goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 01:11:14 PM

Title: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 01:11:14 PM
Now 3-1 vs Snyder.

Walked into a bad situation.  Recruits better and has a better system.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on October 13, 2013, 01:16:39 PM
So, he's the only coach in the Big 12 better than Snyder  :dunno:

G-Patts too probably
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on October 13, 2013, 01:18:11 PM
Well, I guess Briles has had a couple of top 25 caliber teams, after all.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on October 13, 2013, 01:19:19 PM
Yeah, Briles is pretty good.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Panjandrum on October 13, 2013, 01:28:08 PM
I don't disagree in some respects, but it's easier to recruit to a good Texas program than it is to a good Kansas program.

He's a better game day coach, IMO.  I won't argue there.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on October 13, 2013, 01:30:34 PM
I don't disagree in some respects, but it's easier to recruit to a good Texas program than it is to a good Kansas program.

He's a better game day coach, IMO.  I won't argue there.

The "it's easier to recruit to Baylor than to K-State" talking point is pretty dumb fwiw
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 13, 2013, 01:30:48 PM
Now 3-1 vs Snyder.

Walked into a bad situation.  Recruits better and has a better system.

He couldn't beat Snyder with a Heisman winner. His highest finish in the Big XII was 3rd. He's had 1 season where they were ranked at the end of the season.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on October 13, 2013, 01:31:17 PM
Oh yeah how many trophies does briles have?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 13, 2013, 01:32:44 PM
1 winning season in the Big XII.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on October 13, 2013, 01:37:07 PM
He is a younger version of snyder.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 01:38:35 PM
33 Total wins for Baylor in the 10 seasons prior to Briles.

39 wins so far with Briles in 5.5 seasons with Briles, and that includes 3 seasons with a Big 12 South schedule.

Briles vs Snyder:  Briles 3 Wins, Snyder 1 Win
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fill My Bill on October 13, 2013, 01:47:44 PM
If you base everything on the head to head record, things can look weird. Like us having a winning record vs. Texas/ USC. We are not in the same galaxy as those programs.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 13, 2013, 01:55:06 PM
Now 3-1 vs Snyder.

Walked into a bad situation.  Recruits better and has a better system.

You are an idiot.  But so very edgy and controversial.  But still an idiot.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 01:56:33 PM
LHC Bill Snyder has won the Big XII coach of the year 4 times.. Art Briles-0 which means Bill is 4x the coach Briles is.. because math bitch
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 13, 2013, 01:59:12 PM
LHC LHC Bill Snyder has won the Big XII coach of the year 4 times.. Art Briles-0 which means Bill is 4x the coach Briles is.. because math bitch

Infinity times better; which means it isn't even close
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:03:42 PM
Briles has now clownsuited Snyder 3 times in 4 tries, including embarrassing K-State when K-State was the #1 team in the country.

Baylor did not get their version of Vanier and an Indoor practice facility until after Briles arrived (sound familiar).

They averaged 3.3 wins a year in the 10 years prior to Briles, they'll more than double that average in 6 seasons under Briles.

When Briles came into the conference Brown, Stoops, Gundy and Leach were in the Big 12 South and in his first 3 seasons he had to play a full Big 12 South Schedule.  (there's a reason why Snyder wants 2 divisions). 

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:05:09 PM
remember that SI article about Baylor being futility U, thank goodness for Briles!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: hemmy on October 13, 2013, 02:05:55 PM
Soooo... are you saying that is more impressive than Snyder's turn around?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on October 13, 2013, 02:07:32 PM
Briles is a good coach. So is Snyder.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:08:11 PM
Soooo... are you saying that is more impressive than Snyder's turn around?

No, but it's okay to admit that there's now another coach in the league who you can say owns Snyder. 

Stoops, Gundy, now Briles.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on October 13, 2013, 02:10:29 PM
Soooo... are you saying that is more impressive than Snyder's turn around?

Yes. Do you remember Baylor in the early 2000's?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on October 13, 2013, 02:12:23 PM
4 * 0 = 0
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:18:56 PM
Snyder: 1-3 vs Art Briles Baylor teams.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:26:08 PM
dax reminds me of the character lennie from of mice and men
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on October 13, 2013, 02:26:37 PM
There's just no refuting the old head-to-head argument. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:27:43 PM
dax reminds me of the character lennie from of mice and men

You're just angry because you're realizing there's likely going to be another coach in the Big 12 who will own Snyder.  Younger, does the things that kids like, has a prolific and exciting offense built off of speed and talent.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:29:18 PM
nope not angry. keep strangling that puppy with all of your love though
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:30:39 PM
nope not angry. keep strangling that puppy with all of your love though

Head-to-head the numbers don't lie, and the reality that he inherited a really bad football program facing the toughest teams in the conference every year say all there is to know.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:33:53 PM
nope not angry. keep strangling that puppy with all of your love though

Head-to-head the numbers don't lie, and the reality that he inherited a really bad football program facing the toughest teams in the conference every year say all there is to know.
wut?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:35:52 PM
When Snyder came back he had to out do Bo Pelini (that didn't work out so well), Mangino (on his way out), Pinkle, Paul Rhodes and Dan Hawkins.

Briles had Brown, Leach, Stoops and Gundy and AtM was still in the conference.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:37:31 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:43:15 PM
:lol:

In four tries, Snyder has beaten Briles once.

Doesn't get any more clear than that.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:44:38 PM
:lol:


In four tries, Snyder has beaten Briles once.


Doesn't get any more clear than that.
wut?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:45:28 PM
:lol:


In four tries, Snyder has beaten Briles once.


Doesn't get any more clear than that.
wut?

You've got nothing but your odd Tuck like anger with reality.

Sad

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on October 13, 2013, 02:46:42 PM
I mean, crap.  Baylor beat K-State in 2012, so Baylor was better than K-State in 2012.  Doesn't get any more clear than that.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:50:28 PM
:lol:


In four tries, Snyder has beaten Briles once.


Doesn't get any more clear than that.
wut?

You've got nothing but your odd Tuck like anger with reality.

Sad

Snyder: 1-3 vs Art Briles Baylor teams.


Now 3-1 vs Snyder.
:cyclist:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 02:52:28 PM
Typo's don't change reality.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 02:55:06 PM
Reality is we have the reigning National Coach of the Year!   :bill:


 :love:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 03:00:15 PM
Reality is we have the reigning National Coach of the Year!   :bill:


 :love:

That Briles absolutely destroyed.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 13, 2013, 03:01:22 PM
Dax, do you think LHC Bill Snyder is a good football coach? Because you complain about him a lot, his system, his "slothfence" etc.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 03:03:23 PM
Reality is we have the reigning National Coach of the Year!   :bill:


 :love:

That Briles absolutely destroyed.
'grats!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on October 13, 2013, 03:11:16 PM
Briles is a good coach.  I like him and how much he respects k-state and bsfs and lhofcbs
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 03:15:05 PM
Dax, do you think LHC LHC Bill Snyder is a good football coach? Because you complain about him a lot, his system, his "slothfence" etc.

Sure
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 03:16:11 PM
LHC Bill Snyder>> Pete Carroll



 :love:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on October 13, 2013, 03:32:55 PM
Dax kind of seems like a whiny bitch  :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CHONGS on October 13, 2013, 03:46:45 PM
but bill owns al golden who was (is?) the greatest coach of all time?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: eastcat on October 13, 2013, 03:54:57 PM
LHC Bill Snyder>> Pete Carroll



 :love:

lol
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 13, 2013, 04:22:56 PM
but bill owns al golden who was (is?) the greatest coach of all time?

oh my.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: jgtbh on October 13, 2013, 05:19:31 PM
Reality is we have the reigning National Coach of the Year!   :bill:


 :love:

That Briles absolutely destroyed.

This girl and her friend with Leprosy have something to say to you and Glasco Martin... don't let it hurt your feelings... Glasco didn't

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifti.me%2Fi%2FnmvUC.gif&hash=64eae5bfa33bb1cb44b7dab628fb1497f2033a39)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wiley on October 13, 2013, 05:57:20 PM
Soooo... are you saying that is more impressive than Snyder's turn around?

No, but it's okay to admit that there's now another coach in the league who you can say owns Snyder. 

Stoops, Gundy, now Briles.

Just replaced Leach, nothing new
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: hemmy on October 13, 2013, 06:07:20 PM
Soooo... are you saying that is more impressive than Snyder's turn around?

No, but it's okay to admit that there's now another coach in the league who you can say owns Snyder. 

Stoops, Gundy, now Briles.


So the fact that a vastly superior Baylor team almost got beat by a crap KSU team (which would have made it 2-2 vs 3-1) now means Briles > Snyder? What if the cats won, would you declare Briles = Snyder?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 13, 2013, 06:44:03 PM
Who is responsible for assembling the "crap" K-State squad?

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on October 13, 2013, 08:57:23 PM
But, but, who gives a crap.  :'bye cruel world:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on October 13, 2013, 09:56:09 PM
This year, Art Briles has been a better coach.  Over their careers?  Snyder wins, and it's not close.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on October 13, 2013, 10:01:14 PM
Who is responsible for assembling the "crap" K-State squad?
This admittedly crap KState squad is still better than most of the teams that played before Snyder.  It also has plenty of future potential, the team is improving, coaching still needs to improve, but this year doesn't discount all his previous success.  If we are bowl eligible, there will be plenty of hope for the team in the future, hopefully Bill will learn from his coaching mistakes.  I have not been a fan at all of his coaching decisions thus far, but give me a break. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on October 13, 2013, 10:02:36 PM
Who is responsible for assembling the "crap" K-State squad?
SODJ is just like the kid with the red t-shirt in his gif sig; he just wants some attention.   As in "look at me, I don't like our coach because he's losing".  :runaway:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 13, 2013, 10:02:54 PM
jackstack, shut up
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on October 13, 2013, 10:03:51 PM
Who is responsible for assembling the "crap" K-State squad?
This admittedly crap KState squad is still better than most of the teams that played before Snyder.  It also has plenty of future potential, the team is improving, coaching still needs to improve, but this year doesn't discount all his previous success.  If we are bowl eligible, there will be plenty of hope for the team in the future, hopefully Bill will learn from his coaching mistakes.  I have not been a fan at all of his coaching decisions thus far, but give me a break.  :D
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on October 13, 2013, 10:15:38 PM
jackstack, shut up
:whistle1:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 14, 2013, 07:44:29 AM
Briles has inherited two bad situations.

He took over at Houston after the dumpster fire our current OC left behind and played a non-conference schedule that Snyder would have dropped like a plate of whipped butter or changed faster than moving the team to the shady side of the plane on a trans-continental flight through multiple time zones (Oregon, Alabama, Michigan, Miss. State, Oklahoma State and Miami).  With TCU, Louisville, Southern Miss (when they were good), Central Florida (thank you again EMAW sniper) and East Carolina on the conference schedule in the first 2-3 years, and did well. 

Then walked into another dumpster fire at Baylor playing against a Big 12 South schedule and 4 BCS school non-conference games in his first 2 years. 





Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catzacker on October 14, 2013, 08:31:45 AM
i haven't read this thread, so i'm assuming this point has been made - but bill has walked into two bad situations (both at the same school) and won a bcs conference championship. 

briles has yet to win anything of substance.  moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on October 14, 2013, 08:53:34 AM
Based on the talent differential, Baylor should have walked away from Saturday's game 20 or 30 point winners.  That the game was very much undecided with 2 minutes left tells me that someone made good use of their inferior talent.  That's coaching. 

Talent differential speaks to recruiting, which is a separate issue.  Briles, directly or indirectly, recruits better talent that LHCBS.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on October 14, 2013, 08:58:36 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 14, 2013, 10:07:00 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on October 14, 2013, 11:46:40 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

Not if we "fire" Bill now and hire Briles.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on October 14, 2013, 11:52:07 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

Not if we "fire" Bill now and hire Briles.
It is said Briles will never take a job outside of the state of Texas - I am relatively sure Ark offered him and Tenn prolly got involved to some degree.  Briles has the potential to become the Snyder of Waco unless UT or ATM come after him and I could see him turning down ATM if he has BU rolling like they are now and the Big 12 is stable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on October 14, 2013, 11:59:02 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

Not if we "fire" Bill now and hire Briles.
It is said Briles will never take a job outside of the state of Texas - I am relatively sure Ark offered him and Tenn prolly got involved to some degree.  Briles has the potential to become the Snyder of Waco unless UT or ATM come after him and I could see him turning down ATM if he has BU rolling like they are now and the Big 12 is stable.

Hmmm... move K-State to Texas?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on October 14, 2013, 12:00:40 PM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 
This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

Not if we "fire" Bill now and hire Briles.
It is said Briles will never take a job outside of the state of Texas - I am relatively sure Ark offered him and Tenn prolly got involved to some degree.  Briles has the potential to become the Snyder of Waco unless UT or ATM come after him and I could see him turning down ATM if he has BU rolling like they are now and the Big 12 is stable.

Hmmm... move K-State to Texas?
that option will be on the table when Conference Armageddon fires back up
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on October 14, 2013, 12:25:10 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trogdor on October 14, 2013, 12:29:23 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on October 14, 2013, 12:40:14 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.
only because he didn't have a Bohl, Brown & Gundy > Snyder.  :Carl:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 14, 2013, 12:58:53 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.
only because he didn't have a Bohl, Brown & Gundy > Snyder.  :Carl:

Another way to think about the question:
Could Briles win two conference championships at K-State, starting in 1989 and coaching until now.  No way in hell.

Would Snyder have built what he did at K-State if he had been hired at Baylor.  Yes.

This will become more clear as time goes on.  Briles is a good coach, but he is not at the same level of Snyder.  Or Stoops.  I don't think he is at the same level of Patterson, either.  If I had to pick between Patterson and Briles as my coach for the next 15 years, I would pick Patterson.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on October 14, 2013, 01:00:18 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.
only because he didn't have a Bohl, Brown & Gundy > Snyder.  :Carl:

Another way to think about the question:
Could Briles win two conference championships at K-State, starting in 1989 and coaching until now.  No way in hell.

Would Snyder have built what he did at K-State if he had been hired at Baylor.  Yes.

This will become more clear as time goes on.  Briles is a good coach, but he is not at the same level of Snyder.  Or Stoops.  I don't think he is at the same level of Patterson, either.  If I had to pick between Patterson and Briles as my coach for the next 15 years, I would pick Patterson.
I think Briles is currently the best coach in the conference. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on October 14, 2013, 01:03:07 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.
only because he didn't have a Bohl, Brown & Gundy > Snyder.  :Carl:

Another way to think about the question:
Could Briles win two conference championships at K-State, starting in 1989 and coaching until now.  No way in hell.

Would Snyder have built what he did at K-State if he had been hired at Baylor.  Yes.

This will become more clear as time goes on.  Briles is a good coach, but he is not at the same level of Snyder.  Or Stoops.  I don't think he is at the same level of Patterson, either.  If I had to pick between Patterson and Briles as my coach for the next 15 years, I would pick Patterson.
I think Briles is currently the best coach in the conference.
SD and I tend to disagree; it's Mack.  ;)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: nicname on October 14, 2013, 01:11:50 PM
The list of coaches to have owned Snyder is pretty short.  Osborne, McCartney, Barnett went 4-2, Stoops, Gundy is 2-1, Leach, Briles currently 3-1. 

Only Osborne, McCartney and Stopps have had clearly superior programs at concurrent times.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 14, 2013, 01:18:13 PM
Do we really want to talk about taking a clearly superior team into a game and barely hanging on to win?

I can think of numerous times when Snyder took a clearly superior team into a stadum and barely won.   I can think of 2 games during the 1998 season alone, and that doesn't include the two losses that year.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 14, 2013, 01:38:23 PM
Do we really want to talk about taking a clearly superior team into a game and barely hanging on to win?

I can think of numerous times when Snyder took a clearly superior team into a stadum and barely won.   I can think of 2 games during the 1998 season alone, and that doesn't include the two losses that year.



WHAT  :Wha:

THAT NEVER HAPPENS TO ANYONE EVER.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on October 14, 2013, 01:39:59 PM
seems like a pretty straightforward argument here. snyder has accomplished more, is the better coach if you consider everything ever. briles is the better coach right now. will take.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2013, 03:07:14 PM
Watching goEMAW defend Snyder against Dax feels like something out of the twilight zone.
only because he didn't have a Bohl, Brown & Gundy > Snyder.  :Carl:

Another way to think about the question:
Could Briles win two conference championships at K-State, starting in 1989 and coaching until now.  No way in hell.

Would Snyder have built what he did at K-State if he had been hired at Baylor.  Yes.

This will become more clear as time goes on.  Briles is a good coach, but he is not at the same level of Snyder.  Or Stoops.  I don't think he is at the same level of Patterson, either.  If I had to pick between Patterson and Briles as my coach for the next 15 years, I would pick Patterson.
I think Briles is currently the best coach in the conference. 

Hmmm, good discussion topic. Are talking like, who should win coach of the year this year, or who is going to have the best career when they retire?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 14, 2013, 03:36:33 PM
The list of coaches to have owned Snyder is pretty short.  Osborne, McCartney, Barnett went 4-2, Stoops, Gundy is 2-1, Leach, Briles currently 3-1. 

Only Osborne, McCartney and Stopps have had clearly superior programs at concurrent times.

I went and looked, and it's pretty ugly.  Stoops, Leach, Gundy and Briles are a combined 21-4 head to head against Snyder.

By any measure, that's getting dominated.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2013, 04:04:04 PM
Snyder's entire career at K-State has pretty much been smoke and mirrors.  Everyone outside of Butthurtville got the memo years ago.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on October 14, 2013, 04:06:41 PM
Do we really want to talk about taking a clearly superior team into a game and barely hanging on to win?

I can think of numerous times when Snyder took a clearly superior team into a stadum and barely won.   I can think of 2 games during the 1998 season alone, and that doesn't include the two losses that year.

Hey, Dax, I was referring to Snyder's coaching job as being pretty good to hang with Baylor, not criticizing Briles for letting an inferior team hang around. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on October 14, 2013, 04:12:19 PM
Snyder's entire career at K-State has pretty much been smoke and mirrors.  Everyone outside of Butthurtville got the memo years ago.

16 of 17, tho.  :billdance:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 14, 2013, 04:15:29 PM
Snyder's entire career at K-State has pretty much been smoke and mirrors.  Everyone outside of Butthurtville got the memo years ago.

The entire Mangino era at ku was nothing but smoke and mirrors.



Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: OregonSmock on October 14, 2013, 04:19:31 PM
Snyder's entire career at K-State has pretty much been smoke and mirrors.  Everyone outside of Butthurtville got the memo years ago.

The entire Mangino era at ku was nothing but smoke and mirrors.


12-1 Orange Bowl, tho
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catzacker on October 14, 2013, 04:20:46 PM
 :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on October 14, 2013, 04:22:52 PM
Snyder's entire career at K-State has pretty much been smoke and mirrors.  Everyone outside of Butthurtville got the memo years ago.

The entire Mangino era at ku 2007 season was nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 14, 2013, 04:25:28 PM
seems like a pretty straightforward argument here. snyder has accomplished more, is the better coach if you consider everything ever. briles is the better coach right now. will take.

Briles has the better team this season.  So, if Snyder has a better team next season, does that mean Snyder is a better coach?  And, does that mean that Gene Chizick was the best coach the year he won the national championship?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on October 14, 2013, 04:26:32 PM
seems like a pretty straightforward argument here. snyder has accomplished more, is the better coach if you consider everything ever. briles is the better coach right now. will take.

Briles has the better team this season.  So, if Snyder has a better team next season, does that mean Snyder is a better coach?  And, does that mean that Gene Chizick was the best coach the year he won the national championship?

yes, yes, and yes.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 14, 2013, 04:29:24 PM
Snyder's entire career at K-State has pretty much been smoke and mirrors.  Everyone outside of Butthurtville got the memo years ago.

You're so cute when you try to talk KU football
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 14, 2013, 04:33:07 PM
seems like a pretty straightforward argument here. snyder has accomplished more, is the better coach if you consider everything ever. briles is the better coach right now. will take.

Briles has the better team this season.  So, if Snyder has a better team next season, does that mean Snyder is a better coach?  And, does that mean that Gene Chizick was the best coach the year he won the national championship?

yes, yes, and yes.

OK, well at least I understand your criteria.  Most people consider the question presented in terms of a longer time frame, but that is not the style on this board.  It does make the analysis a little easier , though.

Of course, you also understand that this makes oscar Weber a better coach than Frank Martin or Bob Huggins or Lon Kruger......and the same as Bill Self.  I'm so glad to know that everybody who is trashing Snyder under this criteria will be applauding Weber.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on October 14, 2013, 04:35:09 PM
oscar was big 12 coach of the year, last year
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on October 14, 2013, 04:43:14 PM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2013, 04:45:27 PM
Here's how I'd look at it. By the time they retire, this is the ranked list of who will have accomplished the most:

1. Stoops
2. Brown
3. Briles
4. Snyder
5. Gundy
No one else will be close.


Kingsbury may very well end up on that list, but it's way too early to tell.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on October 14, 2013, 08:27:03 PM
Hmmm, good discussion topic. Are talking like, who should win coach of the year this year, or who is going to have the best career when they retire?
i'm talking about who i would want coaching my team for the next 5 years.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on October 14, 2013, 08:41:52 PM
Here's how I'd look at it. By the time they retire, this is the ranked list of who will have accomplished the most:

1. Stoops
2. Brown
3. Briles
4. Snyder
5. Gundy
No one else will be close.


Kingsbury may very well end up on that list, but it's way too early to tell.

I think Briles could win a natty at a higher profile school, but i don't think he will get one at Baylor if he decides to be baylors Snyder.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2013, 12:55:01 AM
Here's how I'd look at it. By the time they retire, this is the ranked list of who will have accomplished the most:

1. Stoops
2. Brown
3. Briles
4. Snyder
5. Gundy
No one else will be close.


Kingsbury may very well end up on that list, but it's way too early to tell.

I think Briles could win a natty at a higher profile school, but i don't think he will get one at Baylor if he decides to be baylors Snyder.

You do realize it will be easier for him after this season, right? For all intents and purposes the Big 12 champ will get a shot at the national championship
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 15, 2013, 06:05:08 AM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?

No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.  Briles is a good coach but I think there are going to be problems long term.  His teams do not show a great amount of discipline and his approach depends on having better athletes.  Briles has really scored with some receivers and seastrunk, but I doubt he will always have the best athletes in the big 12.  Ut and ou are down right now, but when they get back to usual and dont think briles can have much success with his style.  He won't change his style, and that style sucks unless you have superstars at the skill positions.  Plus, I think there will be some discipline and recruiting issues long-term.  The way they handled the Dixon assault is telling.....completely swept under the rug.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 15, 2013, 12:27:20 PM
Let's talk about discipline and attention to detail for a bit, and then let's roll our 2013 KSU Qhatz into the discussion.   

Turnovers, penalties, bad angles, poor clock management, terrible footwork at QB, terrible technique in the secondary and on and on and on . . .

We really gonna talk about Art Briles and Baylor lacking discipline?



Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on October 15, 2013, 12:30:07 PM
there are many different things about coaching that really matter when examining a coach and how their teams perform in the trenches.  i feel most of those things have been ignored in this thread.

criteria #1, patriotism.  is the coach a true patriot?  list examples.
criteria #2, america.  how does the coach spend his/her 4th of july holiday?
criteria #3, the red white and blue.  does the coach speak any foreign languages?  if so, why?
criteria #4, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  how does this coach pursue happiness?  vacations at the lake with a bbq and smores like americans do?
criteria #5, these colors don't bleed.  does the coach know the meaning of this term and if not, what term do they use to exprese america's global dominance?

go cats
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on October 15, 2013, 12:46:26 PM
there are many different things about coaching that really matter when examining a coach and how their teams perform in the trenches.  i feel most of those things have been ignored in this thread.

criteria #1, patriotism.  is the coach a true patriot?  list examples.
criteria #2, america.  how does the coach spend his/her 4th of july holiday?
criteria #3, the red white and blue.  does the coach speak any foreign languages?  if so, why?
criteria #4, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  how does this coach pursue happiness?  vacations at the lake with a bbq and smores like americans do?
criteria #5, these colors don't bleed.  does the coach know the meaning of this term and if not, what term do they use to exprese america's global dominance?

go cats

I would guess Briles values the state of Texas (like most weird Texas people) over the good ole US of A.

And frankly, I don't like that.

Not.

One.

Bit.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2013, 12:47:16 PM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?

No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.
I don't compare the records of the two the last 4 years for the same reason I wouldn't compare Briles' first 4 years at Baylor to Snyder's first 4 years at Kansas State. The situations aren't the same so what is gained by comparing the records?

I also love how you concluded that I dramatically underappreciated Snyder and overvalued Briles. Where did I place a value on either of them for you to figure that out?

You and landon/timhawk have to be the two worst posters on this board when it comes to logic and conclusions.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on October 15, 2013, 12:58:33 PM
there are many different things about coaching that really matter when examining a coach and how their teams perform in the trenches.  i feel most of those things have been ignored in this thread.

criteria #1, patriotism.  is the coach a true patriot?  list examples.
criteria #2, america.  how does the coach spend his/her 4th of july holiday?
criteria #3, the red white and blue.  does the coach speak any foreign languages?  if so, why?
criteria #4, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  how does this coach pursue happiness?  vacations at the lake with a bbq and smores like americans do?
criteria #5, these colors don't bleed.  does the coach know the meaning of this term and if not, what term do they use to exprese america's global dominance?

go cats

I would guess Briles values the state of Texas (like most weird Texas people) over the good ole US of A.

And frankly, I don't like that.

Not.

One.

Bit.

yup.  they fly their own flag at the same height as old glory down there.   only state in the union allowed to do so.  i wonder why? 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on October 15, 2013, 01:07:23 PM
Plus, I think there will be some discipline and recruiting issues long-term.  The way they handled the Dixon assault is telling.....completely swept under the rug.
LOL, I guess some fans only see what they want to with Snyder.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on October 15, 2013, 01:20:41 PM
there are many different things about coaching that really matter when examining a coach and how their teams perform in the trenches.  i feel most of those things have been ignored in this thread.

criteria #1, patriotism.  is the coach a true patriot?  list examples.
criteria #2, america.  how does the coach spend his/her 4th of july holiday?
criteria #3, the red white and blue.  does the coach speak any foreign languages?  if so, why?
criteria #4, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  how does this coach pursue happiness?  vacations at the lake with a bbq and smores like americans do?
criteria #5, these colors don't bleed.  does the coach know the meaning of this term and if not, what term do they use to exprese america's global dominance?

go cats

I would guess Briles values the state of Texas (like most weird Texas people) over the good ole US of A.

And frankly, I don't like that.

Not.

One.

Bit.

yup.  they fly their own flag at the same height as old glory down there.   only state in the union allowed to do so.  i wonder why?


http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texasflag.asp (http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texasflag.asp)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on October 15, 2013, 01:24:24 PM
there are many different things about coaching that really matter when examining a coach and how their teams perform in the trenches.  i feel most of those things have been ignored in this thread.

criteria #1, patriotism.  is the coach a true patriot?  list examples.
criteria #2, america.  how does the coach spend his/her 4th of july holiday?
criteria #3, the red white and blue.  does the coach speak any foreign languages?  if so, why?
criteria #4, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  how does this coach pursue happiness?  vacations at the lake with a bbq and smores like americans do?
criteria #5, these colors don't bleed.  does the coach know the meaning of this term and if not, what term do they use to exprese america's global dominance?

go cats

I would guess Briles values the state of Texas (like most weird Texas people) over the good ole US of A.

And frankly, I don't like that.

Not.

One.

Bit.

yup.  they fly their own flag at the same height as old glory down there.   only state in the union allowed to do so.  i wonder why?


http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texasflag.asp (http://www.snopes.com/history/american/texasflag.asp)

wow, someone that actually thinks isn't a reverse truth website.  hey buddy- news for you:  plenty of texans flags fly at the same level as old glory and it's legal down there.  i have to wonder though, why are you defending the practice?  been on any out of country vacations lately, pedro?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on October 15, 2013, 06:00:26 PM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?
[/quote
No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.
I don't compare the records of the two the last 4 years for the same reason I wouldn't compare Briles' first 4 years at Baylor to Snyder's first 4 years at Kansas State. The situations aren't the same so what is gained by comparing the records?

I also love how you concluded that I dramatically underappreciated Snyder and overvalued Briles. Where did I place a value on either of them for you to figure that out?

You and landon/timhawk have to be the two worst posters on this board when it comes to logic and conclusions.

You are right: it is not logical to compare ghe last 4 years but it is very logical to compare based on last weekend or the first half of this season.  Snyder and briles weren't starting from the exact place four years ago, but pretty close.  It is at least a much better comparison than one game or half a season.

My logic is plenty fine; you just don't like my perspective, son.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on October 15, 2013, 06:06:56 PM
My logic is plenty fine; you just don't like my perspective, son.

may not be the best word choice here, lacey...  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on October 15, 2013, 06:07:58 PM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?
[/quote
No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.
I don't compare the records of the two the last 4 years for the same reason I wouldn't compare Briles' first 4 years at Baylor to Snyder's first 4 years at Kansas State. The situations aren't the same so what is gained by comparing the records?

I also love how you concluded that I dramatically underappreciated Snyder and overvalued Briles. Where did I place a value on either of them for you to figure that out?

You and landon/timhawk have to be the two worst posters on this board when it comes to logic and conclusions.

You are right: it is not logical to compare ghe last 4 years but it is very logical to compare based on last weekend or the first half of this season.  Snyder and briles weren't starting from the exact place four years ago, but pretty close.  It is at least a much better comparison than one game or half a season.

My logic is plenty fine; you just don't like my perspective, son.

...SON!!!!!!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on October 15, 2013, 06:36:34 PM
My logic is plenty fine; you just don't like my perspective, son.

may not be the best word choice here, lacey...  :sdeek:

Take the moronic rambling from the village idiot with a grain of salt.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on October 15, 2013, 10:20:26 PM
 
Art Briles: 'We looked death in the face'

Posted by: Chris Vannini on Tuesday October 15, 2013

 
Every practice deals with situational work, but there was one situation Baylor hasn’t been in until this past weekend.

A close, competitive game.

After winning their first four games by an average of 54.2 points, the Bears found themselves trailing at Kansas State 25-21 heading into the fourth quarter. It was a only matter of time before Baylor would find itself in a struggle, and they came through, scoring two fourth-quarter touchdowns to win 35-25.

“The thing we did through the first four, five weeks is we practiced for a game,” Art Briles said at his weekly press conference. “That’s why I’m saying we’re still in the infant stages of our season, because that was the first complete game we’ve played.

“We’ve been practicing for those scenarios, because we haven’t been able to do them up to this point. It’s all changed now, but we were ready when the time game.”

It’s a situation Oregon often finds itself in. A year ago, the Ducks played one game that was decided by one score: a 17-14 loss against Stanford. This year, quarterback Marcus Mariota took his first fourth-quarter snap this past weekend, when Washington gave the Ducks a challenge. Like Baylor, Oregon powered through the fourth for a win.

That was the biggest takeaway for Briles from the K-State game. The Wildcats outscored Baylor 15-0 in the third quarter and had a blocked punt. The Bears finally faced some adversity, and they overcame it.

“We looked death in the face the other day and said, ‘Not today,’” Briles said. “That’s what we did. What happened to us in the third quarter, if you’re on the road and you get a punt blocked, it’s about 90 percent that you don’t win the football game.
“That’s why I’m saying we showed a lot of maturity as a team. Those things not only deflate what you’ve got going on, but it inflates the crowd and gets them going. It’s critical.” :Wha:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on October 16, 2013, 02:36:11 PM

Art Briles: 'We looked death in the face'

Posted by: Chris Vannini on Tuesday October 15, 2013

 
Every practice deals with situational work, but there was one situation Baylor hasn’t been in until this past weekend.

A close, competitive game.

After winning their first four games by an average of 54.2 points, the Bears found themselves trailing at Kansas State 25-21 heading into the fourth quarter. It was a only matter of time before Baylor would find itself in a struggle, and they came through, scoring two fourth-quarter touchdowns to win 35-25.

“The thing we did through the first four, five weeks is we practiced for a game,” Art Briles said at his weekly press conference. “That’s why I’m saying we’re still in the infant stages of our season, because that was the first complete game we’ve played.

“We’ve been practicing for those scenarios, because we haven’t been able to do them up to this point. It’s all changed now, but we were ready when the time game.”

It’s a situation Oregon often finds itself in. A year ago, the Ducks played one game that was decided by one score: a 17-14 loss against Stanford. This year, quarterback Marcus Mariota took his first fourth-quarter snap this past weekend, when Washington gave the Ducks a challenge. Like Baylor, Oregon powered through the fourth for a win.

That was the biggest takeaway for Briles from the K-State game. The Wildcats outscored Baylor 15-0 in the third quarter and had a blocked punt. The Bears finally faced some adversity, and they overcame it.

“We looked death in the face the other day and said, ‘Not today,’” Briles said. “That’s what we did. What happened to us in the third quarter, if you’re on the road and you get a punt blocked, it’s about 90 percent that you don’t win the football game.
“That’s why I’m saying we showed a lot of maturity as a team. Those things not only deflate what you’ve got going on, but it inflates the crowd and gets them going. It’s critical.” :Wha:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi113.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn216%2Fwrfrancis%2FGrimSchemer2_zps5ec13afa.png&hash=22ab72a12b3a85899a58820b0ffb209033af658d)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kst8cat on October 18, 2013, 09:48:40 AM
The list of coaches to have owned Snyder is pretty short.  Osborne, McCartney, Barnett went 4-2, Stoops, Gundy is 2-1, Leach, Briles currently 3-1. 

Only Osborne, McCartney and Stopps have had clearly superior programs at concurrent times.

I went and looked, and it's pretty ugly.  Stoops, Leach, Gundy and Briles are a combined 21-4 head to head against Snyder.

By any measure, that's getting dominated.

You didn't look hard enough because your numbers are false.  They are 18-5 vs. Snyder.  The five wins are:

2000 vs Leach
2003, 2012 vs. Stoops
2011 vs. Briles
2012 vs. Gundy
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kst8cat on October 18, 2013, 09:52:35 AM
Do we really want to talk about taking a clearly superior team into a game and barely hanging on to win?

I can think of numerous times when Snyder took a clearly superior team into a stadum and barely won.   I can think of 2 games during the 1998 season alone, and that doesn't include the two losses that year.

By definition, the games we barely won don't include the two losses, so you really did not have to specify that. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2013, 10:58:19 AM
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9861289/chris-brown-how-art-briles-potent-offense-made-baylor-national-title-contender
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on October 23, 2013, 10:58:39 AM
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9861289/chris-brown-how-art-briles-potent-offense-made-baylor-national-title-contender

Really good article.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on October 23, 2013, 11:11:26 AM
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9861289/chris-brown-how-art-briles-potent-offense-made-baylor-national-title-contender

Really good article.

I almost started a new thread called Grantlanalysis.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 23, 2013, 11:33:09 AM
Does Philip Montgomery's name come up for jobs? Seems like it should.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 07, 2014, 11:32:35 AM
Briles now 4-1 vs Snyder, with 1 outright Dr. Pepper and 1 shared Dr. Pepper.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on December 07, 2014, 12:04:46 PM
Briles now 4-1 vs Snyder, with 1 outright Dr. Pepper and 1 shared Dr. Pepper.



Yeah, Briles ownership of Snyder has surpassed Leach and Stoops. I take some small measure of solace in the fact that at least Baylor is now winning the conference and has become a legit elite contender the last 2 seasons. Also, Snyder has won at Norman 2 straight times.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on December 07, 2014, 12:07:42 PM
Briles now 4-1 vs Snyder, with 1 outright Dr. Pepper and 1 shared Dr. Pepper.



Yeah, Briles ownership of Snyder has surpassed Leach and Stoops. I take some small measure of solace in the fact that at least Baylor is now winning the conference and has become a legit elite contender the last 2 seasons. Also, Snyder has won at Norman 2 straight times.
So did Baylor.  :dunno:  Nevermind... Home/Away
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on December 07, 2014, 12:10:42 PM
I only brought up Snyder winning at Norman because it means Stoops ownership of Snyder seems to have subsided a bit.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on December 07, 2014, 12:13:03 PM
I only brought up Snyder winning at Norman because it means Stoops ownership of Snyder seems to have subsided a bit.
For some reason Stoops isn't winning like before.  Lose of BV???  :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: EMAWzified on December 07, 2014, 12:20:47 PM
Briles is sitting amidst a recruiting hotbed. Can only imagine what DITR Snyder could mine from there.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 07, 2014, 12:23:49 PM
Briles is sitting amidst a recruiting hotbed. Can only imagine what DITR Snyder could mine from there.

So?  Everyone in the Big 12, nearly everyone in the SEC, and much of the Pac-12 recruit Texas hard.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on December 07, 2014, 12:38:59 PM
Oh yeah how many trophies does briles have?

the same amount.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wiley on December 07, 2014, 07:16:41 PM
I feel like briles big moment was when he hired bennett as the dc.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on December 07, 2014, 07:22:57 PM
In response to IP I'd say currently but not all time yet
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wiley on December 07, 2014, 07:23:55 PM
I feel like briles big moment was when he hired bennett as the dc.
Interview with Bennett said he never once turned on his computer while coaching at smu, even snyder would chuckle at that (i think).
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on December 07, 2014, 07:34:23 PM
Did YOUR gym teacher use a computer? Mine sure didn't.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wiley on December 07, 2014, 07:43:51 PM
Did YOUR gym teacher use a computer? Mine sure didn't.
Yes, he did
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on December 08, 2014, 12:27:44 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

:lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 08, 2014, 01:54:41 PM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

:lol:

Oops. Like the zeal though.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mr Bread on December 08, 2014, 02:12:15 PM
Oh yeah how many trophies does briles have?

the same amount.

Negative.  Briles has an outright Conference USA champy too. :surprised:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on December 09, 2014, 12:54:41 AM
Briles now 4-1 vs Snyder, with 1 outright Dr. Pepper and 1 shared Dr. Pepper.



Yeah, Briles ownership of Snyder has surpassed Leach and Stoops. I take some small measure of solace in the fact that at least Baylor is now winning the conference and has become a legit elite contender the last 2 seasons. Also, Snyder has won at Norman 2 straight times.
Also, in 2012, when we played Baylor, they were playing as good as anyone at the conference at that point.  At some point during that 2012 season for them, things just clicked into place.  They've been playing at a super high level ever since.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on December 09, 2014, 01:25:37 AM
Would like to see how Briles does once his staff starts moving on and up. That is the one thing that makes Bill 1.0 so amazing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on December 09, 2014, 01:27:37 AM
Would like to see how Briles does once his staff starts moving on and up. That is the one thing that makes Bill 1.0 so amazing.
until we were left with a bunch of idiot coaches
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on December 09, 2014, 01:30:37 AM
Would like to see how Briles does once his staff starts moving on and up. That is the one thing that makes Bill 1.0 so amazing.
until we were left with a bunch of idiot coaches
It took 15 years.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on December 09, 2014, 10:49:12 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure.  Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

:lol:

Oops. Like the zeal though.

Let's revisit in ten years.  Snyder will be hall of famer; maybe have a national championship.  Regardless of what Briles manages to achieve before the crap hits the fan, we know it will have hit the fan in ten years.  When it does, even Dave Bliss will be appalled.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on December 09, 2014, 11:16:13 AM
a simple "i was wrong" would have worked
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: michigancat on December 09, 2014, 11:28:01 AM
Bennett is a loser head coach who probably won't go anywhere, have any of his offensive assistants left?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on December 09, 2014, 11:30:36 AM
Bennett is a loser head coach who probably won't go anywhere, have any of his offensive assistants left?
   All have been there for all 7 years at Baylor, assume most where also at Houston. Defensive staff was rebuilt by Bennett.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on December 09, 2014, 11:34:54 AM
Bennett is a loser head coach who probably won't go anywhere, have any of his offensive assistants left?
   All have been there for all 7 years at Baylor, assume most where also at Houston. Defensive staff was rebuilt by Bennett.

Man, sounds like Briles caught lightning in a bottle with his staff...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on December 09, 2014, 11:42:19 AM
Bennett is a loser head coach who probably won't go anywhere, have any of his offensive assistants left?
   All have been there for all 7 years at Baylor, assume most where also at Houston. Defensive staff was rebuilt by Bennett.

Man, sounds like Briles caught lightning in a bottle with his staff...
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fg-ecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FG%2F01%2Fdvd%2Fsony%2FAPlusDetailPages%2FTheNatural%2F1_Nat_L.jpg&hash=55428f0b3ec3a5519b7bbfd06d818c52ca9a4704)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on December 09, 2014, 12:56:22 PM
The turnover on the defensive staff was the biggest problem for Bill 1.0, especially when you add in the fact those were some of the best recruiters. 

It is unlikely Briles loses anyone from his defensive staff and I doubt losing many offensive assistants will be much of a problem.  In fact, Briles would likely replace any losses with an up and coming Texas HS coach that further adds to his recruiting base in Texas. 

With Strong not embracing the Texas HS HUNH style and OU stuck in a rut it is not hard to imagine Briles on run of double digit win seasons not unlike DoD 1.0.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Jabeez on December 09, 2014, 01:03:54 PM
Quote
@TravHaneyESPN: POST: Big 12 talks, assesses after its bad weekend. (Members aren't pleased with Briles.) Who's next at Houston? (In) http://es.pn/163jbAq

What do they say about briles? I hate that guy.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: XocolateThundarr on December 09, 2014, 01:51:24 PM
Bennett is a loser head coach who probably won't go anywhere, have any of his offensive assistants left?
   All have been there for all 7 years at Baylor, assume most where also at Houston. Defensive staff was rebuilt by Bennett.

Man, sounds like Briles caught lightning in a bottle with his staff...

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamesprays.com%2Fimages%2Ficons%2Fi-see-what-you-rough+ridin%27-did-there-2114_preview.jpg&hash=0fc0606303b27275d5760591a6c9e512396c45f6)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on December 09, 2014, 01:59:32 PM
it's pretty sick what some people can make jokes about
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bshea85 on December 09, 2014, 02:16:20 PM
I remember the days when Baylor was an automatic "W" for Kstate.  It didn't matter if we played at home or away, Baylor just rolled over.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on December 09, 2014, 02:19:33 PM
it's pretty sick what some people can make jokes about

That really put a charge into you, eh? 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on December 09, 2014, 02:53:10 PM

I remember the days when Baylor was an automatic "W" for Kstate.  It didn't matter if we played at home or away, Baylor just rolled over.

