Author Topic: 84 Lumber (Read 7696 times)

MakeItRain · « **on:** February 06, 2017, 03:28:57 AM »

I gotta say, when I heard about 84 Lumber and controversial ad, this isn't what i thought I'd see. I don't even remember the edited version of this.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/nPo2B-vjZ28[/youtube]

SdK · « **Reply #1 on:** February 06, 2017, 07:21:14 AM »

Elaborate?

kso_FAN · « **Reply #2 on:** February 06, 2017, 07:27:46 AM »

http://journey84.com/?gclid=Cj0KEQiA2uDEBRDxurOO77Cp-7kBEiQAOUgKVxHlE84HwoIUDp5S5d2HSO6KYMujXx7aqg3w-A7NWjgaAmxl8P8HAQ#part-2

SdK · « **Reply #3 on:** February 06, 2017, 07:32:42 AM »

What the hell

SdK · « **Reply #4 on:** February 06, 2017, 07:33:05 AM »

eff America

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 06, 2017, 09:02:22 AM »

That wall looked pud AF!

kso_FAN · « **Reply #6 on:** February 06, 2017, 09:16:46 AM »

I wonder if 84 Lumber has a contract for building materials for the wall?

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 06, 2017, 09:18:12 AM »

I bet they do. Would be interesting to find out.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #8 on:** February 06, 2017, 09:46:39 AM »

The executive order was signed 10 days ago, pretty safe to say that the bid process hasn't been initiated yet given how it's going to be paid for hasn't been finalized.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #9 on:** February 06, 2017, 09:48:04 AM »

I could see them losing the bid and then blasting them like that like sour grapes.

catastrophe · « **Reply #10 on:** February 06, 2017, 10:04:47 AM »

Seems calculated IMO. They probably expect to make way more by selling lumber to contractors/laborers than wall building materials.

Institutional Control · « **Reply #11 on:** February 06, 2017, 10:08:54 AM »

Quote from: catastrophe on February 06, 2017, 10:04:47 AM

Seems calculated IMO. They probably expect to make way more by selling lumber to contractors/laborers than wall building materials.

Expanding to the West Coast, sucking up to the Cali libtards.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #12 on:** February 06, 2017, 10:28:15 AM »

They probably cut out the careful vetting procedure due to time constraints. Wall was sexy as hell tho.

Interesting advertising strategy. 4 or 5 ads seemed design to piss off about 80% of the demographic that actually watches the Super Bowl, but I guess the calculation is that they'll pay dividends because of all the liberals who will now decide to buy an Audi or shop at 84 Lumber (never heard of it).... because they ran an ad designed to piss off people who watch the Super Bowl.

I don't think that's a good strategy. Probably better to target ads at people who actually watch the Super Bowl. But I'm not an advertising genius or a CEO with money to spend and an agenda to push.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #13 on:** February 06, 2017, 10:31:17 AM »

Glenn beck just had a segment on this. He liked it.

steve dave · « **Reply #14 on:** February 06, 2017, 10:47:53 AM »

I didn't watch the super bowl but have somehow still become aware of 84 lumbar being a thing. so I think they were pretty smart.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 06, 2017, 11:11:31 AM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2017, 10:47:53 AM

I didn't watch the super bowl but have somehow still become aware of 84 lumbar being a thing. so I think they were pretty smart.

There used to be one in mhk

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #16 on:** February 06, 2017, 12:56:09 PM »

84 Lumber: We support human trafficking

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

renocat · « **Reply #17 on:** February 06, 2017, 01:54:22 PM »

So are they wanting to sell lumber? Are they wanting rich people to build walls around their land.to keep out undesirables? Are they saying it is America's duty to provide social welfare to the world's poor? I think it is last one. If so, should our policy be we take away the benefits going to a bontified poor American and give it to an illegal alien, net budget nuetral.

Institutional Control · « **Reply #18 on:** February 06, 2017, 01:58:54 PM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on February 06, 2017, 10:28:15 AM

They probably cut out the careful vetting procedure due to time constraints. Wall was sexy as hell tho.

Interesting advertising strategy. 4 or 5 ads seemed design to piss off about 80% of the demographic that actually watches the Super Bowl, but I guess the calculation is that they'll pay dividends because of all the liberals who will now decide to buy an Audi or shop at 84 Lumber (never heard of it).... because they ran an ad designed to piss off people who watch the Super Bowl.

I don't think that's a good strategy. Probably better to target ads at people who actually watch the Super Bowl. But I'm not an advertising genius or a CEO with money to spend and an agenda to push.

You think 80% of the 111 million people who watched the Super Bowl are Trump supporters?