The Trump Presidency

[Phil Titola]

I for one am stunned that electric car guy who generates hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue via green energy credits is butthurt about the Paris thing

You and Trump think this is about Paris

[Panjandrum]

Like, this was what made musk and that other guy realize trump was a piece of crap?

I think Musk realized that the PR hit wasn't worth it when Trump basically had a circle jerk in the Rose Garden with a bunch of fossil fuel industry lobbyists.

Probably better to go take a few photo ops with Jerry Brown.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Like, this was what made musk and that other guy realize trump was a piece of crap?

I think Musk realized that the PR hit wasn't worth it when Trump basically had a circle jerk in the Rose Garden with a bunch of fossil fuel industry lobbyists.

Probably better to go take a few photo ops with Jerry Brown.

I think he was hoping to further his business interests and this made it clear to him that it wasn't working.

[steve dave]

Donny may need a UK gun law refresher

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871331574649901056

[chum1]

https://twitter.com/ProPublica/status/871120985038102528

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/871088348122816514

[steve dave]

https://twitter.com/kevinrothrock/status/871057279847735297

[star seed 7]

Well conservatives have worshipped putin for like a bunch of years now so that might be true.

[Dugout DickStone]

https://twitter.com/kevinrothrock/status/871057279847735297

Trump is gonna squish Putin

[The Big Train]

True and not really that funny

https://twitter.com/CarolineSiede/status/871456906753318912

[SdK]

True and not really that funny

https://twitter.com/CarolineSiede/status/871456906753318912

Word!

[chum1]

https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/871360301236617216

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871328428963901440

[The Big Train]

Duh!  The guy is a complete dumbass.  It's a mystery why anyone is surprised.

[sonofdaxjones]

Lefties now cling to Twitter Dudes who determine what is or isn't proportionate/disproportionate threat?

So, if there is a (another) terror attack on U.S. soil, lefties will hold their criticism of the administration if it's relatively small?  Because, well, apparently they've determined that if not enough people die, the threat, isn't, you know, "real".   

LOL, nice work TBT.

You're such an amazing dumbass.

[bucket]

Lefties now cling to Twitter Dudes who determine what is or isn't proportionate/disproportionate threat?

So, if there is a (another) terror attack on U.S. soil, lefties will hold their criticism of the administration if it's relatively small?  Because, well, apparently they've determined that if not enough people die, the threat, isn't, you know, "real".   

LOL, nice work TBT.

You're such an amazing dumbass.

Dax, 90 people die and 183 are injured everyday due to guns. Where's your outrage over that?

[sonofdaxjones]

Lefties now cling to Twitter Dudes who determine what is or isn't proportionate/disproportionate threat?

So, if there is a (another) terror attack on U.S. soil, lefties will hold their criticism of the administration if it's relatively small?  Because, well, apparently they've determined that if not enough people die, the threat, isn't, you know, "real".   

LOL, nice work TBT.

You're such an amazing dumbass.

Dax, 90 people die and 183 are injured everyday due to guns. Where's your outrage over that?

Most of that driven by religion?  How much of that is "heat of the movement" situations?   All of that planned and coordinated attacks seeking specific targets and intended to cause as many mass casualties as possible?   

[bucket]

Lefties now cling to Twitter Dudes who determine what is or isn't proportionate/disproportionate threat?

So, if there is a (another) terror attack on U.S. soil, lefties will hold their criticism of the administration if it's relatively small?  Because, well, apparently they've determined that if not enough people die, the threat, isn't, you know, "real".   

LOL, nice work TBT.

You're such an amazing dumbass.

Dax, 90 people die and 183 are injured everyday due to guns. Where's your outrage over that?

Most of that driven by religion?  How much of that is "heat of the movement" situations?   All of that planned and coordinated attacks seeking specific targets and intended to cause as many mass casualties as possible?

Should we prioritize ending unwarranted killings based off of religious differences or the greater killer?

Assuming you meant "heat of the moment." Not sure why that should matter.

Regarding your latter question I would just point out that three terrorists killed seven people. Not, say, 47. Still tragic, nonetheless.

[bucket]

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/871558401511247872

Spicey :(

[sonofdaxjones]

Oh, and nice deflection bucket.  Toss in a dumbass strawman.

I hope you're not caught up in a terrorist attack that's not "proportionate" enough to care about.

 

[sonofdaxjones]

Lefties now cling to Twitter Dudes who determine what is or isn't proportionate/disproportionate threat?

So, if there is a (another) terror attack on U.S. soil, lefties will hold their criticism of the administration if it's relatively small?  Because, well, apparently they've determined that if not enough people die, the threat, isn't, you know, "real".   

LOL, nice work TBT.

You're such an amazing dumbass.

Dax, 90 people die and 183 are injured everyday due to guns. Where's your outrage over that?

Most of that driven by religion?  How much of that is "heat of the movement" situations?   All of that planned and coordinated attacks seeking specific targets and intended to cause as many mass casualties as possible?

Should we prioritize ending unwarranted killings based off of religious differences or the greater killer?

Assuming you meant "heat of the moment." Not sure why that should matter.

Regarding your latter question I would just point out that three terrorists killed seven people. Not, say, 47. Still tragic, nonetheless.

Again, keep that fire away from all of those strawmen.   The question again, are you prepared to not care if your talking heads determine if a terrorist attack is not "proportionate" enough?   Yes or no? 

What's the dividing line to caring bucket?  10 dead in once incident, 20-30-40?  What's proportionate enough? 

[sonofdaxjones]

Are libs actually buying the "moral" outrage of Elon Musk, over the PA?


    oh my word.

[star seed 7]

Relax, it's Sunday

[sonofdaxjones]

Relax, it's Sunday

Lib provided hilarity doesn't rest on God's day, lib.

[The Big Train]

Relax, it's Sunday

Lib provided hilarity doesn't rest on God's day, lib.

Neither does your dumbass Dear Leader.

[bucket]

Lefties now cling to Twitter Dudes who determine what is or isn't proportionate/disproportionate threat?

So, if there is a (another) terror attack on U.S. soil, lefties will hold their criticism of the administration if it's relatively small?  Because, well, apparently they've determined that if not enough people die, the threat, isn't, you know, "real".   

LOL, nice work TBT.

You're such an amazing dumbass.

Dax, 90 people die and 183 are injured everyday due to guns. Where's your outrage over that?

Most of that driven by religion?  How much of that is "heat of the movement" situations?   All of that planned and coordinated attacks seeking specific targets and intended to cause as many mass casualties as possible?

Should we prioritize ending unwarranted killings based off of religious differences or the greater killer?

Assuming you meant "heat of the moment." Not sure why that should matter.

Regarding your latter question I would just point out that three terrorists killed seven people. Not, say, 47. Still tragic, nonetheless.

Again, keep that fire away from all of those strawmen.   The question again, are you prepared to not care if your talking heads determine if a terrorist attack is not "proportionate" enough?   Yes or no? 

What's the dividing line to caring bucket?  10 dead in once incident, 20-30-40?  What's proportionate enough?

Way to throw strawman out there to deflect from the questions I posed. I think it's a very reasonable question to ask, why we should prioritize legislative action against Muslims instead of towards gun control, the much bigger threat to your life and mine?

However, in this country it's easier to marginalize brown people than it is to pass laws against the guns that we all love.

A white Christian kills a bunch of people. Let's do nothing. A muslim, travel ban!

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

"Disproportionate" threat is a sad way to minimize marginalize terrorism.

I do think we should start using that term with climate change though.