I miss those days. I remember I used to root for Baylor except when playing the 'Cats of course back when they were trash just because they were always the underdog in almost every game.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 15, 2015, 06:30:54 PM
@davidubben: Does Art Briles' rebuild top LHC Bill Snyder's?


I would say yes.    #tucknation is melting down about it.  It's immaterial that Baylor is in Texas and it's immaterial that OU and Texas are "down".   OU has gone 51-15 over the last five seasons.   That's not very "down".    Briles still has to go into Texas high schools and recruit against everyone and their favorite pet.

Briles has matched the success of Snyder. I'm not sure if the rebuild is better only because I'm not sure if Baylor was as bad when Briles arrived as K-State was when Snyder did. They are very comparable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on May 15, 2015, 06:36:27 PM
@davidubben: Does Art Briles' rebuild top LHC Bill Snyder's?

it's a fair question, i wouldn't be offended by anyone saying briles. but, snyder did have a bigger hole to climb out of. and even if texas-ou aren't exactly down, snyder had to rebuild during the nebraska-colorado monster.

two consecutive league titles is better than anything snyder has done, imo.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on May 15, 2015, 07:25:32 PM
They had more history and tradition when Briles arrived compared to when Snyder arrived. However, they were in shambles when they entered the big 12.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 15, 2015, 08:36:09 PM
Any tradition they had prior to Briles was a distant memory. 

35-101 prior to Briles as a member of the Big 12.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on May 15, 2015, 08:38:49 PM
Any tradition they had prior to Briles was a distant memory. 

35-101 prior to Briles as a member of the Big 12.

Three bowls in the 90's  :dunno:

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 15, 2015, 09:29:04 PM
Briles is going to have to make the playoff to pass Snyder for this. Baylor just wasn't quite bad enough. KSU was almost as bad as KU is today.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 15, 2015, 09:48:41 PM
What s challenge. Who sucked more before they found the ditr at that school.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 15, 2015, 09:48:51 PM
When he runs it into the ground, retires for a few years and then comes back and wins another league title lets talk.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 16, 2015, 06:46:42 AM
Snyder, Stoops, Patterson, Brown had 8 to 20 year head starts on Briles. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: GoodForAnother on May 16, 2015, 07:19:38 AM
when Briles takes off his hat he's super ugly
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on May 16, 2015, 10:02:44 AM
Snyder, Stoops, Patterson, Brown had 8 to 20 year head starts on Briles.

What?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: GONNATEAMKILLU on May 16, 2015, 10:31:45 AM
When he runs it into the ground, retires for a few years and then comes back and wins another league title lets talk.

This
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on May 16, 2015, 10:39:59 AM
pretty similar
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 16, 2015, 11:00:30 AM
Stupid thread. Briles had about 100x the resources when he started. CFB was barely even on tv when Snyder started. Both are insanely successful. I would guess Snyder has a better win%
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 16, 2015, 11:29:46 AM
When he runs it into the ground, retires for a few years and then comes back and wins another league title lets talk.

This

Shouldn't briles get more credit if he doesn't run it into the ground
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 16, 2015, 11:40:46 AM
Resources is not a good argument.   Relative to the era, one could easily argue that Briles had fewer resources relative to Snyder.  When Briles started Baylor was woefully behind on facilities relative to the rest of the Big 12 and schools recruiting Texas hard. 


Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: GONNATEAMKILLU on May 16, 2015, 03:02:45 PM
When he runs it into the ground, retires for a few years and then comes back and wins another league title lets talk.

This

Shouldn't briles get more credit if he doesn't run it into the ground

Absolutely not
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 17, 2015, 08:56:41 AM
Resources is not a good argument.   Relative to the era, one could easily argue that Briles had fewer resources relative to Snyder.  When Briles started Baylor was woefully behind on facilities relative to the rest of the Big 12 and schools recruiting Texas hard.

Yeah, the cfb landscape of 1989 is essentially identical to the landscape of 2008 (or whenever art started).
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 17, 2015, 10:29:09 AM
Resources is not a good argument.   Relative to the era, one could easily argue that Briles had fewer resources relative to Snyder.  When Briles started Baylor was woefully behind on facilities relative to the rest of the Big 12 and schools recruiting Texas hard.

Yeah, the cfb landscape of 1989 is essentially identical to the landscape of 2008 (or whenever art started).

That's pretty much the point.   K-State only had to do $11 million dollars worth of facilities projects in between 1989 and 1993 and other schools were coming to take tours to see them.   In 2008 $11 million in facilities improvements was a drop in the bucket.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ben ji on May 17, 2015, 11:10:31 AM
Resources is not a good argument.   Relative to the era, one could easily argue that Briles had fewer resources relative to Snyder.  When Briles started Baylor was woefully behind on facilities relative to the rest of the Big 12 and schools recruiting Texas hard.

Yeah, the cfb landscape of 1989 is essentially identical to the landscape of 2008 (or whenever art started).

That's pretty much the point.   K-State only had to do $11 million dollars worth of facilities projects in between 1989 and 1993 and other schools were coming to take tours to see them.   In 2008 $11 million in facilities improvements was a drop in the bucket.

Was it 2008 that we spent 10 million to "redo" vanier only to tear it all down 8 years later?

Just LOL at the whole RP/BK era.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on May 17, 2015, 11:14:23 AM
Resources is not a good argument.   Relative to the era, one could easily argue that Briles had fewer resources relative to Snyder.  When Briles started Baylor was woefully behind on facilities relative to the rest of the Big 12 and schools recruiting Texas hard.

Yeah, the cfb landscape of 1989 is essentially identical to the landscape of 2008 (or whenever art started).

That's pretty much the point.   K-State only had to do $11 million dollars worth of facilities projects in between 1989 and 1993 and other schools were coming to take tours to see them.   In 2008 $11 million in facilities improvements was a drop in the bucket.

Well, obviously, that's because football wasn't the pinnacle of the world at that time. Now it is.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on May 17, 2015, 12:53:42 PM
Better resources, better history, recruiting hotbed and he still hasn't accomplished anything greater than Snyder has. This isn't even a question worth serious debate.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on May 17, 2015, 10:55:15 PM
Better resources, better history, recruiting hotbed and he still hasn't accomplished anything greater than Snyder has. This isn't even a question worth serious debate.

as i opined previously, two consecutive big 12 titles is better than anything snyder has done.

but i am curious what dax's point is. like, who cares?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: nicname on May 18, 2015, 01:15:57 AM
I think we're forgetting how badass KSU was 1997-2003. Snyds' teams were top 10 5-7 years and one that wasn't was Big 12 champs. Briles hasn't matched that. He can tho.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Stevesie60 on May 18, 2015, 01:18:35 AM
I'm not a defend-Snyder-at-all-costs dork, in fact I think by the time they both retire Briles will be considered better. But Snyder didn't have a chance to have a shared Big 12 Title during his first stint so I'm not sure the "two Big 12 Titles back-to-back" is a worthy talking point.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 18, 2015, 08:58:12 AM
Good points everybody.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on May 18, 2015, 09:45:03 AM
I think it could be argued either way, but everyone that even comes close to dismissing Baylor being in Texas as a big advantage is an idiot.

Any school in a major conference in Texas or Florida have a nice situation. Still need a good coach and AD support, but the pieces are usually there to make a run.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 18, 2015, 12:55:41 PM
Baylor has significantly elevated itself up the choice ladder with Briles success.   I suspected a fair number of guys they're getting now would have only had Baylor as a fall back at most.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 18, 2015, 07:30:29 PM
Resources is not a good argument.   Relative to the era, one could easily argue that Briles had fewer resources relative to Snyder.  When Briles started Baylor was woefully behind on facilities relative to the rest of the Big 12 and schools recruiting Texas hard.

Yeah, the cfb landscape of 1989 is essentially identical to the landscape of 2008 (or whenever art started).

That's pretty much the point.   K-State only had to do $11 million dollars worth of facilities projects in between 1989 and 1993 and other schools were coming to take tours to see them.   In 2008 $11 million in facilities improvements was a drop in the bucket.

Well, obviously, that's because football wasn't the pinnacle of the world at that time. Now it is.

I can't tell if dax is agreeing or disagreeing with me. But the numbers now are about a multiple of ten as what they were in 1989, so it's obviously easier to do well with more money
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 22, 2015, 10:04:25 AM
Art Briles pales in comparison to the 2nd best Big 12 coach (Old Balls Snyder).

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2015, 11:09:30 AM
https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/602505299472338944
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 24, 2015, 09:38:04 PM
https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/602505299472338944
Does this mean he does more with shitty recruits... just like somebody around here?  :whistle1:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on July 21, 2015, 03:55:46 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 21, 2015, 06:45:21 PM
Heard that on the radio. it was great!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on July 21, 2015, 10:29:00 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on July 21, 2015, 10:34:42 PM
Briles cheats

link?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on July 21, 2015, 10:37:48 PM
If Briles is scary evil, then bring me Satan the Lord of Darkness to coach KU.   Child please...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on July 21, 2015, 10:55:25 PM
Briles cheats

link?

www.youknowitstrue.com

See also www.justwait.com
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on July 22, 2015, 08:27:43 AM
those links don't have any info on Briles cheating, wtf steffy you stupid idiot
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on July 22, 2015, 08:58:56 AM
HE DOESN'T DO IT THE SNYDER WAY!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: OK_Cat on July 22, 2015, 09:16:20 AM
Everybody cheats, idiot steffy
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: slobber on July 22, 2015, 09:16:29 AM

HE DOESN'T DO IT THE WEBER WAY!
FYP
I know it's the wrong board, but Weber out Snyders Snyder.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on July 22, 2015, 09:20:12 AM
I wonder who has the best record since the Big XII became the (Big XII-II}???  :Take the Bait:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on July 22, 2015, 09:26:27 AM
how could people anyone not like Briles?  he's a phenomenal coach, very respectful of LHOFHCBS, and hilarious.  plus he's got that folksy texas high school coach charm.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on July 22, 2015, 09:29:38 AM
how could people anyone not like Briles?  he's a phenomenal coach, very respectful of LHOFHCBS, and hilarious.  plus he's got that folksy texas high school coach charm.

Baylor is incredibly lucky to have him
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on July 22, 2015, 09:30:11 AM
and he could do a load of pushups
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on July 22, 2015, 09:37:15 AM
Kept us out of the MNC.  Metalhead and I will forever hate him for that!  :curse:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on July 22, 2015, 10:38:11 AM
how could people anyone not like Briles?  he's a phenomenal coach, very respectful of LHOFHCBS, and hilarious.  plus he's got that folksy texas high school coach charm.

How anyone with a brain could not see through his schtick is beyond me.  Briles has the worst traits from Roy Williams and Dave Bliss.  A scary combination.

Just wait.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on July 22, 2015, 10:51:49 AM
how could people anyone not like Briles?  he's a phenomenal coach, very respectful of LHOFHCBS, and hilarious.  plus he's got that folksy texas high school coach charm.

How anyone with a brain could not see through his schtick is beyond me.  Briles has the worst traits from Roy Williams and Dave Bliss.  A scary combination.

Just wait.
winning is the only trait that matters and he is doing it at rough ridin' baylor. just shut up already
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on July 22, 2015, 10:54:06 AM
how could people anyone not like Briles?  he's a phenomenal coach, very respectful of LHOFHCBS, and hilarious.  plus he's got that folksy texas high school coach charm.

How anyone with a brain could not see through his schtick is beyond me.  Briles has the worst traits from Roy Williams and Dave Bliss.  A scary combination.

Just wait.
Don't worry Steffy, the old man will take this young pup to the woodshed.  He's all upset that his team wasn't predicted to win the Big XII this year.  Wait until the Wizard puts a spell on him; he'll be crying like the baby he is.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on July 22, 2015, 11:02:48 AM
what is his schtick?  steffy hoping on a prayer that he gets busted for cheating with zero info about it, great stuff as always
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on July 22, 2015, 11:13:52 AM
what is his schtick?  steffy hoping on a prayer that he gets busted for cheating with zero info about it, great stuff as always

yeah but can't you just tell?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on July 22, 2015, 11:18:20 AM
what is his schtick?  steffy hoping on a prayer that he gets busted for cheating with zero info about it, great stuff as always

yeah but can't you just tell?

#JustWait  #OneDayAtATime
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on July 22, 2015, 12:27:28 PM
Hey guys I don't like Briles. He seems arrogant. And I think he really plays up the folksy-texasy thing to where it doesn't seem genuine. Obv a very good coach but very hateable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on July 22, 2015, 12:34:27 PM
Hey guys I don't like Briles. He seems arrogant. And I think he really plays up the folksy-texasy thing to where it doesn't seem genuine. Obv a very good coach but very hateable.

Thanks for your opinion.

Does anyone else have any opinions to share on Art Briles, the man?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trogdor on July 22, 2015, 12:59:41 PM
Hey guys I don't like Briles. He seems arrogant. And I think he really plays up the folksy-texasy thing to where it doesn't seem genuine. Obv a very good coach but very hateable.

Thanks for your opinion.

Does anyone else have any opinions to share on Art Briles, the man?

Hey guys I don't like Briles. He seems arrogant. And I think he really plays up the folksy-texasy thing to where it doesn't seem genuine. Obv a very good coach but very hateable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 22, 2015, 01:50:17 PM
With a new starting QB and the loss of Phil Montgomery the potential for a offensive slide exist. An offensive slide could really hurt their defense, making other offensive less predictable due to the fact they don't have to play catch up at such a high level. That plus a harder schedule could make thing more interesting in the Big 12.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on July 29, 2015, 04:50:13 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on July 29, 2015, 11:34:51 PM
i neither like nor dislike art briles
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on July 30, 2015, 10:26:59 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

You're a dope
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 31, 2015, 09:49:59 AM
Outside of Gundy, Briles is the most full of crap coach in the conf.  His gross ears also make me sick
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 31, 2015, 09:53:22 AM
Briles is a class A whiner.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: RU82 on August 02, 2015, 09:07:49 PM
Both are really good coaches IMHO as their accomplishments speak for themselves. 

I did notice that half of Baylor's 2014 Big 12 players were 4 star recruits.     Then I noticed 4 of the Kansas State 1st and 2nd team all big 12 performers were walk-ons.  Now all I can say is that is impressive.   

Jonathan Truman
Ryan Mueller
Curry Sexton
B.J. Finney.

That has to be a record for all major conferences.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Stevesie60 on August 03, 2015, 12:52:09 AM
No one is denying that coaching kids up from walk-ons is a great accomplishment. But think of how much we could accomplish if those kids were already good and we could focus on other things in practice besides coaching them up. Or how good we'd be if we made them even better than they already were.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: massofcatfan on August 03, 2015, 01:20:05 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

You're a dope

your
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 03, 2015, 01:34:55 PM
No one is denying that coaching kids up from walk-ons is a great accomplishment. But think of how much we could accomplish if those kids were already good and we could focus on other things in practice besides coaching them up. Or how good we'd be if we made them even better than they already were.

Mueller and Finney were better than most scholarship athletes from day 1. They just went to small schools and didn't get recruited. We do a really good job identifying these kids and saving scholarships to offer to other kids who actually get recruited.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on August 03, 2015, 01:58:35 PM
Curry wasn't a walk-on
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on August 05, 2015, 01:53:19 PM

Thanks for your opinion.

Does anyone else have any opinions to share on Art Briles, the man?

Art Briles is a piece of crap.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 05, 2015, 10:15:49 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

You're a dope

your

Nope
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on August 05, 2015, 10:41:24 PM

Thanks for your opinion.

Does anyone else have any opinions to share on Art Briles, the man?

Art Briles is a piece of crap.

very sore loser. Honestly who scores 58 points and still loses?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: American Standard on August 07, 2015, 11:22:45 AM
So...how's the walk-on class look this year? Any ruff rid'in, pimp slappin OGs, under the radar/invisible to radar, future hall of famers ready to rain hell?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: slobber on August 10, 2015, 07:53:04 AM

So...how's the walk-on class look this year? Any ruff rid'in, pimp slappin OGs, under the radar/invisible to radar, future hall of famers ready to rain hell?
They are called DITR.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 10, 2015, 09:35:13 AM

So...how's the walk-on class look this year? Any ruff rid'in, pimp slappin OGs, under the radar/invisible to radar, future hall of famers ready to rain hell?
They are called DITR.


Gonna win 'em all!
I think he's insulting our great dirt farming team; but yea... DITR.  :ROFL:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Bookcat on August 10, 2015, 04:04:20 PM
Yeah, but that 1 win we got was way better than all of theirs. Its the way we did it with one player (Arthur), against Heisman ...... They'll never top that. You can't.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 10, 2015, 06:19:54 PM
Yeah, but that 1 win we got was way better than all of theirs. Its the way we did it with one player (Arthur), against Heisman ...... They'll never top that. You can't.
That whopping they gave us in 2012 started their run for dbl championships in 13-14.  If you asked them they would tell you that was their best win.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 10, 2015, 06:25:37 PM
Also, they put up a large muriual in their sport's complex of this game for motivation on the field.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: American Standard on August 11, 2015, 03:53:39 PM

So...how's the walk-on class look this year? Any ruff rid'in, pimp slappin OGs, under the radar/invisible to radar, future hall of famers ready to rain hell?
They are called DITR.


Gonna win 'em all!
Any mention of diamonds cues Emmett Smith in my head. Sometimes those diamonds are surrounded by...

Looking forward to getting to Little apple again this year. Maybe the bus driver can get the team to the stadium on time instead of taking us on a tour of the local grasslands like 2013. We know Snyder handpicked the bus drivers. Payback bitches!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chuckjames on August 21, 2015, 01:50:03 PM
While talking the moral high ground is usually for losers, i think the Baylor situation this week is an exemption, and should be taken into account when comparing the 2.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 21, 2015, 02:10:18 PM
Things are getting kind of warm for Briles
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on August 21, 2015, 02:44:20 PM
Baylor isn't going to fire Briles over this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on August 21, 2015, 02:44:31 PM
He is a crap human and maybe should but they aren't


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chuckjames on August 21, 2015, 02:55:08 PM
some mid level administrator will tho. the buses are warming up in Waco.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on August 21, 2015, 02:55:41 PM
The AD will take the hit on this.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on August 21, 2015, 03:00:28 PM
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/BaylorAthletics">@BaylorAthletics</a> that tarp isn't just for covering up seats is it</p>&mdash; Chuck F'n Strong (@ChuckFnStrong) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckFnStrong/status/634749858910466048">August 21, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on August 21, 2015, 03:01:07 PM
The AD will take the hit on this.
Wasn't the victim a female student athlete? There is plenty of blame to go around, but how does the AD not even protect one of their own SA's? Heads need to roll.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on August 21, 2015, 03:02:03 PM
Can you not embed tweets on gE?

@Chuckfnstrong is rough ridin' killing it today.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on August 21, 2015, 03:03:49 PM
Can you not embed tweets on gE?

@Chuckfnstrong is rough ridin' killing it today.

Glad somebody is.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on August 21, 2015, 03:21:21 PM
Can you not embed tweets on gE?

@Chuckfnstrong is rough ridin' killing it today.
Just paste the url to the tweet.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 21, 2015, 03:31:44 PM
I'd love for him to get fired and then have Currie pick him up when Bill retires.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on August 21, 2015, 04:31:45 PM
I'd love for him to get fired and then have Currie pick him up when Bill retires.

I would rather go 6-6 from here to eternity than have Briles come to K-State after reading about what happened.  I hope he gets crap canned and never coaches again. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 21, 2015, 06:40:45 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/baylor-de-sam-ukwuachu-sentenced-to-180-days-in-jail--10-years-probation-222938095.html
DE Sam Ukwuachu sentenced for raping a female Baylor student-athlete

 :sdeek: he lied about Chris Peterson, pretty stupid lie too

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 21, 2015, 06:50:44 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on August 21, 2015, 07:36:47 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 21, 2015, 08:11:28 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.
Briles is no friend of the K-State family.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: bones129 on August 21, 2015, 08:21:55 PM
Who would believe Briles over Petersen??
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 21, 2015, 08:23:54 PM
Literally no one
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 21, 2015, 09:00:39 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on August 21, 2015, 09:36:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

So like if you know something else why wouldn't you say it?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 21, 2015, 10:47:13 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Stevesie60 on August 22, 2015, 01:20:45 AM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

Heh.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 22, 2015, 09:24:05 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 22, 2015, 10:17:30 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.

What have I had to say about Briles character other to say he was lying? So I'm confused do you like him or not?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 22, 2015, 10:23:41 AM
Also I'm going to go on record now and change my mind on Briles vs. Peterson. I'm not sure who is lying, maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle, as thin as that middle ground is in this case.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 22, 2015, 11:58:59 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.

What have I had to say about Briles character other to say he was lying? So I'm confused do you like him or not?

Are you serious?  You've posting for months about how "adorable" Briles is, talking about what a great coach he is, all while many on this board were telling you he was a dirtbag.

Just admit you fell for his schtick, and then the matter will be done.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 22, 2015, 12:00:54 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.

What have I had to say about Briles character other to say he was lying? So I'm confused do you like him or not?

Are you serious?  You've posting for months about how "adorable" Briles is, talking about what a great coach he is, all while many on this board were telling you he was a dirtbag.

Just admit you fell for his schtick, and then the matter will be done.

Saying he had an adorable appearance on Highly Questionable and saying he's a good football says what exactly about his character?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 22, 2015, 12:03:43 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.

What have I had to say about Briles character other to say he was lying? So I'm confused do you like him or not?

Are you serious?  You've posting for months about how "adorable" Briles is, talking about what a great coach he is, all while many on this board were telling you he was a dirtbag.

Just admit you fell for his schtick, and then the matter will be done.

Saying he had an adorable appearance on Highly Questionable and saying he's a good football says what exactly about his character?

You're handling this about as well as Briles and Baylor handled the rape.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 22, 2015, 12:05:37 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.

What have I had to say about Briles character other to say he was lying? So I'm confused do you like him or not?

Are you serious?  You've posting for months about how "adorable" Briles is, talking about what a great coach he is, all while many on this board were telling you he was a dirtbag.

Just admit you fell for his schtick, and then the matter will be done.

Saying he had an adorable appearance on Highly Questionable and saying he's a good football says what exactly about his character?

You're handling this about as well as Briles and Baylor handled the rape.

So nothing? Thought so, keep flailing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 22, 2015, 12:07:32 PM
Also I'm going to go on record now and change my mind on Briles vs. Peterson. I'm not sure who is lying, maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle, as thin as that middle ground is in this case.

If he's lying, he doubled down and it's pretty elaborate. This seems too specific for him to be lying about.
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/art-briles-releases-statement--baylor-shares-sam-ukwuachu-transfer-document-001627927.html
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 22, 2015, 03:08:50 PM
Nothing like this has ever been buried at K-State like it has at Baylor, not even close.


Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on August 22, 2015, 03:38:28 PM
Who would believe Briles over Petersen??

Down here in Texas, it's every Tom, Dick and Harry with a Baylor hat &/or t-shirt... Otherwise, MIR is correct; literally no one.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 22, 2015, 05:48:21 PM
Lol at using the transfer papers as his excuse.  Like Boise would put "sexual assault" or similar on there for reason he is leaving
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 22, 2015, 07:31:59 PM
http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2015/8/21/9188971/a-few-maybes-about-the-baylor-case
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pendergast on August 22, 2015, 07:46:39 PM
He knew what he was dealing with, it's really not that hard to tell if someone is lying, unless they've been highly trained in that area.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 22, 2015, 10:22:49 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimagizer.imageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg909%2F6205%2FqLUQCR.gif&hash=d28cda34ce9c19333cfb185c5657ed6a72eeac71)

Courtesy of ShaggyBevoTexas
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on August 22, 2015, 10:49:52 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimagizer.imageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg909%2F6205%2FqLUQCR.gif&hash=d28cda34ce9c19333cfb185c5657ed6a72eeac71)

Courtesy of ShaggyBevoTexas
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 24, 2015, 09:54:33 AM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 24, 2015, 10:41:18 AM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: michigancat on August 24, 2015, 10:47:57 AM
Snyder definitely would have taken Raines if he hadn't have gotten caught.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 24, 2015, 11:24:26 AM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?

Well, I guess one guy beats and rapes women and the other guy beats the crap out of people with his friends and delivers the killing blow with a kick to the face. So they aren't quite the same, but they seem sort of similar to me.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 24, 2015, 11:48:36 AM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?

Well, I guess one guy beats and rapes women and the other guy beats the crap out of people with his friends and delivers the killing blow with a kick to the face. So they aren't quite the same, but they seem sort of similar to me.
what a weird way to look at things.  sad, really.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on August 24, 2015, 11:50:38 AM
Sounds like their is a crap storm heading towards Brilesville. Every stone is getting overturned.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AbeFroman on August 24, 2015, 12:35:01 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?

Well, I guess one guy beats and rapes women and the other guy beats the crap out of people with his friends and delivers the killing blow with a kick to the face. So they aren't quite the same, but they seem sort of similar to me.

Except Snyder and the coaches balked on the scholarship offer the next day and Briles actually brought a POS woman abuser on campus where he continued to lie after another incident.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 24, 2015, 12:37:14 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?

Well, I guess one guy beats and rapes women and the other guy beats the crap out of people with his friends and delivers the killing blow with a kick to the face. So they aren't quite the same, but they seem sort of similar to me.

Except Snyder and the coaches balked on the scholarship offer the next day and Briles actually brought a POS woman abuser on campus.
It had to be said.  :Wha:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: michigancat on August 24, 2015, 12:38:07 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?

Well, I guess one guy beats and rapes women and the other guy beats the crap out of people with his friends and delivers the killing blow with a kick to the face. So they aren't quite the same, but they seem sort of similar to me.

Except Snyder and the coaches balked on the scholarship offer the next day and Briles actually brought a POS woman abuser on campus.

I think Briles would have revoked the offer if he had been caught by the media, too. (Note I may have the timelines wrong)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 24, 2015, 12:38:21 PM
Jfc. What a trash human being. I hope this debate is over now.

I'm sure Snyder has probably done some crap things in his day, but I doubt anything comes even close to this. It's sickening.

http://cjonline.com/stories/020405/kca_raines.shtml#.VdsvevlVhBc
how could you post that link, assuming you read the article, and still make a comparison to the two situations?

Well, I guess one guy beats and rapes women and the other guy beats the crap out of people with his friends and delivers the killing blow with a kick to the face. So they aren't quite the same, but they seem sort of similar to me.

Except Snyder and the coaches balked on the scholarship offer the next day and Briles actually brought a POS woman abuser on campus.

They balked because the media was throwing a fit. It's not like they weren't aware they were recruiting a killer throughout the whole process. He was convicted.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AbeFroman on August 24, 2015, 12:38:29 PM
I mean, if Raines had made it to campus, killed another kid, and then Snyder and Currie conspired to throw the hypothetical dead student under the bus, then yeah it would be similar.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 24, 2015, 12:40:27 PM
I mean, if Raines had made it to campus, killed another kid, and then Snyder and Currie conspired to throw the hypothetical dead student under the bus, then yeah it would be similar.
Go get him, Abe!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 24, 2015, 12:41:54 PM
Briles and Snyder both did what the football coach should do. Kansas State's administration did what they should do. Baylor's administration did not.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on August 24, 2015, 12:44:01 PM
Briles probably hoped the guy had learned his lesson, like most coaches would hope of a guy who's good at their sport. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 24, 2015, 12:45:10 PM
Briles and Snyder both did what the football coach should do. Kansas State's administration did what they should do. Baylor's administration did not.
A few years back, when Snyder dropped out of the crooked Cam Newton scam speaks volumes.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 24, 2015, 12:58:14 PM
Briles and Snyder both did what the football coach should do. Kansas State's administration did what they should do. Baylor's administration did not.
A few years back, when Snyder dropped out of the crooked Cam Newton scam speaks volumes.

LOL, okay
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 24, 2015, 04:29:09 PM
Briles isn't going to lose his job over this.  The convouted, multiple defenses being thrown up by Baylor (the nondescript transfer form not signed or completed by Briles being the most prominent) are all bullshit, but Baylor will use the "us against the world" mentality in order to stick with Briles.  It's pretty wild when you think about it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 24, 2015, 04:37:40 PM
I don't think Briles really did much wrong. The school probably should lose its football program, though.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on August 24, 2015, 04:54:15 PM
I don't think Briles really did much wrong. The school probably should lose its football program, though.

Peterson is really hurting Briles credibility, it laughable that Briles acting like he didn't find any dirt about Ukwuachu. All Briles has to say from the knowledge we uptained we thought Sam deserved a 2nd chance. Instead Briles is being a coward and dimwit. He is going to be linked to the sorry ass investigation no matter what and is opening up himself to more damage.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 24, 2015, 05:05:43 PM
he's a football coach, which by definition means dumbass
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: michigancat on August 24, 2015, 05:08:21 PM
IIRC Snyder claimed he didn't know about the Raines conviction
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 24, 2015, 05:09:49 PM
IIRC Snyder claimed he didn't know about the Raines conviction
according to the article, you don't iirc
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: michigancat on August 24, 2015, 05:11:47 PM
IIRC Snyder claimed he didn't know about the Raines conviction
according to the article, you don't iirc

Quote
"The information that was shared with us when the young man was on our campus is somewhat different from what is now being reported in the media."

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 24, 2015, 05:18:22 PM
that's a big leap to make based upon that quote.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on August 24, 2015, 05:20:45 PM
What did LHC Bill Snyder know about Sam Ukwuachu and when did he know it?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 24, 2015, 05:52:14 PM
I don't think Briles really did much wrong. The school probably should lose its football program, though.

Peterson is really hurting Briles credibility, it laughable that Briles acting like he didn't find any dirt about Ukwuachu. All Briles has to say from the knowledge we uptained we thought Sam deserved a 2nd chance. Instead Briles is being a coward and dimwit. He is going to be linked to the sorry ass investigation no matter what and is opening up himself to more damage.

This. Also they should have kicked him off the team when he was initially accused in Waco of sexual assault instead of trying to get him back on the field.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on August 24, 2015, 06:00:22 PM
I don't think Briles really did much wrong. The school probably should lose its football program, though.

Peterson is really hurting Briles credibility, it laughable that Briles acting like he didn't find any dirt about Ukwuachu. All Briles has to say from the knowledge we uptained we thought Sam deserved a 2nd chance. Instead Briles is being a coward and dimwit. He is going to be linked to the sorry ass investigation no matter what and is opening up himself to more damage.

This. Also they should have kicked him off the team when he was initially accused in Waco of sexual assault instead of trying to get him back on the field.
It really has nothing to do with a 2nd chance recruit. If he was recruited out of high school as an honor role student and the same thing happened with the assault and cover up it still would be a major major issue. A lot of this is gravy and it appears that Baylor has a ton of gravy.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 24, 2015, 08:32:47 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 24, 2015, 08:53:43 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

That coach has vested interests in saying that - not saying he's lying. Author also notes Boise could have not told him what they knew.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 24, 2015, 08:55:51 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on August 24, 2015, 09:34:40 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

That coach has vested interests in saying that - not saying he's lying. Author also notes Boise could have not told him what they knew.

That is such a silly article, how does a high school coach know anything about what Briles knows.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pendergast on August 24, 2015, 09:38:14 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You need to find some perspective on this.  The sides are forming their lines, I don't know how this could be any more predictable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 24, 2015, 09:44:59 PM
Peterson was trying to cover up the beating. Why would he have told Briles about it? He wanted to get Ukwuachu as far away as possible.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: bones129 on August 24, 2015, 09:48:12 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

That coach has vested interests in saying that - not saying he's lying. Author also notes Boise could have not told him what they knew.

That is such a silly article, how does a high school coach know anything about what Briles knows.

Texas HS coaches worship Briles. They think he can do no wrong.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 24, 2015, 09:49:47 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.

I'm still waiting for your stupid ass to post a link of me saying anything about Briles' character other than me calling him a liar. Your meltdown is because I had a one line post mentioning that Briles was adorable on a rough ridin' television show. Produce the link of me calling a dumb rough ridin' football coach a good man, contribute to the actual conversation happening, or just shut the eff up, freak.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 24, 2015, 09:53:40 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You need to find some perspective on this.  The sides are forming their lines, I don't know how this could be any more predictable.

What perspective do I need to find, is there a stance I've taken that I'm unaware of? When this broke it seems everyone, me included, raced to call the guy a liar. It isn't as simple as Briles is lying and Peterson is a holy deity who is telling the truth.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Stevesie60 on August 25, 2015, 12:31:45 AM
No matter what comes out, Baylor is not going to lose his job. Even if for whatever reason the NCAA said he couldn't recruit for two years (this would never happen) Baylor would not fire him. He's their Snyder.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bones129 on August 25, 2015, 12:51:20 AM
No matter what comes out, Baylor is not going to lose his job. Even if for whatever reason the NCAA said he couldn't recruit for two years (this would never happen) Baylor would not fire him. He's their Snyder.

True, whether it should be or not. Baylor worships this guy. Still like to know what he knew, and when he knew it, but we'll never find out.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on August 25, 2015, 12:55:41 AM
Where was the appropriate place for Ukwuachu after his stint in Boise?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bones129 on August 25, 2015, 01:07:52 AM
Where was the appropriate place for Ukwuachu after his stint in Boise?

Prison?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 25, 2015, 03:52:01 AM
Where was the appropriate place for Ukwuachu after his stint in Boise?

That's just it, this Briles vs. Peterson BS is:
1. People not understanding what is happening with the story and others absolutely playing the result.
2. An incredible distraction from what the true story should be here and it's Baylor University completely mishandling everything from the time of the rape to the aftermath of the conviction.

Even if Briles knew everything, everything that could have been known is this:

Quote
This isn’t the first violent incident that Ukwuachu has been accused of. In documents from May 2013 obtained by Texas Monthly, Marc Paul, the assistant athletics director at Boise State University, recounts advising to Ukwuachu’s then-girlfriend in Boise that she stay away from the house the two shared for several nights, after he put his fist through a window while drunk. Paul also makes plans for how to get police protection for the couple’s other housemate, who received threatening text messages from Ukwuachu. Handwritten notes in a document from a Boise State source also refer to times that Ukwuachu would get verbally abusive over “small irritants” like a spilled drink, and note that the woman he lived with acknowledged that she would “probably not” admit it if the abuse were physical. It ends with the words “NOT healthy relationship!” underlined.
http://www.texasmonthly.com/article/silence-at-baylor/#sthash.PQO0ikG2.dpuf

So the dude punched through a window and acted like a drunken crap head. They didn't know he hit the girlfriend (she didn't say he hit her until the rape trial so Briles couldn't have known that), he didn't rape anyone. I'm going to guess that at least 95% of college football fans would absolutely take someone as a transfer whose greatest transgression is punching through a window. The talking point that Baylor shouldn't have taken this hardened criminal woman beating rapist is intellectually lazy/inaccurate. His transgressions at Boise State were in no way an indicator that he would rape a woman.

People really need to talk more about Baylor not taking him out of her classes, reducing her scholarship, and despite having a much lighter burden of proof finding that he did nothing wrong.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on August 25, 2015, 09:59:00 AM


People really need to talk more about Baylor not taking him out of her classes, reducing her scholarship, and despite having a much lighter burden of proof finding that he did nothing wrong.
This could be a large Title IX issue for the AD but I don't know how much leverage the feds have with a private U like Baylor.

I can maybe excuse Briles for not asking too tough a question on why a program like Boise would kick off a Freshman DE that started every game but the first and had 4.5 sacks but I can't see why he kept him on scholarship after the rape indictment.  I mean, Baylor has the pull with the Waco authorities to sweep all the charges under the rug until the Texas Monthly story the week of the trial(!) but when the DA still gets an indictment Art has to realize his is in a no win situation. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pendergast on August 25, 2015, 10:03:09 AM
Or we could understand that much more knowledge on the situation was exchanged and understood between parties than has been captured in print, as in, literally, every human interaction ever.

And no, I would not take a transfer that was threatening people to the point they were advised to seek a restraining order.  Whatever floats your boat though.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on August 25, 2015, 10:22:19 AM
If it was 100% that this guy would assault people he came in contact with, and Baylor rejected him, there'd have been a non-Baylor victim.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 25, 2015, 10:36:49 AM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.

I'm still waiting for your stupid ass to post a link of me saying anything about Briles' character other than me calling him a liar. Your meltdown is because I had a one line post mentioning that Briles was adorable on a rough ridin' television show. Produce the link of me calling a dumb rough ridin' football coach a good man, contribute to the actual conversation happening, or just shut the eff up, freak.

You have issues.

I tried to tell you Briles was scary evil.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Don't be mad at me that you got duped (and still are, apparently) by his superficial southern "charm."
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 25, 2015, 10:41:24 AM
the chip brown letter to ken starr  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 25, 2015, 10:43:18 AM
Or we could understand that much more knowledge on the situation was exchanged and understood between parties than has been captured in print, as in, literally, every human interaction ever.

And no, I would not take a transfer that was threatening people to the point they were advised to seek a restraining order.  Whatever floats your boat though.

Oh ok. Hey everyone pendergast knows more about the situation than literally everyone who has done the investigating and reporting on the story, grats. Even if there was more information exchanged it isn't going to be something more substantive than what has already been reported. Two powerful men have publicly accused the other of lying, if there was more to be told it likely would have been told at this point.

Also LOL at your high horse about what Ukwuachu did as it relates to who we have/had playing for us. We have a player in the opening video montage that was convicted for beating his wife, I'm guessing you don't care enough to voice an objection to that. Football players are bred to be ultra aggressive, couple that with drinking, and the normal stupid crap that normal 18-22 year old males with not fully developed brains do and of course this stuff will happen often without anyone knowing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 25, 2015, 10:51:19 AM
the chip brown letter to ken starr  :sdeek:

http://www.baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=294601&amp;amp;page=2&amp;amp;p=5136454
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on August 25, 2015, 10:56:16 AM
pretty disingenuous of chip to talk about how he's a real reporter and then throw out accusations for ten paragraphs and then on top of that share with the world what he emailed starr. none of that screams professional reporter to me.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 25, 2015, 10:57:42 AM
the chip brown letter to ken starr  :sdeek:

http://www.baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=294601&amp;amp;page=2&amp;amp;p=5136454

baylor fans are the worst (i'm posting this after reading the first two responses to that thread)

pretty disingenuous of chip to talk about how he's a real reporter and then throw out accusations for ten paragraphs and then on top of that share with the world what he emailed starr. none of that screams professional reporter to me.
yes but he did do a good job of highlighting the things that MiR is talking about.  maybe chip needs to do a "mash up" letter with mir.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pendergast on August 25, 2015, 11:00:46 AM
Or we could understand that much more knowledge on the situation was exchanged and understood between parties than has been captured in print, as in, literally, every human interaction ever.

And no, I would not take a transfer that was threatening people to the point they were advised to seek a restraining order.  Whatever floats your boat though.

Oh ok. Hey everyone pendergast knows more about the situation than literally everyone who has done the investigating and reporting on the story, grats. Even if there was more information exchanged it isn't going to be something more substantive than what has already been reported. Two powerful men have publicly accused the other of lying, if there was more to be told it likely would have been told at this point.

Also LOL at your high horse about what Ukwuachu did as it relates to who we have/had playing for us. We have a player in the opening video montage that was convicted for beating his wife, I'm guessing you don't care enough to voice an objection to that. Football players are bred to be ultra aggressive, couple that with drinking, and the normal stupid crap that normal 18-22 year old males with not fully developed brains do and of course this stuff will happen often without anyone knowing.

Guess that one slipped by me.  You know when Bill asks me for his approval of recruits and advice on discipline I'll pay closer attention next time.  I'm a firm supporter of wife beating though, lets off steam and keeps them in the kitchen.  I tell you what.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 25, 2015, 11:13:04 AM
the chip brown letter to ken starr  :sdeek:

http://www.baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=294601&amp;amp;page=2&amp;amp;p=5136454

baylor fans are the worst (i'm posting this after reading the first two responses to that thread)

pretty disingenuous of chip to talk about how he's a real reporter and then throw out accusations for ten paragraphs and then on top of that share with the world what he emailed starr. none of that screams professional reporter to me.
yes but he did do a good job of highlighting the things that MiR is talking about.  maybe chip needs to do a "mash up" letter with mir.

Chip should not have framed this as a letter he was legitimately seeking answers to and then publish it as a column, it can't be both.

Also as far as horrible Baylor fans go, enjoy
Quote
KCbear96  KCbear96 is online now
Baylor fan
           (514 points)
Join Date
Apr 2010
Posts
1,080
Question for Chip Brown...why did the victim get in SU's car when he had been acting aggressive? Why was she putting herself in a bad situation by sleeping in the aggressor's bed? Of course, it sucks this happened to her, but these are just a couple questions I'd like answered. Perhaps this situation should be a case study in Freshman 101 so girls reduce the chances of getting in these situations...it's happening far too often.
Reply With Quote
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: #LIFE on August 25, 2015, 11:28:49 AM
#RapistsLivesMatter
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 25, 2015, 11:33:44 AM
if chip brown had better constructed his letter to ken starr, this innocent woman probably wouldn't have been raped (assuming she didn't do a bunch of things that precipitated her rape, which we know she did).
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on August 25, 2015, 11:34:06 AM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.

I'm still waiting for your stupid ass to post a link of me saying anything about Briles' character other than me calling him a liar. Your meltdown is because I had a one line post mentioning that Briles was adorable on a rough ridin' television show. Produce the link of me calling a dumb rough ridin' football coach a good man, contribute to the actual conversation happening, or just shut the eff up, freak.

You have issues.

I tried to tell you Briles was scary evil.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Don't be mad at me that you got duped (and still are, apparently) by his superficial southern "charm."

you keep alluding that you have some sort of info on Briles, but, you don't know crap
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on August 25, 2015, 11:36:20 AM
the chip brown letter to ken starr  :sdeek:

http://www.baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=294601&amp;amp;page=2&amp;amp;p=5136454

baylor fans are the worst (i'm posting this after reading the first two responses to that thread)

pretty disingenuous of chip to talk about how he's a real reporter and then throw out accusations for ten paragraphs and then on top of that share with the world what he emailed starr. none of that screams professional reporter to me.
yes but he did do a good job of highlighting the things that MiR is talking about.  maybe chip needs to do a "mash up" letter with mir.

Chip should not have framed this as a letter he was legitimately seeking answers to and then publish it as a column, it can't be both.

