Author Topic: 3-6-16 K-State Player Per 100 Ratings and Team ADV Stats (Read 14122 times)

kso_FAN · « **Reply #75 on:** January 13, 2016, 01:50:32 PM »

Here is a massive season by season comparison chart going back to 03.

Cire · « **Reply #76 on:** January 13, 2016, 01:59:03 PM »

Good news for The Flush
Christ, beas was a rebounding machine

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kso_FAN · « **Reply #77 on:** January 13, 2016, 02:14:24 PM »

Top 20 per 100s in each category since 2003.

dal9 · « **Reply #78 on:** January 13, 2016, 03:20:49 PM »

Good job Carlbre!

Also, that Hurt DREB stat is hard to believe...maybe last night's game is affecting me too much

kso_FAN · « **Reply #79 on:** January 14, 2016, 10:56:40 AM »

Season/Big 12 animated box score with advanced stats.

2nd half 3 PT shooting and defense must get better in Big 12 play, which is a flip from what we did most of the OOC schedule.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #80 on:** January 18, 2016, 11:21:21 AM »

Animated Season/Big 12 per 100s:

Animated Season/Big 12 advanced box score:

kso_FAN · « **Reply #81 on:** January 21, 2016, 12:40:49 PM »

Big 12 only per 100s.

The first thing that sticks out is scoring. You've simply got to have more guys that can score and produce at a higher rate than what we have. Someone playing significant minutes has to step and be score in the high 20s/low 30s per 100 possessions and we don't have.

Wade seems to have hit is freshman funk. He's doing work on the boards, but he isn't hitting shots at all right now.

Big 12 only advanced box score.

A bad shooting team has to consistently win TOs, oboards, and get to the FT line. In Big 12 play 2nd half defense has been a major downfall as well.

sys · « **Reply #82 on:** January 21, 2016, 05:19:02 PM »

33.9. it just keeps creeping up. we need to turn that trend around starting saturday.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #83 on:** January 25, 2016, 12:52:28 PM »

Season per 100s.

3PT shooting has improved the last couple of a games and the Cats now have 4 shooters at 30% or better.

The Cats need at least a couple of guys to step up and be 25+ per 100 scorers if this team has any shot at approaching .500 in the Big 12.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #84 on:** January 28, 2016, 09:40:34 AM »

Big 12 only update:

Pretty much the numbers of a bottom 1/3, 2-6 team. Nothing stands out on the page except Edward's steal rate. Pretty much everything must improve, but especially scoring/shooting if this team wants to get to 7 or 8 conference wins and push .500.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #85 on:** February 02, 2016, 02:04:53 PM »

A real lack of players that can "score the ball". The only team of those I've charted with no player that scores at least 25 pts per 100 or better.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #86 on:** February 04, 2016, 09:37:27 AM »

Individual and team stats, Big 12 only.

BrokenSky1113 · « **Reply #87 on:** February 04, 2016, 12:31:30 PM »

Edwards is off a cliff for the second straight year. I have no idea what happens to him. He can vanish in games like Houdini

kso_FAN · « **Reply #88 on:** February 04, 2016, 12:37:37 PM »

Quote from: BrokenSky1113 on February 04, 2016, 12:31:30 PM

Edwards is off a cliff for the second straight year. I have no idea what happens to him. He can vanish in games like Houdini

He's decent at a lot of things, but not really great at anything (maybe steals). K-State needed him (or Wes) to perform at an all league level (1st/2nd team) with the turnover from last year and he just isn't good enough to do that.

sys · « **Reply #89 on:** February 04, 2016, 01:06:31 PM »

so, stokes is out for the season, it sounds like? statistically, he looks completely replaceable, but presumably he was getting minutes for a reason. will make it that much tougher to stay in the top 50.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #90 on:** February 04, 2016, 01:08:23 PM »

Quote from: sys on February 04, 2016, 01:06:31 PM

so, stokes is out for the season, it sounds like? statistically, he looks completely replaceable, but presumably he was getting minutes for a reason. will make it that much tougher to stay in the top 50.

Carlbe will have to step up among others. He missed like 3 point blank shots last night, plus he can't shoot 3s.

So yeah.

BrokenSky1113 · « **Reply #91 on:** February 04, 2016, 01:10:43 PM »

Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on February 04, 2016, 12:37:37 PM

Quote from: BrokenSky1113 on February 04, 2016, 12:31:30 PM
Edwards is off a cliff for the second straight year. I have no idea what happens to him. He can vanish in games like Houdini

He's decent at a lot of things, but not really great at anything (maybe steals). K-State needed him (or Wes) to perform at an all league level (1st/2nd team) with the turnover from last year and he just isn't good enough to do that.

I totally agree. But if he could at least stay at the all-around B- level he was showing in the non-con, where he was 1st or second on the team in most categories. I expected the numbers to go down in the big 12, but he has become the 5-6 place guy for us in those same categories.
And when you watch him play, he just seems waaaaayyyy more tentative.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #92 on:** February 04, 2016, 01:13:45 PM »

Quote from: BrokenSky1113 on February 04, 2016, 01:10:43 PM

Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on February 04, 2016, 12:37:37 PM
Quote from: BrokenSky1113 on February 04, 2016, 12:31:30 PM
Edwards is off a cliff for the second straight year. I have no idea what happens to him. He can vanish in games like Houdini

He's decent at a lot of things, but not really great at anything (maybe steals). K-State needed him (or Wes) to perform at an all league level (1st/2nd team) with the turnover from last year and he just isn't good enough to do that.

I totally agree. But if he could at least stay at the all-around B- level he was showing in the non-con, where he was 1st or second on the team in most categories. I expected the numbers to go down in the big 12, but he has become the 5-6 place guy for us in those same categories.
And when you watch him play, he just seems waaaaayyyy more tentative.

Yes, its been disappointing. I bought into how he played in the OOC.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #93 on:** February 07, 2016, 03:27:23 PM »

Updated season/Big 12 per 100 stats.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #94 on:** February 12, 2016, 01:03:01 PM »

You can make a strong case that our best player in Big 12 play is DJamer. Right now he's our best scorer, rebounder, and shot blocker.

sys · « **Reply #95 on:** February 12, 2016, 01:33:05 PM »

Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on February 12, 2016, 01:03:01 PM

You can make a strong case that our best player in Big 12 play is DJamer.

move to the fire oscar thread.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #96 on:** February 12, 2016, 01:44:37 PM »

Quote from: sys on February 12, 2016, 01:33:05 PM

Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on February 12, 2016, 01:03:01 PM
You can make a strong case that our best player in Big 12 play is DJamer.

move to the fire oscar thread.

Best rebounder. Best scorer. Best shot blocker. High 2PT% and FT rate. Decent in steals.

He's become a good player.

I do agree it says a lot about the state of the program though.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #97 on:** February 12, 2016, 10:08:38 PM »

DJamer....

Last 7 games, he has played just over half of the Poss ( or about 22 of every 40 min)....and Ave 11.6 pts and impressive 6.3 Reb. Shooting almost 60% and hitting 23-29 FT. Rock solid.

Cire · « **Reply #98 on:** February 12, 2016, 11:13:02 PM »

Yes and yes.

How does he compare to seibrandt

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

michigancat · « **Reply #99 on:** February 14, 2016, 10:36:00 AM »

Westicles should play the 4