheduled tinfoil hatting.

[treysolid]

Trump says her deleted emails were national secrets or confidential. He hopes a foreign power has said emails or can find them. I don't think risking national security to win a political barb is something many Americans are okay with....but he was making a joke.... So it's okay.

Are you Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). In your mind trump is the one risking national security. Democrats are so rough ridin' stupid

I

Hillary also risked national security with her email server.... A practice not started by her. All of these things are bad. Only dumbasses here are the ones defending Trump because "lol its okay he said it was a joke"

There no national security implication from trump saying he hopes the russians turn over her emails if they have them. You are a delusional Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

except trump didn't say that. he didn't say "turn over the emails if you have them," he said "please find the emails." A request for a foreign nation to use their surveillance apparatus to hack his opposition.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

There are plenty of national security experts and advisors from both Republican and Democrat administrations that have denounced Trump's remark.

Like, yeah, for Trump, it's a joke. But for any other Presidential nominee in history, it's not. Why shouldn't Trump be subject to the same level of scrutiny that everyone else is?

I dont know, you fucktards dont seem to care that hillary clinton kept national security information on a toilet server and then repeatedly lied about while destroying some of the contents. That's a helluva lot more concerning in real life.

Yes. That's bad. The practice of using private email should never been allowed to happen by her or past officials. Tech staffers should be there coaching officials on this stuff... The officials doing this obviously aren't t savvy enough to know all the tech risks.

Are you rough ridin' kidding me? A tech issue?  How about exercising a modicum of common sense, or not deliberately circumventing the FOIA? How about not making up egregious lies and destroying evidence? You think this person is fit to be president?  Good grief.

[steve dave]

does it matter why putin wants trump as president or is it automatically bad that putin does?

[stunted]

Trump is so in your heads. Picking apart his joke tweet in hopes of finding some issue

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Let's not forget that russias involement in this is a unfounded allegation contrived by democrats, and the wikileaks released the emails. JA has refuted that phony allegation.

[treysolid]

does it matter why putin wants trump as president or is it automatically bad that putin does?

it depends. how closely to american interests do russian interests lie? my instincts tell me they are pretty far apart.