Also as far as horrible Baylor fans go, enjoy
Quote
KCbear96  KCbear96 is online now
Baylor fan
           (514 points)
Join Date
Apr 2010
Posts
1,080
Question for Chip Brown...why did the victim get in SU's car when he had been acting aggressive? Why was she putting herself in a bad situation by sleeping in the aggressor's bed? Of course, it sucks this happened to her, but these are just a couple questions I'd like answered. Perhaps this situation should be a case study in Freshman 101 so girls reduce the chances of getting in these situations...it's happening far too often.
Reply With Quote

stuff like that is pretty frustrating to read. but as a now middle aged adult, i've come to the conclusion that roughly 50% of other adults are complete effing idiots. if i was a parent/friend/sibling/acquaintance of that girl i would be livid and out for baylor blood.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 25, 2015, 12:10:24 PM



Briles position = (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F032438b.netsolhost.com%2FWordPress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2Fhear-no-evil-see-no-evil-speak-no-evil.jpg&hash=eef40747bf07dafbb2d8fa571121b6a782265907)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 25, 2015, 01:45:05 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.

I'm still waiting for your stupid ass to post a link of me saying anything about Briles' character other than me calling him a liar. Your meltdown is because I had a one line post mentioning that Briles was adorable on a rough ridin' television show. Produce the link of me calling a dumb rough ridin' football coach a good man, contribute to the actual conversation happening, or just shut the eff up, freak.

You have issues.

I tried to tell you Briles was scary evil.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Don't be mad at me that you got duped (and still are, apparently) by his superficial southern "charm."

you keep alluding that you have some sort of info on Briles, but, you don't know crap

I don't have any inside info on Briles.

My impression is based on what is readily observable to anyone:
1. the way his players act on the field
2. the sudden success at recruiting....at Baylor
3. the history of Baylor and its lack of institutional control
4. the fact that Baylor and Briles seem like a perfect fit for each other
5. the fact that Briles accepts kids that schools like Boise State and Penn. State (Pedo State!) have determined are unacceptable
6. the egotistical, phony way in which Briles interacts with the media
7. the entire culture he has created that is observable to anyone watching (see #1, flashy uniforms, the way his assistants act on the sidelines, etc.)
8. the consistent allegations that he was very crooked at Stephenville and was complicit in rampant steroid abuse
9. the fact that Gary Patterson (post-game) has all but said that Briles and Baylor were cheating at recruiting
10. the fact that Texas passed on Briles when they had the chance to hire him
(recently)11. the fact that Peterson would unnecessarily stick his nose into a situation and claim that he warned Briles about the rapist
(recently) 12. the fact that neither Starr nor McCall have said anything remotely resembling a vote of confidence for Briles

The rape stuff is just the tip of the iceberg.....not inside information, just a prediction based on what I can observe.  If Briles manages to coach another five years (which will only be possible by avoiding scandal) I will admit that I was wrong.  (It ain't going to happen, though.  I will predict two years, max.)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: GoodForAnother on August 25, 2015, 01:50:25 PM
it speaks to Briles coaching ability that anyone gives a crap about this

he and Baylor are no more evil that every other program (Bill recruited a murderer) but people are up in arms because everyone hates Baylor
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CHONGS on August 25, 2015, 02:18:58 PM
crap we forgot to notice the flashy uniforms guys...case CLOSED
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on August 25, 2015, 03:32:22 PM
crap we forgot to notice the flashy uniforms guys...case CLOSED

Not a fact.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 25, 2015, 08:19:55 PM
I think Briles is crooked as crap but that's just mho
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on August 26, 2015, 08:34:01 AM
hadn't considered how the flashy uniforms play into this. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Cartierfor3 on August 26, 2015, 09:59:42 AM
I think Briles is crooked as crap but that's just mho

when I first read this post I thought it said "cool as crap" and I was about to lose it Dickstone
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on August 27, 2015, 11:16:35 AM
Just popping in to say, I told you so (that Briles is a piece of crap).
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 29, 2015, 12:15:54 AM
Steffy knew this too, he just didn't want to tell
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Ex-BU-Players-Father-Says-Briles-Wasnt-Told-About-Violent-Attack-323149521.html?device=phone&c=y
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on August 29, 2015, 12:19:39 AM
wait, steffy is an agendite? :ohno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bones129 on August 29, 2015, 12:20:48 AM
What the hell is a steffy?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 29, 2015, 12:49:31 AM
Steffy knew this too, he just didn't want to tell
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Ex-BU-Players-Father-Says-Briles-Wasnt-Told-About-Violent-Attack-323149521.html?device=phone&c=y

This guy isn't exactly trustworthy. Does he honestly expect someone to believe a coach would have a conversation like that in earshot of the player and their father? That's absurd.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bones129 on August 29, 2015, 01:05:00 AM
Steffy knew this too, he just didn't want to tell
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Ex-BU-Players-Father-Says-Briles-Wasnt-Told-About-Violent-Attack-323149521.html?device=phone&c=y

This guy isn't exactly trustworthy. Does he honestly expect someone to believe a coach would have a conversation like that in earshot of the player and their father? That's absurd.

Interesting point. Food for thought. That said, we'll never know the truth.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 29, 2015, 05:28:12 AM
Steffy knew this too, he just didn't want to tell
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Ex-BU-Players-Father-Says-Briles-Wasnt-Told-About-Violent-Attack-323149521.html?device=phone&c=y

This guy isn't exactly trustworthy. Does he honestly expect someone to believe a coach would have a conversation like that in earshot of the player and their father? That's absurd.

Did you read the article? He was in the next room. What reason would he have for siding with Briles?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on August 29, 2015, 06:40:52 AM
Side with the guy that gave his son a second chance and was trying to give him a third chance? Probably no reason.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 29, 2015, 10:33:06 AM
So Briles knew the kid was dismissed, spoke to his former coach but didn't know?   :ROFL:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on August 29, 2015, 10:45:02 AM
I want to know what he knew and when he knew it.  Ken starr will get to bottom of this.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: #LIFE on August 29, 2015, 11:52:01 AM
MIR supports black athletes being able to freely rape women and everyone that covers it up for them.  Shocker
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 29, 2015, 12:30:26 PM
Steffy knew this too, he just didn't want to tell
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Ex-BU-Players-Father-Says-Briles-Wasnt-Told-About-Violent-Attack-323149521.html?device=phone&c=y

This guy isn't exactly trustworthy. Does he honestly expect someone to believe a coach would have a conversation like that in earshot of the player and their father? That's absurd.

Did you read the article? He was in the next room. What reason would he have for siding with Briles?

Doesn't the next room qualify as earshot if the guy can hear it? Bottom line is a coach isn't conducting business like that.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 29, 2015, 12:37:40 PM
It's doesn't really matter if Briles knew before he came or not - if he didn't know he probably should have. Giving the guy a second chance isn't the issue, it's trying to keep him on the field after raping a girl and rough ridin' up the second chance. He also lied/skirted around the truth of the reason he wasn't playing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 29, 2015, 01:30:26 PM
Steffy knew this too, he just didn't want to tell
http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Ex-BU-Players-Father-Says-Briles-Wasnt-Told-About-Violent-Attack-323149521.html?device=phone&c=y

This guy isn't exactly trustworthy. Does he honestly expect someone to believe a coach would have a conversation like that in earshot of the player and their father? That's absurd.

Did you read the article? He was in the next room. What reason would he have for siding with Briles?

Doesn't the next room qualify as earshot if the guy can hear it? Bottom line is a coach isn't conducting business like that.

Chris Peterson definitely didn't tell Art Briles about the violent attack, that's 100% certain. If Some of you guys spent more time reading and less time hottaking you would have read in this thread that Chris Peterson didn't know he beat his girlfriend's ass because she didn't tell anyone at Boise about it, it wasn't revealed until the trial.

Just so you guys can get the takes right, the question is to whether or not Peterson told Briles that Ukwuachu punched through glass and drunkenly threatened her, not that he beat her up. The damn link says that she didn't tell Boise that he beat her up so how in the hell could Peterson tell Briles something he didn't even know?

Before you call Briles a liar and anyone who doesn't support the Briles is lying narrative, I strongly suggest you read first to try to keep up with what's happening.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 29, 2015, 01:36:36 PM
It's doesn't really matter if Briles knew before he came or not - if he didn't know he probably should have. Giving the guy a second chance isn't the issue, it's trying to keep him on the field after raping a girl and rough ridin' up the second chance. He also lied/skirted around the truth of the reason he wasn't playing.

Well now I know you've read something since you mentioned that he never revealed why Ukwuachu was suspended, you got that right. They didn't try to keep him on the field though, he was suspended. I don't think we should ignore the fact he was suspended because Phil Bennett told some boosters he would play this season. The real issue is the completely abhorrent way Baylor treated the victim, they're going to get their asses handed to them in the title IX lawsuit.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 29, 2015, 01:50:32 PM
It's doesn't really matter if Briles knew before he came or not - if he didn't know he probably should have. Giving the guy a second chance isn't the issue, it's trying to keep him on the field after raping a girl and rough ridin' up the second chance. He also lied/skirted around the truth of the reason he wasn't playing.

Well now I know you've read something since you mentioned that he never revealed why Ukwuachu was suspended, you got that right. They didn't try to keep him on the field though, he was suspended. I don't think we should ignore the fact he was suspended because Phil Bennett told some boosters he would play this season. The real issue is the completely abhorrent way Baylor treated the victim, they're going to get their asses handed to them in the title IX lawsuit.

I've read everything I've seen on it. Just because she didn't mention those things until the trial doesn't mean that the coaching staff couldn't have heard about it from someone else. She says she didn't tell the school - it doesn't mean she didn't tell someone else. Also, I'm not just taking what everyone says at face value. Some people probably aren't telling the truth. We also don't know what else Boise knew about him that they could have possibly told Baylor. There could easily be more than what is known publicly.

Yeah he was suspended but they were actively working to get him back on the team until Texas Monthly blew the thing open. You don't work to get 2nd chance rapists back on the team. He should have kicked him off the team permanently. Baylor deserves to get hammered by the Title IX suit, but Briles shouldn't be looked at as a completely honest or ethical person.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on August 29, 2015, 01:54:35 PM
I'm not saying he's 100% guilty or a huge piece of crap, but he isn't the salt of the earth country Texasy good ol' boy his schtick says he is. He's pretty similar to Jimbo at FSU. Jimbo has that same country southern guy thing he plays up, but he also hides players dirty laundry and tries to play them, even if they raped someone.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 29, 2015, 02:28:16 PM
It's doesn't really matter if Briles knew before he came or not - if he didn't know he probably should have. Giving the guy a second chance isn't the issue, it's trying to keep him on the field after raping a girl and rough ridin' up the second chance. He also lied/skirted around the truth of the reason he wasn't playing.

Well now I know you've read something since you mentioned that he never revealed why Ukwuachu was suspended, you got that right. They didn't try to keep him on the field though, he was suspended. I don't think we should ignore the fact he was suspended because Phil Bennett told some boosters he would play this season. The real issue is the completely abhorrent way Baylor treated the victim, they're going to get their asses handed to them in the title IX lawsuit.

I've read everything I've seen on it. Just because she didn't mention those things until the trial doesn't mean that the coaching staff couldn't have heard about it from someone else. She says she didn't tell the school - it doesn't mean she didn't tell someone else. Also, I'm not just taking what everyone says at face value. Some people probably aren't telling the truth. We also don't know what else Boise knew about him that they could have possibly told Baylor. There could easily be more than what is known publicly.

Yeah he was suspended but they were actively working to get him back on the team until Texas Monthly blew the thing open. You don't work to get 2nd chance rapists back on the team. He should have kicked him off the team permanently. Baylor deserves to get hammered by the Title IX suit, but Briles shouldn't be looked at as a completely honest or ethical person.

He's definitely not that
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 29, 2015, 09:23:52 PM
So Briles knew the kid was dismissed, spoke to his former coach but didn't know?   :ROFL:
Hey quit picking on MIR; he believes.  :crossfingers:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 29, 2015, 09:26:55 PM
MIR supports black athletes being able to freely rape women and everyone that covers it up for them.  Shocker
He has a man crush on Briles.  :Wha:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Unruly on September 12, 2015, 12:58:47 AM
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13633636/baylor-bears-suspend-two-coaches-including-art-briles-son-one-game-recruiting-violation
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bones129 on September 12, 2015, 01:04:26 AM
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13633636/baylor-bears-suspend-two-coaches-including-art-briles-son-one-game-recruiting-violation

Tip of the iceberg?   :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on September 12, 2015, 07:15:32 AM
It's doesn't really matter if Briles knew before he came or not - if he didn't know he probably should have. Giving the guy a second chance isn't the issue, it's trying to keep him on the field after raping a girl and rough ridin' up the second chance. He also lied/skirted around the truth of the reason he wasn't playing.

Well now I know you've read something since you mentioned that he never revealed why Ukwuachu was suspended, you got that right. They didn't try to keep him on the field though, he was suspended. I don't think we should ignore the fact he was suspended because Phil Bennett told some boosters he would play this season. The real issue is the completely abhorrent way Baylor treated the victim, they're going to get their asses handed to them in the title IX lawsuit.

I've read everything I've seen on it. Just because she didn't mention those things until the trial doesn't mean that the coaching staff couldn't have heard about it from someone else. She says she didn't tell the school - it doesn't mean she didn't tell someone else. Also, I'm not just taking what everyone says at face value. Some people probably aren't telling the truth. We also don't know what else Boise knew about him that they could have possibly told Baylor. There could easily be more than what is known publicly.

Yeah he was suspended but they were actively working to get him back on the team until Texas Monthly blew the thing open. You don't work to get 2nd chance rapists back on the team. He should have kicked him off the team permanently. Baylor deserves to get hammered by the Title IX suit, but Briles shouldn't be looked at as a completely honest or ethical person.

He's definitely not that

But he is adorable, right?

I wonder how Florida knew to stay away from the rapist?

Briles asking his son to take the fall for recruiting violations is priceless.

Iceberg hit; ship going down.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 21, 2015, 01:33:00 PM
 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SEK_EMAW on September 21, 2015, 03:34:09 PM
Baylor assistant Jeff Lebby was on the Tulsa sideline during its game against Oklahoma on Saturday. His presence violated NCAA rules that say coaches can not scout an oppossing team in person during the season. Baylor coach Art Briles said he will not punish Lebby for the error, leaving the matter to Baylor compliance. He said Lebby’s presence offered no advantage to the Bears. But he did call the incident “embarrassing,” adding that he called OU coach Bob Stoops to apologize.

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article35984442.html#storylink=cpy
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on September 21, 2015, 04:07:34 PM
Art.....just adorable!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on September 21, 2015, 04:18:32 PM
Art...Tip of the iceberg!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on September 21, 2015, 07:00:29 PM
 :zzz:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on September 21, 2015, 07:24:13 PM
Stoops should come out and say Briles didn't call him, because ...  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on September 21, 2015, 10:57:59 PM
What the hell is a steffy?

i wondered this too... this is one of the google results (page not found)

William Alford Steffy Sex Offender in Wichita, KS 67203


 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on September 21, 2015, 11:02:44 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FU4I0nnr.png&hash=2a32c605f363a0589b5a6dc0f4b5e1c6287dc5d6)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on September 21, 2015, 11:06:10 PM
like he's ever heard the word "no"
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Bloodfart on September 21, 2015, 11:26:37 PM
What the hell is a steffy?

i wondered this too... this is one of the google results (page not found)

William Alford Steffy Sex Offender in Wichita, KS 67203


 :sdeek:

User names are always intriguing to me.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on September 21, 2015, 11:27:13 PM
08 year olds, dude
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on September 21, 2015, 11:37:36 PM
Cracked this case wide open
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on September 22, 2015, 10:47:16 AM
Message board rule 27:  If you can't respond to the logic/merits of someone's posts, accuse them of being a sex offender (or racist).

As to Briles:  Anybody who believes anything Briles says about the latest scandal is beyond naïve.  This latest one will get the NCAA involved, which is why Briles is already nervous and apologizing.  Local DA's and rape victims might be pushed aside in Waco, but NCAA investigators will prove to be a little more problematic.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on September 22, 2015, 10:50:51 AM
yep, look for Baylor to get the death penalty from the NCAA investigators.  this is just the tip of the iceberg folks, hang on to your shirts (red?)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on September 22, 2015, 10:54:59 AM
I'm beginning to think maybe briles Batt BcKee'd a member of steffy's family?  v weird obsession
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Asteriskhead on September 22, 2015, 11:01:18 AM
Message board rule 27:  If you can't respond to the logic/merits of someone's posts, accuse them of being a sex offender (or racist).

As to Briles:  Anybody who believes anything Briles says about the latest scandal is beyond naïve.  This latest one will get the NCAA involved, which is why Briles is already nervous and apologizing.  Local DA's and rape victims might be pushed aside in Waco, but NCAA investigators will prove to be a little more problematic.

what you're attempting to describe is Godwin's law, you imbecile.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Blackcats on September 22, 2015, 11:06:01 AM
Message board rule 27:  If you can't respond to the logic/merits of someone's posts, accuse them of being a sex offender (or racist).

As to Briles:  Anybody who believes anything Briles says about the latest scandal is beyond naïve.  This latest one will get the NCAA involved, which is why Briles is already nervous and apologizing.  Local DA's and rape victims might be pushed aside in Waco, but NCAA investigators will prove to be a little more problematic.

what you're attempting to describe is Godwin's law, you imbecile.

STEFFY IS CLEARLY A NAZI!!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Asteriskhead on September 22, 2015, 11:12:17 AM
Message board rule 27:  If you can't respond to the logic/merits of someone's posts, accuse them of being a sex offender (or racist).

As to Briles:  Anybody who believes anything Briles says about the latest scandal is beyond naïve.  This latest one will get the NCAA involved, which is why Briles is already nervous and apologizing.  Local DA's and rape victims might be pushed aside in Waco, but NCAA investigators will prove to be a little more problematic.

what you're attempting to describe is Godwin's law, you imbecile.

STEFFY IS CLEARLY A NAZI!!

give me a long enough timeline and I'll equate him to the version of Adolph Hitler pictured in Adam Sandler's classic film, Little Nicky.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on September 22, 2015, 11:14:05 AM
steffy is just the worst, its either a sock or a gpc mod
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on September 22, 2015, 01:23:10 PM
I'm beginning to think maybe briles Batt BcKee'd a member of steffy's family?  v weird obsession

Nope, just don't like rape.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on September 22, 2015, 02:42:57 PM
and before 4 weeks ago?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on September 22, 2015, 02:50:19 PM
Huge fan probably.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2015, 03:09:12 PM
I'm beginning to think maybe briles Batt BcKee'd a member of steffy's family?  v weird obsession

Nope, just don't like rape.

Who did Art Briles rape?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 22, 2015, 03:11:17 PM
I am beginning to feel a certain hostility towards Steffy and I as we blow hug holes in Art Briles, the huge liar
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on September 22, 2015, 03:17:58 PM
I am beginning to feel a certain hostility towards Steffy and I as we blow hug holes in Art Briles, the huge liar
The Art Briles secret admirers are defiantly Steffy haters.   
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 22, 2015, 03:56:09 PM
Art Briles looks like the whiny "avenge me!" dad in the original Red Dawn.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on September 22, 2015, 03:57:17 PM
Art Briles looks like the whiny "avenge me!" dad in the original Red Dawn.
:thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 06, 2015, 06:54:41 AM
5-1 vs Snyder, even starting a true Freshman QB in his first start.   There are now two coaches in the conference that absolutely own Snyder, and a couple of others waiting on financing approval to take ownership.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Asteriskhead on November 06, 2015, 08:23:44 AM
5-1 vs Snyder, even starting a true Freshman QB in his first start.   There are now two coaches in the conference that absolutely own Snyder, and a couple of others waiting on financing approval to take ownership.

This quote makes me wish he was our coach, almost.

https://twitter.com/Jake_Trotter/status/662488363543359489
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 31, 2016, 11:00:58 AM
https://twitter.com/sportscenter/status/693815220825886720
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 31, 2016, 11:26:36 AM
Art knows nothing about this.  NOTHING lalalalala
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: cfbandyman on January 31, 2016, 11:40:33 AM
https://twitter.com/sportscenter/status/693815220825886720

That shouldn't be that big of a surprise. After all they aren't that far removed from the basketball scandal. Crazy that a baptist school would have so many issues with this stuff.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on January 31, 2016, 11:59:28 AM
I would like to hire a publicly shamed Briles.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on January 31, 2016, 12:20:21 PM
https://twitter.com/sportscenter/status/693815220825886720

That shouldn't be that big of a surprise. After all they aren't that far removed from the basketball scandal. Crazy that a baptist school would have so many issues with this stuff.

That's  the exact reason why they have so many issues. They want to uphold this good Baptist image so they sweep everything under the rug to save face.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on January 31, 2016, 01:09:43 PM
ken rough ridin' starr
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: HELLHAMMER on January 31, 2016, 01:14:02 PM
(https://sp.yimg.com/xj/th?id=OIP.Maa9a45c1bbdfb87d6867ba641c152496H2&pid=15.1&H=102&W=160&P=0)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wazucat on January 31, 2016, 02:07:29 PM
SMU must get really butthurt when they watch Baylor slip out of every scandal with minimal consequence.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on January 31, 2016, 02:40:06 PM
What a trash program Baylor runs...




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 31, 2016, 04:05:38 PM
(https://sp.yimg.com/xj/th?id=OIP.Maa9a45c1bbdfb87d6867ba641c152496H2&pid=15.1&H=102&W=160&P=0)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on January 31, 2016, 05:08:38 PM
Briles = Bliss.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on January 31, 2016, 05:44:54 PM
SMU must get really butthurt when they watch Baylor slip out of every scandal with minimal consequence.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on January 31, 2016, 10:46:53 PM
Plenty more to come.  Disgusting.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 31, 2016, 10:53:23 PM
I would like to add that Snyder I had plenty of issues, but not quite like this, and thus, I must continually point out what a total trash athletic department and school Baylor is. 
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 01, 2016, 08:41:39 AM
I would like to hire a publicly shamed Briles.

I would, too, but Baylor doesn't have the moral fortitude to fire him.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on February 01, 2016, 08:45:42 AM
Rape isn't cool like it was in your day,  Art.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 01, 2016, 09:31:57 AM
https://twitter.com/sportscenter/status/693815220825886720

That shouldn't be that big of a surprise. After all they aren't that far removed from the basketball scandal. Crazy that a baptist school would have so many issues with this stuff.
No, actually it's not. More likely to cover it up I'd think.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 01, 2016, 09:33:35 AM
I would like to hire a publicly shamed Briles.

I would, too, but Baylor doesn't have the moral fortitude to fire him.
I would not. I'd rather have oscar Weber coaching our football team than a guy that allows rapists on his team.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on February 01, 2016, 09:50:53 AM
https://twitter.com/sportscenter/status/693815220825886720

That shouldn't be that big of a surprise. After all they aren't that far removed from the basketball scandal. Crazy that a baptist school would have so many issues with this stuff.

That's  the exact reason why they have so many issues. They want to uphold this good Baptist image so they sweep everything under the rug to save face.

Hmmm...Christian zealots tend to have a higher rate of sex offenses and overall sexual deviance.  The players/coaches may not be zealots, but are governed by an institution led by zealots.  Only surprise is that this didn't come out earlier, or with more frequency.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 01, 2016, 09:51:49 AM
I would like to hire a publicly shamed Briles.

I would, too, but Baylor doesn't have the moral fortitude to fire him.
I would not. I'd rather have oscar Weber coaching our football team than a guy that allows rapists on his team.

The coach's job is to win, period. He's not capable of stopping rape investigations without the full aid and support of Baylor. A coach should get the best players available and the school should balance that, just like K-State did when Snyder tried to get a murderer on his team.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CHONGS on February 01, 2016, 10:10:26 AM
^^^
This is how Penn State stuff happens and why it will almost certainly happen again. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 01, 2016, 10:16:43 AM
come on, Art...  :frown:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 01, 2016, 10:36:14 AM
I would like to hire a publicly shamed Briles.

I would, too, but Baylor doesn't have the moral fortitude to fire him.
I would not. I'd rather have oscar Weber coaching our football team than a guy that allows rapists on his team.

The coach's job is to win, period. He's not capable of stopping rape investigations without the full aid and support of Baylor. A coach should get the best players available and the school should balance that, just like K-State did when Snyder tried to get a murderer on his team.

Is that you, Art?

A coaches job is not "to win, period."  They have obligations to the university and to the players beyond just winning. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 01, 2016, 11:00:24 AM
I think Baylor should lose their football program, but Art should still be allowed to coach without penalty. Penn State should have lost its program, too.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 01, 2016, 11:12:59 AM
I would like to hire a publicly shamed Briles.

I would, too, but Baylor doesn't have the moral fortitude to fire him.
I would not. I'd rather have oscar Weber coaching our football team than a guy that allows rapists on his team.

The coach's job is to win, period. He's not capable of stopping rape investigations without the full aid and support of Baylor. A coach should get the best players available and the school should balance that, just like K-State did when Snyder tried to get a murderer on his team.
Pfffft no.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on February 01, 2016, 11:45:42 AM
3 things:
1. Uni should never be the entity in charge of investigating anything.  Their police force should be parking ppl only.  Real actual police, from the muni that the uni exists in, should be the ppl that handle crime.  I have no idea how this is not the case everywhere.  I mean, WTF?  I get raped and I am going to tell my teacher?  eff that.  Call the cops.

2. there are plenty of ppl accused of plenty of things.  I don't necessarily think that anyone should be held out of anything unless there are significant signs that they were involved in the behavior they are accused of, or even charged. 

3. It isn't Briles' job to find evidence, weigh it, charge the kid, and dish out justice.  I mean, if someone came to him with an accusation, he should def report it and let the judicial system sort it out, but he should def not be part of the sorting out. 

One of the stupidest things in our country, when it comes to domestic and sexual violence, is that the entire dumbass country is comfy letting colleges police themselves as if they are part of the judicial.  So dumb.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on February 01, 2016, 11:58:35 AM
3 things:
1. Uni should never be the entity in charge of investigating anything.  Their police force should be parking ppl only.  Real actual police, from the muni that the uni exists in, should be the ppl that handle crime.  I have no idea how this is not the case everywhere.  I mean, WTF?  I get raped and I am going to tell my teacher?  eff that.  Call the cops.

2. there are plenty of ppl accused of plenty of things.  I don't necessarily think that anyone should be held out of anything unless there are significant signs that they were involved in the behavior they are accused of, or even charged. 

3. It isn't Briles' job to find evidence, weigh it, charge the kid, and dish out justice.  I mean, if someone came to him with an accusation, he should def report it and let the judicial system sort it out, but he should def not be part of the sorting out. 

One of the stupidest things in our country, when it comes to domestic and sexual violence, is that the entire dumbass country is comfy letting colleges police themselves as if they are part of the judicial.  So dumb.

Yes.  I read the story and had to keep going back to the start and re-reading because I didn't understand why there was so much about how the university was resolving this crime among its students.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on February 01, 2016, 03:12:11 PM
3 things:
1. Uni should never be the entity in charge of investigating anything.  Their police force should be parking ppl only.  Real actual police, from the muni that the uni exists in, should be the ppl that handle crime.  I have no idea how this is not the case everywhere.  I mean, WTF?  I get raped and I am going to tell my teacher?  eff that.  Call the cops.

2. there are plenty of ppl accused of plenty of things.  I don't necessarily think that anyone should be held out of anything unless there are significant signs that they were involved in the behavior they are accused of, or even charged. 

3. It isn't Briles' job to find evidence, weigh it, charge the kid, and dish out justice.  I mean, if someone came to him with an accusation, he should def report it and let the judicial system sort it out, but he should def not be part of the sorting out. 

One of the stupidest things in our country, when it comes to domestic and sexual violence, is that the entire dumbass country is comfy letting colleges police themselves as if they are part of the judicial.  So dumb.

agreed. I'd add to number one that universities shouldn't be able to hire police officers from the city the university is located in. That would cut the incentive so many police chiefs have to play nice with the school until they can double dip on retirements.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AbeFroman on February 01, 2016, 03:28:13 PM
There are plenty of MCMW things you can do that don't involve sweeping rape under the rug. eff Art Briles
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 01, 2016, 04:03:43 PM
There are plenty of MCMW things you can do that don't involve sweeping rape under the rug. eff Art Briles
Exactly.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 01, 2016, 04:39:28 PM
MakeItRain is awful quiet.  Remember when he was all "Briles is so adorable!" when Briles was doing his fake, good-old-boy act?  And how defensive he got when I told him Briles was a scumbag and that he was a tool for falling for that schtick.

I can no longer say this is the "tip of the iceberg," because that would diminish the rape incidents.  But there is plenty more disgusting stuff to come out of Waco involving Briles and Baylor.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on February 01, 2016, 05:05:17 PM
you don't know anything
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on February 01, 2016, 06:39:51 PM
you don't know anything

And you do, kitty cat? :whistle1:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 01, 2016, 10:19:12 PM
MakeItRain is awful quiet.  Remember when he was all "Briles is so adorable!" when Briles was doing his fake, good-old-boy act?  And how defensive he got when I told him Briles was a scumbag and that he was a tool for falling for that schtick.

I can no longer say this is the "tip of the iceberg," because that would diminish the rape incidents.  But there is plenty more disgusting stuff to come out of Waco involving Briles and Baylor.

His appearance on Highly Questionable was definitely adorable, neither he nor any of his players committed rape on the show. He laughed with Papillion, it was great.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on February 23, 2016, 09:59:13 AM
I told you guys that Art Briles was a piece of crap a long time ago.  Glad to see some of you come around.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 23, 2016, 10:44:25 AM
Most all college coaches are pieces of crap in various ways, ya dummy.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 23, 2016, 11:22:37 AM
Most all college coaches are pieces of crap in various ways, ya dummy.

At least saban, miles, bielema etc. are like "yeah, I am a huge piece of crap, so what?" and don't do the fake god squad crap like briles.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on February 23, 2016, 12:31:10 PM
Most all college coaches are pieces of crap in various ways, ya dummy.


HCGMFP is perfect.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on February 23, 2016, 12:44:31 PM
3 things:
1. Uni should never be the entity in charge of investigating anything.  Their police force should be parking ppl only.  Real actual police, from the muni that the uni exists in, should be the ppl that handle crime.  I have no idea how this is not the case everywhere.  I mean, WTF?  I get raped and I am going to tell my teacher?  eff that.  Call the cops.

2. there are plenty of ppl accused of plenty of things.  I don't necessarily think that anyone should be held out of anything unless there are significant signs that they were involved in the behavior they are accused of, or even charged. 

3. It isn't Briles' job to find evidence, weigh it, charge the kid, and dish out justice.  I mean, if someone came to him with an accusation, he should def report it and let the judicial system sort it out, but he should def not be part of the sorting out. 

One of the stupidest things in our country, when it comes to domestic and sexual violence, is that the entire dumbass country is comfy letting colleges police themselves as if they are part of the judicial.  So dumb.

Campus cops are commissioned law enforcement officers, like all cops.  They have to submit reports to the county or district court, like all cops (maybe municipal court, at times).  They don't have any incentives to hide crimes on campus, quite the opposite--they typically don't get a lot of violent crime cases, and tend to work them to get the harshest prosecution. 

KU is the one university that I've seen try to game the campus cops thing.  They hired the retiring Lawrence PD police chief so that he could snag police reports going to the DA, and I suspect he got them before the DA did.  THAT is the only law enforcement gap I've seen in campus police forces.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on February 23, 2016, 12:52:55 PM
Most all college coaches are pieces of crap in various ways, ya dummy.


HCGMFP is perfect.
Fat, sweaty, and perpetually butthurt about something. Yep perfect.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on February 23, 2016, 01:47:11 PM
if a pervasive lawless drug culture is what you're into, also perfect! :drool:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on February 23, 2016, 04:14:02 PM

Fat, sweaty, and perpetually butthurt about something. Yep perfect.  :thumbsup:

Jealousy because he doesn't coach purple little brother doesn't mean he isn't perfect.

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on February 23, 2016, 04:14:50 PM
if a pervasive lawless drug culture is what you're into, also perfect! :drool:

HCGMFP isn't Art Briles.  He actually disciplines his football players and doesn't cover up crimes that they commit.

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 23, 2016, 04:36:43 PM
if a pervasive lawless drug culture is what you're into, also perfect! :drool:

HCGMFP isn't Art Briles.  He actually disciplines his football players and doesn't cover up crimes that they commit.

Don't get too worked up, Frog.  There are a vocal minority of posters on this board who were duped by Briles "aw shucks" schtick.  Most rationale people know that Patterson is the boss and that Briles' days are numbered.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 23, 2016, 06:44:48 PM
Most people know that D1 coaches cover up crap all the time, just not like Baylor. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 24, 2016, 08:39:34 AM
Most people understand the difference between trying to avoid public disclosure of some parking tickets compared to keeping a guy who has been accused of five separate rapes on your football team.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 26, 2016, 08:07:33 AM
Yeah. Briles is a piece of crap.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 26, 2016, 01:52:15 PM

Most people understand the difference between trying to avoid public disclosure of some parking tickets compared to keeping a guy who has been accused of five separate rapes on your football team.

Yeah, uh, I know the difference.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 31, 2016, 10:33:15 PM
The clock is ticking on Briles.  And faster now.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bones129 on March 31, 2016, 10:41:28 PM
Sued in federal court.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/306548127/Baylor-Title-IX-Lawsuit
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on April 08, 2016, 07:29:29 PM
More raping
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on April 08, 2016, 08:47:32 PM
Sean Oakman being rapey is the least surprising thing ever.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on April 08, 2016, 10:33:21 PM
Sean Oakman being rapey is the least surprising thing ever.

Yep; two players (iwachuetc) that were kicked out of other schools, and Briles took them.  Briles and Baylor are rotten to the core.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2016, 07:50:19 AM
Snyder I took in multiple guys who got the boot elsewhere.   I remember one or two from CU, and if Bill McCartney was booting you, you did some bad stuff. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on April 09, 2016, 10:55:12 AM
He would recruit jack the ripper if he could tackle.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on April 13, 2016, 07:02:36 PM
Oakman arrested


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on April 13, 2016, 08:40:52 PM
:sdeek:
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/report--baylor-waited-two-years-to-investigate-sexual-assault-claim-171938159.html
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on April 14, 2016, 09:52:37 AM
bible aggie gonna bible aggie.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on April 14, 2016, 10:06:40 AM
whether they're raping, killing, cheating, covering up, or raping some more, ain't no party like a baylor athletics party cause a baylor athletics party don't stop!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 14, 2016, 10:11:45 AM
Baylor really is on an island all by themselves on this stuff, possibly unprecedented in college athletics.   
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kim carnes on April 14, 2016, 10:26:19 AM
I can't say I'd be that upset if I was a Baylor fan
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on April 14, 2016, 11:48:28 AM
I can't say I'd be that upset if I was a Baylor fan

obviously they don't care, this sort of garbage is what it takes to win at their garbage school
take away the drugs, murders, rapes, cover ups, etc, and no one would even know their name

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on April 14, 2016, 11:54:11 AM
I can't say I'd be that upset if I was a Baylor fan

obviously they don't care, this sort of garbage is what it takes to win at their garbage school
take away the drugs, murders, rapes, cover ups, etc, and no one would even know their name

Snyder could win at Baylor without the raping.

Which brings us full circle, doesn't it?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on April 14, 2016, 12:54:25 PM
Stone needs to take a MF victory lap in this thread for blowing a hole in the scummiest fake religious school in history
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Cire on April 14, 2016, 02:10:48 PM
It's a baptist school.  Anyone really surprised at lax attitudes towards dominating women?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: tdaver on April 15, 2016, 11:09:18 AM
BYU not just ignoring rape but targeting the victims

http://www.sltrib.com/news/3770084-155/byu-students-say-victims-of-sexual
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3773615-155/prosecutor-says-rape-case-is-threatened
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2016, 11:23:19 AM
holy crap
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on April 25, 2016, 12:12:18 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on April 25, 2016, 12:41:40 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on April 25, 2016, 01:17:01 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.

And the AD and Ken Starr. Here's the issue though, if the issue is institutional at a private institution who provides the heat?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on April 25, 2016, 01:19:59 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.

And the AD and Ken Starr. Here's the issue though, if the issue is institutional at a private institution who provides the heat?

Me and Dugout.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on April 25, 2016, 01:21:19 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.

And the AD and Ken Starr. Here's the issue though, if the issue is institutional at a private institution who provides the heat?

I think it's teed up pretty nicely for ESPN, SI, etc. They're not doing anything to tick off a school with a big national following, but they can take down a new $ football power and promote social justice, title 9, and the like.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 25, 2016, 01:32:51 PM
Yeah, Baylor is going to get excoriated by the national media outlets because they just don't carry enough clout.   For a true blue blood it really has to get bad before it goes beyond 24/7 cycle filler.   
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on April 25, 2016, 01:53:25 PM
Yeah, Baylor is going to get excoriated by the national media outlets because they just don't carry enough clout.   For a true blue blood it really has to get bad before it goes beyond 24/7 cycle filler.

Just the opposite; if this stuff had been going on at UT, OSU, or Bama, it would've already come to light and been a huge story years ago (like 5-10 rapes ago).  I mean, we all know the story about OSU and the tattoo scandal; that seems pretty ridiculous compared to this stuff, doesn't it?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: slobber on April 25, 2016, 02:01:15 PM
Change thread title to: Briles > chance of prison than Snyder
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on April 25, 2016, 09:33:25 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.

And the AD and Ken Starr. Here's the issue though, if the issue is institutional at a private institution who provides the heat?

I think it's teed up pretty nicely for ESPN, SI, etc. They're not doing anything to tick off a school with a big national following, but they can take down a new $ football power and promote social justice, title 9, and the like.

Right, they've been getting being negative national attention, they've been on OTL more than once. Can any other college other than Mizzou and UNC make that claim? The point is that this issue is institutional; Ian McCaw can't fire Brlies over this and Starr can't fire McCaw without one of the two of them burning it down with Starr in the building. They don't have a BOR and there is no way the donors will put heat on, just blame the players. All three of those guys have to get gassed, who's gonna do it?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on April 25, 2016, 09:53:14 PM
Nothing will happen until someone gets murdered and buried in the desert.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on April 25, 2016, 10:01:29 PM
would pretty much have to be chip and joanna at this point
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on April 26, 2016, 10:22:47 AM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.

And the AD and Ken Starr. Here's the issue though, if the issue is institutional at a private institution who provides the heat?

I think it's teed up pretty nicely for ESPN, SI, etc. They're not doing anything to tick off a school with a big national following, but they can take down a new $ football power and promote social justice, title 9, and the like.

Right, they've been getting being negative national attention, they've been on OTL more than once. Can any other college other than Mizzou and UNC make that claim? The point is that this issue is institutional; Ian McCaw can't fire Brlies over this and Starr can't fire McCaw without one of the two of them burning it down with Starr in the building. They don't have a BOR and there is no way the donors will put heat on, just blame the players. All three of those guys have to get gassed, who's gonna do it?

Interesting.  They seem to have a major scandal every 15 years or so. The Bliss thing in the early 2000s, a sex for recruits scandal in the 80s covered in Friday Night Lights.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on April 26, 2016, 10:31:13 AM
would pretty much have to be chip and joanna at this point
:lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on April 26, 2016, 10:33:01 AM
r/cbf has a good timeline of events (hopefully not lukes)
https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/4gg4wr/comprehensive_baylor_timeline_covering/


I don't understand how K-State is getting slammed in the national media and OTL is barely covering this.  This program needs to be shut down tomorrow.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on April 26, 2016, 12:34:11 PM
More Baylor bad stuff.  Plenty more to come.

Not adorable, not at all.

https://twitter.com/AlexDunlapNFL/status/724627455047143424

This could get ugly for Art.

And the AD and Ken Starr. Here's the issue though, if the issue is institutional at a private institution who provides the heat?

I think it's teed up pretty nicely for ESPN, SI, etc. They're not doing anything to tick off a school with a big national following, but they can take down a new $ football power and promote social justice, title 9, and the like.

Right, they've been getting being negative national attention, they've been on OTL more than once. Can any other college other than Mizzou and UNC make that claim? The point is that this issue is institutional; Ian McCaw can't fire Brlies over this and Starr can't fire McCaw without one of the two of them burning it down with Starr in the building. They don't have a BOR and there is no way the donors will put heat on, just blame the players. All three of those guys have to get gassed, who's gonna do it?
Maybe the NCAA ala the Penn State sanctions?  Of course, the NCAA walked back on bunch of those.  I guess the conference could do it
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on April 26, 2016, 02:56:16 PM
I want the Death Penalty for that disgusting and terrible school/program.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on April 26, 2016, 03:27:16 PM
r/cbf has a good timeline of events (hopefully not lukes)
https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/4gg4wr/comprehensive_baylor_timeline_covering/


I don't understand how K-State is getting slammed in the national media and OTL is barely covering this.  This program needs to be shut down tomorrow.

 :sdeek: That's awful when it's laid out like that.  Art Briles and bible aggie should be ashamed.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on April 27, 2016, 11:33:27 AM
I need to teach courses on showing Art Briles up for a scummy fake religious coach.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on April 27, 2016, 11:46:16 AM
r/cbf has a good timeline of events (hopefully not lukes)
https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/4gg4wr/comprehensive_baylor_timeline_covering/


I don't understand how K-State is getting slammed in the national media and OTL is barely covering this.  This program needs to be shut down tomorrow.

 :sdeek: That's awful when it's laid out like that.  Art Briles and bible aggie should be ashamed.

I'd have no problem with the Dept of Ed shuttered the entire athletics department.  And I wish there were significant criminal liabilities for everyone from the college prez down through the AD to Briles.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on April 27, 2016, 04:55:11 PM
I think it's about time to remove Art from my sig.  Was probably time a year ago.  Despicable. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on April 27, 2016, 04:56:28 PM
I'd have no problem with the Dept of Ed shuttered the entire athletics department.  And I wish there were significant criminal liabilities for everyone from the college prez down through the AD to Briles.

 :excited: I'd be cool with that as long as they burned the school down and set the bear free at the same time.  Preferably with no warning to the student body and GoPros posted everywhere.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on April 27, 2016, 11:44:39 PM
I'd have no problem with the Dept of Ed shuttered the entire athletics department.  And I wish there were significant criminal liabilities for everyone from the college prez down through the AD to Briles.

 :excited: I'd be cool with that as long as they burned the school down and set the bear free at the same time.  Preferably with no warning to the student body and GoPros posted everywhere.
Mods, this TCU guy needs to be shackled.  :surprised: :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: nicname on April 28, 2016, 08:31:34 AM
What do you expect would happen mixing voracious sexual predators with prudish Baptists?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: RickRampus on April 28, 2016, 09:13:51 AM
I think it's about time to remove Art from my sig.  Was probably time a year ago.  Despicable.

maybe just take the name off?  I kind of like that signature.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on May 18, 2016, 12:37:18 PM
Can we just kick these guys out of the league?

