26
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
She released that knowing it reflects poorly on A&m. How does it help your husband or the team?
Thats a low blow. Lets ignore for a moment where or whom created the letter. She knows how it would look.
So please explain to me why were accepting of that going out to the world ? Thats unacceptable. So what a regent criticized your husband. Ok. So you are still being paid by the school. Its bigger than your ego. You dont throw your school under the bus like that.
A lot of people have given a lot to your hisband’s program to have success. Oh. And made you rich along the way.
And furthermore why would you give a voice to ignorance by broadcasting it? And in the process possibly hurting the reputation of the folks who have supported your husband. At least that of course would be the knee jeek reaction.
So i have a lot of questions for charlene. It seemed very accusatory, didn’t it?
She did it to shift the attention away from her husband who was being roasted all offseason and all week for being a shitty coach.
No matter what else happens, no matter all his abundance of failures, A&M will be the racist school that fired their "@#&$*# head coach."
That is the card they'll play.
Have you considered that someone has a plan in place to justify his failures as a coach if and when his time is gone here? You know the excuse: toxic environment. So what if such an allegation is baseless. That's how this game is played to keep careers intact. I say that only because we are living in a world now in which everyone is a victim, even if he's paid millions and millions of dollars, and people are no longer responsible for their failures. We live in a time when it's always someone else's fault. Not saying this is the case here or making any predictions. Just saying instead that I'd not be surprised if this is how things play out. The victim card is very frequently played in 2017 America.
Best case scenario, she's a spiteful woman bitter about the criticism her husband is receiving.
Worst case scenario, she herself wrote the letter.
Bad look either way. A&M will be fine after Sumlin is gone, but potential future employers will be asking him about what his wife will do to reflect poorly on their program.
Sumlin, assuming he isn't in on the joke, SHOULD be livid at her. This doesn't help him longterm.
Folks there is no way a member of the HCC sent that letter.
Yes, I know this is from the DOTO (department of the obvious)
It's been sent to stir up trouble for A&M.
There's about a 5% chance that letter is real.
I'm in the group that thinks it's fake.
But if it's not fake I can't imagine an Ag doing it. The sender (person who hand delivered it) has to know that doing that can only hurt A&M especially in this social media age. The person has to know that it will blow up and he/she will be found out.
Also when the media and public find out it was one person who sent it and not an entire university, fan base, state, and region of the US they are gunna be extremely disappointed. Might even blame Trump.
The circumstances of the Texas case are similar to a 2012 shooting in Nogales, Mexico, where Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, 16, was shot 10 times in the back and head by Border Patrol Agent Lonnie Swartz. Swartz fired through the slats in the border fence from Nogales, Arizona. Swartz said rocks were being thrown, prompting him to fire numerous times, reload his gun and fire again.
It was a typical summer day in 2010 when Hernández died. His lawyers say he was playing with three friends in the 33 foot-wide concrete culvert separating El Paso and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Mesa's lawyers say he responded to a group of suspected illegal aliens throwing rocks at Border Patrol agents. Cellphone videos appeared to show that Hernández was hiding beneath a train trestle when he was shot in the head.
A 2013 investigation by the Arizona Republic found that Border Patrol agents and Customs and Border Protection officers killed at least 42 people — including at least 13 Americans — in an eight-year period. At the time, none of the agents or officers responsible were publicly known to have faced consequences.