Another school shooting

[SkinnyBenny]

FWIW, I would love it if all Americans were disarmed. Or maybe all the hardcore  butthurt gun nut weirdos get, like, one or two hunting guns to kill food with (and jerk off to) and one six-bullet handgun for protection (and also to jerk off to). Get caught with any more than that and it's a minimum 50-year sentence. Sorry, that's the price we have to pay for people walking into elementary schools and blowing off 25 5 year-olds' heads.

*edit* actually the only guns you get are muskets since that's what they had when the second amendment was written. Good news, though, is that I think muskets probably have wider barrels for gun nuts to insert their penises into for purposes of getting their rocks off at murder weapons.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

How about when demented children figure out how to drop bombs from drones.  Cheaper than missles.

No Constitutional right for either of those things

Drones are speech!

I'm sure a judge somewhere would agree, especially if its on fire.

[star seed 7]

Activist judges 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

*edit* actually the only guns you get are muskets since that's what they had when the second amendment was written. Good news, though, is that I think muskets probably have wider barrels for gun nuts to insert their penises into for purposes of getting their rocks off at murder weapons.

FWIW, under this scenario only white males would get to vote on stuff, and would get to keep slaves. So you're a weirdo

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Canons were invented at the time the bill of rights were adopted, so maybe the framers didn't intend for artillery (and by extension anti-aircraft) to be protected. 

The analogy might get in the way of the contrived dialogue being advocated against, so disregard as necessary

[wetwillie]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

[sys]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

no one cares about strangers that accidentally die, weirdo.  if you can't feel more virtuous and refined by rambling on about the lower classes masturbating to the thought of cars, what's the point?

[michigancat]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

Yeah no one cares about that, which is why we don't have speed limits or driver's licenses or DUI laws or safety standards and inspections for cars and no one is going to produce self driving cars that will be safer than human-operated ones. Boggles the mind.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

It's too bad we are at a complete stalemate between out and out gun grabbing and lawful possession of ICBMs. Meanwhile, murdering psychopaths are strolling to streets because some libtards were afraid of stygmatizing murdering psychopaths.

[gatoveintisiete]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

Yeah no one cares about that, which is why we don't have speed limits or driver's licenses or DUI laws or safety standards and inspections for cars and no one is going to produce self driving cars that will be safer than human-operated ones. Boggles the mind.

This doesn't go far enough, surely everyone would agree if  everybody would walk to their destination we could save 30,000 lives a year, if that kinda thing is important to ya.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Oh hello, batshit crazy

@wsj
Hillary Clinton calls NRA as stubborn as 'Iranians' or 'Communists' http://t.co/jsTxgvOwUS

This is what they (libtards) mean by "reasonable"

[michigancat]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

Yeah no one cares about that, which is why we don't have speed limits or driver's licenses or DUI laws or safety standards and inspections for cars and no one is going to produce self driving cars that will be safer than human-operated ones. Boggles the mind.

This doesn't go far enough, surely everyone would agree if  everybody would walk to their destination we could save 30,000 lives a year, if that kinda thing is important to ya.

That seems like it would be disastrous to the economy. Maybe start with better public transit and more funding for auto safety research.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Oregon has background checks, gun show and assault weapon restrictions. Fyi

[wetwillie]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

Yeah no one cares about that, which is why we don't have speed limits or driver's licenses or DUI laws or safety standards and inspections for cars and no one is going to produce self driving cars that will be safer than human-operated ones. Boggles the mind.

And yet 30k plus still for every year, but at least we tried.

[gatoveintisiete]

Why are we ok with 30k+ of our fellow citizens being killed violently in cars per year?  It kind of boggles the mind.

Yeah no one cares about that, which is why we don't have speed limits or driver's licenses or DUI laws or safety standards and inspections for cars and no one is going to produce self driving cars that will be safer than human-operated ones. Boggles the mind.

This doesn't go far enough, surely everyone would agree if  everybody would walk to their destination we could save 30,000 lives a year, if that kinda thing is important to ya.

That seems like it would be disastrous to the economy. Maybe start with better public transit and more funding for auto safety research.

No way, we are getting rid of guns and cars and saving lives and the planet here pal.

[michigancat]

 I don't want to ban guns at all. I think you could significantly reduce gun deaths without banning them.

[Dugout DickStone]

Canons were invented at the time the bill of rights were adopted, so maybe the framers didn't intend for artillery (and by extension anti-aircraft) to be protected. 

The analogy might get in the way of the contrived dialogue being advocated against, so disregard as necessary

Well regulated militia tho

[SdK]

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/texas-good-guy-with-a-gun-shoots-carjacking-victim-in-head-then-runs-away/

[Emo EMAW]

I don't want to ban guns at all. I think you could significantly reduce gun deaths without banning them.

(I'm sure we've been over this before...) How would the regulation you have in mind be funded?

[puniraptor]

I don't want to ban guns at all. I think you could significantly reduce gun deaths without banning them.

(I'm sure we've been over this before...) How would the regulation you have in mind be funded?

selling the organs and brain tissue of gun victims

[michigancat]

I don't want to ban guns at all. I think you could significantly reduce gun deaths without banning them.

(I'm sure we've been over this before...) How would the regulation you have in mind be funded?

The gun owners would pay for a lot of it, (through things such as registration and license fees) but I'm sure the general population will pick up much of the tab.

[star seed 7]

User tax

[gatoveintisiete]

User tax

Too regressive

[Emo EMAW]

I don't want to ban guns at all. I think you could significantly reduce gun deaths without banning them.

(I'm sure we've been over this before...) How would the regulation you have in mind be funded?

The gun owners would pay for a lot of it, (through things such as registration and license fees) but I'm sure the general population will pick up much of the tab.

Non-starter.  If the public is the beneficiary of the regulation, the public should pick up the whole tab.  Guns are already taxed enough.

[star seed 7]

Has the added benefit of pricing guns out of the hands of people