How many terrible things involving BB/FB can happen at one university?

http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/15562625/waco-police-records-reveal-additional-violence-allegations-baylor-football-players
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 18, 2016, 01:19:36 PM
This is as bad as penn state
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 18, 2016, 01:34:05 PM
This is as bad as penn state

So build a Briles statue?  Then we could add their respective statues to the Briles > Snyder analysis.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 18, 2016, 02:44:21 PM
LOIC
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 18, 2016, 02:52:49 PM
This is as bad as penn state

So build a Briles statue?  Then we could add their respective statues to the Briles > Snyder analysis.

They probably will
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: PowercatPat on May 18, 2016, 03:55:07 PM
Briles should be fired. That's highly unlikely to happen though.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on May 18, 2016, 11:16:22 PM
Briles should be fired. That's highly unlikely to happen though.

How the eff has this not happened yet, how have they not reviewed the death penalty yet?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 19, 2016, 01:02:54 AM
Briles should be fired. That's highly unlikely to happen though.

How the eff has this not happened yet, how have they not reviewed the death penalty yet?

Uh, because his AD and UP are just as complicit.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 19, 2016, 08:25:26 AM
Briles should be fired. That's highly unlikely to happen though.

How the eff has this not happened yet, how have they not reviewed the death penalty yet?

Uh, because his AD and UP are just as complicit.

Yeah, the administration should be fired/step down before they deal with Briles.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: NeverII on May 19, 2016, 08:29:34 AM
Briles should be fired. That's highly unlikely to happen though.

How the eff has this not happened yet, how have they not reviewed the death penalty yet?

Uh, because his AD and UP are just as complicit.

Not to mention the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do it again. SMU getting leveled with the DP was what ultimately dissolved the SWC. So unless this is part of some massive ploy to appease ESPN by breaking up the Big 12 for good and getting to four 16-team super conferences, it's not going to happen. But I think I just stumbled upon a new conspiracy theory  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 19, 2016, 08:50:19 AM
Briles should be fired. That's highly unlikely to happen though.

How the eff has this not happened yet, how have they not reviewed the death penalty yet?

Uh, because his AD and UP are just as complicit.

Not to mention the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do it again. SMU getting leveled with the DP was what ultimately dissolved the SWC. So unless this is part of some massive ploy to appease ESPN by breaking up the Big 12 for good and getting to four 16-team super conferences, it's not going to happen. But I think I just stumbled upon a new conspiracy theory  :horrorsurprise:

Baylor getting the death penalty would have no negative effect on the stability of the Big 12; in fact, the current members might damn well prefer to kick Baylor out and open up room for another member.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 19, 2016, 09:33:49 AM
Quote
In April, Outside the Lines reported that Baylor did not investigate a sexual assault report made against football players Tre'Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman for more than two years, despite the school's obligation to do so under federal law. They never faced charges.

This is a hugely frustrating thing that comes up every time something like this happens.  The school is not a law enforcement entity.  The cops, and only the cops, should be investigating anything.  Once the investigations are complete, then the uni can dole out non-criminal repercussions and the state can proceed with any criminal process.  I mean, if I worked at Quick Trip and raped my coworker or a customer, QT shouldn't be the one investigating anything.

This is such a mumped up system. 


Also, in this specific case, it is pretty obvious that there needs to be substantial turn over in the police department as well.

There is too much money in college sports.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on May 19, 2016, 09:38:48 AM
Quote
In April, Outside the Lines reported that Baylor did not investigate a sexual assault report made against football players Tre'Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman for more than two years, despite the school's obligation to do so under federal law. They never faced charges.

This is a hugely frustrating thing that comes up every time something like this happens.  The school is not a law enforcement entity.  The cops, and only the cops, should be investigating anything.  Once the investigations are complete, then the uni can dole out non-criminal repercussions and the state can proceed with any criminal process.  I mean, if I worked at Quick Trip and raped my coworker or a customer, QT shouldn't be the one investigating anything.

This is such a mumped up system. 


Also, in this specific case, it is pretty obvious that there needs to be substantial turn over in the police department as well.

There is too much money in college sports.

Yes to all of this. Its become a mess.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 19, 2016, 09:44:32 AM
So, who is going to special investigate the special investigator?  Ken Starr is done. 

RapeAggie is going to need a whole stable of oscar'esque coaches. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 19, 2016, 10:10:32 AM
Quote
In April, Outside the Lines reported that Baylor did not investigate a sexual assault report made against football players Tre'Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman for more than two years, despite the school's obligation to do so under federal law. They never faced charges.

This is a hugely frustrating thing that comes up every time something like this happens.  The school is not a law enforcement entity.  The cops, and only the cops, should be investigating anything.  Once the investigations are complete, then the uni can dole out non-criminal repercussions and the state can proceed with any criminal process.  I mean, if I worked at Quick Trip and raped my coworker or a customer, QT shouldn't be the one investigating anything.

This is such a mumped up system. 


Also, in this specific case, it is pretty obvious that there needs to be substantial turn over in the police department as well.

There is too much money in college sports.

If you worked at QuickTrip and were accused of raping a coworker, there would be an investigation by QuickTrip to see if they need to fire you immediately.  Quicktrip isn't going to prosecute you; they don't have the power to throw you in jail.  But they are paying you a salary, and you are wearing the company logo every time you should up to work.  Also, Quicktrip would probably self-evaluate and say:  "Wow, we hired a rapist.  What can we do to try to ensure that we don't hire another rapist like that?"  Like, say, that you had been fired from Quickstop for allegedly raping somebody at their store, and the manager at Quickstop had called and warned Quicktrip about why they fired you.  Under this scenario, Quicktrip would probably say, "let's not hire people like that again, no matter how good of a pash rusher cashier they are."

You are assuming that "investigation" means criminal investigation, and you are forgetting that Baylor is paying these guys full scholarship and introducing these animals to their campus.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 19, 2016, 10:12:31 AM
Quote
In April, Outside the Lines reported that Baylor did not investigate a sexual assault report made against football players Tre'Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman for more than two years, despite the school's obligation to do so under federal law. They never faced charges.

This is a hugely frustrating thing that comes up every time something like this happens.  The school is not a law enforcement entity.  The cops, and only the cops, should be investigating anything.  Once the investigations are complete, then the uni can dole out non-criminal repercussions and the state can proceed with any criminal process.  I mean, if I worked at Quick Trip and raped my coworker or a customer, QT shouldn't be the one investigating anything.

This is such a mumped up system. 


Also, in this specific case, it is pretty obvious that there needs to be substantial turn over in the police department as well.

There is too much money in college sports.

Do you really think that Quicktrip shouldn't fire you unless, and until, you have been found guilty by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of committing the crime?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: HerrSonntag on May 19, 2016, 02:05:38 PM
Quote
In April, Outside the Lines reported that Baylor did not investigate a sexual assault report made against football players Tre'Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman for more than two years, despite the school's obligation to do so under federal law. They never faced charges.

This is a hugely frustrating thing that comes up every time something like this happens.  The school is not a law enforcement entity.  The cops, and only the cops, should be investigating anything.  Once the investigations are complete, then the uni can dole out non-criminal repercussions and the state can proceed with any criminal process.  I mean, if I worked at Quick Trip and raped my coworker or a customer, QT shouldn't be the one investigating anything.

This is such a mumped up system. 


Also, in this specific case, it is pretty obvious that there needs to be substantial turn over in the police department as well.

There is too much money in college sports.

Do you really think that Quicktrip shouldn't fire you unless, and until, you have been found guilty by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of committing the crime?
People get fired to alleged impropriety all the time, the bar is not near as high as the legal system.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 19, 2016, 02:42:58 PM
No one said QT wouldn't fire that person.  You guys are getting lost in the weeds.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 19, 2016, 02:54:59 PM
No one said QT wouldn't fire that person.  You guys are getting lost in the weeds.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

How is QT going to make a decision about whether to fire that person without doing some sort of investigation?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 19, 2016, 03:34:35 PM
I want a hot dog
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 19, 2016, 03:50:36 PM
I want a hot dog

Buffalo chicken roller and for the Big 12 to kick Baylor out
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatNation on May 19, 2016, 04:03:03 PM
Report: Baylor board of regents considering firing Art Briles:

Baylor's board of regents is considering firing head coach Art Briles amid a sexual assault and domestic violence scandal, sources told Mac Engel of the Star-Telegram.
The news comes just hours after ESPN's Outside the Lines released more examples of the university allegedly covering up criminal behavior by members of the football team. While the board is expected to retain Briles, the sources confirmed the discussion about firing the successful coach is ongoing.


http://www.thescore.com/news/1029664
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 19, 2016, 04:13:14 PM
How quick does Texas or an SEC school hire Art?  I mean, I don't think he should schedule any family vacations in the next month or two.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 19, 2016, 04:15:53 PM
How quick does Texas or an SEC school hire Art?  I mean, I don't think he should schedule any family vacations in the next month or two.

Kansas State may be looking for a head coach next offseason.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 19, 2016, 04:16:37 PM
:BruceDubious:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 19, 2016, 06:57:53 PM
This is as bad as penn state

Not even possible
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 19, 2016, 07:01:56 PM
I would imagine briles would get hired by a p5 school about as fast as Dave bliss did
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on May 19, 2016, 07:19:50 PM
This is as bad as penn state

Not even possible

It's all just awful.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 19, 2016, 07:25:22 PM
Quote
In April, Outside the Lines reported that Baylor did not investigate a sexual assault report made against football players Tre'Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman for more than two years, despite the school's obligation to do so under federal law. They never faced charges.

This is a hugely frustrating thing that comes up every time something like this happens.  The school is not a law enforcement entity.  The cops, and only the cops, should be investigating anything.  Once the investigations are complete, then the uni can dole out non-criminal repercussions and the state can proceed with any criminal process.  I mean, if I worked at Quick Trip and raped my coworker or a customer, QT shouldn't be the one investigating anything.

This is such a mumped up system. 


Also, in this specific case, it is pretty obvious that there needs to be substantial turn over in the police department as well.

There is too much money in college sports.
Did you read the article FAN linked? The Waco police department basically did nothing themselves (and actually appeared to help cover up some of these cases). If anything this is the best reason for an additional party doing SOME sort of investigation.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 19, 2016, 07:29:47 PM
Yeah, I read it.  That is why I also noted that the police dept needs to.have some turn over too, but, whatever.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: HELLHAMMER on May 19, 2016, 08:26:33 PM
I told a random Baylor fan that his team was full of rapists and various other criminals at halftime of last years game.  Some tuck reprimanded me for talking crap so I sauntered off in a drunken strut.

It feels good to be right constantly.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 19, 2016, 08:38:48 PM
Yeah, I read it.  That is why I also noted that the police dept needs to.have some turn over too, but, whatever.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Well, I guess I think it's strange that the university investigating sexual assaults is one of your main takeaways from this mess.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 19, 2016, 08:59:51 PM
Not surlrised, Michigancat desires a police state where myriad quasi law enforcement agencies investigate the same alleged crime to ensure the perp gets his or is at least ruined by the process.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 19, 2016, 09:18:02 PM
Not surlrised, Michigancat desires a police state where myriad quasi law enforcement agencies investigate the same alleged crime to ensure the perp gets his or is at least ruined by the process.
I'm surlrised FSD is so pro Briles/rape.

:frown:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 19, 2016, 09:24:22 PM
Gonna enjoy watching and joining in on the meltdown when Briles retains his job (not pro rapey Briles). 

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 19, 2016, 10:13:43 PM
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/texas-ag-says-baylor-must-release-parts-of-sexual-assault-records-024517428.html
Texas AG says Baylor must release parts of sexual assault records
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 19, 2016, 10:21:37 PM
I told a random Baylor fan that his team was full of rapists and various other criminals at halftime of last years game.  Some tuck reprimanded me for talking crap so I sauntered off in a drunken strut.

It feels good to be right constantly.

I'm not about to throw the first stone. It seems virtually impossible that nearly all college football programs don't have rapey incidents covered up, sheer numbers alone dictate the number of reported assaults committed by football players is likely pretty low, and that's without discussing the culture of football players and the added dynamic of how they're treated on campuses. This Amy Schumer clip absolutely nailed it, the payoff is at the end.
http://deadspin.com/amy-schumers-sketch-about-football-players-who-rape-was-1699461849
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on May 20, 2016, 07:01:16 AM
What a guy.

https://twitter.com/coachartbriles/status/733425470205628416
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: RickRampus on May 20, 2016, 08:36:05 AM
rough ridin' despicable
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 20, 2016, 08:59:02 AM
They will never fire him.  They are just as bad as he is
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 20, 2016, 08:59:56 AM
they need to cut the head off
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 20, 2016, 09:26:11 AM
They will never fire him.  They are just as bad as he is

this
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: PowercatPat on May 20, 2016, 09:39:56 AM
What a guy.

https://twitter.com/coachartbriles/status/733425470205628416

That is one of the most laughable tweets I have ever seen.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on May 20, 2016, 10:03:45 AM
if they fire him we should hire him immediately. he could be our football bob huggins.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 20, 2016, 10:05:38 AM
if they fire him we should hire him immediately. he could be our football bob huggins.

Then I would have to expose/totally blow holes in our own coach.  that isn't my style
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 20, 2016, 10:06:26 AM
briles/currie dynamic would be amazing
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 20, 2016, 10:07:09 AM
if they fire him we should hire him immediately. he could be our football bob huggins.

Where would Mitch rank a Briles hire?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 20, 2016, 10:17:53 AM
briles/currie dynamic would be amazing

briles/kill/currie
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 20, 2016, 10:18:21 AM
^^^ say that 3 times fast
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 20, 2016, 01:26:00 PM
What a guy.

https://twitter.com/coachartbriles/status/733425470205628416

Guys, remind me to not bitch abt Snyder/Currie our admin ever again...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 21, 2016, 11:10:56 AM
do you guys remember when I predicted this?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 21, 2016, 11:30:00 AM
briles/currie dynamic would be amazing

briles/kill/currie

eff briles, marry kill, kill currie
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 12:34:30 PM
do you guys remember when I predicted this?

Ahem, I think I was like five pages before you.  It's good to have a peer on this board, though.  Cheers, Dugout
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 12:40:37 PM
Did you guys hear the one about how Corey Coleman celebrated his high draft pick?  I thought not; old habits die hard for Rapelor and the Waco PD.

He drag raced his charger down the main road through Baylor campus.  Lost control, demolished a fence and plowed his car straight into a building.  Source: A+

Nothing the Waco PD was interested in, apparently.  Not even a blood alcohol test.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 21, 2016, 12:51:28 PM
This is worse than Dave Bliss, right?

He got like a decade long show cause order.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 21, 2016, 01:07:55 PM
it was dugout
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 21, 2016, 01:32:07 PM
it was dugout

Of course but Steffy was like my Canada on this continent
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:18:14 PM


Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:23:43 PM


No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  .     .       .     Briles is a good coach but I think there are going to be problems long term.  His teams do not show a great amount of discipline and his approach depends on having better athletes.  .    .    . Plus, I think there will be some discipline and recruiting issues long-term.  The way they handled the Dixon assault is telling.....completely swept under the rug.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:30:11 PM


Let's revisit in ten years.  Snyder will be hall of famer; maybe have a national championship.  Regardless of what Briles manages to achieve before the crap hits the fan, we know it will have hit the fan in ten years.  When it does, even Dave Bliss will be appalled.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:32:10 PM
a simple "i was wrong" would have worked

Because kslim is an bad person
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:34:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:37:04 PM
Briles cheats

link?

www.youknowitstrue.com

See also www.justwait.com
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:38:05 PM
how could people anyone not like Briles?  he's a phenomenal coach, very respectful of LHOFHCBS, and hilarious.  plus he's got that folksy texas high school coach charm.

How anyone with a brain could not see through his schtick is beyond me.  Briles has the worst traits from Roy Williams and Dave Bliss.  A scary combination.

Just wait.
winning is the only trait that matters and he is doing it at rough ridin' baylor. just shut up already
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:40:13 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

You're a dope
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:41:28 PM
Outside of Gundy, Briles is the most full of crap coach in the conf.  His gross ears also make me sick

Dugout with two nice points
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:43:57 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 21, 2016, 10:47:08 PM


Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now.

This is still true
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:48:47 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)

Very fitting, the criminal analogy and all.

Briles is scary evil.

That house of cards is going to be fun to watch burn to the ground.  I imagine Snyder will still be coaching when it happens, which will be soon.

Seems like a good day to revisit this.

Today's events are just the tip of the iceberg. Trust me.

Being dishonest about someone else's dishonesty, fantastic.

What?

Just admit that you are a horrible judge of character, and move on.

I'm not (and never was) claiming to have inside information.  It's just common sense.

There will be more bad stuff to come.

What have I had to say about Briles character other to say he was lying? So I'm confused do you like him or not?

Are you serious?  You've posting for months about how "adorable" Briles is, talking about what a great coach he is, all while many on this board were telling you he was a dirtbag.

Just admit you fell for his schtick, and then the matter will be done.

Saying he had an adorable appearance on Highly Questionable and saying he's a good football says what exactly about his character?

You're handling this about as well as Briles and Baylor handled the rape.

So nothing? Thought so, keep flailing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:51:02 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.

I'm still waiting for your stupid ass to post a link of me saying anything about Briles' character other than me calling him a liar. Your meltdown is because I had a one line post mentioning that Briles was adorable on a rough ridin' television show. Produce the link of me calling a dumb rough ridin' football coach a good man, contribute to the actual conversation happening, or just shut the eff up, freak.

You have issues.

I tried to tell you Briles was scary evil.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Don't be mad at me that you got duped (and still are, apparently) by his superficial southern "charm."
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:53:27 PM
http://es.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/sam-ukwuachu-s-hs-coach-backs-up-what-art-briles-knew-about-player-s-past-230241843.html
Sam Ukwuachu’s HS coach backs up what Art Briles knew about player’s past

Anyone willing to walk back the Art Briles is lying scum rhetoric?

You are too funny.

You've had every chance to jump, but it seems you are determined to go down with this sinking ship.

Very Baylor-ly of you.

I'm going to enjoy watching it happen to Briles, Baylor, and you.

I'm still waiting for your stupid ass to post a link of me saying anything about Briles' character other than me calling him a liar. Your meltdown is because I had a one line post mentioning that Briles was adorable on a rough ridin' television show. Produce the link of me calling a dumb rough ridin' football coach a good man, contribute to the actual conversation happening, or just shut the eff up, freak.

You have issues.

I tried to tell you Briles was scary evil.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Don't be mad at me that you got duped (and still are, apparently) by his superficial southern "charm."

you keep alluding that you have some sort of info on Briles, but, you don't know crap

I don't have any inside info on Briles.

My impression is based on what is readily observable to anyone:
1. the way his players act on the field
2. the sudden success at recruiting....at Baylor
3. the history of Baylor and its lack of institutional control
4. the fact that Baylor and Briles seem like a perfect fit for each other
5. the fact that Briles accepts kids that schools like Boise State and Penn. State (Pedo State!) have determined are unacceptable
6. the egotistical, phony way in which Briles interacts with the media
7. the entire culture he has created that is observable to anyone watching (see #1, flashy uniforms, the way his assistants act on the sidelines, etc.)
8. the consistent allegations that he was very crooked at Stephenville and was complicit in rampant steroid abuse
9. the fact that Gary Patterson (post-game) has all but said that Briles and Baylor were cheating at recruiting
10. the fact that Texas passed on Briles when they had the chance to hire him
(recently)11. the fact that Peterson would unnecessarily stick his nose into a situation and claim that he warned Briles about the rapist
(recently) 12. the fact that neither Starr nor McCall have said anything remotely resembling a vote of confidence for Briles

The rape stuff is just the tip of the iceberg.....not inside information, just a prediction based on what I can observe.  If Briles manages to coach another five years (which will only be possible by avoiding scandal) I will admit that I was wrong.  (It ain't going to happen, though.  I will predict two years, max.)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 21, 2016, 10:56:50 PM


Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now.

This is still true

1.  LOL no, it is not true.
2.  You, too, are scary evil
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on May 21, 2016, 11:41:52 PM
 :bartender:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 21, 2016, 11:44:56 PM
This weirdo psycho thinks he's going to get praised for this instead of ridiculed
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 21, 2016, 11:47:40 PM
Has any of this made it where we actually could trade Snyder for Briles right now?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kim carnes on May 21, 2016, 11:53:18 PM
Of course we would take briles, he hasn't done anything wrong. his players are adults, he shouldn't be held responsible for their actions.  Jfc
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 22, 2016, 01:32:00 AM
Man, if we could get Briles. :excited:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 22, 2016, 09:22:02 AM
He can't be as filthy dirty rampant cheating now so I don't want him.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 22, 2016, 09:31:28 AM
Yeah I would not want Briles at this point.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 22, 2016, 09:36:08 AM
This weirdo psycho thinks he's going to get praised for this instead of ridiculed

The nastier the name-calling by rain, the more wrong he is.

If he calls you psycho, it means you pretty much have demolished him.

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 22, 2016, 09:48:41 AM
Yeah I would not want Briles at this point.

Another on team Briles is a smelly cheater with gross ears.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 22, 2016, 10:57:06 AM
Need Briles to stay on at Baylor but for them to have crippling sanctions and for Snyder to go another 4 years so he can try to even the record at 5-5.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: waks on May 22, 2016, 11:53:21 AM


Let's revisit in ten years.  Snyder will be hall of famer; maybe have a national championship.  Regardless of what Briles manages to achieve before the crap hits the fan, we know it will have hit the fan in ten years.  When it does, even Dave Bliss will be appalled.
:lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 22, 2016, 01:31:36 PM
Did you guys hear the one about how Corey Coleman celebrated his high draft pick?  I thought not; old habits die hard for Rapelor and the Waco PD.

He drag raced his charger down the main road through Baylor campus.  Lost control, demolished a fence and plowed his car straight into a building.  Source: A+

Nothing the Waco PD was interested in, apparently.  Not even a blood alcohol test.

This is a p. good story, Steffy. Also, I would not trade Snyder for Briles. I like our comfortable rut. I know what to expect.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 22, 2016, 03:14:22 PM
a simple "i was wrong" would have worked

Because kslim is an bad person
damn
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 22, 2016, 10:05:30 PM
Yeah I would not want Briles at this point.

Another on team Briles is a smelly cheater with gross ears.
Hey guys, I been on the team for awhile now.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sekpoke on May 23, 2016, 09:43:06 PM

http://prevailandride.blogspot.com/2016/05/baylor-has-rape-problem.html?m=1 (http://prevailandride.blogspot.com/2016/05/baylor-has-rape-problem.html?m=1)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 24, 2016, 11:40:31 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FAlQ6G7L.png&hash=e7231851328fddb3407e89fc46e1e91890f7a416)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 24, 2016, 01:23:12 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/05/24/kenneth-starr-reportedly-to-be-removed-as-baylor-president-amid-football-scandal/
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 24, 2016, 01:53:55 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 24, 2016, 02:21:51 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 24, 2016, 02:51:45 PM
they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

Yea, they won't fire him.  They should, but they won't. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 24, 2016, 03:49:00 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 24, 2016, 03:56:05 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.
I bet you tons of $ he is.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 24, 2016, 04:16:55 PM
Baylor thinks they are feeling the heat on this because Texas is tired of them being good.  I mean you can't make this stuff up.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 24, 2016, 04:28:15 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.

i said baylor isn't dumb, and they're not. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 24, 2016, 06:46:53 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.

i said baylor isn't dumb, and they're not.

Keeping Briles would be dumb.  The honeymoon is over; he lied, cheated, and swept under the rug to a nice little run.  But he won't be able to do that anymore; the spotlight will be hot.  Not to mention, he has lost support from a portion of the fan base.  No longer will his bs "ah shucks" schtick be charming and adorable......just creepy.

I would actually prefer the slow, painful death that will occur if they don't fire him.  It is what Briles and Baylor both deserve.  But I don't know what will happen; my best guess is that he will get fired.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 24, 2016, 07:14:04 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.

i said baylor isn't dumb, and they're not.

Keeping Briles would be dumb.  The honeymoon is over; he lied, cheated, and swept under the rug to a nice little run.  But he won't be able to do that anymore; the spotlight will be hot.  Not to mention, he has lost support from a portion of the fan base.  No longer will his bs "ah shucks" schtick be charming and adorable......just creepy.

I would actually prefer the slow, painful death that will occur if they don't fire him.  It is what Briles and Baylor both deserve.  But I don't know what will happen; my best guess is that he will get fired.
They may fire him, but you can bet your ass, that some other school will pick him up quickly.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 24, 2016, 07:15:48 PM
Especially if he goes cheaper than what he's getting now.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 24, 2016, 07:48:35 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.

i said baylor isn't dumb, and they're not.

Keeping Briles would be dumb.  The honeymoon is over; he lied, cheated, and swept under the rug to a nice little run.  But he won't be able to do that anymore; the spotlight will be hot.  Not to mention, he has lost support from a portion of the fan base.  No longer will his bs "ah shucks" schtick be charming and adorable......just creepy.

I would actually prefer the slow, painful death that will occur if they don't fire him.  It is what Briles and Baylor both deserve.  But I don't know what will happen; my best guess is that he will get fired.
They may fire him, but you can bet your ass, that some other school will pick him up quickly.

There are some schools that would hire a publicly-disgraced Briles, after a few years.  UTEP perhaps, or Arky State sounds about right. But no decent program will touch him.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 24, 2016, 07:51:24 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.

i said baylor isn't dumb, and they're not.

Keeping Briles would be dumb.  The honeymoon is over; he lied, cheated, and swept under the rug to a nice little run.  But he won't be able to do that anymore; the spotlight will be hot.  Not to mention, he has lost support from a portion of the fan base.  No longer will his bs "ah shucks" schtick be charming and adorable......just creepy.

I would actually prefer the slow, painful death that will occur if they don't fire him.  It is what Briles and Baylor both deserve.  But I don't know what will happen; my best guess is that he will get fired.

none of the things that he's done matter to baylor's administration.  they can't afford to play by the rules, they're sitting on a $300 million dollar stadium that they just built.  if they were to fire their current coach/proven winner for breaking the rules, they have to follow that action up with a oscar weber "good guy" hire.  unfortunately for k-state hoops fans, that's not going to happen.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 24, 2016, 10:48:08 PM
Briles hasn't lost the fan base.

Just go check out the digusting baylorfans forums.  Those delusional idiots think UT is trying to steal Briles amongst other dumb crap. 

Briles will be staying in Waco.  The boosters that bought all the new trucks for their football players don't want him gone.

Bible aggie's disgusting fake piety is one of the reasons I hate them.  If Briles hadn't been winning then his ass would be out.  Since he has improved their recruiting and turned that loser school into a winner in football, they won't be getting rid of him. 

Ken Starr will get bounced as will some other non-important people, but Briles will get a pass.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 24, 2016, 11:07:49 PM
Bible aggie is disgusting.  Briles should be bounced with Starr.

they might be disgusting but they're not dumb, briles will survive this

It's both disgusting and dumb.  The gig is over for Briles.  Even if they don't fire him, he can't be effective going forward.

i said baylor isn't dumb, and they're not.

Keeping Briles would be dumb.  The honeymoon is over; he lied, cheated, and swept under the rug to a nice little run.  But he won't be able to do that anymore; the spotlight will be hot.  Not to mention, he has lost support from a portion of the fan base.  No longer will his bs "ah shucks" schtick be charming and adorable......just creepy.

I would actually prefer the slow, painful death that will occur if they don't fire him.  It is what Briles and Baylor both deserve.  But I don't know what will happen; my best guess is that he will get fired.

none of the things that he's done matter to baylor's administration.  they can't afford to play by the rules, they're sitting on a $300 million dollar stadium that they just built.  if they were to fire their current coach/proven winner for breaking the rules, they have to follow that action up with a oscar weber "good guy" hire.  unfortunately for k-state hoops fans, that's not going to happen.

Dude, you're not getting what I am saying.  I'm not predicting whether he will get fired or not. Im saying that, if he doesn't, he will not continue to have the success he was having.  You said that if Baylor hires a new coach, he will have to play by the rules.  Same goes for Briles going forward at Baykor, except probably double.  I guarantee you that a program that was sweeping rapes under the rug is also recruiting dirty and complicit in steroid use.  It won't fly going forward.  So Baylor can either try to win clean with a new coach, or watch Briles slip into mediocrity when forced to play clean.  You say they can't afford to play by the rules.....but they can't afford not to, either.  They are screwed.  (Karma is a mother f'er.). I believe they will eventually come to this realization and cut bait with Briles, but I don't know for sure.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 24, 2016, 11:10:01 PM
fair enough, i just don't see the leopard changing his spots regardless of the direction his new university president gives him
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 24, 2016, 11:16:26 PM
Briles hasn't lost the fan base.

Just go check out the digusting baylorfans forums.  Those delusional idiots think UT is trying to steal Briles amongst other dumb crap. 

Briles will be staying in Waco.  The boosters that bought all the new trucks for their football players don't want him gone.

Bible aggie's disgusting fake piety is one of the reasons I hate them.  If Briles hadn't been winning then his ass would be out.  Since he has improved their recruiting and turned that loser school into a winner in football, they won't be getting rid of him. 

Ken Starr will get bounced as will some other non-important people, but Briles will get a pass.

Yes, the idiots on baylorfans are unbelievable, but that isn't reflective of the entire fan base.  Think if someone tried to gauge the ksu fan base based on this message board.  And, in any event, most people whose opinion really matters aren't posting on boards like us schmucks are.

I am quite sure that there are many people at Baylor who are now disgusted with Briles.  Even if that is just 10% of the base, it is still tough to win when 10% of the base hates you and is looking for reasons to can you.  Baylor is going to be down next year; can you imagine how the 10% would react if, say, Baylor lost to Osu early and then stumbled to a 7-5 season.

He has been permanently crippled by this scandal.  (Karma)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kim carnes on May 24, 2016, 11:19:06 PM
Steffy plz stfu
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatNation on May 24, 2016, 11:21:30 PM
Seriously, I think the Big 12 should take action and vote on giving them the boot. Baylor's reaction to all of this is unreal. Bring in Memphis, Cinci, or Colo St and get this disgusting school/fanbase out of here.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 25, 2016, 07:16:46 AM
The TCU vs Baylor hate fest is like Yale v Harvard but for dumb people. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 25, 2016, 08:35:19 AM
The TCU vs Baylor hate fest is like Yale v Harvard but for dumb people. 

except it's not a tcu vs baylor hatefest.  it's an everyone vs. baylor hatefest and it always has been.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 25, 2016, 08:50:00 AM
The TCU vs Baylor hate fest is like Yale v Harvard but for dumb people. 

except it's not a tcu vs baylor hatefest.  it's an everyone vs. baylor hatefest and it always has been.

This
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 25, 2016, 09:03:52 AM


Yes, the idiots on baylorfans are unbelievable, but that isn't reflective of the entire fan base.  Think if someone tried to gauge the ksu fan base based on this message board.  And, in any event, most people whose opinion really matters aren't posting on boards like us schmucks are.

I am quite sure that there are many people at Baylor who are now disgusted with Briles.  Even if that is just 10% of the base, it is still tough to win when 10% of the base hates you and is looking for reasons to can you.  Baylor is going to be down next year; can you imagine how the 10% would react if, say, Baylor lost to Osu early and then stumbled to a 7-5 season.

He has been permanently crippled by this scandal.  (Karma)

Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal, but none of the bible aggie alumni that I work with (3 or 4 of them) give a crap about this.  They just want the football team to stay good.

Ken Starr will fall on the sword.  Their AD might even fall on the sword.  Briles will live on and will continue to be a dirty eff. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 09:08:42 AM
Pro tip: If it was your school too. You'd just want your football team to be good too. Did you give a crap that your starting QB lived in a mound of blow? Answer: No!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 25, 2016, 09:16:12 AM
Pro tip: If it was your school too. You'd just want your football team to be good too. Did you give a crap that your starting QB lived in a mound of blow? Answer: No!

That's not what we're discussing.  Stay on topic please.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on May 25, 2016, 09:23:49 AM
I think the subject has changed to Hubener being a coke head.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 25, 2016, 09:24:22 AM
I just want to make sure I am understanding your argument Steffy.  Baylor is demonstrably showing that they will not punish Briles or the football program despite damning allegations.  Because of this, they are going to try super hard to punish Briles and the football program in the future?  I don't see it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 25, 2016, 10:05:10 AM
steffy should stick to the ins and outs of redshirts
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 25, 2016, 10:07:55 AM
I just want to make sure I am understanding your argument Steffy.  Baylor is demonstrably showing that they will not punish Briles or the football program despite damning allegations.  Because of this, they are going to try super hard to punish Briles and the football program in the future?  I don't see it.

The heat coming forward will be primarily from external sources, who didn't give a crap about Baylor before all of this.  But also from the minority of Baylor fans who are embarrassed by this POS.

The board of regents is like a 25-30 person board.  I'm sure there are a multitude of perspectives represented.  Look, I think the whole thing is disgusting; I don't think it would happen at KSU because there are principled people who would not let it get this far.  But I'm not willing to believe that there isn't a segment of the BU that can't see this for what it is.  Surely there are those people.  They probably just don't post as often on message boards. (Maybe they should.)  I really want to believe that anyway...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 25, 2016, 10:09:27 AM
steffy should stick to the ins and outs of redshirts

Well, except I was 2-3 years ahead of this board on this issue.

I'm still not sure I completely understand the redshirt issue.  Just glad that Dante got one.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 25, 2016, 10:20:14 AM
I'm sure that some people want Briles out but if this type of scandal doesn't get it done, nothing will.  The power clearly lies with people that have chosen to let almost anything go and to sacrifice anybody at the university before him.  They aren't the people that are likely to be needling around the program looking for problems.

Also, lol @ any reputable university president taking the Baylor job after this.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 10:24:52 AM
steffy should stick to the ins and outs of redshirts

Well, except I was 2-3 years ahead of this board on this issue.

I'm still not sure I completely understand the redshirt issue.  Just glad that Dante got one.

It's pretty disturbing that you knew about these rapes 2-3 years ago and said nothing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 25, 2016, 10:42:31 AM
Pro tip: If it was your school too. You'd just want your football team to be good too. Did you give a crap that your starting QB lived in a mound of blow? Answer: No!

Man, I really can't even understand what wacky is saying here. Boykin was on coke? Hubes was on coke? Former cat qbs were on coke? Purely a hypothetical? Now I know how ppl must feel reading my posts.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 10:50:01 AM
They're QB before Boykins was a drug addict, pvegs.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 10:58:12 AM
They're QB before Boykins was a drug addict, pvegs.

I just don't see that as a big deal.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 11:03:09 AM
They're QB before Boykins was a drug addict, pvegs.

I just don't see that as a big deal.
exactly
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 25, 2016, 11:04:59 AM
I'm sure that some people want Briles out but if this type of scandal doesn't get it done, nothing will.  The power clearly lies with people that have chosen to let almost anything go and to sacrifice anybody at the university before him.  They aren't the people that are likely to be needling around the program looking for problems.

Also, lol @ any reputable university president taking the Baylor job after this.

I agree that Briles would be emboldened if this were all playing out behind closed doors, but the public aspect of it changes the dynamics.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 25, 2016, 12:58:49 PM
If other fan bases judged ksu fans by this board they'd think ksu is just hot studs with boats
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on May 25, 2016, 01:14:19 PM
Boy, what a joke it would be if the school was like, "well the AD and president are gone because they knew what was going on in the football program, but the coach who is highest paid and closest to the action was clueless."
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 01:19:38 PM
Boy, what a joke it would be if the school was like, "well the AD and president are gone because they knew what was going on in the football program, but the coach who is highest paid and closest to the action was clueless."

The president would be the one deciding not to pursue an investigation or to cover up a crime.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 25, 2016, 01:32:48 PM
Boy, what a joke it would be if the school was like, "well the AD and president are gone because they knew what was going on in the football program, but the coach who is highest paid and closest to the action was clueless."

The president would be the one deciding not to pursue an investigation or to cover up a crime.

So Joe Paterno goes to the university president and says some kids are getting diddled and president does nothing and that's all Joe can do?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 01:39:34 PM
Boy, what a joke it would be if the school was like, "well the AD and president are gone because they knew what was going on in the football program, but the coach who is highest paid and closest to the action was clueless."

The president would be the one deciding not to pursue an investigation or to cover up a crime.

So Joe Paterno goes to the university president and says some kids are getting diddled and president does nothing and that's all Joe can do?

No, Joe can call the cops. In this case, weren't the police already investigating?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: fatdamon on May 25, 2016, 02:08:03 PM
 
They're QB before Boykins was a drug addict, pvegs.

 :D
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 02:33:14 PM
Did GE.blog really just compare doing a rape to doing cocaine? Really ??
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 02:35:28 PM
maybe its just me but if a ksu qb was doing blow id probably just tell them to switch nostrils from time to time, if the ksu qb was raping girls im going to a jayhawk grad kbi officer.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 02:38:56 PM
maybe its just me but if a ksu qb was doing blow id probably just tell them to switch nostrils from time to time, if the ksu qb was raping girls im going to a jayhawk grad kbi officer.

:thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on May 25, 2016, 02:42:16 PM
What about raping cocaine addict QBs?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 25, 2016, 02:44:30 PM
Did GE.blog really just compare doing a rape to doing cocaine? Really ??

I would say that Wacky probably doesn't speak for the majority of the blog.  He did though.  He absolutely did.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 02:45:32 PM
What about raping cocaine addict QBs?
death nail
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 02:50:52 PM
Well if you don't hand select parts of what I said, then yeah, I guess that's what it looks like. But all anyone cares about is winning football games and ppl won't remember this with Briles two years from now. Now go tell us how much of a badass you wanted to be towards dscott, kslim, you badass you!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 02:56:05 PM
Well if you don't hand select parts of what I said, then yeah, I guess that's what it looks like. But all anyone cares about is winning football games and ppl won't remember this with Briles two years from now. Now go tell us how much of a badass you wanted to be towards dscott, kslim, you badass you!
everything alright man? you seem sad. also my comment would not have been toward dscott it would have been fitz.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 02:56:14 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 02:57:33 PM


Yes, the idiots on baylorfans are unbelievable, but that isn't reflective of the entire fan base.  Think if someone tried to gauge the ksu fan base based on this message board.  And, in any event, most people whose opinion really matters aren't posting on boards like us schmucks are.

I am quite sure that there are many people at Baylor who are now disgusted with Briles.  Even if that is just 10% of the base, it is still tough to win when 10% of the base hates you and is looking for reasons to can you.  Baylor is going to be down next year; can you imagine how the 10% would react if, say, Baylor lost to Osu early and then stumbled to a 7-5 season.

He has been permanently crippled by this scandal.  (Karma)

Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal, but none of the bible aggie alumni that I work with (3 or 4 of them) give a crap about this.  They just want the football team to stay good.

Ken Starr will fall on the sword.  Their AD might even fall on the sword.  Briles will live on and will continue to be a dirty eff.
I was responding to this fwiw
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 02:58:38 PM
Also, i'm very well Kslim, thanks for asking. 30 minutes away from our work HH.  :Woot:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:03:08 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F66.media.tumblr.com%2Fe95bd2a317c632ad00fce24bbf9385ca%2Ftumblr_mloa08X1v91rq3i3ro1_1280.gif&hash=05a1871cb0bac9739bd07c62d83c4593666943b5)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 25, 2016, 03:04:12 PM
I think the subject has changed to Hubener being a coke head.

Seems like he would be faster if this was true.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 03:05:27 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
are you stupid? how is this the same? two ex baylor players have been proven guilty in a court of law. ells ex side piece admitted to just being a jealous becky
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:08:12 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
are you stupid? how is this the same? two ex baylor players have been proven guilty in a court of law. ells ex side piece admitted to just being a jealous becky
Am I stupid? We had no evidence until afterwards, dummy. Everyone wanted him to play and nobody really gave a crap what went down. I dislike Baylor, but everyone acting like it's a rape factory compared to other programs, are kidding themselves.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 03:10:43 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
are you stupid? how is this the same? two ex baylor players have been proven guilty in a court of law. ells ex side piece admitted to just being a jealous becky
Am I stupid? We had no evidence until afterwards, dummy. Everyone wanted him to play and nobody really gave a crap what went down. I dislike Baylor, but everyone acting like it's a rape factory compared to other programs, are kidding themselves.
and like i posted above, if we have players raping girls they need to be in jail and snyder/currie/ect need fired asap. dont be obtuse in your statements
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 25, 2016, 03:20:04 PM
Am I stupid? We had no evidence until afterwards, dummy. Everyone wanted him to play and nobody really gave a crap what went down. I dislike Baylor, but everyone acting like it's a rape factory compared to other programs, are kidding themselves.

The evidence points to bible aggie being a rape factory compared to other programs tho.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 03:24:09 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
are you stupid? how is this the same? two ex baylor players have been proven guilty in a court of law. ells ex side piece admitted to just being a jealous becky
Am I stupid? We had no evidence until afterwards, dummy. Everyone wanted him to play and nobody really gave a crap what went down. I dislike Baylor, but everyone acting like it's a rape factory compared to other programs, are kidding themselves.
and like i posted above, if we have players raping girls they need to be in jail and snyder/currie/ect need fired asap. dont be obtuse in your statements

Snyder/Currie/etc would only really need to be fired if they are actively trying to keep the rapists on the team out of jail. You could make a strong case for firing Shultz over the 2 women currently suing K-State for not investigating their rapes, but Shultz is gone, anyway.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:26:34 PM
Well, I dated a girl who claims she was raped by a starting lineman during the prince years and nothing came of it, so I bet most schools try and hide this crap. I love football, but this is how big it's gotten. It's pathetic.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 03:26:48 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
are you stupid? how is this the same? two ex baylor players have been proven guilty in a court of law. ells ex side piece admitted to just being a jealous becky
Am I stupid? We had no evidence until afterwards, dummy. Everyone wanted him to play and nobody really gave a crap what went down. I dislike Baylor, but everyone acting like it's a rape factory compared to other programs, are kidding themselves.
and like i posted above, if we have players raping girls they need to be in jail and snyder/currie/ect need fired asap. dont be obtuse in your statements

Snyder/Currie/etc would only really need to be fired if they are actively trying to keep the rapists on the team out of jail.
correct, so correlating the two is so absurd i cant even wrap my head around it.  also how the eff the waco PD not being just drug through the mud right now is equally as troubling.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 03:27:48 PM
Well, I dated a girl who claims she was raped by a starting lineman during the prince years and nothing came of it, so I bet most schools try and hide this crap. I love football, but this is how big it's gotten. It's pathetic.

