0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: renocat on September 19, 2014, 04:06:00 PMRegarding the Orman family picture, the dog children look happy. According to his bio no children; I don't trust a man who won't spawn. Also he had a company that sold energy effecient lighting, damn dim blue bulbs. Is this guy a prairie al gore?You're kidding about the bulbs right?
Regarding the Orman family picture, the dog children look happy. According to his bio no children; I don't trust a man who won't spawn. Also he had a company that sold energy effecient lighting, damn dim blue bulbs. Is this guy a prairie al gore?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 20, 2014, 01:36:46 PMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 20, 2014, 09:27:15 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:33:44 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:26:48 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:13:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:08:52 AMQuestion: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?Yes, I disagree. If a candidate doesn't want to be on the ballot, he should be able to withdraw. There is nothing dirty about this.The law doesn't allow you to withdraw for "not wanting to be on the ballot." You can onloy withdraw if you are "incapable of serving." Do you understand the definitional difference between "can't" and "I don't wanna"? Now I'll ask you again, do you think Taylor told the truth when he said he was "incapable of serving if elected"? If so, what do you think changed?He lost interest, I guess. Does it really matter if he was telling the truth?I would guess perjury is not something lawyers should be engaged in. If Taylor is capable of serving, and a court has now ruled he swore under oath he is not, he has committed perjury.I didn't even see where the court questioned Taylor.They didn't, and the letter is not a sworn statement, so he didn't perjure himself. He did lie to the legal system, which is blatantly unethical, but he'll never be called out for that, just like the justices chose not to call him out for his lie. Instead, they aided him in his lie. That's the part that's so infuriating. It's just another example of how the government no longer has any sense of justice or right and wrong - the government only cares about government, and the liberal expansion of more government.
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 20, 2014, 09:27:15 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:33:44 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:26:48 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:13:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:08:52 AMQuestion: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?Yes, I disagree. If a candidate doesn't want to be on the ballot, he should be able to withdraw. There is nothing dirty about this.The law doesn't allow you to withdraw for "not wanting to be on the ballot." You can onloy withdraw if you are "incapable of serving." Do you understand the definitional difference between "can't" and "I don't wanna"? Now I'll ask you again, do you think Taylor told the truth when he said he was "incapable of serving if elected"? If so, what do you think changed?He lost interest, I guess. Does it really matter if he was telling the truth?I would guess perjury is not something lawyers should be engaged in. If Taylor is capable of serving, and a court has now ruled he swore under oath he is not, he has committed perjury.I didn't even see where the court questioned Taylor.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:33:44 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:26:48 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:13:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:08:52 AMQuestion: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?Yes, I disagree. If a candidate doesn't want to be on the ballot, he should be able to withdraw. There is nothing dirty about this.The law doesn't allow you to withdraw for "not wanting to be on the ballot." You can onloy withdraw if you are "incapable of serving." Do you understand the definitional difference between "can't" and "I don't wanna"? Now I'll ask you again, do you think Taylor told the truth when he said he was "incapable of serving if elected"? If so, what do you think changed?He lost interest, I guess. Does it really matter if he was telling the truth?I would guess perjury is not something lawyers should be engaged in. If Taylor is capable of serving, and a court has now ruled he swore under oath he is not, he has committed perjury.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:26:48 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:13:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:08:52 AMQuestion: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?Yes, I disagree. If a candidate doesn't want to be on the ballot, he should be able to withdraw. There is nothing dirty about this.The law doesn't allow you to withdraw for "not wanting to be on the ballot." You can onloy withdraw if you are "incapable of serving." Do you understand the definitional difference between "can't" and "I don't wanna"? Now I'll ask you again, do you think Taylor told the truth when he said he was "incapable of serving if elected"? If so, what do you think changed?He lost interest, I guess. Does it really matter if he was telling the truth?
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on September 19, 2014, 10:13:26 AMQuote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:08:52 AMQuestion: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?Yes, I disagree. If a candidate doesn't want to be on the ballot, he should be able to withdraw. There is nothing dirty about this.The law doesn't allow you to withdraw for "not wanting to be on the ballot." You can onloy withdraw if you are "incapable of serving." Do you understand the definitional difference between "can't" and "I don't wanna"? Now I'll ask you again, do you think Taylor told the truth when he said he was "incapable of serving if elected"? If so, what do you think changed?
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 19, 2014, 10:08:52 AMQuestion: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?Yes, I disagree. If a candidate doesn't want to be on the ballot, he should be able to withdraw. There is nothing dirty about this.
Question: Do you disagree that this is a dirty trick? Do you actually think that Taylor honestly is incable of serving?
Get this, guys. Lawrence Liberal Paul Davis went to a strip club near Coffeeville during the 90s. What a loser.
He had to lay on the floor of the champagne room
I am seeing on the news that some absentee ballots still have Taylor's name on them and some don't have the correct date that they need to be returned by. What a joke. Kobach has one of the easiest jobs on planet earth and he can't get it right.
“You may vote using the ballot accompanying this letter as soon as you receive it, or you may wait to vote until you’ve received further notification from us,” Kobach told overseas voters. His disclaimer added, “If a replacement ballot is sent to you, and you have already returned the ballot that accompanies this letter, only your replacement ballot will be counted.”
Except for you overseas kansas voters, all 642 of you, you get yours from kobach himself.
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 23, 2014, 07:40:48 PMExcept for you overseas kansas voters, all 642 of you, you get yours from kobach himself.Yep. You get a ballot that may or may not count, pending further notice. Thank you for your service.
If only the man whose only role is to get people driver's licenses and print ballots would stop trying to interpret a law that the Supreme Court has already interpreted for him . . .
