Author Topic: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread (Read 433298 times)

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #1226 on:** January 28, 2015, 06:28:32 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 28, 2015, 04:52:39 PM

Wut http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/22/us-senate-man-climate-change-global-warming-hoax

Quote
“Climate is changing and climate has always changed and always will,” Inhofe told the Senate. “The hoax is that there are some people who are so arrogant to think they are so powerful they can change climate. Man can’t change climate.”

Chair for the environment committee. These are the consequences of electing republicans

Lib7 - I can pretty much guarantee you that Inhofe is a lot more knowledgable about climate science than you. So maybe keep that in mind.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1227 on:** January 28, 2015, 06:34:16 PM »

interesting response from someone who disregards 95 percent of the scientific community

Tobias · « **Reply #1228 on:** January 28, 2015, 06:37:57 PM »

I've got $5 on lib

CNS · « **Reply #1229 on:** January 28, 2015, 08:51:56 PM »

I've got $5 on 95% of the scientific community. Could give a eff about a senator, rep, pres, or any other person who's job consists of lying or twisting truth intentionally a large amount of the time.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #1230 on:** January 28, 2015, 08:57:07 PM »

Quote from: CNS on January 28, 2015, 08:51:56 PM

I've got $5 on 95% of the scientific community. Could give a eff about a senator, rep, pres, or any other person who's job consists of lying or twisting truth intentionally a large amount of the time.

I've got $5 that the 95% (I thought it was 97 - has it gone down?) talking point is bullshit.

CNS · « **Reply #1231 on:** January 28, 2015, 08:58:17 PM »

For a conservative, you love long odds bets.

CNS · « **Reply #1232 on:** January 28, 2015, 08:58:55 PM »

Do you think scientists are lying and in league with the far left agenda?

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #1233 on:** January 28, 2015, 09:06:13 PM »

WSJ: The Myth of the 97% Consensus

It's almost as misleading a statistic as the "women only earn 73 cents for every dollar a man makes" bs.

CNS · « **Reply #1234 on:** January 28, 2015, 09:23:50 PM »

Not subscribing to that. Can't read w/o subscribing.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #1235 on:** January 28, 2015, 09:25:09 PM »

OMG, the libtards got SNOPES'D

Seriously, that 95% thing has been bunker for a rough ridin' long time, how are you idiots still running with that?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1236 on:** January 28, 2015, 09:55:37 PM »

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/28/beijing-smog-unliveable-mayor-wang-anshun-china

Haven't looked, but are many still wanting to let China hide behind "developing nation" status.

Of course this goes against America is the root of all evil in the AGW propagandist narrative.

Just waiting for that huge dam they built to go full blown environmental disaster . . . it's on its way now.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1237 on:** January 28, 2015, 09:59:17 PM »

Republicans would love nothing more than to have china's environmental regs in the US, after all humans can't harm the planet, only God can do that!

michigancat · « **Reply #1238 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:02:34 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 28, 2015, 09:55:37 PM

Of course this goes against America is the root of all evil in the AGW propagandist narrative.

LOL what?

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1239 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:03:26 PM »

Very daxian claim

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1240 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:21:18 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 28, 2015, 09:59:17 PM

Republicans would love nothing more than to have china's environmental regs in the US, after all humans can't harm the planet, only God can do that!

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1241 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:22:29 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on January 28, 2015, 10:02:34 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 28, 2015, 09:55:37 PM

Of course this goes against America is the root of all evil in the AGW propagandist narrative.

LOL what?

Geezus, don't be dense passive aggressive cRusty

michigancat · « **Reply #1242 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:26:34 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 28, 2015, 10:22:29 PM

Quote from: michigancat on January 28, 2015, 10:02:34 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 28, 2015, 09:55:37 PM

Of course this goes against America is the root of all evil in the AGW propagandist narrative.

LOL what?

Geezus, don't be dense passive aggressive cRusty

Only if you don't make up some of the weirdest crap I've ever heard. Like, what in the world, man.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1243 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:29:14 PM »

The epa isn't business friendly! Who cares that we can drink our water and breathe our air here, that crap is overrated

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1244 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:30:11 PM »

Really dude, I mean you've never read or seen the constant narrative that United States is the biggest polluter etc. etc. Yet, the last time a U.S. City even looked remotely like many Chinese cities was 35 and 40 years ago from an air quality perspective.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1245 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:30:41 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 28, 2015, 10:29:14 PM

The epa isn't business friendly! Who cares that we can drink our water and breathe our air here, that crap is overrated

Lib continues to flail away.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #1246 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:32:10 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 28, 2015, 10:30:11 PM

Really dude, I mean you've never read or seen the constant narrative that United States is the biggest polluter etc. etc. Yet, the last time a U.S. City even looked remotely like many Chinese cities was 35 and 40 years ago from an air quality perspective.

I've read that we use the most resources, but never that we are the biggest polluter. I wouldn't be surprised if we are per capita, though.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1247 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:32:28 PM »

If god didn't want pollution then he wouldn't have invented it

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #1248 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:34:41 PM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 28, 2015, 10:32:28 PM

If god didn't want pollution then he wouldn't have invented it

The arrogance of people who think they can change anything is staggering.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1249 on:** January 28, 2015, 10:46:43 PM »

Looks like increasing C02 levels aka food for the biosphere is coming at a good time.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/have-we-reached-peak-food-shortages-loom-as-global-production-rates-slow-10009185.html