Did she tell the police?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:28:19 PM
Well, I dated a girl who claims she was raped by a starting lineman during the prince years and nothing came of it, so I bet most schools try and hide this crap. I love football, but this is how big it's gotten. It's pathetic.

Did she tell the police?
Yes, dumbass.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on May 25, 2016, 03:30:36 PM
You guys are right though. The K-State way, is always to take the high road. You wouldn't want this swept under the rug. Especially when it comes to your QB. You wouldn't care about winning, you'd want to shine light on it. Ellrobersonisinnocent, amirite, guys?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F66.media.tumblr.com%2Fe95bd2a317c632ad00fce24bbf9385ca%2Ftumblr_mloa08X1v91rq3i3ro1_1280.gif&hash=05a1871cb0bac9739bd07c62d83c4593666943b5)
:love:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 03:31:35 PM
Well, I dated a girl who claims she was raped by a starting lineman during the prince years and nothing came of it, so I bet most schools try and hide this crap. I love football, but this is how big it's gotten. It's pathetic.

Did she tell the police?
Yes, dumbass.

Well, that's too bad. K-State really should be investigating rape accusations. Hopefully they lose their lawsuit and things change.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:33:31 PM
I'm not trying to win a war here. This crap happens in every program. Everyone loves talking crap on Baylor and it's because they kick our asses every year and ppl hate them now. Especially when stuff like this comes out. Look at Florida State and Winston. He plays in the NFL now. Wow, what a rough ridin' world.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 03:38:57 PM
I'm not trying to win a war here. This crap happens in every program. Everyone loves talking crap on Baylor and it's because they kick our asses every year and ppl hate them now. Especially when stuff like this comes out. Look at Florida State and Winston. He plays in the NFL now. Wow, what a rough ridin' world.
do youw the difference between allegation and conviction? Also don't try to high horse when the majority of us were all over currie and shultz when the ksu rape stuff came out. Nobody with a brain would stand up for those guys (that arent from baylor)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 25, 2016, 03:42:40 PM
I'm not trying to win a war here. This crap happens in every program. Everyone loves talking crap on Baylor and it's because they kick our asses every year and ppl hate them now. Especially when stuff like this comes out. Look at Florida State and Winston. He plays in the NFL now. Wow, what a rough ridin' world.
do youw the difference between allegation and conviction? Also don't try to high horse when the majority of us were all over currie and shultz when the ksu rape stuff came out. Nobody with a brain would stand up for those guys (that arent from baylor)

FSU did everything in its power to try to keep him from being charged. It was pretty pathetic. It's just as bad as Baylor, really.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 03:43:47 PM
I'm not trying to win a war here. This crap happens in every program. Everyone loves talking crap on Baylor and it's because they kick our asses every year and ppl hate them now. Especially when stuff like this comes out. Look at Florida State and Winston. He plays in the NFL now. Wow, what a rough ridin' world.
do youw the difference between allegation and conviction? Also don't try to high horse when the majority of us were all over currie and shultz when the ksu rape stuff came out. Nobody with a brain would stand up for those guys (that arent from baylor)

FSU did everything in its power to try to keep him from being charged. It was pretty pathetic. It's just as bad as Baylor, really.
and fsu should burn as well, that wasnt my point
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 25, 2016, 03:44:35 PM
I'm not trying to win a war here. This crap happens in every program. Everyone loves talking crap on Baylor and it's because they kick our asses every year and ppl hate them now. Especially when stuff like this comes out. Look at Florida State and Winston. He plays in the NFL now. Wow, what a rough ridin' world.

They don't kick our asses every year and I've always hated them.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:45:34 PM
Kslim, i'm done going down this rabbit hole with you. You tried to make me sound like a dumbass, when all I was doing was letting everyone know is, Baylor isn't the only rape factory out there. There is a difference between allegation and conviction and some schools are better at keeping it at an allegation because  :kstategrad: You know how many girls settle to be hush hush, so schools can win rough ridin' football games?

If your point is that you think that I don't think rape is bad, then you're wrong.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 25, 2016, 03:47:52 PM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 03:48:04 PM
Alright, i'm gonna go get lit with my coworkers, have fun guys.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 25, 2016, 04:50:32 PM
They're QB before Boykins was a drug addict, pvegs.

Right, Pachall. My bad, wacky, but that was pretty open to the public and all, given that he went to rehab.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 25, 2016, 04:55:27 PM
Man, this thread is so lit that I agree with Wacky, and also everyone else. What a world.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 05:20:12 PM
 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 25, 2016, 05:20:28 PM
They're QB before Boykins was a drug addict, pvegs.
They're http://goEMAW.com/forum/Smileys/goEMAW/Stickout%20Tongue.gif  http://goEMAW.com/forum/Smileys/goEMAW/cheesy.gif
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kim carnes on May 25, 2016, 09:10:09 PM
Guys the true pos in all of this is steffy for pretending like he cares for any reason other than him hating briles and baylor
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 25, 2016, 09:14:52 PM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 06:28:58 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on May 26, 2016, 07:42:27 AM
Anyone else surprised it was Starr before Art?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 08:18:42 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you

Kslim and I are on the same page here.  I guess opposition to rape covering-up brings everybody almost everybody together.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 26, 2016, 08:19:49 AM
Anyone else surprised it was Starr before Art?

Why wouldn't it be Starr before Art? Why would you fire Art and then let the current administration that covered up rape replace him?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:27:26 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you

Kslim and I are on the same page here.  I guess opposition to rape covering-up brings everybody almost everybody together.
Steffy, don't be a dumb eff. You've been calling for Baylor's head before this scandal. I'm sorry some guy banged your wife from there.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 08:34:26 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you

Kslim and I are on the same page here.  I guess opposition to rape covering-up brings everybody almost everybody together.
Steffy, don't be a dumb eff. You've been calling for Baylor's head before this scandal. I'm sorry some guy banged your wife from there.

LOL right....don't be mad that I grasped something about Briles and Baylor that your thick head still doesn't comprehend.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:35:21 AM
Guys the true pos in all of this is steffy for pretending like he cares for any reason other than him hating briles and baylor
This
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:38:17 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you

Kslim and I are on the same page here.  I guess opposition to rape covering-up brings everybody almost everybody together.
Steffy, don't be a dumb eff. You've been calling for Baylor's head before this scandal. I'm sorry some guy banged your wife from there.

LOL right....don't be mad that I grasped something about Briles and Baylor that your thick head still doesn't comprehend.
WUT?! You didn't grasp anything, dumb eff. You played the usual "It's Baylor, they've gotta be cheating to be good" card, without any logic/insight at all. It's like calling that someone will win the lottery eventually. You're just a sour vagina for all things baylor. Turns out their PR department is awful. Congrats!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 08:39:09 AM
Guys the true pos in all of this is steffy for pretending like he cares for any reason other than him hating briles and baylor
This

I will go on record (again) and say that there is plenty more dirt to come out on Briles and Baylor.  Blatant recruiting violations, steroid abuse.  That is what I suspected would bring them down all along.  I never considered they possibility that they were harboring and protecting rapist.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 08:40:07 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you

Kslim and I are on the same page here.  I guess opposition to rape covering-up brings everybody almost everybody together.
Steffy, don't be a dumb eff. You've been calling for Baylor's head before this scandal. I'm sorry some guy banged your wife from there.

LOL right....don't be mad that I grasped something about Briles and Baylor that your thick head still doesn't comprehend.
WUT?! You didn't grasp anything, dumb eff. You played the usual "It's Baylor, they've gotta be cheating to be good" card, without any logic/insight at all. It's like calling that someone will win the lottery eventually. You're just a sour vagina for all things baylor. Turns out their PR department is awful. Congrats!

OK, rape apologist
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 26, 2016, 08:41:47 AM
good god, it's like reading rough ridin' shaggy c-listers with steffy posting here
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 08:42:20 AM
I think some of you need to actually read the story, multiple players from baylor raped/sexually abused woman and it was reported. They waited until the players were no longer there to do anything about it and both we convicted. I mean hell peterson told briles how big of a piece of crap he was and not to take him yet he did anyway. Sorry but that crap cant be "oh this happens at every program its okay"
Sounds like most programs, that didn't get caught. eff you Baylor! :shakesfist:
again you are comparing apples to oranges its one thing to turn a blind eye to a envelope full of cash. Completely different to cover up rape. Keep playing the baylor apologist tho, it looks good on you

Kslim and I are on the same page here.  I guess opposition to rape covering-up brings everybody almost everybody together.
Steffy, don't be a dumb eff. You've been calling for Baylor's head before this scandal. I'm sorry some guy banged your wife from there.

LOL right....don't be mad that I grasped something about Briles and Baylor that your thick head still doesn't comprehend.
WUT?! You didn't grasp anything, dumb eff. You played the usual "It's Baylor, they've gotta be cheating to be good" card, without any logic/insight at all. It's like calling that someone will win the lottery eventually. You're just a sour vagina for all things baylor. Turns out their PR department is awful. Congrats!

OK, rape apologist

By the way, that is a pretty good starting point as to the logic in figuring this thing out.  You still don't get it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:44:00 AM
good god, it's like reading rough ridin' shaggy c-listers with steffy posting here
Thank you! HE CALLED HIS SHOT THO! NOT BUTTHURT ABOUT BAYLOR AT ALL.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:46:24 AM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:50:50 AM
Kslim should feel shame for steffy being on the same page as him. Take it to the shame thread, dork.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 08:53:35 AM
Kslim should feel shame for steffy being on the same page as him. Take it to the shame thread, dork.
truthfully i did, but lets not act like your initial statement wasnt rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). i should have stopped after my initial post but you didn't get it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:57:34 AM
Kslim should feel shame for steffy being on the same page as him. Take it to the shame thread, dork.
truthfully i did, but lets not act like your initial statement wasnt rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). i should have stopped after my initial post but you didn't get it.
Well ya, I hate when ppl call me a "rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)". So i'll over due my drivel until some ppl get it. Yes, Baylor is a POS, are we all happy now?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 09:01:12 AM
good god, it's like reading rough ridin' shaggy c-listers with steffy posting here
Thank you! HE CALLED HIS SHOT THO! NOT BUTTHURT ABOUT BAYLOR AT ALL.

Wacky, the reason I don't like Briles is because I knew this stuff was almost certainly occurring.  If you go back on this thread, I listed my logic and reasoning.  (People made fun of me.)  It isn't because I thought Briles ears were ugly.  And I went on record as saying they were dirty.  And they were.  And then you want to make this about "well steffy just doesn't like Baylor."  That part is true...but the reason I don't is because I knew they were dirty as hell (I didn't anticipate this dirty, though).

I think you are just really pissed that I was right as hell, and my logic was spot-on.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 09:01:16 AM
Kslim should feel shame for steffy being on the same page as him. Take it to the shame thread, dork.
truthfully i did, but lets not act like your initial statement wasnt rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). i should have stopped after my initial post but you didn't get it.
Well ya, I hate when ppl call me a "rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)". So i'll over due my drivel until some ppl get it. Yes, Baylor is a POS, are we all happy now?
never wasnt happy bud, internet isnt that serious. just glad that you can see that doing coke and raping someone are two different things both legally and morally. thats where this all started.

eff steffy go cats
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 09:05:18 AM
 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 09:06:58 AM
good god, it's like reading rough ridin' shaggy c-listers with steffy posting here
Thank you! HE CALLED HIS SHOT THO! NOT BUTTHURT ABOUT BAYLOR AT ALL.

Wacky, the reason I don't like Briles is because I knew this stuff was almost certainly occurring.  If you go back on this thread, I listed my logic and reasoning.  (People made fun of me.)  It isn't because I thought Briles ears were ugly.  And I went on record as saying they were dirty.  And they were.  And then you want to make this about "well steffy just doesn't like Baylor."  That part is true...but the reason I don't is because I knew they were dirty as hell (I didn't anticipate this dirty, though).

I think you are just really pissed that I was right as hell, and my logic was spot-on.
You knew girls were being raped all along and never reported it? Kinda mumped up, steffy. Is that how Baylor gets their super juice to be good at football?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 09:07:42 AM
Good grief, could you imagine the rape factory Alabama has going on to be good at football? Steffy, what are your deets on that one?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 09:10:42 AM
good god, it's like reading rough ridin' shaggy c-listers with steffy posting here
Thank you! HE CALLED HIS SHOT THO! NOT BUTTHURT ABOUT BAYLOR AT ALL.

Wacky, the reason I don't like Briles is because I knew this stuff was almost certainly occurring.  If you go back on this thread, I listed my logic and reasoning.  (People made fun of me.)  It isn't because I thought Briles ears were ugly.  And I went on record as saying they were dirty.  And they were.  And then you want to make this about "well steffy just doesn't like Baylor."  That part is true...but the reason I don't is because I knew they were dirty as hell (I didn't anticipate this dirty, though).

I think you are just really pissed that I was right as hell, and my logic was spot-on.
You knew girls were being raped all along and never reported it? Kinda mumped up, steffy. Is that how Baylor gets their super juice to be good at football?

I knew they were dirty.  And they exceeded my expectations.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 09:13:20 AM
Wait, so you're telling me 5* bball players don't just want to randomly play at Baylor? You're telling me that one of the worst football programs in the state, that turned a corner, with minimal resources, didn't do it legitimately? What a rough ridin' concept steffy! That rape juice is no joke!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 09:48:17 AM
Wait, so you're telling me 5* bball players don't just want to randomly play at Baylor? You're telling me that one of the worst football programs in the state, that turned a corner, with minimal resources, didn't do it legitimately? What a rough ridin' concept steffy! That rape juice is no joke!

I know, it really wasn't that hard to figure out, was it?  Which raises the question:  Why did everybody call me an idiot and attack me when I said Briles was not adorable but, in fact, a slimeball and that we didn't want him as KSU coach?

You can't make the claim--now--that everybody knew that something like this was going to happen.  Because when somebody predicted it (me) years ago, I got grilled on this board.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 09:51:15 AM
Spoiler alert: K-State isn't clean either. Ppl made fun of you, because you're a terrible poster. No program is clean, some are just better at manipulating the system than others. Briles is great, just shitty at tying up lose ends on the rape game. That one will sneak up on ya at times.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 26, 2016, 10:03:35 AM
Nobody cares about drugs/academic cheating/recruiting violations because they are all pretty victimless crimes.  People care about sexual assaults and violent crimes because they hurt and put other people at risk.

People wanted Briles because he won.  Nobody thought he was squeaky clean but nobody thought he was covering up sexual assaults and adding players to the team that put girls on campus at risk.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 10:04:54 AM
exactly, i think 99% of us are MCMW but not when it involves rape
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 26, 2016, 10:11:58 AM
Spoiler alert: K-State isn't clean either. Ppl made fun of you, because you're a terrible poster. No program is clean, some are just better at manipulating the system than others. Briles is great, just shitty at tying up lose ends on the rape game. That one will sneak up on ya at times.

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AppleJack on May 26, 2016, 10:45:08 AM
Briles fired. wow.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 10:48:36 AM
Damn AJ. You fast. Pat forde on Twitter knows what's  up.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 10:49:57 AM
Welcome back Baylor, the new KU. #mangino'd
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 10:50:57 AM
  If Briles manages to coach another five years (which will only be possible by avoiding scandal) I will admit that I was wrong.  (It ain't going to happen, though.  I will predict two years, max.)

The crap hit the fan even sooner than I expected.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 10:52:19 AM
I'd imagine a lot of players will look to transfer.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 10:55:31 AM
I'd imagine a lot of players will look to transfer.
Houston will be a prime spot

Also, sad that Steffy can read the future, but wouldn't do good with it. He allowed those girls to get raped, just to win a few games vs Baylor again.  :frown:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 26, 2016, 11:00:22 AM
That Pepper Hamilton report must be pretty damning.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on May 26, 2016, 11:04:27 AM
Amazing it took this long.  Shame Pinks didn't get the same axe at Mizzou.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 26, 2016, 11:06:34 AM
so baylor's cool with chicks now or nah
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on May 26, 2016, 11:07:53 AM
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/5/26/5253866/art-briles-baylor-fired

Some guy named Phil Bennett to take over and Kendall is staying, for now.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 11:08:16 AM
I'd imagine a lot of players will look to transfer.

Yes.  TCU should benefit directly from this.  Baylor has a couple LB commits that I'd like TCU to make a run at.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 11:09:03 AM
I'd imagine a lot of players will look to transfer.

Yes.  TCU should benefit directly from this.  Baylor has a couple LB commits that I'd like TCU to make a run at.
Good thing those girls got raped.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 11:09:50 AM
And kudos to bible aggie for doing the right thing.

Briles is a dirty eff.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 11:10:58 AM
Good thing those girls got raped.  :thumbs:

You have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 26, 2016, 11:12:32 AM
And Briles is out
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:12:43 AM
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b9/Body_bag.JPG)

 :whistle1: just gonna leave this here

two rapes one cup was too much too handle i guess, (cue all the other universities to do the same)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 26, 2016, 11:13:40 AM
I'd imagine a lot of players will look to transfer.

Yes.  TCU should benefit directly from this.  Baylor has a couple LB commits that I'd like TCU to make a run at.
Good thing those girls got raped.  :thumbs:

Yeah, now they can get raped at TCU instead.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 11:15:20 AM
And Briles is out
Chicat has all the scoops!
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 11:16:55 AM

Yeah, now they can get raped at TCU instead.

 :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2016, 11:17:34 AM
Cya loser
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 26, 2016, 11:18:00 AM
And Briles is out
Chicat has all the scoops!

I'd spaced out for awhile as Wacky was getting worked up. 
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 11:18:27 AM
And Briles is out
Chicat has all the scoops!

I'd spaced out for awhile as Wacky was getting worked up.
Valid
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 26, 2016, 11:18:46 AM
Snyder will never catch him
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on May 26, 2016, 11:19:59 AM
moving forward, who would I take?  Briles.  But that doesn't diminish what Bill has done.  Bill's accomplishments (to this point) are remarkably better than Briles. 

This is the right answer.  We should usher Bill into retirement and name a stadium after him or something, and hire Briles.

Let's revisit this in 10 years.  Then, it will be:  LHC Bill Snyder, Hall of Famer, five-time conference coach of the year, three-time national coach of the year, four-time conference champion; national championship in 2014 (first year of playoffs) and playoff semifinalists in 2015.

Briles:  Best BU coach since Graft Taft; got BU share of conference in 2013.  Then, team underperformed in 2014, finishing 6-3 (and tied for second to champ KSU), and then lack of player discipline and recruiting scandals led to his eventual departure. Produced the best run of BU football since the 1970's, but no Hall of Famer.

not entirely accurate but  :surprised:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 'taterblast on May 26, 2016, 11:22:11 AM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?

No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.  Briles is a good coach but I think there are going to be problems long term.  His teams do not show a great amount of discipline and his approach depends on having better athletes.  Briles has really scored with some receivers and seastrunk, but I doubt he will always have the best athletes in the big 12.  Ut and ou are down right now, but when they get back to usual and dont think briles can have much success with his style.  He won't change his style, and that style sucks unless you have superstars at the skill positions.  Plus, I think there will be some discipline and recruiting issues long-term.  The way they handled the Dixon assault is telling.....completely swept under the rug.

i'm jealous of how good Steffy must be feeling right now
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on May 26, 2016, 11:23:20 AM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?

No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.  Briles is a good coach but I think there are going to be problems long term.  His teams do not show a great amount of discipline and his approach depends on having better athletes.  Briles has really scored with some receivers and seastrunk, but I doubt he will always have the best athletes in the big 12.  Ut and ou are down right now, but when they get back to usual and dont think briles can have much success with his style.  He won't change his style, and that style sucks unless you have superstars at the skill positions.  Plus, I think there will be some discipline and recruiting issues long-term.  The way they handled the Dixon assault is telling.....completely swept under the rug.

i'm jealous of how good Steffy must be feeling right now

Steffy, what are this weekends powerball numbers?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AppleJack on May 26, 2016, 11:25:46 AM
wonder what Chip and JoJo think  :confused:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 11:27:02 AM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff

Link?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 11:28:20 AM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff

Link?
You're adorable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WillieWatanabe on May 26, 2016, 11:30:22 AM
wonder what Chip and JoJo think  :confused:

I bet they're so disappointed. Their name is on that brick walkway thing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 26, 2016, 11:32:28 AM
And kudos to bible aggie for doing the right thing.

Briles is a dirty eff.

agreed, i'm genuinely surprised they pulled the trigger

they didn't fix the problem with college athletics but at least they cleaned up their own backyard
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:33:18 AM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff

Link?
You're adorable.
not goemawing at all, you have brought up the fact that not only do you know girls who were assaulted youve also heard the stories. HOW IN THE eff HAVE YOU NOT TOLD PEOPLE (that could help) ABOUT THIS?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:33:56 AM
i get a fanningbrag but holy crap that actually pisses me off.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 26, 2016, 11:35:23 AM
would you two taking your pissing match somewhere else?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:36:07 AM
would you two taking your pissing match somewhere else?
no?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 11:40:09 AM
I've brought it up before, but ppl lol it off like: "fanning doesn't know crap", "prove it" etc. being fanning isn't what it's all cracked up to be. Even tho all my stories have validity. Some days I wish my screen name said Steve Dave
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:42:48 AM
I've brought it up before, but ppl lol it off like: "fanning doesn't know crap", "prove it" etc. being fanning isn't what it's all cracked up to be. Even tho all my stories have validity. Some days I wish my screen name said Steve Dave
let me make this as blunt as i can, if your screen name was fatty fat fat i would still question that position. i may be in the minority here but if someone tells you they were raped/assaulted morally i think you have to tell someone of authority
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 11:43:05 AM
Also, how the eff could I help something that I find out years after the matter?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:43:47 AM
and now to pissclams delight back to your regularly scheduled program of making fun of baylor
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2016, 11:44:36 AM
I believe that someone told you that WackyCat08. I hope it's not true though :(
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 11:45:10 AM
You meet ppl after college, Kslim. If I knew someone in college, that got raped, I would obviously tell.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:45:47 AM
Also, how the eff could I help something that I find out years after the matter?
ever heard of serial rapist? i mean come on bud, we are both looking like real assholes right now but just stop
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 11:45:58 AM
You meet ppl after college, Kslim. If I knew someone in college, that got raped, I would obviously tell.

I don't know about that.  You seem pretty Art Briles-ish.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:47:02 AM
You meet ppl after college, Kslim. If I knew someone in college, that got raped, I would obviously tell.
thats good to know. im out, no mic drop
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on May 26, 2016, 11:50:26 AM
I mean, you already BBS-ed it. Might as well just @ the Riley PD.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on May 26, 2016, 11:50:32 AM
i'm genuinely surprised they pulled the trigger

It makes me wonder if they know that some really dirty dirt on Briles could be made public at some point.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 26, 2016, 11:51:02 AM
would you two taking your pissing match somewhere else?
no?

just trying to help

wacky's new hobby of arguing the counterpoint to everything on the internet isn't as fun for everyone else as apparently it is for him
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 11:51:39 AM
I really want to read that report now.

There has to be some really salacious stuff in there. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kim carnes on May 26, 2016, 11:52:02 AM
Let's hire briles.  C ya Snyder
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 11:52:32 AM
I really want to read that report now.

There has to be some really salacious stuff in there.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjZY7b5WsAAFhxE.jpg)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 26, 2016, 11:55:07 AM
Need Briles to stay on at Baylor but for them to have crippling sanctions and for Snyder to go another 4 years so he can try to even the record at 5-5.

:frown:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 11:56:20 AM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff

Link?
You're adorable.

I didn't mean to call out your friend's fake story but it was appropriate
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 26, 2016, 12:25:02 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unt.edu%2Fnorthtexan%2Fimages%2Fw07_necrough_elizondo.jpg&hash=ddfe4ac12a9cbefbb9907603fe85f40700461a9d)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 26, 2016, 12:38:58 PM
The John Curries of the world walked a little taller today.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 26, 2016, 12:39:29 PM
oscar is def going to get an extension out of this.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 12:47:06 PM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff

Link?
You're adorable.

I didn't mean to call out your friend's fake story but it was appropriate
I love ppl who think all rape stories are fake. Very weird and random.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 12:48:11 PM
would you two taking your pissing match somewhere else?
no?

just trying to help

wacky's new hobby of arguing the counterpoint to everything on the internet isn't as fun for everyone else as apparently it is for him
Just trying to help ppl be less naive, day-by-day.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 12:57:05 PM
would you two taking your pissing match somewhere else?
no?

just trying to help

wacky's new hobby of arguing the counterpoint to everything on the internet isn't as fun for everyone else as apparently it is for him
Just trying to help ppl be less naive, day-by-day.
i dont even...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:00:23 PM
Clams does have a point tho. Nobody wanted to say Bautista took that punch like a champ, but I did. Everyone thinks the crying Jordan meme is funny, I think it's rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Everyone is outraged at Baylor over these rapes and i'm the only one who said they were just the dumb ones to get caught. Because all programs have stories like these. What a world!!!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 26, 2016, 01:04:49 PM
could be time for a lap, zappycat
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:05:42 PM
could be time for a lap, zappycat
I'm bored and I only have 3 weeks left of freedom!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 01:07:56 PM
Clams does have a point tho. Nobody wanted to say Bautista took that punch like a champ, but I did. Everyone thinks the crying Jordan meme is funny, I think it's rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Everyone is outraged at Baylor over these rapes and i'm the only one who said they were just the dumb ones to get caught. Because all programs have stories like these. What a world!!!

Bro, I irl like you as a person, but you're a little off on this one. Just because Baylor was the one to get caught, doesn't mean we can't be outraged. In fact, if these things really do go on at most schools (I think they do as well) then it's cause for even more outrage. I hope this is a wake up call to a lot of programs that things like this can't keep happening. At the very least I hope it's a wake up call to the NCAA to monitor schools.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:08:39 PM
Clams does have a point tho. Nobody wanted to say Bautista took that punch like a champ, but I did. Everyone thinks the crying Jordan meme is funny, I think it's rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Everyone is outraged at Baylor over these rapes and i'm the only one who said they were just the dumb ones to get caught. Because all programs have stories like these. What a world!!!

Bro, I irl like you as a person, but you're a little off on this one. Just because Baylor was the one to get caught, doesn't mean we can't be outraged. In fact, if these things really do go on at most schools (I think they do as well) then it's cause for even more outrage. I hope this is a wake up call to a lot of programs that things like this can't keep happening. At the very least I hope it's a wake up call to the NCAA to monitor schools.
I agree with all of this.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 01:10:52 PM
Clams does have a point tho. Nobody wanted to say Bautista took that punch like a champ, but I did. Everyone thinks the crying Jordan meme is funny, I think it's rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Everyone is outraged at Baylor over these rapes and i'm the only one who said they were just the dumb ones to get caught. Because all programs have stories like these. What a world!!!

Bro, I irl like you as a person, but you're a little off on this one. Just because Baylor was the one to get caught, doesn't mean we can't be outraged. In fact, if these things really do go on at most schools (I think they do as well) then it's cause for even more outrage. I hope this is a wake up call to a lot of programs that things like this can't keep happening. At the very least I hope it's a wake up call to the NCAA to monitor schools.
I agree with all of this.

your last few posts don't really reflect that, but ok.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:16:30 PM
I absolutely think there's a problem out there. We're finally turning the tide to lives matter > let's win football games. I just want everyone to get off their high horses, because many hate Baylor for other reasons. Unfortunately, our school ignored similar issues in the past. Now it's becoming a bigger deal. This is good.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 26, 2016, 01:19:37 PM
http://www.baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?action=story&story=170207

Quote
Ken Starr transitions to role of Chancellor and remains professor at Baylor University Law School

What a joke.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 26, 2016, 01:20:20 PM
everyone get off your high horses, wacky heard a story from a girl once, sheesh
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 26, 2016, 01:21:11 PM
slap on wrist.  Ken knows where bodies are buried, I would guess, and at Baylor, than may not just be a saying.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:22:08 PM
everyone get off your high horses, wacky heard a story from a girl once, sheesh
(https://media.giphy.com/media/Fjr6v88OPk7U4/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 26, 2016, 01:24:19 PM
Is there some way we can kick Baylor out of the Big 12?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:26:53 PM
everyone get off your high horses, wacky heard a story from a girl once, sheesh
Also, it was just made public about K-State ignoring rape stories at frats, but you're probably right, this chick cried and made up this story for no reason.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 01:30:27 PM
Bring up that most programs cover up stuff like this = Rape apologist. Insert IRL story about K-State covering up a story about this with a girl I know for cash considerations = Briles is a cheating mother rough rider! #SteffyStuff

Link?
You're adorable.

I didn't mean to call out your friend's fake story but it was appropriate
I love ppl who think all rape stories are fake. Very weird and random.

I think fake stories are fake.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:32:51 PM
I love you, 'stone. But what you think is fake, you already rationalize as fact in your mind. Maybe it's part of who you are with your profession and all. Idk. If it didn't happen to you, it's not true. You do it all the time.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 26, 2016, 01:32:54 PM
everyone get off your high horses, wacky heard a story from a girl once, sheesh
(https://media.giphy.com/media/Fjr6v88OPk7U4/giphy.gif)

I'm all over the map on Krysten Ritter, one day I think she's the bees knees, the next  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:36:46 PM
 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:37:35 PM
She's got kind of a white trash look to her. Some days I dig it, some days I don't. Brittany Murphy was the same way.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 01:43:32 PM
I love you, 'stone. But what you think is fake, you already rationalize as fact in your mind. Maybe it's part of who you are with your profession and all. Idk. If it didn't happen to you, it's not true. You do it all the time.

Apparently KSU didn't pay her enough hush money that she had to share the story and coverup with you.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 26, 2016, 01:45:56 PM
I love you, 'stone. But what you think is fake, you already rationalize as fact in your mind. Maybe it's part of who you are with your profession and all. Idk. If it didn't happen to you, it's not true. You do it all the time.

Apparently KSU didn't pay her enough hush money that she had to share the story and coverup with you.

hey, if you had a really personal story that you didn't want a bunch of random people on the internet to know, you would tell wacky also, so I think you're being a bit unfair
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on May 26, 2016, 01:46:10 PM
Briles gotta be kicking himself over not taking the UT job.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:47:44 PM
I mean, we were getting close. I think when ppl are trying to develop a relationship, ppl open up about things. She had been removed from the school for 4 years. I'd assume K-State wouldn't give a eff at that point. The whole "allegedly" game.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 01:48:51 PM
How much hush money?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:50:20 PM
Do you think 50% of rape cases, are made up 'stone? I know this might be a touchy subject and all, since frats are so closely affiliated with it.

Maybe you think these girls just got too drunk and woke up in bed with them and then  they tell ppl they got raped?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on May 26, 2016, 01:52:04 PM
Big day for Steffy :cheers:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:52:23 PM
How much hush money?
I never asked.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 26, 2016, 01:55:23 PM
How much hush money?
I never asked.

yeah story sounds more made up by the minute
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 01:57:13 PM
Do you think 50% of rape cases, are made up 'stone? I know this might be a touchy subject and all, since frats are so closely affiliated with it.

Maybe you think these girls just got too drunk and woke up in bed with them and then  they tell ppl they got raped?

I have no idea what %.  The second hand story of being raped, filing charges with the RCPD and being paid off by KSU then telling you is something I find not credible.

trying to paint me as some type of rape denier is such a weak ass ad hominem attempt at defending the second hand story I will just assume you are kidding.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:57:25 PM
 :facepalm:

What kind of monster asks a $ amount, when they're opening up to you about something traumatizing, and crying on your shoulder? Apparently 'stone and M^2.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 01:59:46 PM
I guess I just want to believe in ppl and usually put a lot of trust into them. Could be a flaw.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 02:09:59 PM
I guess I just want to believe in ppl and usually put a lot of trust into them. Could be a flaw.

It's cool wack, being trusting is usually a good thing.  Be lucky you moved on from someone who was misleading you.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 02:13:28 PM
 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2016, 02:16:41 PM
JFC, this whole wacky/whoever else pissing contest is terrible bbs'n and is ruining the baylor coaching search before it even begins. Just stfu and move on so this thread can be readable again.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 26, 2016, 02:18:11 PM
What I don't get is why everyone was so mean to Steffy. He had a lot of reasonable posts that proved 100% right in the end.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2016, 02:19:31 PM
What I don't get is why this thread should be super interesting right now but is actually really bad
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 02:20:58 PM
You're currently making it worse right now, SB.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2016, 02:25:00 PM
not possible :cool:

The real question is how will this all affect the McLane Stade brick tarp??
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 26, 2016, 02:25:47 PM
What I don't get is why everyone was so mean to Steffy. He had a lot of reasonable posts that proved 100% right in the end.

I love underdogs.  Pro-steffy here. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on May 26, 2016, 02:26:34 PM
the donors for McLane must feel like the donors for Ice Family Basketball Training Practice Facility Center
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CatsNShocks on May 26, 2016, 02:27:43 PM
What I don't get is why this thread should be super interesting right now but is actually really bad
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 02:28:50 PM
What I don't get is why this thread should be super interesting right now but is actually really bad
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: NeverII on May 26, 2016, 02:33:01 PM
I don't know why, but this reminds me of Jim Tressel's falling out at Ohio State. The transgressions don't even compare, but he still hasn't seen the light of day since getting the ax at tOSU. Have to believe Art will be resigned to the same fate.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 02:34:57 PM
They should promote Kendall and nothing else changes.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 26, 2016, 02:39:28 PM
that slime was probably recruiting kids to Baylor telling them they could get away with rape,
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 02:39:58 PM
I bet Bennett does well this year and they just pick him.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 26, 2016, 02:41:02 PM
Ya know, whenever goEMAW gets under my girdle, I just think, look at my avatar, bruhs
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on May 26, 2016, 02:42:57 PM
How can they let anyone on that staff survive if Briles is out?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 02:46:15 PM
How can they let anyone on that staff survive if Briles is out?

bcuz bible aggie
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 02:49:17 PM
Also,  lolz

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.graytvinc.com%2Fimages%2FCosby%2BBU.png&hash=d08d6eb92ad61945f39df5583c5ca32ecf8f906f)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on May 26, 2016, 02:49:58 PM

How can they let anyone on that staff survive if Briles is out?

bcuz bible aggie

U guyz haz bibles 2 brah.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 02:55:09 PM

How can they let anyone on that staff survive if Briles is out?

bcuz bible aggie

U guyz haz bibles 2 brah.

Only in the chapel (which is where they belong).  Bible aggie uses them to teach classes.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 03:05:54 PM
I find it hilarious that people are answering Dax' 3-1 talking point with Snyder's number of Big 12 championships and COY awards, as if Briles has been coaching against Snyder for 20 years.

Every single person in this thread, steffy being the exception, would trade Snyder in for Art right now. Snyder has had a great career, Briles is now a better coach. How in the hell could anyone reasonably debate this?

No, I said we need to revisit in 10 years; at that time it will be clear who better coach was and currently is.  Why don't you take briles and snyders conference record during Snyder 2.0?  Seems like fair comparison.  Snyder will have more wins.......even after this year.  Snyder is 22-15 and briles is 17-19. Briles had the hèisman trophy winner and still finished behind Snyder in 2011.  This isn't even close.  You dramatically under appreciate Snyder and overvalue briles, but hey that knee jerk reaction is sooo this board.  Briles is a good coach but I think there are going to be problems long term.  His teams do not show a great amount of discipline and his approach depends on having better athletes.  Briles has really scored with some receivers and seastrunk, but I doubt he will always have the best athletes in the big 12.  Ut and ou are down right now, but when they get back to usual and dont think briles can have much success with his style.  He won't change his style, and that style sucks unless you have superstars at the skill positions.  Plus, I think there will be some discipline and recruiting issues long-term.  The way they handled the Dixon assault is telling.....completely swept under the rug.

i'm jealous of how good Steffy must be feeling right now

Feels good, tater
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 03:06:50 PM
https://twitter.com/ESPNprDScott/status/735878890183372801
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 03:07:52 PM
Big day for Steffy :cheers:

 :cheers:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 26, 2016, 03:10:39 PM
What I don't get is why everyone was so mean to Steffy. He had a lot of reasonable posts that proved 100% right in the end.

I guess we can give him some credit for being a fortune teller. However, no one was claiming that Baylor and Briles were pillars of virtue. Steffy ranted against anyone who stopped short of condemning Briles to prison. He spent two years arguing a false premise. His tone sucked.

Steffy in this thread is the hope diamond wrapped in a smelly, dirty Wal-Mart plastic bag.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 03:17:55 PM
I am pro steffy.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 03:18:56 PM
Bible aggie rescinded the honorary PhD that they gave Cosby when his rape allegations surfaced.

So they apparently cared about rape as long as it wasn't one of their football players being the rapist.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 26, 2016, 03:24:06 PM
Bible aggie rescinded the honorary PhD that they gave Cosby when his rape allegations surfaced.

So they apparently cared about rape as long as it wasn't one of their football players being the rapist.

Have you been banned from all of the TCU and Baylor boards or something?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 26, 2016, 03:26:27 PM
something i still havent figured out is how waco PD is still just rainbows and sunshine in all of this, the cover up on their part is just as bad
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 03:27:13 PM
Have you been banned from all of the TCU and Baylor boards or something?

TCU boards are boring.  bible aggie boards are gross.

You guys are fun though.  Plus, I have a spiritual connection to KSU.  I banged my high school sweetheart in the dorms up there (and in a hotel room and got head at one of her sorority functions that I came up for). 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 26, 2016, 03:28:12 PM
something i still havent figured out is how waco PD is still just rainbows and sunshine in all of this, the cover up on their part is just as bad

Waco PD has a long history of being a crap show.

Just look at the whole bikers at twin peaks fiasco. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 03:46:07 PM
Have you been banned from all of the TCU and Baylor boards or something?

TCU boards are boring.  bible aggie boards are gross.

You guys are fun though.  Plus, I have a spiritual connection to KSU.  I banged my high school sweetheart in the dorms up there (and in a hotel room and got head at one of her sorority functions that I came up for).

We just got wacky bragged by church aggie
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 03:46:58 PM
 :D
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on May 26, 2016, 03:50:46 PM
I bet Bennett does well this year and they just pick him.

Word is he is not necessarily going to get the interim job. His name surfaced with reports of Ukwuachu, so he's not exactly completely clean. Hard to see how they pick anyone from this staff after looking at the Pepper Hamilton report, but they almost have to.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on May 26, 2016, 03:51:41 PM
Ya know, whenever goEMAW gets under my girdle, I just think, look at my avatar, bruhs

How long have you been waiting to say that?  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2016, 03:53:53 PM
How can so much weird stuff happen in such a relatively small community?

--Branch Davidians
--Carlton Dotson/Dave Bliss
--Fertilizer plant explosion two days after the Boston bombing, turns out it was intentionally set (I know this was actually the town of West, but gmafb it's the same place)
--Chip and Joanna are from there
--They made Ken Starr their university president lololol
--Toilet shaped stadium
--brick wall tarps
--This
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DOD Take 2 on May 26, 2016, 03:56:19 PM
How can so much weird stuff happen in such a relatively small community?

--Branch Davidians
--Carlos Dotson/Dave Bliss
--Fertilizer plant explosion two days after the Boston bombing, turns out it was intentionally set (I know this was actually the town of West, but gmafb it's the same place)
--Chip and Joanna are from there
--They made Ken Starr their university president lololol
--Toilet shaped stadium
--brick wall tarps
--This

Don't forget Scott Drew trying to get a JC recruit deported
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 26, 2016, 04:02:15 PM
We need to shove trumps wall just to the north of them

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on May 26, 2016, 04:02:35 PM

How can so much weird stuff happen in such a relatively small community?

--Branch Davidians
--Carlos Dotson/Dave Bliss
--Fertilizer plant explosion two days after the Boston bombing, turns out it was intentionally set (I know this was actually the town of West, but gmafb it's the same place)
--Chip and Joanna are from there
--They made Ken Starr their university president lololol
--Toilet shaped stadium
--brick wall tarps
--This

Don't forget Scott Drew trying to get a JC recruit deported

The big biker gang bust thing
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2016, 04:13:35 PM
Genuinely forgot about the biker gang shootout at that twin peaks. Such a durn weird place.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 26, 2016, 04:13:48 PM
What I don't get is why everyone was so mean to Steffy. He had a lot of reasonable posts that proved 100% right in the end.

I will go on record (again) and say that there is plenty more dirt to come out on Briles and Baylor.  Blatant recruiting violations, steroid abuse.  That is what I suspected would bring them down all along.  I never considered they possibility that they were harboring and protecting rapist.

He was mad that Baylor was cheating at football stuff.  Turns out a rape cover-up scandal is ending the program as they knew it.  Steffy's still hung up on yet-to-be exposed recruiting/drug issues.

And Briles is going out 5-1 against Snyder.  Maybe should get credit for 6-1 if whatever's left of his players beat OBz again this year.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 26, 2016, 04:15:10 PM
There's gotta be some usually terrible Baylor message board that's poppin' off right now with something interesting.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:18:39 PM
There's gotta be some usually terrible Baylor message board that's poppin' off right now with something interesting.
Quote
Art Briles is the salt of the Earth
Baylor is relenting to the media, and can get ****ed for all I care
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:20:11 PM
Quote
What a horrific day for Baylor football. I recognize that the victims of this situation should be supported with all available resources and I surely hope that they can recover emotionally and physically from whatever truly happened...but if I step aside from that for a moment...this will go down as the worst day in the history of Baylor Football.

Art was amazing at his profession and he will be again for some other program in the future. He was so very unique in what he did: talent evaluation, building a culture of winning, the genius behind his marketing (uniforms), selecting coaches (other than Bennett and Norwood) and just being a CEO of Baylor football.

I am sick to my stomach at how Baylor has caved in this situation to both the media and liberals. Our achilles heel has always been our PR dept and it has come back to bite us once again. No defense of the situation while liberals and the media trashed the University from one end to the other. No defense of the employees.

I am praying that with the financial resources that we have that we will go out and make a splash hire....but I am seriously doubting that will happen. If they give the job to Bennett then we are done.

WAC
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: PIPE on May 26, 2016, 04:21:21 PM
All I want to know is what does WackyCat do for a living?  Cause he has like a thousand posts today.......

I want his job  :cheers:


Don't ask me how I know this :blush:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:22:08 PM
Quote
I am so done with Baylor.

Good luck guys.

And fuk most of you.

God might love you, I doubt it though.

Go Fuk yourselves and Fuk Baylor.

This ol boy is done
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:22:38 PM
All I want to know is what does WackyCat do for a living?  Cause he has like a thousand posts today.......

I want his job  :cheers:


Don't ask me how I know this :blush:
All I know is, it's good to be ahead right now.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: HerrSonntag on May 26, 2016, 04:24:20 PM
OBz is going to be retiring one of these days, though it would beg the question if DUIs and rape are on par with each other when comparing our history as 2nd-chance-U.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:25:38 PM
Here you go TCUhornfrog guy

Quote
Not that all TCU fans are trolls, but this is for the trolls who may come here to throw stones and fail to know their own history..

TCU has had plenty of problems on it own. There have been several dozen rapes at TCU the last few years and many involve football players, including a gang rape, not to mention the drug ring that the FBI investigated several years ago. So while Baylor cleans up its mess and fires its coach, Patterson keeps bringing in players who assault others. What is the saying, something about glass houses and stones?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:27:29 PM
Quote
These firings are bs. The board of regents...
...wouldn't defend their own mothers.

Some are glad to be rid of Starr.

I'm certain Briles was given the opportunity to resign, but wouldn't BECAUSE HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WORTHY OF LEAVING.

You Must Be Registered and Logged On To View "URL" BBCode Contents...

I've tried & tried & tried to support this school through thick & thin.

THE BOARD OF REGENTS--MUCH LIKE A CLINTON/BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SUPREME COURT--WILL EVENTUALLY AND MOST CERTAINLY DESTROY THIS SCHOOL.

I'm done.

Final post.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on May 26, 2016, 04:29:03 PM
I knew a girl who got gang banged by the football team, but it was consensual... soooo  :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 04:39:33 PM
TIL; that conservatives hate liberals because libs hate football and rape, and want to ruin both for everyone.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 26, 2016, 04:42:32 PM
I would say Briles has to forfeit at least 3 of those wins
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:43:04 PM
Quote
If any Baylor girl (which the assumption is that she is moderately intelligent) decides to go home with a tattooed dumbass who barely speaks english then she should be shipped back to Dallas or Houston.

What the hell do you think is going to happen?

Who raised the kids? Yes sir, I will take off my clothes after spending 3 hours with you at a stinky beer joint, but please dont excited by my young co-ed body?

Makes plenty of sense of to me.

Just more fodder for Buddy and Dary to take back control of the school and ensure that we suck.

Thee will get to relive his glory days.....even though what happened in the early 80's make 2015-16 look like grammar school.

In case anyone forgot....the moral majority can go fuk themselves again and again and again.

Baylor should drop all sports other than equestrian, tennis and golf. bunch of pu$$ies.

At least I can root for UCLA and Houston now. For that matter I might even root for the purple lesbians up north.

Just in case you forgot....go fuk yourselves.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on May 26, 2016, 04:47:20 PM
Disgusting. How did we ever let these Neanderthals into the league??
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: RickRampus on May 26, 2016, 04:47:29 PM
so they have their own renocat too, interesting
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 04:48:49 PM
so they have their own renocat too, interesting

I think they're like 90% renocats
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on May 26, 2016, 04:53:34 PM
Are we the purple lesbians up north?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 04:53:49 PM
I never realized how much TCU and Baylor hate each other. It's like two ugly lil bros, talking about who's got the bigger dick. Very weird and random obsession on both sides.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on May 26, 2016, 05:51:06 PM
They both want to be more bible-y than the other.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: RockState2000 on May 26, 2016, 06:10:04 PM
Have you been banned from all of the TCU and Baylor boards or something?

TCU boards are boring.  bible aggie boards are gross.

You guys are fun though.  Plus, I have a spiritual connection to KSU.  I banged my high school sweetheart in the dorms up there (and in a hotel room and got head at one of her sorority functions that I came up for).

I like this guy. RS2K approved.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on May 26, 2016, 06:51:44 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjZZVT1UkAAgZOD.jpg)


#Family



^message to k-state kats ?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on May 26, 2016, 06:56:35 PM
Wildcat salute: Congratulations Phil Bennett!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 26, 2016, 07:36:05 PM
Oh.

https://twitter.com/FakeWillie/status/735932574061600768
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 26, 2016, 07:39:20 PM
Quote
If any Baylor girl (which the assumption is that she is moderately intelligent) decides to go home with a tattooed dumbass who barely speaks english then she should be shipped back to Dallas or Houston.

What the hell do you think is going to happen?

Who raised the kids? Yes sir, I will take off my clothes after spending 3 hours with you at a stinky beer joint, but please dont excited by my young co-ed body?

Makes plenty of sense of to me.

Just more fodder for Buddy and Dary to take back control of the school and ensure that we suck.

Thee will get to relive his glory days.....even though what happened in the early 80's make 2015-16 look like grammar school.

In case anyone forgot....the moral majority can go fuk themselves again and again and again.

Baylor should drop all sports other than equestrian, tennis and golf. bunch of pu$$ies.

At least I can root for UCLA and Houston now. For that matter I might even root for the purple lesbians up north.

Just in case you forgot....go fuk yourselves.

wow, purple lesbians? has to be tcu, but i'd like it if ku fans would call us that :) haha. what a bad person.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: eastcat on May 26, 2016, 07:43:57 PM
Purple lesbians?

I'm impressed. That's better than anything KU has come up with.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 26, 2016, 08:02:37 PM
Quote
If any Baylor girl (which the assumption is that she is moderately intelligent) decides to go home with a tattooed dumbass who barely speaks english then she should be shipped back to Dallas or Houston.

What the hell do you think is going to happen?

Who raised the kids? Yes sir, I will take off my clothes after spending 3 hours with you at a stinky beer joint, but please dont excited by my young co-ed body?

Makes plenty of sense of to me.

Just more fodder for Buddy and Dary to take back control of the school and ensure that we suck.

Thee will get to relive his glory days.....even though what happened in the early 80's make 2015-16 look like grammar school.

In case anyone forgot....the moral majority can go fuk themselves again and again and again.

Baylor should drop all sports other than equestrian, tennis and golf. bunch of pu$$ies.

At least I can root for UCLA and Houston now. For that matter I might even root for the purple lesbians up north.

Just in case you forgot....go fuk yourselves.

What the eff?
:opcat:  :curse: :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 26, 2016, 08:04:28 PM
Oh.

https://twitter.com/FakeWillie/status/735932574061600768

White people are absolutely the worst
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on May 26, 2016, 08:19:41 PM
Why are liberals always getting upset about rape cover ups? Smh

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 26, 2016, 08:40:25 PM
Why are liberals always getting upset about rape cover ups? Smh

pussification of america
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 08:51:46 PM
You guys are going to send this to the pit, aren't you? ????
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on May 26, 2016, 08:59:30 PM
Make Baylor Shitty Again!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 26, 2016, 09:05:41 PM
White people are absolutely the worst

Somewhere in kansas, that minor's dad/scorekeeper is still mad about our antics and ranting about all the crimes we must have committed over the last few years.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 09:41:54 PM
Oh.

https://twitter.com/FakeWillie/status/735932574061600768

White people are absolutely the worst

He didn't say anything about race, rain.  Only you did.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 26, 2016, 09:43:59 PM
One more thing, and it needs to be said:

Briles < Snyder

Case. Closed.

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 09:59:28 PM
Oh.

https://twitter.com/FakeWillie/status/735932574061600768

White people are absolutely the worst

He didn't say anything about race, rain.  Only you did.
That's his only play. African American brought up in the Midwest. Married a white women, etc. we're all privileged tho!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 10:03:08 PM
What if I told you a white coach, put his job on the line, covering up 2 African Americans raping 2 white girls?! What then, MIR?!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: eastcat on May 26, 2016, 10:14:26 PM
Oh.

https://twitter.com/FakeWillie/status/735932574061600768

White people are absolutely the worst

FBI stats disagree  :jerk:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 26, 2016, 10:15:27 PM
Good grief folks
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: HerrSonntag on May 26, 2016, 10:18:59 PM
I am still amazed to see the term "coed" in reference to women who attend a university used in the common vernacular. 
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 26, 2016, 10:24:34 PM
Good grief folks
You're very good at PI'ing, is MIR out of bounds? How long do we accept "white ppl suck" before addressing it? Because I'm sick of MIR's act. He grew up in Garden City, not the Bronx. Chose to take a job in Iowa too.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on May 26, 2016, 10:26:17 PM
Good grief folks
You're very good at PI'ing, is MIR out of bounds? How long do we accept "white ppl suck" before addressing it? Because I'm sick of MIR's act. He grew up in Garden City, not the Bronx. Chose to take a job in Iowa too.
knock it off, wacky
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on May 26, 2016, 10:29:31 PM
Man, I dunno, this thread is a cesspool, and we are all guilty. Snyder greater than Briles is the most legit thing that has been posted in 13 hours. Wow, on team steffy again. What a day
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on May 26, 2016, 10:58:14 PM
The fact that some people are suggesting that rape is just collateral damage of running a college athletics program kinda makes one realize how unimportant sports are in the grand scheme of things.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 26, 2016, 11:22:56 PM
Good grief folks
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on May 26, 2016, 11:39:06 PM
Something seems too easy about the way this went down. As bad as losing their president and football coach is, this happened very quickly with very little wrongdoing admitted.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on May 26, 2016, 11:51:08 PM
Something seems too easy about the way this went down. As bad as losing their president and football coach is, this happened very quickly with very little wrongdoing admitted.

I doubt this is over. Nor did it happen quickly. They hired a well-known law firm with Title IX expertise to investigate their institution. That doesn't happen overnight. They were smart to take the initiative, but that doesn't mean the NCAA (or federal prosecutors, for that matter) won't be sending their own investigators. Furthermore, we haven't seen the contents of the full report.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 26, 2016, 11:54:45 PM
OMG :ROFL:

Wacky
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dreadcentral.com%2Fimg%2Fnews%2Foct12%2Fpat7.jpg&hash=0cd78365a87e610d5eaa01a98aaef9122c2b806e)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: stunted on May 27, 2016, 12:42:44 AM
Oh.

https://twitter.com/FakeWillie/status/735932574061600768

White people are absolutely the worst

He didn't say anything about race, rain.  Only you did.
That's his only play. African American brought up in the Midwest. Married a white women, etc. we're all privileged tho!

Quote
You can die from someone else’s misery—emotional states are as infectious as diseases....The unfortunate
sometimes draw misfortune on themselves; they will also draw it on you. Associate with the happy and
fortunate instead.

it's not worth it wacky. trump/privilege 4 life
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on May 27, 2016, 08:01:40 AM
Something seems too easy about the way this went down. As bad as losing their president and football coach is, this happened very quickly with very little wrongdoing admitted.

I doubt this is over. Nor did it happen quickly. They hired a well-known law firm with Title IX expertise to investigate their institution. That doesn't happen overnight. They were smart to take the initiative, but that doesn't mean the NCAA (or federal prosecutors, for that matter) won't be sending their own investigators. Furthermore, we haven't seen the contents of the full report.

OK, I'll amend my comment. I think specifically the Starr being demoted to chancellor - a position he created - while retaining all privileges seems like an aggressive move on his part that won't stand.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on May 27, 2016, 08:04:32 AM
Something seems too easy about the way this went down. As bad as losing their president and football coach is, this happened very quickly with very little wrongdoing admitted.

I doubt this is over. Nor did it happen quickly. They hired a well-known law firm with Title IX expertise to investigate their institution. That doesn't happen overnight. They were smart to take the initiative, but that doesn't mean the NCAA (or federal prosecutors, for that matter) won't be sending their own investigators. Furthermore, we haven't seen the contents of the full report.

OK, I'll amend my comment. I think specifically the Starr being demoted to chancellor - a position he created - while retaining all privileges seems like an aggressive move on his part that won't stand.
Aggressive move to change the nameplate on his front door? 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on May 27, 2016, 08:07:48 AM
To keep his foot in the door of school power when it appears he shouldn't have a leg to stand on.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: troubledscribe on May 27, 2016, 08:35:54 AM
Is it too soon to hire Briles yet?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 27, 2016, 08:46:17 AM
I think the back lash is getting momentum from the fact that Baylor is a religious based school and now looks crazy hypocritical.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TheHamburglar on May 27, 2016, 08:51:44 AM
If Bennett takes the interim job, Bill's going to say something supportive of Phil and it's going to sound empathetic towards the Baylor staff.  The tide is already turning towards "how can they keep someone from the inside who probably knew something" and referencing Phil's Sam Ukwauchu comments.  Bill's going to error towards supporting his friend and it's not going to sound good.

If I remember correctly, his Paterno comments made me cringe.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 27, 2016, 09:00:34 AM
How can so much weird stuff happen in such a relatively small community?

--Branch Davidians
--Carlton Dotson/Dave Bliss
--Fertilizer plant explosion two days after the Boston bombing, turns out it was intentionally set (I know this was actually the town of West, but gmafb it's the same place)
--Chip and Joanna are from there
--They made Ken Starr their university president lololol
--Toilet shaped stadium
--brick wall tarps
--This

How in the world did you forget the basketball decapitation?  That's like the weirdest one. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 27, 2016, 09:01:00 AM
If Bennett takes the interim job, Bill's going to say something supportive of Phil and it's going to sound empathetic towards the Baylor staff.  The tide is already turning towards "how can they keep someone from the inside who probably knew something" and referencing Phil's Sam Ukwauchu comments.  Bill's going to error towards supporting his friend and it's not going to sound good.

If I remember correctly, his Paterno comments made me cringe.

Yes, Snyder put his foot in his mouth with regard to Paterno; hopefully he learned his lesson and won't do that same with regard to Bennett, because I think you are exactly right with regard to the heat coming on baylor for keeping bennett.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on May 27, 2016, 09:01:13 AM
If Bennett takes the interim job, Bill's going to say something supportive of Phil and it's going to sound empathetic towards the Baylor staff.  The tide is already turning towards "how can they keep someone from the inside who probably knew something" and referencing Phil's Sam Ukwauchu comments.  Bill's going to error towards supporting his friend and it's not going to sound good.

If I remember correctly, his Paterno comments made me cringe.

What did Bennett say about Ukwauchu?  LHCBS seems savvy enough to avoid stepping in piles of crap...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on May 27, 2016, 09:01:59 AM
How can so much weird stuff happen in such a relatively small community?

--Branch Davidians
--Carlton Dotson/Dave Bliss
--Fertilizer plant explosion two days after the Boston bombing, turns out it was intentionally set (I know this was actually the town of West, but gmafb it's the same place)
--Chip and Joanna are from there
--They made Ken Starr their university president lololol
--Toilet shaped stadium
--brick wall tarps
--This

How in the world did you forget the basketball decapitation?  That's like the weirdest one.

Ah I see it, weird that you didn't name the murdered kid (Dennehy sp??).
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on May 27, 2016, 09:02:48 AM
LHCBS seems savvy enough to avoid stepping in piles of crap...

What if he leaves his note cards about what to say on the roof of his vehicle and then drives off?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on May 27, 2016, 09:10:52 AM
LHCBS seems savvy enough to avoid stepping in piles of crap...

What if he leaves his note cards about what to say on the roof of his vehicle and then drives off?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcoacheshotseat.com%2Fcoacheshotseatblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F09%2FBillSnyder2.jpg&hash=6907317199144c639b6b2d1936c554e4668f39aa)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on May 27, 2016, 09:13:49 AM
Snyder = -Briles ± sqrt(Briles2 - 4(Bennett)(Paterno)) / 2(Bennett)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 27, 2016, 09:17:51 AM
I can't imagine anybody caring about what Snyder has to say about Bennett.  The media has their pelts and if they aren't satisfied, I would imagine Starr and the AD will be attacked further.

Regardless, if Bennett was hired in the interim then he must be pretty damn clean in this.  They didn't fire Briles so they could potentially step in the crap with Bennett.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 27, 2016, 10:32:49 AM
If Bennett takes the interim job, Bill's going to say something supportive of Phil and it's going to sound empathetic towards the Baylor staff.  The tide is already turning towards "how can they keep someone from the inside who probably knew something" and referencing Phil's Sam Ukwauchu comments.  Bill's going to error towards supporting his friend and it's not going to sound good.

If I remember correctly, his Paterno comments made me cringe.

LHCBS seems savvy enough to avoid stepping in piles of crap...

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/01/kansas_state_coach_bill_snyder.htm

He had other comments after Paterno was fired but before he died that I can't find but they were similar.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on May 27, 2016, 11:35:59 AM
How can so much weird stuff happen in such a relatively small community?

--Branch Davidians
--Carlton Dotson/Dave Bliss
--Fertilizer plant explosion two days after the Boston bombing, turns out it was intentionally set (I know this was actually the town of West, but gmafb it's the same place)
--Chip and Joanna are from there
--They made Ken Starr their university president lololol
--Toilet shaped stadium
--brick wall tarps
--This

How in the world did you forget the basketball decapitation?  That's like the weirdest one.

There's a reason Chuck Barris called it Whack-o, Texas on the Gong Show over 40 years ago.  CIA assassins know the real score.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Asteriskhead on May 27, 2016, 11:39:19 AM
this thread is the best litmus test that has ever existed.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 27, 2016, 11:40:41 AM
this thread is the best litmus test that has ever existed.

I hope it doesn't make me a rape defender...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 27, 2016, 11:43:56 AM
I hope it makes me look not naive.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on May 27, 2016, 11:47:21 AM
 :Wha:

 :pray:

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: bshea85 on May 27, 2016, 02:59:52 PM
5/27/2016:
Briles just got #Paterno'd


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 27, 2016, 03:39:33 PM
The last few pages have been fantastic.   I want to thank each and every one of you.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: troubledscribe on May 27, 2016, 03:41:28 PM
The last few pages have been fantastic.   I want to thank each and every one of you.

You are welcome. If there is something I try hard at, it is posting on this great kstate fansite.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 27, 2016, 07:09:12 PM
something i still havent figured out is how waco PD is still just rainbows and sunshine in all of this, the cover up on their part is just as bad

Worse, since their sole function is law enforcement
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 27, 2016, 08:50:23 PM
JFC, this whole wacky/whoever else pissing contest is terrible bbs'n and is ruining the baylor coaching search before it even begins. Just stfu and move on so this thread can be readable again.

   http://goEMAW.com/forum/Smileys/goEMAW/thumbs_up_emoticon.gif
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 27, 2016, 09:14:14 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjZZVT1UkAAgZOD.jpg)


#Family



^message to k-state kats ?
THIS IS WHY I CAN'T STAND THIS bad person; stole our chance at the MNC and has no problem stealing our catch words!!!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on May 27, 2016, 10:08:45 PM
If Bennett takes the interim job, Bill's going to say something supportive of Phil and it's going to sound empathetic towards the Baylor staff.  The tide is already turning towards "how can they keep someone from the inside who probably knew something" and referencing Phil's Sam Ukwauchu comments.  Bill's going to error towards supporting his friend and it's not going to sound good.

If I remember correctly, his Paterno comments made me cringe.

What did Bennett say about Ukwauchu?  LHCBS seems savvy enough to avoid stepping in piles of crap...
iirc Bennett was speaking at a Booster function last summer and said something along the lines of  "we will have Sam at rush end" and motherfucking Sam's rapentrial started in August.  This link is broke but Google still shows the story from the Baylor SB Nation site
Quote
Baylor DC Phil Bennett says DE Sam Ukwuachu is "expected" to return for 2015 - Our Daily Bears
www.ourdailybears.com › baylor-dc-phil...
Mobile-friendly - Jun 3, 2015 - ... but we never got any firm word and probably never will. According to Phil Bennett on today's John ...
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 28, 2016, 06:36:57 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjZZVT1UkAAgZOD.jpg)


#Family



^message to k-state kats ?
THIS IS WHY I CAN'T STAND THIS bad person; stole our chance at the MNC and has no problem stealing our catch words!!!

I hope he completely rapes up #family to an unusable point. 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on May 28, 2016, 07:03:59 AM
something i still havent figured out is how waco PD is still just rainbows and sunshine in all of this, the cover up on their part is just as bad

Worse, since their sole function is law enforcement

I thought for sure the campus cops would get thrown under the bus.  This scandal is still young, and firing Briles was the nuclear option that Baylor used to try to minimize the duration of media coverage.  If the story has legs a week from now, Baylor may have to sacrifice others.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 28, 2016, 08:49:06 AM
What if I told you guys that these cops are fans of a certain college team and keep their lips sealed on purpose? :Wha:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 28, 2016, 09:17:27 AM
What if I told you guys that these cops are fans of a certain college team and keep their lips sealed on purpose? :Wha:

Except in manhattan, they are always after the frats and athletes
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 28, 2016, 03:15:20 PM
What if I told you guys that these cops are fans of a certain college team and keep their lips sealed on purpose? :Wha:

That would make them monsters.   Almost as bad as those committing the crime. Possibly worse as it basically encourages repeated offenses by those doing the assault /rape.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 28, 2016, 03:31:07 PM
Well ya, but it's happening all over the United States of America. I'm not defending them, just feel like ppl should know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on May 28, 2016, 03:34:56 PM
Sports take too prominent of a roll in a lot if ppls lives.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 28, 2016, 03:38:13 PM
Sports take too prominent of a roll in a lot if ppls lives.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
I agree. I've been able to nurse it over the years, but I still need it for satisfaction.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 28, 2016, 03:39:05 PM
Like, why does my dick feel bigger when we beat KU @ basketball? :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 28, 2016, 11:31:04 PM
Like, why does my dick feel bigger when we beat KU @ basketball? :dunno:
cause you take it out and swing it, while trolling for gayhawks!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on May 29, 2016, 12:07:29 PM
Fairly sure the majority of posters here have argued that we need less Currie style and more Briles Style AND have argued that more crimes (and stars) = more championships. So effectively those who have argued that point and are now saying these kids are terrible and Briles is the devil himself have crisply tucked their shirts in. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 29, 2016, 12:39:57 PM
Fairly sure the majority of posters here have argued that we need less Currie style and more Briles Style AND have argued that more crimes (and stars) = more championships. So effectively those who have argued that point and are now saying these kids are terrible and Briles is the devil himself have crisply tucked their shirts in.

Lol no.  The proper method is hope we cheat our balls off, win lots and then pretend we are above cheating while destroying the other teams that get caught.

Get with it
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 29, 2016, 12:42:24 PM
Turns out covering up rape is where these MCMW cats draw the line.  Sad....really.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 29, 2016, 01:10:20 PM
Who knew Briles the rape friendly HC had so many in his corner?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on May 29, 2016, 02:35:13 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 29, 2016, 02:47:54 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.

It's like the second line of the gEMAW charter/pledge.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 29, 2016, 02:57:45 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.




How do fall on attempted murder?  Also you were unclear on drugs.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 29, 2016, 03:50:23 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.




How do fall on attempted murder?  Also you were unclear on drugs.

Drugs are cool unless like selling trafficking

Attempted murder will not be tolerated unless it's just winning a fight because you are tough then case by case basis
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 29, 2016, 03:53:05 PM
Also I'd bet a pretty large sum that Baylor was paying the eff out of their cruits/players
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 29, 2016, 03:59:15 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.




How do fall on attempted murder?  Also you were unclear on drugs.

Drugs are cool unless like selling trafficking

Attempted murder will not be tolerated unless it's just winning a fight because you are tough then case by case basis

If you get crap faced and drive or assault someone with a deadly weapon we are g2g though right?

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 29, 2016, 04:06:11 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.




How do fall on attempted murder?  Also you were unclear on drugs.

Drugs are cool unless like selling trafficking

Attempted murder will not be tolerated unless it's just winning a fight because you are tough then case by case basis

If you get crap faced and drive or assault someone with a deadly weapon we are g2g though right?

Much like the justice system, there will be consequences for DUis

Case by case on the weapon
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 29, 2016, 04:42:50 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.




How do fall on attempted murder?  Also you were unclear on drugs.

I want the coach to try to get him to campus, but the school to tell him no.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on May 29, 2016, 06:38:08 PM
Fairly sure the majority of posters here have argued that we need less Currie style and more Briles Style AND have argued that more crimes (and stars) = more championships. So effectively those who have argued that point and are now saying these kids are terrible and Briles is the devil himself have crisply tucked their shirts in.

Agree that most posters are on board with MCMW, but think most of them were thinking in terms of non-person crimes. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 29, 2016, 09:12:59 PM
Fairly sure the majority of posters here have argued that we need less Currie style and more Briles Style AND have argued that more crimes (and stars) = more championships. So effectively those who have argued that point and are now saying these kids are terrible and Briles is the devil himself have crisply tucked their shirts in.

Lol no.  The proper method is hope we cheat our balls off, win lots and then pretend we are above cheating while destroying the other teams that get caught.

Get with it
This!
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on May 29, 2016, 09:15:12 PM
Rape and rape cover ups = not cool.

Boosters/coaches paying players, recruiting players with other less rapey offenses (petty theft, disorderly, fisticuffs, etc), covering up such petty offenses, and other generalized recruiting violations fall within MCMW and are completely tolerated by goEMAW, officially.   Just win, baby (but no rapes/beating up kids/girls/old people/animals).

If you are not down with this, you really should post on a different site.
And this!!!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 30, 2016, 03:07:01 AM
Also I'd bet a pretty large sum that Baylor was paying the eff out of their cruits/players

Thing is he's been doing all of this winning with average at best classes, not the Ol' Miss route. 
Rivals class rankings
2016- 17
2015- 43
2014- 34
2013- 31
2012- 45
2011- 46
2010- 39
2009- 55
2008- 51

No 5 stars few 4 stars. He's an excellent "coach em' upper" just morally bankrupt.

Despite these underwhelming rankings we've only ranked ahead of Baylor twice in this time frame, 2008 and 2015. Of course at least two of our top 5 recruits from that class are already gone; Banks and English, and their best player in that class will be their starting quarterback for the next three years.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on May 30, 2016, 07:19:37 AM
Also I'd bet a pretty large sum that Baylor was paying the eff out of their cruits/players

Thing is he's been doing all of this winning with average at best classes, not the Ol' Miss route. 
Rivals class rankings
2016- 17
2015- 43
2014- 34
2013- 31
2012- 45
2011- 46
2010- 39
2009- 55
2008- 51

No 5 stars few 4 stars. He's an excellent "coach em' upper" just morally bankrupt.

Despite these underwhelming rankings we've only ranked ahead of Baylor twice in this time frame, 2008 and 2015. Of course at least two of our top 5 recruits from that class are already gone; Banks and English, and their best player in that class will be their starting quarterback for the next three years.

He didn't coach them up; he roided them up.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 30, 2016, 08:55:33 AM
I think the list of toleratable crimes are those your wild and adventurous college and high school gets into. Basically alcohol and practical joke related, and fair-ish fights.  Anything else is probably not okay absent extenuating circumstances.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 30, 2016, 09:20:58 AM
Also I'd bet a pretty large sum that Baylor was paying the eff out of their cruits/players

Thing is he's been doing all of this winning with average at best classes, not the Ol' Miss route. 
Rivals class rankings
2016- 17
2015- 43
2014- 34
2013- 31
2012- 45
2011- 46
2010- 39
2009- 55
2008- 51

No 5 stars few 4 stars. He's an excellent "coach em' upper" just morally bankrupt.

Despite these underwhelming rankings we've only ranked ahead of Baylor twice in this time frame, 2008 and 2015. Of course at least two of our top 5 recruits from that class are already gone; Banks and English, and their best player in that class will be their starting quarterback for the next three years.

He had some super rapey transfers
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: KCFDcat on May 30, 2016, 02:18:00 PM
Jim Grobe?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on May 30, 2016, 02:19:02 PM

He had some super rapey transfers

You are correct, sir!

Those super rapey transfers don't count in the recruiting class rankings, but can make a huge impact (in more ways than one).
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: GregKSU1027 on May 30, 2016, 02:21:10 PM
Jim Grobe?
Don'tcha mean Jim Grope?  :lol:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TownieCat on May 30, 2016, 02:29:08 PM
This will not end well for Bennett and the rest of the staff if they're bringing in a guy like Grobe.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 30, 2016, 03:34:01 PM
This will not end well for Bennett and the r
est of the staff if they're bringing in a guy like Grobe.

I think that may be the point
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 30, 2016, 03:34:35 PM
This will not end well for Bennett and the rest of the staff if they're bringing in a guy like Grobe.

They've announced that the staff, including Phil and Kendall, are staying. Is Grobe going to let Kendall keep their offense?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 30, 2016, 03:35:39 PM
Also I'd bet a pretty large sum that Baylor was paying the eff out of their cruits/players

Thing is he's been doing all of this winning with average at best classes, not the Ol' Miss route. 
Rivals class rankings
2016- 17
2015- 43
2014- 34
2013- 31
2012- 45
2011- 46
2010- 39
2009- 55
2008- 51

No 5 stars few 4 stars. He's an excellent "coach em' upper" just morally bankrupt.

Despite these underwhelming rankings we've only ranked ahead of Baylor twice in this time frame, 2008 and 2015. Of course at least two of our top 5 recruits from that class are already gone; Banks and English, and their best player in that class will be their starting quarterback for the next three years.

He didn't coach them up; he roided them up.

LOL
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on May 30, 2016, 07:48:26 PM
https://twitter.com/blairkerkhoff/status/737432823796224001



#johncurrieforbaylor
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on May 30, 2016, 07:52:10 PM
https://twitter.com/blairkerkhoff/status/737432823796224001



#johncurrieforbaylor
liked/shared
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 30, 2016, 10:08:11 PM
https://twitter.com/blairkerkhoff/status/737432823796224001



#johncurrieforbaylor

That would be pretty shitty
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on May 31, 2016, 06:22:54 AM
peace will reign in the land of bible aggie as their tuck circle is complete

"I've heard him say this 1,000 times in recruiting: 'Bring me an average player who's a great kid over a great player who's a bad kid,'" said Elrod. "That was huge to him."
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/15839523/espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/15839523/why-jim-grobe-perfect-guy-replace-art-briles-baylor

Millions of shirt stays are assuredly headed to Baylor as nothing will get the same tight tuck as linking your socks and polo.
https://www.google.com/search?q=marine+shirt+stays&oq=marine+shirt+stays&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2655j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=marine+shirt+stays&safe=off&tbm=shop
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 31, 2016, 09:25:48 AM
He didn't coach them up; he roided them up.

Briles time as a high school coach in Stephenville is dogged by rumors of a steroid program (which is ridiculous for HS kids, they don't need exogenous test).

Also, the Tech guys have been claiming that Stidham showed up in a brand new truck when he enrolled at Baylor.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 31, 2016, 09:42:08 AM
He didn't coach them up; he roided them up.

Briles time as a high school coach in Stephenville is dogged by rumors of a steroid program (which is ridiculous for HS kids, they don't need exogenous test).

Also, the Tech guys have been claiming that Stidham showed up in a brand new truck when he enrolled at Baylor.

So in other words: Reinventing the SWC.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 31, 2016, 10:10:35 AM
 :zzz:

Had a roommate who stuck roids in one of our long snappers asses all the time. Also, a LB he knew too.

Also, Beasley with the hummer and momma not working with a house.  :jerk:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on May 31, 2016, 10:12:14 AM
yeah. dngaf about baylor players showing up in new trucks.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on May 31, 2016, 10:18:24 AM
:zzz:

Had a roommate who stuck roids in one of our long snappers asses all the time. Also, a LB he knew too.

Also, Beasley with the hummer and momma not working with a house.  :jerk:

Beasley's mom was absolutely working
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 31, 2016, 10:47:15 AM
yeah. dngaf about baylor players showing up in new trucks.

I don't either.

I was friends with several football players at TCU during my time there.  You can't stop players from getting paid.  You can take steps that make it difficult, but it is impossible to shut down.  Boosters show up to events with envelopes with cash and are very good at sliding them into pockets discreetly (one of my best friends was a starting LB, he received more than a couple).  The veteran boosters know how to get the envelope to a player and make it to where the player would have to cause a scene to refuse it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 31, 2016, 10:49:44 AM
:zzz:

Had a roommate who stuck roids in one of our long snappers asses all the time. Also, a LB he knew too.

Also, Beasley with the hummer and momma not working with a house.  :jerk:

Steroids if taken under a proper program aren't nearly as bad for you as they are made out to be. 

The steroid testing program for the NCAA is pretty laughable as well.  It's very easy for players to avoid detection.

A steroid program for high schoolers is rough ridin' detestable though.  Those kids are test factories.  They don't need steroids.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 31, 2016, 10:51:08 AM
So in other words: Reinventing the SWC.

I'm not super old and I grew up in original Big 8 territory.  So  :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DeVere Kalmar on May 31, 2016, 11:29:34 AM
Hey, I heard some insidery rumored tidbits about Phil's time as a head coach at SMU.

During a coaching staff meeting, things became heated and one assistant coach pulled a gun on another staff member. He soon left the staff "to pursue other opportunities."

Phil's coaching staff screamed so many profanities during practice that it became an issue and was in violation of some obscenity clause or something. The outdoor practice field was near an elementary school. The school district staff asked multiple times for them to stop, but they didn't. So finally the SMU legal team worked out a deal with the school district that all practices during elementary school time would take place in the indoor practice facility, otherwise the school district was going to take it to court with video and sound recordings.

Phil landed a qb recruit the old-fashioned way. He hired the recruit's mom to "clean his house." This meant that once a week she showed up and took an envelope of cash from his home.

Don't know if these are true, but there ya go.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on May 31, 2016, 11:52:43 AM
Phil would have to be a complete dumbass (maybe he is?) to be directly involved w/ paying a player or his family. You have to insulate yourself from that stuff.

It would be like Tony Montana selling coke on a corner.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 31, 2016, 01:33:58 PM
:zzz:

Had a roommate who stuck roids in one of our long snappers asses all the time. Also, a LB he knew too.

Also, Beasley with the hummer and momma not working with a house.  :jerk:

Steroids if taken under a proper program aren't nearly as bad for you as they are made out to be. 

The steroid testing program for the NCAA is pretty laughable as well.  It's very easy for players to avoid detection.

A steroid program for high schoolers is rough ridin' detestable though.  Those kids are test factories.  They don't need steroids.

High school kids taking PEDs have been going on for a very long time. I could tell a story about so and so in my high school doing roids but I don't have to because they got very publicly busted for it 20 years ago. If it happened in my Kansas town of 25,000 people it certainly is happening all over Texas.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on May 31, 2016, 02:20:06 PM
:zzz:

Had a roommate who stuck roids in one of our long snappers asses all the time. Also, a LB he knew too.

Also, Beasley with the hummer and momma not working with a house.  :jerk:

Beasley's mom was absolutely working
and it was a duplex and 5 year old tahoe
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on May 31, 2016, 02:40:24 PM
Well, if i'm wrong, my apologies. I know i'm not the only one who heard such type of rumors. And I don't think any of you are naive enough, to think the #1 overall recruit just really wanted to follow delonte to MHK.

 I can confirm the first sentence tho. LB had a very big impact on our 2003 'ship too.  :Woot:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on May 31, 2016, 02:45:22 PM
I believe the Jason Whitlock actually started the Hummer rumor by writing it in his column.  I have also heard Bill Walker's mom was working at Lowe's in Topeka as a cashier when his was here and he was a top 10 recruit and actually was a much higher profile guy for most of his HS career, Beasley was kind of a late bloomer iirc.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on May 31, 2016, 03:25:20 PM

High school kids taking PEDs have been going on for a very long time. I could tell a story about so and so in my high school doing roids but I don't have to because they got very publicly busted for it 20 years ago. If it happened in my Kansas town of 25,000 people it certainly is happening all over Texas.

I know.  The rumors for Briles were that it was an organized program.  Kids are going to use PEDs (I played football in HS.  Our team sucked and wasn't even close to being worth juicing for but we had at least one juicer).  They shouldn't be encouraged to do so by their coaches for HS football.

Encouraging or facilitating HS kids to use PEDs (by an adult) is detestable.  I don't really have problems with it on the NCAA level.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on May 31, 2016, 08:06:52 PM
I believe the Jason Whitlock actually started the Hummer rumor by writing it in his column.  I have also heard Bill Walker's mom was working at Lowe's in Topeka as a cashier when his was here and he was a top 10 recruit and actually was a much higher profile guy for most of his HS career, Beasley was kind of a late bloomer iirc.

I remember that bad person hit job on Beas.  I believe he was rolling a late 90s suburban at the time?  When K-Staters called him on his lie he backed off and tried to say he was trying to set up a fictitious scenario. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 31, 2016, 09:31:40 PM
Taking steroids is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) unless you are a livestock
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on May 31, 2016, 10:23:59 PM
Taking steroids is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) unless you are a livestock
I'd take them if it meant me getting to the league
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kim carnes on May 31, 2016, 10:27:10 PM
Taking steroids is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) unless you are a livestock

No
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Asteriskhead on June 01, 2016, 09:31:38 AM

High school kids taking PEDs have been going on for a very long time. I could tell a story about so and so in my high school doing roids but I don't have to because they got very publicly busted for it 20 years ago. If it happened in my Kansas town of 25,000 people it certainly is happening all over Texas.

I know.  The rumors for Briles were that it was an organized program.  Kids are going to use PEDs (I played football in HS.  Our team sucked and wasn't even close to being worth juicing for but we had at least one juicer).  They shouldn't be encouraged to do so by their coaches for HS football.

Encouraging or facilitating HS kids to use PEDs (by an adult) is detestable.  I don't really have problems with it on the NCAA level.

Probably shouldn't occur at the NCAA level either. Hormone therapy is quite ill-advised it testosterone production hasn't leveled off in the individual yet. I'm glad that someone else on this blogsite is pro-PED, but I think that it should occur at the professional level only. Hormone therapy could have disastrous effects on a 18-22 year old kid who is still developing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on June 01, 2016, 10:43:31 AM
do i think players took stuff at ksu? yes

do i compare it to rapes? no

can we move on from that? maybe
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 01, 2016, 12:36:26 PM
I don't think anyone was comparing the two. Just challenging nardfrogs pointing of the finger at Briles players taking roids.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on June 01, 2016, 07:39:31 PM
What a noble man.  It's a shame a true leader like this was sacrificed. 
"The captain goes down with the ship,"
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/ken-starr-out-baylor-university-223778?cmpid=sf
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 02, 2016, 08:21:50 AM
It took them long enough, but it's good to see them making the decision to not continue employing the rape-enabler as chancellor.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: chum1 on June 02, 2016, 08:27:21 AM
Can't fault them at all if they were just doing their due diligence in the meantime - ESPECIALLY with a majorly litigious fuckwad like Starr.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 02, 2016, 08:31:43 AM
Can't fault them at all if they were just doing their due diligence in the meantime - ESPECIALLY with a majorly litigious fuckwad like Starr.
Yeah. They didn't oscar hire this. They looked into it.  :clap:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on June 02, 2016, 08:46:13 AM
Can't fault them at all if they were just doing their due diligence in the meantime - ESPECIALLY with a majorly litigious fuckwad like Starr.
Yeah. They didn't oscar hire this. They looked into it.  :clap:

If they don't have a morality contract clause strong enough to fire someone for covering up a rape(s) Baylor should murder all of their lawyers.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on June 02, 2016, 10:23:02 AM
Baylor Nation,

My heart goes out to the victims for the pain that they have endured. Sexual assault has no place on our campus or in our society. As a father of two daughters, a grandfather, and a husband, my prayers are with the victims of this type of abuse, wherever they are. After 38 years of coaching, I have certainly made mistakes and, in hindsight, I would have done certain things differently. I always strive to be a better coach, a better father and husband, and a better person.

Keep in mind, the complete scope of what happened here has not been disclosed and unfortunately at this time I am contractually obligated to remain silent on the matter. The report prepared by Pepper Hamilton, the law firm hired and paid for by Baylor's Board of Regents, has not been shared with me directly, despite my full cooperation with the investigation. I can only assume that the report, which is not independent, supports the conclusions that the Board has already drawn. I hope to share with you what I was aware of as soon as I can so Baylor Nation can begin the healing process.

I have the utmost admiration for Baylor University, its community, and its important mission. I am truly grateful for having had the chance to coach hundreds of young student athletes at this University. I am deeply humbled for having had the opportunity to be a part of Baylor Nation.

Coach Art Briles

http://www.ourdailybears.com/baylor-football-scandal/2016/6/2/11838886/art-briles-releases-statement-to-kwtx-and-espns-mike-and-mike
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on June 02, 2016, 10:34:08 AM
The report prepared by Pepper Hamilton, the law firm hired and paid for by Baylor's Board of Regents, has not been shared with me directly, despite my full cooperation with the investigation. I can only assume that the report, which is not independent, supports the conclusions that the Board has already drawn.


That attitude is the same stupid ass attitude that Tom Brady/Pat's fans have with deflategate.  There is no reason the NFL would want to villainize and punish it's star player and no reason the Baylor BOR would want to destroy their football program.  If anything, they hoped the Pepper Hamilton report would give them another out.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on June 02, 2016, 10:34:48 AM
He's a father of a grandfather?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 02, 2016, 10:37:33 AM
The report prepared by Pepper Hamilton, the law firm hired and paid for by Baylor's Board of Regents, has not been shared with me directly, despite my full cooperation with the investigation. I can only assume that the report, which is not independent, supports the conclusions that the Board has already drawn.


That attitude is the same stupid ass attitude that Tom Brady/Pat's fans have with deflategate.  There is no reason the NFL would want to villainize and punish it's star player and no reason the Baylor BOR would want to destroy their football program.  If anything, they hoped the Pepper Hamilton report would give them another out.

The school really should release the full report.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on June 02, 2016, 10:41:41 AM
He's a father of a grandfather?

A veiled reference to being Snyder's daddy?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: #LIFE on June 02, 2016, 10:45:59 AM
my prayers are with the victims of this type of abuse, wherever they are.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 02, 2016, 12:12:28 PM
He only said prayers once.  I expected that phony religious dirtbag to throw around a bunch of god speak.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on June 02, 2016, 12:20:57 PM
He only said prayers once.  I expected that phony religious dirtbag to throw around a bunch of god speak.
dont worry, rumor is mike singletary is probably going to be the next coach. you will get all of the gospel coach speak you can handle, season ticket holders will receive a wooden cross necklace as well
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Brock Landers on June 02, 2016, 12:53:25 PM
my prayers are with the victims of this type of abuse, wherever they are.

 :surprised:


Rumblings that the tarp will be OFF for the Texas game.


That tarp has been there a long time.  What's hiding underneath??    :ohno:

Tunnel to our rape train.

:thumbs:

 :surprised: :surprised: :surprised:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on June 03, 2016, 01:20:51 PM
He only said prayers once.  I expected that phony religious dirtbag to throw around a bunch of god speak.
dont worry, rumor is mike singletary is probably going to be the next coach. you will get all of the gospel coach speak you can handle, season ticket holders will receive a wooden cross necklace as well
Singletary is just what this conference needs to fill the void from Proud Paul's departure  :crossfingers:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 04, 2016, 09:36:56 AM
Won't release recruits.  What a dirtbag school
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on June 04, 2016, 11:43:20 AM
Won't release recruits.  What a dirtbag school

Grobe saying some crap abt how everyone needs "time to think" and digest what's happened before making any decisions. Well, okay, but the kids want out bc of a huge and evil scandal and IT'S rough ridin' JUNE SCHOOL STARTS IN AUGUST LET THEM LIVE THEIR LIVES
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on June 04, 2016, 01:21:40 PM
K-State has pulled the same crap guys.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 04, 2016, 01:25:53 PM
Yeah, Currie wouldn't release those recruits, either.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 04, 2016, 01:39:26 PM
K-State has pulled the same crap guys.

Newsflash:  IDGAF, the thread is for Baylor bashing
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on June 04, 2016, 01:42:06 PM
K-State has pulled the same crap guys.

Newsflash:  IDGAF, the thread is for Baylor bashing

yeah, i mean to do this crap right before kids are supposed to come and start summer workouts and fall practice is kind of different. also what is jim rough ridin' grobe going to say that will convince them?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on June 04, 2016, 11:40:21 PM
K-State has pulled the same crap guys.

Newsflash:  IDGAF, the thread is for Baylor bashing

yeah, i mean to do this crap right before kids are supposed to come and start summer workouts and fall practice is kind of different. also what is jim rough ridin' grobe going to say that will convince them?
maybe he wants to pull an Oscar and have one winning season.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on June 08, 2016, 07:35:07 PM
Sorry if Luk'd. Not sure where this goes:

http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html (http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: waks on June 08, 2016, 07:48:17 PM
Sorry if Luk'd. Not sure where this goes:

http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html (http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html)
Extensively covered here (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=37680.150)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on June 08, 2016, 08:14:39 PM
Sorry if Luk'd. Not sure where this goes:

http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html (http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html)
Extensively covered here (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=37680.150)
:facepalm: Sorry, I never go on that section of gE...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatNation on June 08, 2016, 09:33:56 PM
Sorry if Luk'd. Not sure where this goes:

http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html (http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html)

So you dropped it in the Baylor thread?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: waks on June 09, 2016, 12:33:05 AM
Sorry if Luk'd. Not sure where this goes:

http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html (http://www.wibw.com/content/news/Well-known-Manhattan-businessman-arrested--382186651.html)

So you dropped it in the Baylor thread?
Makes decent sense to me
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on June 13, 2016, 08:00:58 AM
Baylor regents meeting today to discuss if they will turn Briles being fired into a one year suspension :Lurk:.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 13, 2016, 08:35:22 AM
Baylor regents meeting today to discuss if they will turn Briles being fired into a one year suspension :Lurk:.

That would be so Baylor.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on June 13, 2016, 09:06:31 AM
Baylor regents meeting today to discuss if they will turn Briles being fired into a one year suspension :Lurk:.

That would be so Baylor.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaafb/report-baylor-considering-one-year-suspension-for-briles/ar-AAgYTjZ?li=BBnba9I&ocid=mailsignout
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on June 13, 2016, 09:08:21 AM
If the head coach is to blame enough for a year long suspension, he is to blame enough to be fired.  Absolutely inexcusable.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on June 13, 2016, 09:19:51 AM
Money talks and they can keep being rapey as long as they keep winning.  Just unreal
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on June 13, 2016, 09:27:42 AM
If this becomes a suspension, does whoever they hired to be coach now (did they yet?) become an interim, and does that mean that this year's game would count in the Briles vs. Snyder H2H?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 13, 2016, 10:01:54 AM
They hired an interim coach, Trim. He's not sticking around.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TCUHornedFrog on June 13, 2016, 10:10:59 AM
Baylor regents meeting today to discuss if they will turn Briles being fired into a one year suspension :Lurk:.

Disgusting
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on June 13, 2016, 10:16:05 AM
Wow, if Briles somehow against all odds runs his official record against Snyder to 6-1 this year...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on June 14, 2016, 10:52:05 AM
Wait, so they fired him but are considering not firing him?  How does that work? 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Shooter Jones on June 14, 2016, 10:57:23 AM
Wait, so they fired him but are considering not firing him?  How does that work?

I think it has always been "suspended with intent to terminate" or some stupid crap, not fired. And everyone just assumed they'd do the right thing and let him go so they reported it as that
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on June 14, 2016, 04:55:56 PM
that Stanford swimmer kid should be praying they don't fire Art
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on June 14, 2016, 10:57:55 PM
I mean, we knew Jason King was human garbage, but the extent to which he is willing go full pro-Briles, pro-Baylor in the midst of this is still jarring.

https://twitter.com/JasonKingBR/status/742925987822768128
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on June 15, 2016, 07:44:12 AM
I mean, we knew Jason King was human garbage, but the extent to which he is willing go full pro-Briles, pro-Baylor in the midst of this is still jarring.

https://twitter.com/JasonKingBR/status/742925987822768128
that's amazing
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 15, 2016, 08:26:32 AM
Baylor really should release the full report.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on June 15, 2016, 10:13:23 AM
To be fair, I'd want to know what the evidence was too.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on June 15, 2016, 12:01:18 PM
I think they should release the report but there is no way Briles should be brought back.

There is absolutely no way the he didn't know about some of this and choose to do nothing.  He accepted multiple players that have been in trouble in the past AND did not punish players on his team for the same conduct.  That isn't giving players a second chance, that is blatantly putting students at risk for the benefit of the football team.  If he was somehow miraculously ignorant to all of his athlete's conduct, he should be let go for gross incompetence to the extent of putting students at risk.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on June 15, 2016, 12:24:35 PM
It's weird that Baylor fans think there would be even a shred of redeeming material in the report.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on June 15, 2016, 01:29:16 PM
It's weird that Baylor fans think there would be even a shred of redeeming material in the report.
It's not that hard.  They want to keep the best coach Baylor has had in the 21st century.   :Cheers:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on June 18, 2016, 10:26:30 AM
Briles and Baylor have reportedly reached a settlement. Guessing they paid him a shitload of money to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 18, 2016, 12:22:29 PM
I think they should release the report but there is no way Briles should be brought back.

There is absolutely no way the he didn't know about some of this and choose to do nothing.  He accepted multiple players that have been in trouble in the past AND did not punish players on his team for the same conduct.  That isn't giving players a second chance, that is blatantly putting students at risk for the benefit of the football team.  If he was somehow miraculously ignorant to all of his athlete's conduct, he should be let go for gross incompetence to the extent of putting students at risk.

Briles is a master of denying stuff. 

My son is roaming another team's sidelines stealing info?  I am shocked!

This transfer is a dangerous sexual predator and his coach literally called me and told me?  Well now, I do not remember that!

He will always be able to say he simply had no idea what his athletes were doing...I think the admin realized when it is so widespread that schtick was not going to fly
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 31, 2016, 02:06:38 PM
You would like to report an assault?

How about you get charged with a crime for your trouble
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on July 31, 2016, 04:00:58 PM
I didn't think it was possible, but it appears they really did use the angle of cool uniforms and no chance of being prosecuted for raping women to harvest talent and win games. I know it happened at places like Florida State, but this just appears so systemic and willful.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on July 31, 2016, 06:11:36 PM
The NCAA has to come down on them, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on July 31, 2016, 10:07:31 PM
Quote
Baylor rape victims say the university told women who attempted to report their assaults that their parents would be informed of their alcohol or drug use under the student conduct code and in some circumstances were themselves charged with code violations, according to the Associated Press.

Baylor’s student code banned dancing until 1996 and only last year removed “fornication,” “adultery,” and “homosexual acts” from its official list of misconduct. Victims say Baylor even punished women who tried to report assaults that happened to other victims:

One woman said her case began when she called police to report a physical assault on another woman at an off-campus party. Police demanded to know if she was underage and had been drinking, then arrested and reported her to the school office that investigates conduct code violations, she said. She told Baylor officials her drinking was a result of being raped a month earlier and detailed what happened in person and in a letter.

She received an alcohol code violation and told to do 25 hours community service, and when she tried to appeal, the woman said Baylor officials urged her to drop it. The school never pursued her rape claim.

“I was told by many Baylor staff that they couldn’t do anything for me because my assault was off campus, yet they had no problem punishing me for my off-campus drinking,” the woman said.
Universities are required by federal law to investigate sexual assaults, whether they happen on- or off-campus, and feds informed Baylor in 2011 that its conduct policy may have a chilling effect on sexual assault reporting. Being caught drinking alcohol is cause for expulsion under Baylor’s student conduct policy.

Pepper Hamilton’s report cited the policy as “creating barriers” to victims reporting their assaults, due both to fears of being punished and those of parental informing.

http://deadspin.com/report-baylor-coerced-rape-victims-into-silence-by-thr-1784599815?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on July 31, 2016, 10:24:59 PM
The NCAA has to come down on them, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This most recent report has nothing to do with their athletic department, so, no they don't, and no they won't.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on July 31, 2016, 10:27:12 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2013/09/24/ncaa-reduction-in-penn-state-penalties-sends-broader-signal/2864567/
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on August 01, 2016, 09:57:33 PM
The amount of institutional weight Baylor put on these women is exactly why they should be banned from all competition.  Sorry for the student athletes who have made a career there and will be mumped over (although I would say they should get an unconditional release), but eff that school with every inch of a rusty flag poll.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: bucket on August 02, 2016, 08:53:51 PM
Another player got arrested. Stalking and alleged physical abuse.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 03, 2016, 08:48:33 AM
Case closed. Bill wins. Lock this rough rider up.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 03, 2016, 10:16:12 AM
Case closed. Bill wins. Lock this rough rider up.

Also 'Stone was completely right about this, lock it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 03, 2016, 11:35:25 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKdz6sTUsAAu6RZ.png)
:sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 03, 2016, 02:24:50 PM
More bad news for Baylor, DA wanting access to the Pepper Hamilton report.  He/she would only ask for it if they believe that it contained evidence of criminal conduct.  That could be suspicion that there are uncharged athletes that have committed a criminal offense, or could be obstruction of justice on the part of Baylor employees.   :horrorsurprise:

http://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/17208637/district-attorney-asks-baylor-bears-pepper-hamilton-investigation-access

Interesting that Baylor reportedly did not take possession of the report so that it would not be available via civil subpoena.  DA will have problems getting it via court order due to attorney-client privilege.  Looks crafty at the moment, but if the DA secures a copy, it will bolster an obstruction of justice case....

Pretty slimy move.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 03, 2016, 02:43:46 PM
Like hell they did not take possession of it...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 03, 2016, 02:50:44 PM
I doubt they did, they can look at it whenever they want--while in possession of their attorneys.  Poor security over that report would be bad news, any copy not in possession of the attorneys is subject to subpoena or seizure via a search warrant.  I'd guess they're smart enough to not risk having physical custody of the report--if they do and say the don't, you have another obstruction of justice and a perjury charge staring you in the face.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on August 03, 2016, 02:56:22 PM
Their president was Kenneth f'ing Starr, hey absolutely did everything possible to protect Baylor from any public scrutiny or consequences.  Ken got a little dirt on him on the way out, but nothing criminal, heavens no!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 03, 2016, 03:05:22 PM
The Big 12 should tell Baylor to have Pepper Hamilton hand that report over or find a new conference.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 03, 2016, 04:22:56 PM
I doubt they did, they can look at it whenever they want--while in possession of their attorneys.  Poor security over that report would be bad news, any copy not in possession of the attorneys is subject to subpoena or seizure via a search warrant.  I'd guess they're smart enough to not risk having physical custody of the report--if they do and say the don't, you have another obstruction of justice and a perjury charge staring you in the face.

If you can see it on your screen, you have possession of it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on August 03, 2016, 05:05:45 PM
I doubt they did, they can look at it whenever they want--while in possession of their attorneys.  Poor security over that report would be bad news, any copy not in possession of the attorneys is subject to subpoena or seizure via a search warrant.  I'd guess they're smart enough to not risk having physical custody of the report--if they do and say the don't, you have another obstruction of justice and a perjury charge staring you in the face.

If you can see it on your screen, you have possession of it.

Remember when they scheduled and received a dramatic reading of the report, instead of a written report?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on August 03, 2016, 05:17:13 PM
I don't see why it would matter for attorney-client privilege purposes whether the report is in the possession of the attorney vs. the client.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on August 03, 2016, 05:19:21 PM
I don't see why it would matter for attorney-client privilege purposes whether the report is in the possession of the attorney vs. the client.

let's all throw our "I don't sees" in the ring here and field test our law and order knowledge.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on August 03, 2016, 05:20:00 PM
I don't see why it would matter for attorney-client privilege purposes whether the report is in the possession of the attorney vs. the client.

Possession is 9/10ths the law.
Title: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on August 03, 2016, 05:24:54 PM
Also, if there is evidence the report contains information about an ongoing crime then I don't think attorney-client privilege matters.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on August 03, 2016, 05:45:09 PM
Also, if there is evidence the report contains information about an ongoing crime then I don't think attorney-client privilege matters.

I'm pretty sure there is spousal privilege that is even better than attorney client, maybe some of these people marry each other?  Just speculating!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on August 03, 2016, 07:30:25 PM
Also, if there is evidence the report contains information about an ongoing crime then I don't think attorney-client privilege matters.

I'm pretty sure there is spousal privilege that is even better than attorney client, maybe some of these people marry each other?  Just speculating!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That would be pretty devious.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 03, 2016, 09:48:25 PM
Hmmm...fortunately, most of you are not familiar with the criminal justice system, and that's a good thing.  You absolutely CANNOT subpoena an attorney for their client's records, it truly is a privilege.  Trust me, I would love to do that in my investigations, but it is an inviolable privilege.  You never see Perry Mason called to testify against his client--well the same principle applies here.  Baylor instructed Pepper Hamilton to retain the report for that very reason.  Yeah, I'm sure they (Baylor) know what it says, but have not retained a copy.    Instructing Pepper Hamilton to retain the report was a very smart move, and anyone at Baylor that would undermine that by keeping a copy would be incredibly stupid, and put the institution at risk.  Maybe the DA will get lucky and discover a Baylor dumbass that kept a copy of the report, and issue a court order to obtain it.  Slim odds on that, though.

 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 04, 2016, 09:02:09 AM
Hmmm...fortunately, most of you are not familiar with the criminal justice system, and that's a good thing.  You absolutely CANNOT subpoena an attorney for their client's records, it truly is a privilege.  Trust me, I would love to do that in my investigations, but it is an inviolable privilege.  You never see Perry Mason called to testify against his client--well the same principle applies here.  Baylor instructed Pepper Hamilton to retain the report for that very reason.  Yeah, I'm sure they (Baylor) know what it says, but have not retained a copy.    Instructing Pepper Hamilton to retain the report was a very smart move, and anyone at Baylor that would undermine that by keeping a copy would be incredibly stupid, and put the institution at risk.  Maybe the DA will get lucky and discover a Baylor dumbass that kept a copy of the report, and issue a court order to obtain it.  Slim odds on that, though.

Then they had it and destroyed it.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on August 04, 2016, 09:52:03 AM
What you described might be the rule of thumb for investigators, but it's not the law. Law firms get subpoenaed all the time and are obligated to respond. They typically don't have to produce privileged documents, but neither does a client. You cannot just hand something to your attorney in order to make impossible to get.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-crime-fraud-exception-the-attorney-client-privilege.html
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 04, 2016, 10:17:55 AM
What you described might be the rule of thumb for investigators, but it's not the law. Law firms get subpoenaed all the time and are obligated to respond. They typically don't have to produce privileged documents, but neither does a client. You cannot just hand something to your attorney in order to make impossible to get.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-crime-fraud-exception-the-attorney-client-privilege.html

You are correct to a point.  The Pepper Hamilton report is work product of the firm, and is privileged.  It was not prepared by Baylor and handed to Pepper Hamilton, the firm was engaged to prepare the report. 
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 04, 2016, 02:49:27 PM
What you described might be the rule of thumb for investigators, but it's not the law. Law firms get subpoenaed all the time and are obligated to respond. They typically don't have to produce privileged documents, but neither does a client. You cannot just hand something to your attorney in order to make impossible to get.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-crime-fraud-exception-the-attorney-client-privilege.html

You are correct to a point.  The Pepper Hamilton report is work product of the firm, and is privileged.  It was not prepared by Baylor and handed to Pepper Hamilton, the firm was engaged to prepare the report.

Work product has a pretty good set of exceptions, and the investigative report not being available by any other means is pretty apparent.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on August 05, 2016, 12:49:09 AM
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/report-county-district-attorney-wants-access-to-baylor-report-162602102.html

I'm curious to what kind of 'privacy' they are claiming.  We've all seen people try to say they are protecting victims by preventing reports containing those names or identifying info.  This doesn't seems like attorney client action. 


What you described might be the rule of thumb for investigators, but it's not the law. Law firms get subpoenaed all the time and are obligated to respond. They typically don't have to produce privileged documents, but neither does a client. You cannot just hand something to your attorney in order to make impossible to get.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-crime-fraud-exception-the-attorney-client-privilege.html

Also this, especially if it appears like the admin is looking for a report as a way to find holes to plug them.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 19, 2016, 11:35:31 AM
https://twitter.com/BaylorFail/status/766665364902060032
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 19, 2016, 11:54:02 AM
i guess he's more of an instagram guy
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on August 19, 2016, 01:55:33 PM
this ish zamora video is some plain evil crap. and grobe's reaction, wtf.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 19, 2016, 05:19:04 PM
Recruiting low quality people and them shooting them full of steroids is a bad combination.  I can't believe their S&C coach (the guy who tried to fight a TCU fan a few years ago) still has a job.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on August 19, 2016, 07:09:25 PM
jesus christ I watched it  :frown:

I hope someone hits that guy with a car and he bleeds out slowly.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on August 19, 2016, 08:01:19 PM
jesus christ I watched it  :frown:

I hope someone hits that guy with a car and he bleeds out slowly.

He needs punched right in the throat. Continuously. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on August 19, 2016, 08:17:08 PM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 20, 2016, 10:34:12 AM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Spracne on August 20, 2016, 10:41:11 AM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 20, 2016, 10:57:42 AM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.

the PH report is gong to come out eventually, they might as well get it over with.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 20, 2016, 12:19:16 PM
that dude is sadistic....will be truly loved at Baylor
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on August 20, 2016, 12:24:04 PM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.

It will be subject to a 1000 page PO.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 20, 2016, 12:29:21 PM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.

It will be subject to a 1000 page PO.

will still probably get leaked
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 20, 2016, 12:53:06 PM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.

the PH report is gong to come out eventually, they might as well get it over with.

The problem for Baylor is that the report undoubtedly casts some of the assistants as horrible people, but BU tried to salvage this season by keeping the gang of assistants on staff.  So they can't come clean with the report, because that would demonstrate they aren't really serious about making cultural changes.

Nothing has changed with them; still evil, shallow, and self-rightous
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 20, 2016, 01:00:57 PM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.

the PH report is gong to come out eventually, they might as well get it over with.

The problem for Baylor is that the report undoubtedly casts some of the assistants as horrible people, but BU tried to salvage this season by keeping the gang of assistants on staff.  So they can't come clean with the report, because that would demonstrate they aren't really serious about making cultural changes.

Nothing has changed with them; still evil, shallow, and self-rightous

they have already demonstrated they aren't serious
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on August 20, 2016, 01:16:21 PM
Who has subpoenaed the report, and who is claiming privilege? I thought the report was an evaluation of baylor's ncaa compliance protocols, not legal advice on how to cover up rape, or whatever you dillweeds are implying.

I don't think anyone has yet.

It is going to come out unless they try and get it in McLennan county or wherever Baylor has convinced the law enforcement and bench to be their cover ups.
I believe Baylor already has pending Title IX litigation, which I assume the feds have exclusive jurisdiction over? Regardless, just make a Title IX claim and it's out of the local courts.

the PH report is gong to come out eventually, they might as well get it over with.

The problem for Baylor is that the report undoubtedly casts some of the assistants as horrible people, but BU tried to salvage this season by keeping the gang of assistants on staff.  So they can't come clean with the report, because that would demonstrate they aren't really serious about making cultural changes.

Nothing has changed with them; still evil, shallow, and self-rightous

they have already demonstrated they aren't serious

True.  I should've said "it would provide further proof that they aren't serious"
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatNation on August 29, 2016, 02:13:45 PM
Zamora is starting week 1. Nice job Grobe.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 29, 2016, 02:16:43 PM
Zamora is starting week 1. Nice job Grobe.
Son of a bitch!  :curse:

(https://media.giphy.com/media/ikcJ56KAyhm8w/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 29, 2016, 09:53:38 PM
Zamora is starting week 1. Nice job Grobe.
Son of a bitch!  :curse:

(https://media.giphy.com/media/ikcJ56KAyhm8w/giphy.gif)
I would call you an effin jerk; if that gif wasn't so gawd damned funny! (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FROFL.gif&hash=6bba8807037f47549325f7bacc2721aa5071ac45)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on August 29, 2016, 09:59:36 PM
But you know what would be funny and enjoyable.  Zamora and Grobe being tossed off the bridge by a dog. (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2Fthumbs_up_emoticon.gif&hash=b1f2e975b7df20d1f196018d8418db79682bd85d)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on August 29, 2016, 10:08:57 PM
Baxter's Revenge
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on August 30, 2016, 12:59:01 AM
But you know what would be funny and enjoyable.  Zamora and Grobe being tossed off the bridge by a dog. (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2Fthumbs_up_emoticon.gif&hash=b1f2e975b7df20d1f196018d8418db79682bd85d)

I'm sure Clifford could get the job done.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on August 30, 2016, 07:40:41 AM
Is this the guy that hit his dog?  Wgaf
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: kitten_mittons on August 30, 2016, 07:51:02 AM
Is this the guy that hit his dog?  Wgaf
Non-psychotics.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 30, 2016, 08:09:15 AM
Is this the guy that hit his dog?  Wgaf

You think he just hit his dog?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 30, 2016, 08:30:35 AM
There's a difference between a slap at your dog and totally abusing the poor son of a bitch, you awful person fsd. That gif up above was live footage of the event.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on August 30, 2016, 09:12:31 AM
I think what he did is despicable by itself and deserves some sort of charges and punishment.  But, even more, there is a strong tie to that behavior and other violent behaviors and mental illnesses, so the kid needs to get some help, too.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 30, 2016, 09:58:10 AM
Zamora is starting week 1. Nice job Grobe.
Son of a bitch!  :curse:

(https://media.giphy.com/media/ikcJ56KAyhm8w/giphy.gif)

That Pontiac Catalina!  Wow, it's identical to the car I was assigned to for high school drivers education!  The GIF is hilarious.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 30, 2016, 04:25:27 PM
Hmmmm.....

https://twitter.com/DavidSmoak/status/770733193020387328

Apparently Grobe is more like this.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/mOxCUSoRZ7vDq/giphy.gif)

Good for him!

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Yard Dog on August 30, 2016, 04:26:28 PM
So he will be sitting out games against Northwestern State, SMU, and Rice . . . I don't think he will feel much remorse when he is spending the second half on the sidelines with the starters anyways.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 30, 2016, 04:27:46 PM
Hmmmm.....

https://twitter.com/DavidSmoak/status/770733193020387328

Apparently Grobe is more like this.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/mOxCUSoRZ7vDq/giphy.gif)

Good for him!

FSD will be PISSED
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 30, 2016, 04:30:25 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Yard Dog on August 30, 2016, 05:16:08 PM
So he will be sitting out games against Northwestern State, SMU, and Rice . . . I don't think he will feel much remorse when he is spending the second half on the sidelines with the starters anyways.

https://twitter.com/GPCwallace/status/770743604390178816

Wally agrees with me.  :don'tcare:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on August 30, 2016, 05:25:29 PM
There's a difference between a slap at your dog and totally abusing the poor son of a bitch, you awful person fsd. That gif up above was live footage of the event.

Jsck Black punting that stuffed dog was live footage???  JK, haha, sucker :Take the Bait:

Sadly, my troll was vindicated by the suspension against the 3 sister's of the poor teams baylor plays every year. Apparently nobody actually gaf about dogs. :blindfold:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: michigancat on August 30, 2016, 05:25:53 PM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 30, 2016, 06:32:15 PM
There's a difference between a slap at your dog and totally abusing the poor son of a bitch, you awful person fsd. That gif up above was live footage of the event.

Jsck Black punting that stuffed dog was live footage???  JK, haha, sucker :Take the Bait:

Sadly, my troll was vindicated by the suspension against the 3 sister's of the poor teams baylor plays every year. Apparently nobody actually gaf about dogs. :blindfold:
;)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on August 30, 2016, 08:46:55 PM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?
that dog had it coming, every living creature in that house got its ass kicked :lynchmob:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 31, 2016, 12:33:55 AM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?

Can I have a few guesses?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 31, 2016, 08:28:14 AM
Maybe you should have just gone ahead and mentioned what Nyle Wiren did, because I have no idea what you are even talking about.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fedor on August 31, 2016, 08:34:40 AM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?

Can I have a few guesses?
Sure, have a go but don't even think about mentioning skin color because there are at least 3 factor well ahead of that.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: michigancat on August 31, 2016, 09:17:06 AM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?

Can I have a few guesses?
Sure, have a go but don't even think about mentioning skin color because there are at least 3 factor well ahead of that.
I was thinking it was because he played for KSU and there was no video. But whatever.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Fedor on August 31, 2016, 09:40:07 AM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?

Can I have a few guesses?
Sure, have a go but don't even think about mentioning skin color because there are at least 3 factor well ahead of that.
I was thinking it was because he played for KSU and there was no video. But whatever.
Also was so long ago that a large portion of the posters here don't know the story.  But it seems it is always in play with MIR.  My apologies if this is not the case.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on August 31, 2016, 03:10:53 PM
how has Nyle Wiren not been mentioned?

Can I have a few guesses?
Sure, have a go but don't even think about mentioning skin color because there are at least 3 factor well ahead of that.
I was thinking it was because he played for KSU and there was no video. But whatever.
Also was so long ago that a large portion of the posters here don't know the story.  But it seems it is always in play with MIR.  My apologies if this is not the case.

 :ROFL:
Title: Briles > Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on September 16, 2016, 07:41:02 PM
https://twitter.com/bearntex/status/776936765051461632
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: wetwillie on September 16, 2016, 07:50:54 PM
Body double
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on September 16, 2016, 07:53:05 PM
He's hardly overlooking any rape in that pic.  No way it's him.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on September 16, 2016, 10:21:58 PM
I wasn't lying

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20160917%2F1b76d85eb7d471bc6b90a5218d19ad61.jpg&hash=ab1a5e2a5fa8088c33d6cbc022ec0066100bac42)
Title: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2016, 06:48:18 AM
:lol: just heard that during halftime the Rice marching band made a giant "IX". Wonder if Briles stuck around for it.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on September 17, 2016, 07:36:29 AM
:lol: just heard that during halftime the Rice marching band made a giant "IX". Wonder if Briles stuck around for it.

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/16/12949832/rice-band-baylor
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on October 08, 2016, 09:05:08 AM
Thought I would park this here.  Title IX coordinator at Baylor quits (she was part of the "let's make it look like we are cleaning up the mess, even if we aren't" effort).

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/10/07/coverup-culture-persists-at-baylor-amid-widespread-campus-rape-crisis/ (https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/10/07/coverup-culture-persists-at-baylor-amid-widespread-campus-rape-crisis/)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on October 31, 2016, 01:04:01 PM
60 Minutes segment:  Baylor scandal worse than reported?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/e7d01e2a-f982-3d11-bebc-c5c3210750db/ss_baylor-sex-assault-scandal.html

First mention I've heard of a gang rape....
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on October 31, 2016, 01:52:17 PM
Baylor deserves everything terrible coming their way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on October 31, 2016, 06:10:59 PM
Okay, that's it. Time to kick them out of the conference and bring in someone else.

I have a feeling that this is going to get more uglier....
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on October 31, 2016, 07:26:52 PM
The whole f-ing AD should be death penalty and everyone from Starr down should be looking at conspiracy charges.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on October 31, 2016, 07:32:19 PM
baylor is just the type of program the ncaa would be willing to make an example of
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on October 31, 2016, 07:50:03 PM
nah, the ncaa was neutered years ago.  there is no going back.  they're varys.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on October 31, 2016, 08:32:38 PM
nah, the ncaa was neutered years ago.  there is no going back.  they're varys.

varys is p powerful
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on October 31, 2016, 08:45:28 PM
no stones
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on October 31, 2016, 08:47:10 PM
but still gets things done
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Canary on October 31, 2016, 09:26:34 PM
I don't believe anything will be done in regards to Baylor.  Sadly.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on October 31, 2016, 10:34:51 PM
I don't believe anything will be done in regards to Baylor.  Sadly.

Unfortunately, I hate saying it in despise of NCAA & Baylor, but you're probably right. They only care about making money and not the integrity of the game or the students.

This is a perfect example of the NCAA (or the Big 12 for that matter) to intervene and drop the hammer on them and say "Hey, this $*!% is getting old quick. Give us that Pepper Hamilton report (in full, no redacted's), cease the posturing and hypocritical Mickey Mouse BS, and get your Title IX in order, or we'll just go to a different direction due to the sheer egregiousness of the misconducts that was/is occurring." And make it stick this time without any rescinds.

If Baylor still thinks they're untouchable (based on the way they're acting currently, other than throwing some guys under the bus), then just put the death penalty, "unequivocally", on the table as one of the sanctions. I'm not sure you could call Baylor's corrective actions "swift" or applied correctly/fairly to have the death penalty off the table at this point.

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on November 01, 2016, 07:49:58 AM
college football money has gotten too big.  It drives the bus.  Needs to be separated from the school somehow.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on November 01, 2016, 08:52:20 AM
I don't believe anything will be done in regards to Baylor.  Sadly.

Unfortunately, I hate saying it in despise of NCAA & Baylor, but you're probably right. They only care about making money and not the integrity of the game or the students.

This is a perfect example of the NCAA (or the Big 12 for that matter) to intervene and drop the hammer on them and say "Hey, this $*!% is getting old quick. Give us that Pepper Hamilton report (in full, no redacted's), cease the posturing and hypocritical Mickey Mouse BS, and get your Title IX in order, or we'll just go to a different direction due to the sheer egregiousness of the misconducts that was/is occurring." And make it stick this time without any rescinds.

If Baylor still thinks they're untouchable (based on the way they're acting currently, other than throwing some guys under the bus), then just put the death penalty, "unequivocally", on the table as one of the sanctions. I'm not sure you could call Baylor's corrective actions "swift" or applied correctly/fairly to have the death penalty off the table at this point.

This.  Plus tie into the resignation of the gal brought in to clean up the Title IX mess at Baylor, and the resistance she met after their shitty treatment of rape victims was exposed.  Baylor has gotten away with a lot, and has not had to pay a price, except for some bad press.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on November 01, 2016, 11:12:12 AM
I don't believe anything will be done in regards to Baylor.  Sadly.

Unfortunately, I hate saying it in despise of NCAA & Baylor, but you're probably right. They only care about making money and not the integrity of the game or the students.

This is a perfect example of the NCAA (or the Big 12 for that matter) to intervene and drop the hammer on them and say "Hey, this $*!% is getting old quick. Give us that Pepper Hamilton report (in full, no redacted's), cease the posturing and hypocritical Mickey Mouse BS, and get your Title IX in order, or we'll just go to a different direction due to the sheer egregiousness of the misconducts that was/is occurring." And make it stick this time without any rescinds.

If Baylor still thinks they're untouchable (based on the way they're acting currently, other than throwing some guys under the bus), then just put the death penalty, "unequivocally", on the table as one of the sanctions. I'm not sure you could call Baylor's corrective actions "swift" or applied correctly/fairly to have the death penalty off the table at this point.

This.  Plus tie into the resignation of the gal brought in to clean up the Title IX mess at Baylor, and the resistance she met after their shitty treatment of rape victims was exposed.  Baylor has gotten away with a lot, and has not had to pay a price, except for some bad press.

Quite frankly, this is a bullshit way of looking at this.  They had their chance to clean up their act after the first 5 or 10 rapes.  Stop and think about that. They let this go on and on and on.  The only thing the NCAA should be considering is a death penalty for the football program (as I said I would love to see the entire AD) and the only consideration should be how long their program is shut down.  We are so far beyond different options of punishments being 'on the table', it's insane to consider anything but ending their program for a decade.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kslim on November 01, 2016, 11:14:54 AM
scary to think about living in a world where football and money are more important than multiple women being assaulted.

eff baylor, waco and everything they have done
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 01, 2016, 11:19:23 AM
How can you guys think the NCAA believes that raping women is worse than raping kids?  If they do anything, it will be a slap on the wrist compared to what Penn State got.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Canary on November 01, 2016, 11:26:03 AM
How can you guys think the NCAA believes that raping women is worse than raping kids?  If they do anything, it will be a slap on the wrist compared to what Penn State got.
That's a good point, but I think the scope of those who knew is larger at Baylor than it was at Penn State.  I can believe that very few knew at Penn State. At Baylor it seems highly unlikely that anyone on the coaching staff would be unaware of what was going on. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 01, 2016, 11:29:54 AM
Who was the highest ranking person to know in either situation?  I can't remember.  To me that matters more than how many knew.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on November 01, 2016, 09:21:34 PM
http://www.baylor.edu/thetruth/

^the truth
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on November 01, 2016, 09:32:06 PM
JFC!  They could have started this site two years ago and it wouldn't have changed their agenda.  Bullshit is as bullshit does.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: PurpleOil on November 01, 2016, 09:46:02 PM
I still maintain that the Feds burned the wrong complex down in '93.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on November 01, 2016, 09:50:36 PM
With a Clinton getting back in the Oval Office maybe they will finish the job
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Canary on November 01, 2016, 09:54:01 PM
Who was the highest ranking person to know in either situation?  I can't remember.  To me that matters more than how many knew.
As near as I can recall the president at Baylor knew, and Joe Paterno and campus law enforcement at Penn State.  I could be absolutely wrong about that though.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 01, 2016, 10:10:23 PM
Also, the rapist at penn state was a coach who used university facilities to lure child victims into his rape den of terror over a period of decades.

The rapists at baylor are some jerkoff roided out jocks rage-raping coeds in drunken stupers. I.e., ncaa standard conduct for p5 athletes since 1952, sadly.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on November 01, 2016, 10:36:14 PM
Also, the rapist at penn state was a coach who used university facilities to lure child victims into his rape den of terror over a period of decades.

The rapists at baylor are some jerkoff roided out jocks rage-raping coeds in drunken stupers. I.e., ncaa standard conduct for p5 athletes since 1952, sadly.
Why the 1952 date?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on November 02, 2016, 01:06:30 AM
Also, the rapist at penn state was a coach who used university facilities to lure child victims into his rape den of terror over a period of decades.

The rapists at baylor are some jerkoff roided out jocks rage-raping coeds in drunken stupers. I.e., ncaa standard conduct for p5 athletes since 1952, sadly.
But my understanding is that roided jerk off was reported to the police and university whereas Pedo lion was not. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 02, 2016, 08:12:43 AM
Also, the rapist at penn state was a coach who used university facilities to lure child victims into his rape den of terror over a period of decades.

The rapists at baylor are some jerkoff roided out jocks rage-raping coeds in drunken stupers. I.e., ncaa standard conduct for p5 athletes since 1952, sadly.
But my understanding is that roided jerk off was reported to the police and university whereas Pedo lion was not.

The rapes were reported to Paterno and he sent them up the chain to the president. Then nobody did anything.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Bookcat on November 02, 2016, 08:34:58 AM
-----------------

"Anyone who has had firsthand experience of sexual assault understands that many victims go through a deep sense of shame, guilt and fear. Some may be afraid that no one will listen to them or believe them or that they will be the targets of retaliation. These incidents may leave lifelong scars. This is the reason we are working so hard to remove barriers to reporting and to provide a supportive environment for our students.

That Baylor did not respond as a caring Christian community to those who were hurt grieves all of us – regents, administrators, faculty and staff. On behalf of everyone at Baylor, I want to apologize again to the victims and their families. I will do all I can to ensure this never happens again."  D. Garland, Interim Prez

----------------------


Wow....  what crap.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on November 02, 2016, 08:48:14 AM
Bast-tards will do anything to get back to the way it was; so if bullshit works, then bullshit it will be.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 03, 2016, 10:22:35 PM
Also, the rapist at penn state was a coach who used university facilities to lure child victims into his rape den of terror over a period of decades.

The rapists at baylor are some jerkoff roided out jocks rage-raping coeds in drunken stupers. I.e., ncaa standard conduct for p5 athletes since 1952, sadly.
But my understanding is that roided jerk off was reported to the police and university whereas Pedo lion was not.

Pedo was definitely reported to people at the University far more significant that campus pd
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: PurpleOil on November 04, 2016, 07:07:14 AM
Bast-tards will do anything to get back to the way it was; so if bullshit works, then bullshit it will be.

Exactly. Baylor has consistently shown that they plan to only do the bare minimum, if that, as they deal with this scandal. They deserve the death penalty more than SMU or Penn State ever did.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KSUBrian on November 04, 2016, 08:19:04 AM
Bast-tards will do anything to get back to the way it was; so if bullshit works, then bullshit it will be.

Exactly. Baylor has consistently shown that they plan to only do the bare minimum, if that, as they deal with this scandal. They deserve the death penalty more than SMU or Penn State ever did.

Even though deserved, NCAA does not have the sack to do death penalty. NCAA penalty should be three year bowl ban and loss of a scholly for each reported incident for 3 years. B12 penalty GTFO of conference.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on November 09, 2016, 08:18:13 AM
http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=18001536&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=college-football
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on November 09, 2016, 10:22:29 AM
I kind of like Finebaum. Mostly just covers SEC, but he tells college football fans how it is and what needs to be done.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on November 09, 2016, 10:38:41 AM
I don't get the his motivation of his sudden outrage. Baylor being a POS is not new news. Where was to outrage months ago?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 09, 2016, 09:13:56 PM
My prediction that baylor would ultimately derail may be coming to fruition. :pray:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on November 11, 2016, 03:24:12 AM
http://deadspin.com/report-baylor-also-involved-in-run-of-the-mill-recruit-1788845728
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on November 11, 2016, 08:24:27 AM
http://deadspin.com/report-baylor-also-involved-in-run-of-the-mill-recruit-1788845728

meanwhile the b12 sits idly by and does nothing.  as someone else pointed out earlier, our conference is complicit in this bullshit and it's embarrassing.
 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Joker on December 08, 2016, 08:06:28 PM
Art is going down swinging.  Maybe flailing is a better word.


"Some people think themselves above the law, but the laws of Texas establish accountability for everyone, even renegade, self-dealing regents of a Christian university," Briles' lawsuit states.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18238961/art-briles-sues-baylor-officials-libel-conspiracy (http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18238961/art-briles-sues-baylor-officials-libel-conspiracy)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on December 08, 2016, 08:19:19 PM
Art is going down swinging.  Maybe flailing is a better word.


"Some people think themselves above the law, but the laws of Texas establish accountability for everyone, even renegade, self-dealing regents of a Christian university," Briles' lawsuit states.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18238961/art-briles-sues-baylor-officials-libel-conspiracy (http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18238961/art-briles-sues-baylor-officials-libel-conspiracy)

"Laws of Texas."  What a douche bag.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on December 08, 2016, 08:36:44 PM
starting the complaint with the bible verse was pretty incredible
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 08, 2016, 09:07:31 PM
This is pretty much the best thing that could have happened.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on December 08, 2016, 09:24:00 PM
Yeah, whatever makes Baylor terrible again is what I am rooting for.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 08, 2016, 09:39:56 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

LHOFCBS was on Highly Questionable on Tuesday, you know what his appearance was? It was absolutely adorable :love:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on December 08, 2016, 09:47:07 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

LHOFCBS was on Highly Questionable on Tuesday, you know what his appearance was? It was absolutely adorable :love:

Link?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 08, 2016, 11:48:16 PM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

LHOFCBS was on Highly Questionable on Tuesday, you know what his appearance was? It was absolutely adorable :love:

Link?

Unfortunately not. ESPN does not put reairs or clips of those afternoon shows online.

He told a story about his parents splitting when he was six and they had to move to St. Joe, and live in a studio apartment downtown so that his mom could walk to work. He also told a story about his dad buying him some sweet yellow convertible, don't remember the year or model but it was from the 40's, HQ had a photo of it. Anyway, he went to his dad's in Omaha over the summer to get the car but when Bill went back to St. Joe he was staying out late with the car so his mother told his father to get the car picked up or she would drive it in the Mizzourah River. He didn't have another car until a few years later when he was working at a used car lot his grandfather owned. He worked to make money to buy a car, but instead of a sweet convertible he got a jalopy for $52, yep that's $52 no typo. Papi asked him what the most romantic thing he's ever done for Sharon, he had no answer. Bomani said it was winning the 2003 Big 12 Championship, Bill said "well I hope it's gone beyond that." The interview ended with Bill apologizing for being boring, they all laughed and said he was great.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Spracne on December 09, 2016, 12:11:42 AM
Art is going down swinging.  Maybe flailing is a better word.


"Some people think themselves above the law, but the laws of Texas establish accountability for everyone, even renegade, self-dealing regents of a Christian university," Briles' lawsuit states.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18238961/art-briles-sues-baylor-officials-libel-conspiracy (http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18238961/art-briles-sues-baylor-officials-libel-conspiracy)

"Laws of Texas."  What a douche bag.

We do have laws, and the lawsuit was filed in Texas state court and alleges violations of Texas law, so...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 09, 2016, 12:44:13 AM
Hey look everyone, its Captain Well Actually...
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on December 09, 2016, 01:27:49 AM
Hey look everyone, its Captain Well Actually...

 :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on December 09, 2016, 07:17:35 AM
Oh man! http://www.espn.com/espnradio/podcast/feeds/itunes/podCast?id=6962629

Go to about 8:45.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: ednksu on December 09, 2016, 07:22:18 AM
Oh man! http://www.espn.com/espnradio/podcast/feeds/itunes/podCast?id=6962629

Go to about 8:45.
I was just about to post this! Good find. 


link off itnues
http://www.espn.com/espnradio/play?id=18222496
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: POWL on December 09, 2016, 07:37:16 AM
Oh man! http://www.espn.com/espnradio/podcast/feeds/itunes/podCast?id=6962629

Go to about 8:45.
I was just about to post this! Good find. 


link off itnues
http://www.espn.com/espnradio/play?id=18222496
i feel awkward just listening to that.........think i'll take a shower to wash away the guilt
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Joker on December 09, 2016, 08:39:49 AM
OMG Briles was absolutely adorable on Highly Questionable today :love:

LHOFCBS was on Highly Questionable on Tuesday, you know what his appearance was? It was absolutely adorable :love:

Link?

Unfortunately not. ESPN does not put reairs or clips of those afternoon shows online.

He told a story about his parents splitting when he was six and they had to move to St. Joe, and live in a studio apartment downtown so that his mom could walk to work. He also told a story about his dad buying him some sweet yellow convertible, don't remember the year or model but it was from the 40's, HQ had a photo of it. Anyway, he went to his dad's in Omaha over the summer to get the car but when Bill went back to St. Joe he was staying out late with the car so his mother told his father to get the car picked up or she would drive it in the Mizzourah River. He didn't have another car until a few years later when he was working at a used car lot his grandfather owned. He worked to make money to buy a car, but instead of a sweet convertible he got a jalopy for $52, yep that's $52 no typo. Papi asked him what the most romantic thing he's ever done for Sharon, he had no answer. Bomani said it was winning the 2003 Big 12 Championship, Bill said "well I hope it's gone beyond that." The interview ended with Bill apologizing for being boring, they all laughed and said he was great.

Bill should try this appearing human stuff more often.  Although, I suppose the rarity is what makes it so interesting.

Would love to see him back in the yellow convertible with the top down doing 37 in a 30.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on December 09, 2016, 08:41:30 AM
Surprised he didn't have to ask "Sharon who?"
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 09, 2016, 09:19:17 AM
Surprised he didn't have to ask "Sharon who?"

Papi said "your wife"
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 09, 2016, 09:22:05 AM
Oh man! http://www.espn.com/espnradio/podcast/feeds/itunes/podCast?id=6962629

Go to about 8:45.
I was just about to post this! Good find. 


link off itnues
http://www.espn.com/espnradio/play?id=18222496
i feel awkward just listening to that.........think i'll take a shower to wash away the guilt

What's your problem?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CNS on December 09, 2016, 09:41:19 AM
Surprised he didn't have to ask "Sharon who?"

Papi said "your wife"

Pro assist on his part.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on December 09, 2016, 11:59:39 AM
Highly Questionable is the absolute worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 09, 2016, 12:05:48 PM
Highly Questionable is the absolute worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's certainly no spongebob
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on December 09, 2016, 12:39:39 PM
Here is what needs to happen.  LHCBS needs to sit down with Art Briles and have a deep, personal conversation.  Then, LHCBS needs to find it in his heart to have the compassion and courage to give Art Briles another shot, at Kansas State University.  Then, Bill needs to vouch for Art Briles, we need to hire him, and then, together, we need to go win eff loads of football games.  The End.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 09, 2016, 12:53:47 PM
Here is what needs to happen.  LHCBS needs to sit down with Art Briles and have a deep, personal conversation.  Then, LHCBS needs to find it in his heart to have the compassion and courage to give Art Briles another shot, at Kansas State University.  Then, Bill needs to vouch for Art Briles, we need to hire him, and then, together, we need to go win eff loads of football games.  The End.

It's reasonable to assume that Art is going to have a little trouble recruiting, especially in this part of the country. He needs to go coach a fcs school away from the plains region.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on December 09, 2016, 02:04:55 PM
Highly Questionable is the absolute worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You shut your god damn mouth!
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on December 09, 2016, 02:09:48 PM
Highly Questionable is the absolute worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
God, you're the worst.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on December 10, 2016, 03:50:17 AM
Highly Questionable is the absolute worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
God, you're the worst.

I beg to differ.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 22, 2016, 02:21:24 PM
Wow! This guy ran a school.

https://twitter.com/RedditCFB/status/812029761954414592
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on December 22, 2016, 07:10:50 PM
Mods, I plead with you to change this mumped up thread title.  How in the world would anyone in their right mind think a lying, cheating, dishonest out of work coach even compares with the one and only LHOFHCBS!  Please change to:  The Disgrace of the Big XII- Fired Coach Art Briles
TIA
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 22, 2016, 09:37:56 PM
Wow! This guy ran a school.

https://twitter.com/RedditCFB/status/812029761954414592

OMG

Sad
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 28, 2016, 12:21:53 AM
Good for Baylor for beating the hell out of Boise, had that in my bowl pool btw :cool: but it is obvious that most.of this staff gives no effs about getting a job somewhere else. Many of the coaches have went from wearing #CAB t-shirts under their jackets to now just going full out and putting it on the jackets, Grobe and Bennett appear to be the only coaches on the sidelines without the CAB jackets. They also have 6 personal foul/unsportsmanlike conduct penalties in this game with 8 minutes left.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on December 28, 2016, 12:28:21 AM
Thugs
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 28, 2016, 12:46:05 AM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on December 28, 2016, 04:16:40 AM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.

SMU style? Would be fun to watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on December 28, 2016, 09:36:30 AM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
I am so happy that rape enabling finger taping dork is taking his ass up out of this conference.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 28, 2016, 01:40:45 PM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
I am so happy that rape enabling finger taping dork is taking his ass up out of this conference.

his wife sarah was in mhk a few weeks back. I talked w/ her some at b&b. forgot to tell everyone. this just reminded me.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 28, 2016, 02:01:03 PM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
I am so happy that rape enabling finger taping dork is taking his ass up out of this conference.

his wife sarah was in mhk a few weeks back. I talked w/ her some at b&b. forgot to tell everyone. this just reminded me.

Next time you see Sarah please ask her why her husband is walking around with tape on his fingers. Does he moonlight as a minor league catcher?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 28, 2016, 02:07:34 PM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
I am so happy that rape enabling finger taping dork is taking his ass up out of this conference.

his wife sarah was in mhk a few weeks back. I talked w/ her some at b&b. forgot to tell everyone. this just reminded me.

Next time you see Sarah please ask her why her husband is walking around with tape on his fingers. Does he moonlight as a minor league catcher?

will do. I put my odds of ever talking to her again around 50% so there is a chance this actually might happen.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on December 28, 2016, 02:13:36 PM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
I am so happy that rape enabling finger taping dork is taking his ass up out of this conference.

his wife sarah was in mhk a few weeks back. I talked w/ her some at b&b. forgot to tell everyone. this just reminded me.

Next time you see Sarah please ask her why her husband is walking around with tape on his fingers. Does he moonlight as a minor league catcher?

will do. I put my odds of ever talking to her again around 50% so there is a chance this actually might happen.

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on January 03, 2017, 09:03:25 AM
I completely forgot, until the announcers just mentioned it, that Kendall is joining Kiffin. FAU may end up with the death penalty.
I am so happy that rape enabling finger taping dork is taking his ass up out of this conference.

his wife sarah was in mhk a few weeks back. I talked w/ her some at b&b. forgot to tell everyone. this just reminded me.

Next time you see Sarah please ask her why her husband is walking around with tape on his fingers. Does he moonlight as a minor league catcher?

will do. I put my odds of ever talking to her again around 50% so there is a chance this actually might happen.
i bet she has great Chip & JoAnna stories
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on January 24, 2017, 12:33:10 PM
An interesting discussion of Briles' situation and what it would take for a program to hire him:

http://247sports.com/Article/In-coaching-purgatory-ADs-say-Art-Briles-still-too-risky-to-hire-50771747?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=college-football
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on January 24, 2017, 02:00:37 PM
An interesting discussion of Briles' situation and what it would take for a program to hire him:

http://247sports.com/Article/In-coaching-purgatory-ADs-say-Art-Briles-still-too-risky-to-hire-50771747?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=college-football

the guy hasn't even publicly accepted responsibility for his role in whole thing, so i guess what i'm saying is he can eat a hot bag of dicks
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2017, 02:02:32 PM
I would think cold dicks would be less pleasant
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on January 24, 2017, 02:07:19 PM
maybe, but if they were really hot then it would be v. uncomfortable to eat them.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CHONGS on January 24, 2017, 02:29:27 PM
Spicy hot or temperature hot?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on January 24, 2017, 02:52:22 PM
fahrenheit 451
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CHONGS on January 24, 2017, 03:15:26 PM
The temperature when freedom burns

Oh man thats a tagline for a movie
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: CatsNShocks on January 24, 2017, 03:30:28 PM
An interesting discussion of Briles' situation and what it would take for a program to hire him:

http://247sports.com/Article/In-coaching-purgatory-ADs-say-Art-Briles-still-too-risky-to-hire-50771747?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=college-football

the guy hasn't even publicly accepted responsibility for his role in whole thing, so i guess what i'm saying is he can eat a hot bag of dicks


Quote
Step 3: To hire Briles, it would likely take someone with an incredible amount of political capital in his job.

“I’m not even sure if someone other than (Nick) Saban or Urban (Meyer) could do it,” the source said.

Not saying he would or should, but Snyder has that type of political capital.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on January 24, 2017, 05:47:01 PM
Snyder would have to murder Currie and institute martial law if he wanted Briles to be the Cats next head coach.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on January 24, 2017, 05:55:14 PM
Cold dicks with some hot wing sauce or something. That would be terrible
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on January 24, 2017, 06:04:10 PM
puni would eat it for lunch
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on January 24, 2017, 06:19:11 PM
lol
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 24, 2017, 10:19:41 PM
I think he would add about half a pound of frozen peas and microwave them first, though.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on January 25, 2017, 08:10:33 AM
Snyder would have to murder Currie and institute martial law if he wanted Briles to be the Cats next head coach.

Could you overcome the revulsion of the events at Baylor to get a coaching edge from Briles?  I don't think Snyder could.  Damn, for a minute there, I was looking the Currie murder and martial law as a source of entertainment.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 25, 2017, 08:34:11 AM
I think Snyder could.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on January 25, 2017, 10:01:58 AM
microwave them first

Hot and cold dicks
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Skipper44 on January 25, 2017, 11:00:37 AM
microwave them first

Hot and cold dicks
so, mixed dicks?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 27, 2017, 04:06:07 PM
https://twitter.com/RedditCFB/status/825099379476422662
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: meow meow on January 27, 2017, 04:12:32 PM
so yeah, it's time to kick them out of the conference
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on January 27, 2017, 04:52:24 PM
Jesus
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2017, 04:57:28 PM
the trainer got free college in return for being quiet about being raped  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 27, 2017, 04:58:09 PM
the trainer got free college in return for being quiet about being raped  :sdeek:
Holy eff!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on January 27, 2017, 04:58:25 PM
Just awful.  No punishment is too harsh for the coaches that willingly put students at risk for their own benefit.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on January 27, 2017, 05:32:08 PM
 
Quote
Former assistant coach Kendal Briles -- the son of the head coach -- once told a Dallas area student athlete, "Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor and they love football players," according to the suit.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on January 27, 2017, 05:39:08 PM
Reading that complaint, 52 rapes by 21 players in 4 years....several "hostesses" became pregnant by football players.  That complaint is sickening to read.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on January 27, 2017, 06:10:44 PM
Makes you sick to your stomach..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2017, 06:24:27 PM
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/usatoday/editorial/sports/ncaaf/2017-01-27-Baylor-Elizabeth-Doe-lawsuit.pdf
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2017, 06:32:33 PM
Good lord.

http://www.baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=319981
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on January 27, 2017, 08:38:56 PM
Sister just sent me that link. Makes me sick

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on January 27, 2017, 09:57:52 PM
Well, that just escalated from a simmer to a full blown nuclear explosion.

I cannot , for the life of me, have any possibilities that the Big 12 is not going to do something about this. This is just bad PR for them.

Surely, there has to be a bylaw somewhere that a institutional can be kicked out for gross negligence.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: steve dave on January 27, 2017, 10:08:22 PM
I mean, you can put whatever you want in a lawsuit though. to play devils advocate, everyone is acting like the allegations are the facts. they are just maybe the facts.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Spracne on January 27, 2017, 10:37:18 PM
Correction...The headlines will keep coming until the objective is achieved or exhausted...Right now "exhausted" isn't an option because it isn't going to happen.

Baylor doesn't belong with the rest and that wouldn't change for a significant period of time, meaning years, if not decades.

If you don't have the pedigree, you aren't welcome, and those at the table aren't willing to share.

That's all this is about and ever has been.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on January 27, 2017, 10:39:10 PM
Or maybe the coaches and admins at Baylor are rough ridin' downgrades who don't care about anyone on the way to the top
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2017, 10:53:51 PM
Quote

This is a sad situation on many fronts. You have women who were victimized. That's awful. You have women who made bad choices and regretted them, equally awful. You have men who treated women badly and took something they weren't entitled to. Awful. You have a new president that will repeal much of the overreach of Title IX.. Think of that what you will. This I know. Baylor is a great, but imperfect institution. The events of the past few months will make her better. The recognition on campus of the problem of violence against women is a good thing. The crazy overreach of the DOE is bad and will be repealed. We made a great hire and I'm confident the days ahead will make us proud of our players. There will be some who err. They will be dealt with. We'll win as a football team, and as a university.

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pete on January 28, 2017, 07:10:27 AM
Quote

This is a sad situation on many fronts. You have women who were victimized. That's awful. You have women who made bad choices and regretted them, equally awful. You have men who treated women badly and took something they weren't entitled to. Awful. You have a new president that will repeal much of the overreach of Title IX.. Think of that what you will. This I know. Baylor is a great, but imperfect institution. The events of the past few months will make her better. The recognition on campus of the problem of violence against women is a good thing. The crazy overreach of the DOE is bad and will be repealed. We made a great hire and I'm confident the days ahead will make us proud of our players. There will be some who err. They will be dealt with. We'll win as a football team, and as a university.


My bet, is that those Baylor fans are right, that jack crap is going to to happen to them.  This is the absolute perfect time in America in the last 50 years to be a piece of crap and prosper.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Joker on January 28, 2017, 07:40:56 AM
I mean, you can put whatever you want in a lawsuit though. to play devils advocate, everyone is acting like the allegations are the facts. they are just maybe the facts.

This is an important point.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on January 28, 2017, 07:57:50 AM
Quote
My brain is fried with this mess. The timing of these articles seems like an obvious attempt to wreck our recruiting class with unproven allegations to shock our commits. I don't believe that God cares who wins football games, but He does care about people. I'm praying for our new coaching staff as they do their best to combat these attacks.


Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatNkilt on January 28, 2017, 08:18:00 AM
If everything in this lawsuit is true, then I think the Big 12 should kick Baylor out and bring Houston in.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 28, 2017, 09:27:19 AM
did a trainer really get free tuition for a coverup?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pete on January 28, 2017, 11:50:22 AM
I wish I had a nickel for every time the phrase "suck it up, buttercup" has been used amongst Baylor alumni.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 29, 2017, 12:38:01 AM
I always wondered how they became so good, so fast.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on January 29, 2017, 12:42:00 AM
Not that surprising, Texas school that gets good quickly after decades of being terrible. Only way they could change that
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 29, 2017, 08:44:39 AM
I mean, you can put whatever you want in a lawsuit though. to play devils advocate, everyone is acting like the allegations are the facts. they are just maybe the facts.

This is an important point.

Putting things in a lawsuit that aren't true is a good way to get suspended and sanctioned, tho.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: _33 on January 30, 2017, 09:35:27 AM
Hopefully they have to negate all of their 2012 wins and then we can hang a national championship banner.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on January 30, 2017, 12:02:09 PM
Hopefully they have to negate all of their 2012 wins and then we can hang a national championship banner.
I wish we had won the bowl game in that case...  :frown:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: RickRampus on February 02, 2017, 09:18:36 PM
Whoa

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on February 02, 2017, 10:41:45 PM
IF, and  big If at that, what can we expect as punishment?  SMU death penalty? Briles banned? Any ideas?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on February 02, 2017, 10:58:54 PM
How can you guys think the NCAA believes that raping women is worse than raping kids?  If they do anything, it will be a slap on the wrist compared to what Penn State got.

52 alleged rapes. Coaches covering up. Administration covering it up.

This reeks worse than SMU's slush fund.

I don't know about you, but this situation is a full blown lack of institutional control.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on February 02, 2017, 11:00:28 PM
Unfortunately, I hate saying it in despise of NCAA & Baylor, but you're probably right. They only care about making money and not the integrity of the game or the students.

This is a perfect example of the NCAA (or the Big 12 for that matter) to intervene and drop the hammer on them and say "Hey, this $*!% is getting old quick. Give us that Pepper Hamilton report (in full, no redacted's), cease the posturing and hypocritical Mickey Mouse BS, and get your Title IX in order, or we'll just go to a different direction due to the sheer egregiousness of the misconducts that was/is occurring." And make it stick this time without any rescinds.

If Baylor still thinks they're untouchable (based on the way they're acting currently, other than throwing some guys under the bus), then just put the death penalty, "unequivocally", on the table as one of the sanctions. I'm not sure you could call Baylor's corrective actions "swift" or applied correctly/fairly to have the death penalty off the table at this point.

I been calling it for a while. This is a big problem that the Big XII and the NCAA cannot ignore now.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on February 03, 2017, 12:56:04 AM
Quote

This is a sad situation on many fronts. You have women who were victimized. That's awful. You have women who made bad choices and regretted them, equally awful. You have men who treated women badly and took something they weren't entitled to. Awful. You have a new president that will repeal much of the overreach of Title IX.. Think of that what you will. This I know. Baylor is a great, but imperfect institution. The events of the past few months will make her better. The recognition on campus of the problem of violence against women is a good thing. The crazy overreach of the DOE is bad and will be repealed. We made a great hire and I'm confident the days ahead will make us proud of our players. There will be some who err. They will be dealt with. We'll win as a football team, and as a university.


Just reread this.  Didnt mention it earlier, but the idea of being "entitled" to sex in a relationship is disturbing.  I wonder how much marital rape is happening in the Baylor alum community.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: POWL on February 03, 2017, 07:37:54 AM
Quote

This is a sad situation on many fronts. You have women who were victimized. That's awful. You have women who made bad choices and regretted them, equally awful. You have men who treated women badly and took something they weren't entitled to. Awful. You have a new president that will repeal much of the overreach of Title IX.. Think of that what you will. This I know. Baylor is a great, but imperfect institution. The events of the past few months will make her better. The recognition on campus of the problem of violence against women is a good thing. The crazy overreach of the DOE is bad and will be repealed. We made a great hire and I'm confident the days ahead will make us proud of our players. There will be some who err. They will be dealt with. We'll win as a football team, and as a university.


Just reread this.  Didnt mention it earlier, but the idea of being "entitled" to sex in a relationship is disturbing.  I wonder how much marital rape is happening in the Baylor alum community.
My guess is they are trying to draw a line from the sacrament of marriage, which includes the phrase "self giving" to imply the entitled to sex thing ..........it is a weak argument, IMO
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on February 03, 2017, 08:20:01 AM
More coming out, not looking good for Art Briles:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/big12/2017/02/02/baylor-sexual-assault-scandal-art-briles/97428036/

Quote
Briles and his staff "created a disciplinary black hole into which reports of misconduct such as drug use, physical assault, domestic violence, brandishing of guns, indecent exposure and academic fraud disappeared."

Does that put the finishing touch on the unhireability of Briles?  Knowing about it and doing nothing is bad enough, but concealment could put Briles personally at risk for civil litigation. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 03, 2017, 10:15:47 AM
Briles texting about this is awfully bad for him.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 03, 2017, 10:28:29 AM
Briles will never get a division 1 head coaching job again. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 03, 2017, 12:40:23 PM
I couldn't really do another victory lap, could I? 


Of course I could
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on February 03, 2017, 01:52:54 PM
So I guess Briles filed a libel suit and then quickly dismissed it right before the text messages came out?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on February 03, 2017, 02:02:40 PM
Briles will never get a division 1 head coaching job again.

Technically true.

However, if this had happened with him at another school and not Baylor, and he were to be applying to Baylor without it ever having happened there, my guess is he could have got hired there.  Maybe.

With the mindset they had about issues.  Not sure what it would have taken for a red flag or two to be raised to keep them from chasing that football glory dream.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on February 03, 2017, 04:12:08 PM
So I guess Briles filed a libel suit and then quickly dismissed it right before the text messages came out?

Not sure when he put the suit out, but he pulled it as soon as he found out about the text messages. At least that is my understanding. Him pulling the libel suit just tells everyone that he definitely knew and he knows he's screwed. Kind of incriminated himself to the public by pulling it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on February 03, 2017, 04:19:58 PM
Not only is he a piece of crap who did all of it, but he is a piece of crap who would rather lie his ass off than even pretend to be contrite. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TheHamburglar on February 03, 2017, 06:11:55 PM
Not only is he a piece of crap who did all of it, but he is a piece of crap who would rather lie his ass off than even pretend to be contrite.

Lance Armstrong but with covering up other's rapes and assaults.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: TheHamburglar on February 03, 2017, 06:15:50 PM
So I guess Briles filed a libel suit and then quickly dismissed it right before the text messages came out?

Not sure when he put the suit out, but he pulled it as soon as he found out about the text messages. At least that is my understanding. Him pulling the libel suit just tells everyone that he definitely knew and he knows he's screwed. Kind of incriminated himself to the public by pulling it.

Could this have quickly gotten into level of frivolous where the defendants could have counter-sued Briles for their legal fees?  Is that a thing?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KST8FAN on February 06, 2017, 10:16:26 PM
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html)

Tom
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 07, 2017, 07:43:46 AM
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html)

Tom

at the very least he should be commended for trying to pay for it, that's a big step forward for baylor FB
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on February 07, 2017, 08:41:54 AM
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html)

Tom

at the very least he should be commended for trying to pay for it, that's a big step forward for baylor FB

So, just to be straight, at Baylor, you can rape a girl and not be charged with a crime.  You try to hire a prostitute and are charged with a crime.

So, what happens if you actually have consensual sex without money changing hands?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 07, 2017, 08:54:26 AM
So, what happens if you actually have consensual sex without money changing hands?

baptists don't allow that
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on February 07, 2017, 09:51:19 AM
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html)

Tom

You keep thinking we've heard all the dirt there is about Baylor, and they keep producing more.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 07, 2017, 10:07:37 AM
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/police/baylor-strength-coach-arrested-on-prostitution-charge/article_4388ab9e-daf5-5704-b83d-f61a1e7740c3.html)

Tom

You keep thinking we've heard all the dirt there is about Baylor, and they keep producing more.

There is plenty more.  We haven't even touched the steroid abuse and have just hit the tip of the iceberg on dirty recruiting.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 07, 2017, 10:18:14 AM
Nobody cares about steroids and dirty recruiting, jfc.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 07, 2017, 10:42:31 AM
Nobody cares about steroids and dirty recruiting, jfc.

Nobody?  Not even the NCAA?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ew2x4 on February 07, 2017, 10:48:47 AM
I care about dirty recruiting if it affects us. Which it probably does.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 07, 2017, 10:53:21 AM
You guys think the rapes and assaults are bad? Well, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Turns out players were doing roids and getting cash from boosters, too.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 07, 2017, 10:58:04 AM
hey Steffy and I are just showing off at this point
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on February 07, 2017, 12:51:41 PM
So, what happens if you actually have consensual sex without money changing hands?

baptists don't allow that

My bad.  Forgot about the whole "baptist" thing.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AbeFroman on February 07, 2017, 01:16:09 PM
I think it's pretty fitting dax started this thread.  :flush:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2017, 01:18:59 PM
I think it's pretty fitting dax started this thread.  :flush:

Dates are your friend Abe.   Context and dates, give it a try sometime.

I will say though, friend.   You are tremendously butthurt lately, friend.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AbeFroman on February 07, 2017, 01:25:35 PM
Hindisght is a big part of this, but kinda shows how well you are at reading people. Nobody expected 50+ rape coverups but in 2013 it was hard not to think there was something going on that would eventually come out.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 07, 2017, 01:29:30 PM
Hindisght is a big part of this, but kinda shows how well you are at reading people. Nobody expected 50+ rape coverups but in 2013 it was hard not to think there was something going on that would eventually come out.

In 2013, it was easy to imagine something like recruiting violations. It is easy to imagine recruiting violations at every highly successful football program, really. I don't think anyone believed there was some sort of massive coverup involving the university and the Waco PD to keep Baylor football winning, though.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2017, 01:30:10 PM
Hindisght is a big part of this, but kinda shows how well you are at reading people. Nobody expected 50+ rape coverups but in 2013 it was hard not to think there was something going on that would eventually come out.

Ah, Abe lots of people thought there was "something going on" at K-State during Snyder 1.0 (and on some levels they were right, lots of MCMW, but outside of one incident, nothing on the level of Baylor, and no real cover-ups because K-State got a lot of immediate ridicule on several issues).

So yeah:  Hindsight



Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 07, 2017, 01:34:22 PM
http://www.baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=320548&s=5c6715c5898baf1bbfc1c0a12e392091
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on February 07, 2017, 01:55:02 PM
It's time to remove them from the conference. Welcome back, Nebraska
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on February 07, 2017, 02:07:30 PM
Since prostitution guy is under the new watch, should the title of the thread be updated?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 07, 2017, 03:07:15 PM
You guys think the rapes and assaults are bad? Well, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Turns out players were doing roids and getting cash from boosters, too.

Man you are stupid.  Nobody said that roids and cash are as bad as rapes and assaults.  I just said there is more dirt to come.  Cash and roids definitely qualify as "dirt."
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 07, 2017, 03:10:18 PM
hey Steffy and I are just showing off at this point

I know.  Now it is "Well, hell, everybody probably saw this coming in 2013."

No, everybody didn't.  Just Stone and I.  In 2013 everybody was talking like "I wish we had Briles" and "damn those uniforms are so sick"
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 07, 2017, 03:22:53 PM
and I said "I don't want the dad from the original Red Dawn as my coach....he is up to something."
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2017, 04:47:38 PM
"He is up to something" doesn't match with "He covered up all kinds of rapes" when discussing football coaches in most situations.

Little insider tip:  Everybody is "up to something" (but probably not colluding with administration and local police to cover up rape . . . well, maybe one school is, but . . . ).

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2017, 03:17:35 AM
hey Steffy and I are just showing off at this point

Maybe you can but steffy has been talking about steroids and recruiting violations for three years. Pretty safe to assume that there were recruiting violations given hostesses were encouraged to bone 'cruits. But was anyone actually giving push back to the thought of Baylor being dirty?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: EMAWican on February 08, 2017, 09:54:03 AM
That's it?

https://twitter.com/Big12Conference/status/829344148620791808
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on February 08, 2017, 10:05:31 AM
Would it be plausible that Baylor withdrew from the conference?  I know they're not at the Nebraska or KU level of delusional self-importance, but they're damn close.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 10:15:50 AM
Would it be plausible that Baylor withdrew from the conference?  I know they're not at the Nebraska or KU level of delusional self-importance, but they're damn close.

No, they would have to find another conference that wants them first.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2017, 10:18:37 AM
What the hell do you mean by "that's it?" This was unprecedented action taken no only by the Big 12 but any major conference.

I also can't believe how many of you are seriously discussing three conference kicking Baylor out. I what way does that benefit the conference at all?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2017, 10:25:18 AM
Weak response, but I expected even less.

No one in power really gives a crap about the crimes and ethical implications.  This is just about "appropriate public response."
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 10:29:39 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2017/02/08/big-12-withholding-revenue-baylor-review-title-ix-changes/97639228/

Quote
The money will be placed into escrow and eventually returned to Baylor, pending the results of the review.

So they don't really lose anything, then?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 10:30:24 AM
What the hell do you mean by "that's it?" This was unprecedented action taken no only by the Big 12 but any major conference.

I also can't believe how many of you are seriously discussing three conference kicking Baylor out. I what way does that benefit the conference at all?

does it benefit the b12 financially by punishing baylor?  meh, the b12 will be just fine without their lying and cheating asses.  we can find any number of schools who can succeed when ignoring criminal and ncaa bylaws

booting them would show that the conference takes pride in its member institutions and doesn't support the illegal (ncaa) actions of its members and when a certain member commits such egregious actions such as have occurred at baylor, that the conference is bigger than one rogue member

doing nothing supports baylor's actions and this 25% revenue thing is a joke

"hey baylor, we know you earned this money by raping and LOIC'ing your ass off so you can't have the money that those actions generated.  instead, we will take the money that those actions generated.  thanks, brah."

ultimately, it's embarrassing to share a conference with them but this move really cements what's most important
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 10:32:18 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 10:32:37 AM
What the hell do you mean by "that's it?" This was unprecedented action taken no only by the Big 12 but any major conference.

I also can't believe how many of you are seriously discussing three conference kicking Baylor out. I what way does that benefit the conference at all?

does it benefit the b12 financially by punishing baylor?  meh, the b12 will be just fine without their lying and cheating asses.  we can find any number of schools who can succeed when ignoring criminal and ncaa bylaws

booting them would show that the conference takes pride in its member institutions and doesn't support the illegal (ncaa) actions of its members and when a certain member commits such egregious actions such as have occurred at baylor, that the conference is bigger than one rogue member

doing nothing supports baylor's actions and this 25% revenue thing is a joke

"hey baylor, we know you earned this money by raping and LOIC'ing your ass off so you can't have the money that those actions generated.  instead, we will take the money that those actions generated.  thanks, brah."

"Only until you implement Title IX like everyone else did back in 1972, though. Then we'll give you the money back."
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 10:34:17 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt. 

that's only if you're of the incorrect belief that there were a few parties involved with this and that they've been weeded out

the things that they're accused of don't happen without complicit involvement at all levels of the university
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 10:37:10 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt. 

that's only if you're of the incorrect belief that there were a few parties involved with this and that they've been weeded out

the things that they're accused of don't happen without complicit involvement at all levels of the university
well then *crazy thought, so stay with me here*, a third party investigation occurs to determine who was involved and who was not and punish those responsible.

:surprised:

or, you know, the conference could make a ham-handed, reactionary decision that would ultimately be detrimental to itself.  that's worked well in the past.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 10:38:13 AM
I don't think kicking Baylor out of the Big 12 would hurt us in any way. There is no shortage of programs on Baylor's level that would be willing to join the Big 12.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 10:46:00 AM
I don't think kicking Baylor out of the Big 12 would hurt us in any way. There is no shortage of programs on Baylor's level that would be willing to join the Big 12.
Yep.  No shortage of programs with 4 top 15 finishes and a Heisman winner in the last 5 seasons.  Can't walk 5 feet without tripping over a program like that willing to join the Big 12. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 10:47:43 AM
I don't think kicking Baylor out of the Big 12 would hurt us in any way. There is no shortage of programs on Baylor's level that would be willing to join the Big 12.
Yep.  No shortage of programs with 4 top 15 finishes and a Heisman winner in the last 5 seasons.  Can't walk 5 feet without tripping over a program like that willing to join the Big 12.

Briles is gone and Baylor supposedly has cleaned up their act. They will be better than they were before Briles (couldn't be worse), but they won't be competitive in the Big 12 for a long time.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: EMAWican on February 08, 2017, 10:52:32 AM
What the hell do you mean by "that's it?" This was unprecedented action taken no only by the Big 12 but any major conference.

I also can't believe how many of you are seriously discussing three conference kicking Baylor out. I what way does that benefit the conference at all?

The Big 12 has now set the precedent and it's weak and borderline meaningless.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 10:56:46 AM
I don't think kicking Baylor out of the Big 12 would hurt us in any way. There is no shortage of programs on Baylor's level that would be willing to join the Big 12.
Yep.  No shortage of programs with 4 top 15 finishes and a Heisman winner in the last 5 seasons.  Can't walk 5 feet without tripping over a program like that willing to join the Big 12.

Briles is gone and Baylor supposedly has cleaned up their act. They will be better than they were before Briles (couldn't be worse), but they won't be competitive in the Big 12 for a long time.
They have a legitimate head coach and a good recruiting class.  They'll be competitive.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 11:00:22 AM
I don't think kicking Baylor out of the Big 12 would hurt us in any way. There is no shortage of programs on Baylor's level that would be willing to join the Big 12.
Yep.  No shortage of programs with 4 top 15 finishes and a Heisman winner in the last 5 seasons.  Can't walk 5 feet without tripping over a program like that willing to join the Big 12.

Briles is gone and Baylor supposedly has cleaned up their act. They will be better than they were before Briles (couldn't be worse), but they won't be competitive in the Big 12 for a long time.
They have a legitimate head coach and a good recruiting class.  They'll be competitive.

We will see. I don't see them in the top 5 of the Big 12.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2017, 11:11:05 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 11:14:17 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.
I agree.  It doesn't make any sense for the conference to do anything.  But this conditional "punishment" is par for the course when it comes to Big 12 leadership deciding on whether or not to act.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 11:18:27 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

I think losing a lawsuit to Baylor would be worth it to be rid of them. I really don't like my alma mater being associated with them.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 11:22:42 AM
I don't think kicking Baylor out of the Big 12 would hurt us in any way. There is no shortage of programs on Baylor's level that would be willing to join the Big 12.
Yep.  No shortage of programs with 4 top 15 finishes and a Heisman winner in the last 5 seasons.  Can't walk 5 feet without tripping over a program like that willing to join the Big 12. 

easy to do when you cheat your  ass off and institute rape city usa rules
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on February 08, 2017, 11:33:34 AM
Should take all their money, they deserve nothing
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2017, 11:36:40 AM
The conference needs to sanction them with additional loss of rides, recruiting off campus etc. etc. 

Of course knowing Baylor, they'll just violate all that as well.

They're a rogue athletic program, a total throwback to the old SWC days.   All major schools use athletics to pump up their enrollment, applications etc. etc.  But this is clearly a case of a private school letting athletics run wild to pump up the enrollment of a school that costs $52K a year to attend. 



Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 11:37:49 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

the university benefits from the athletic department's actions both positively and negatively
kicking baylor out of the big 12 does more than punish the athletic department, it would severely cripple that cesspool of a school and that's appropriate punishment for what they've allowed to go on down there imo
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2017, 12:19:11 PM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

I think losing a lawsuit to Baylor would be worth it to be rid of them. I really don't like my alma mater being associated with them.

I'm going to assume that you're using hyperbole here. The conference losing money equates to the member institutions losing money. No one associates Baylor with Kansas State just as no one in the world thinks about the Big 10 or Illinois when you hear the name Jerry Sandusky.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2017, 12:24:48 PM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

the university benefits from the athletic department's actions both positively and negatively
kicking baylor out of the big 12 does more than punish the athletic department, it would severely cripple that cesspool of a school and that's appropriate punishment for what they've allowed to go on down there imo

You're still avoiding the point that the conference shouldn't be the entity that handles this. What you're proposing is akin to a guy in KCMO having an issue with chronic drunk driving then the city commission of KCMO deciding that guy can't drive in Kansas City anymore even though his license hasn't been revoked. That's a stunt.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on February 08, 2017, 12:48:28 PM
From what I've seen, I think the most appropriate thing to do would be to charge Briles with being an accessory after the fact to rape.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 12:57:02 PM
From what I've seen, I think the most appropriate thing to do would be to charge Briles with being an accessory after the fact to rape.

Also the Waco PD, Ken Starr, any assistant coaches that were complicit, the athletic director, etc.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2017, 01:14:41 PM
From what I've seen, I think the most appropriate thing to do would be to charge Briles with being an accessory after the fact to rape.

Also the Waco PD, Ken Starr, any assistant coaches that were complicit, the athletic director, etc.

I can get behind this but it looks like this runs real deep. Anyone who threatened an accuser with a violation of the honor code should be charged first.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 08, 2017, 02:01:35 PM
I don't usually agree with Stephen A. Smith, but he hit the nail on the head yesterday when he said that the most effective punishment would be for parents to stop sending their kids to Baylor. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2017, 03:16:47 PM
The only way Baylor is getting kicked out is if the Big 12 magically ends up with 13, 15, or 17 teams someday (so, never)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 03:26:09 PM
I don't usually agree with Stephen A. Smith, but he hit the nail on the head yesterday when he said that the most effective punishment would be for parents to stop sending their kids to Baylor. 
that will happen as soon as the prospective students don't have a team to cheer for
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 03:32:08 PM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

the university benefits from the athletic department's actions both positively and negatively
kicking baylor out of the big 12 does more than punish the athletic department, it would severely cripple that cesspool of a school and that's appropriate punishment for what they've allowed to go on down there imo

You're still avoiding the point that the conference shouldn't be the entity that handles this. What you're proposing is akin to a guy in KCMO having an issue with chronic drunk driving then the city commission of KCMO deciding that guy can't drive in Kansas City anymore even though his license hasn't been revoked. That's a stunt.

the conference doesn't have to be the only entity to deal with it but they certainly have the option of being one of the entities to deal with it

i don't like your dui example but if a sales guy at your office who was a real revenue producer for your company continually did things that embarrassed your company and its brand, he would be shown the door

what they've done puts into the question what's important to the b12 and while we all know it's possible to operate within gray areas, this is gross negligence and does make the other schools who define who and what this conference is look bad
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 08, 2017, 04:28:34 PM
I really don't like the standard being set by "oh now you're just punishing those who arent even responsible."
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 04:30:07 PM
I really don't like the standard being set by "oh now you're just punishing those who arent even responsible."
Yes. The thought of limiting the punishment to only those responsible.  What a frightening standard.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 04:34:08 PM
The school was ultimately responsible.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 04:36:02 PM
The school was ultimately responsible.
When you say "the school" do you mean, like, the administration?  the buildings themselves? 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 04:43:16 PM
The school was ultimately responsible.
When you say "the school" do you mean, like, the administration?  the buildings themselves?

The institution.

Also, it's easy to pretend that everyone responsible is gone, but sadly that is not the case.

https://www.change.org/p/a-call-for-the-resignation-of-bethany-mccraw-and-reagan-ramsower

It's so much more than the football coaching staff, the athletics director, and the university president. Baylor shouldn't have a football program. Penn State shouldn't, either.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 04:49:18 PM
The school was ultimately responsible.
When you say "the school" do you mean, like, the administration?  the buildings themselves?

The institution.

Also, it's easy to pretend that everyone responsible is gone, but sadly that is not the case.

https://www.change.org/p/a-call-for-the-resignation-of-bethany-mccraw-and-reagan-ramsower

It's so much more than the football coaching staff, the athletics director, and the university president. Baylor shouldn't have a football program. Penn State shouldn't, either.
oh okay.  the institution.  the head coach, athletic director, or university president, aren't "ultimately responsible."   rather, the buck stops at "the institution."  got it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DQ12 on February 08, 2017, 04:53:53 PM
the institution really should have known better.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 04:54:36 PM
The school was ultimately responsible.
When you say "the school" do you mean, like, the administration?  the buildings themselves?

The institution.

Also, it's easy to pretend that everyone responsible is gone, but sadly that is not the case.

https://www.change.org/p/a-call-for-the-resignation-of-bethany-mccraw-and-reagan-ramsower

It's so much more than the football coaching staff, the athletics director, and the university president. Baylor shouldn't have a football program. Penn State shouldn't, either.
oh okay.  the institution.  the head coach, athletic director, or university president, aren't "ultimately responsible."   rather, the buck stops at "the institution."  got it.

Yes. That includes all regents, donors, faculty, students, etc. Everything. Anyone who supports the rape-enablers with time and money is in some way complicit.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TheHamburglar on February 08, 2017, 04:59:50 PM
I'd be happy if the Big12 forced Baylor to find the booster that made the "If you mention the mission of the university one more time I'm going the puke...I was promised a national championship" comment then forced the university to disassociate itself from that person.

Those are the people responsible for this that are still a part of the university.

That said, I have a feeling these lawsuits are going to be a pretty big monetary penalty for the university. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2017, 05:01:53 PM
I'd be happy if the Big12 forced Baylor to find the booster that made the "If you mention the mission of the university one time I'm going the puke...I was promised a national championship" comment and force the university to disassociate itself from that person.

They could just kick them out. Then that person would freely disassociate himself from Baylor. All of the people wearing #CAB shirts all year would, too.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on February 08, 2017, 05:09:33 PM
https://twitter.com/ChuckCarltonDMN/status/829357219716136960

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2017, 06:12:15 PM
https://twitter.com/ChuckCarltonDMN/status/829357219716136960

Yep, because private schools commingle the eff out of athletic department finances with other crap in the back office. 

That's why it's a joke. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2017, 06:37:39 PM
https://twitter.com/ChuckCarltonDMN/status/829357219716136960

Yep, because private schools commingle the eff out of athletic department finances with other crap in the back office. 

That's why it's a joke. 

the sanctions wouldn't materially impact any b12 school
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2017, 06:38:11 PM
https://twitter.com/ChuckCarltonDMN/status/829357219716136960

Yep, because private schools commingle the eff out of athletic department finances with other crap in the back office. 

That's why it's a joke. 

the sanctions wouldn't materially impact any b12 school

Oh
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on February 08, 2017, 09:33:33 PM
The Baylor fans are ultimately responsible...punish them.  :Carl:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on February 08, 2017, 11:11:20 PM
I wonder why the authorities didn't just temporarily fine BTK instead of putting him in prison. I mean, his family, church, neighbors, they were all affected by his punishment and they didn't do anything.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2017, 07:35:37 AM
I wonder why the authorities didn't just temporarily fine BTK instead of putting him in prison. I mean, his family, church, neighbors, they were all affected by his punishment and they didn't do anything.

Exactly.  Just hold that money off to the side, and if he goes like 6-12 months without any new issues, and attends some counseling, give the money back to him.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2017, 08:23:17 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

I think losing a lawsuit to Baylor would be worth it to be rid of them. I really don't like my alma mater being associated with them.

I'm going to assume that you're using hyperbole here. The conference losing money equates to the member institutions losing money. No one associates Baylor with Kansas State just as no one in the world thinks about the Big 10 or Illinois when you hear the name Jerry Sandusky.

For me, it's not about what others think or equate. I really don't want to play athletics against Baylor anymore. They are not good enough for us.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 09, 2017, 08:56:32 AM
not really a good analogy either considering the punishment that was given to penn state

that issue was addressed and dealt with which is unlike the baylor situ
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 09, 2017, 09:26:59 AM
kicking Baylor out of the conference only punishes innocent parties at this point.  doing it would be nothing more than a silly PR stunt.

Exactly. Baylor would also sue the crap out of the conference given that entity has no grounds for kicking them out for what is alleged here.

'clams rightly points out that the problem is a university problem but then calls for an athletic entity to deal with it, that makes no sense. Frankly the State of Texas, federal government, or some other body that governs or licenses the university should be stepping in here.

I think losing a lawsuit to Baylor would be worth it to be rid of them. I really don't like my alma mater being associated with them.

I'm going to assume that you're using hyperbole here. The conference losing money equates to the member institutions losing money. No one associates Baylor with Kansas State just as no one in the world thinks about the Big 10 or Illinois when you hear the name Jerry Sandusky.

For me, it's not about what others think or equate. I really don't want to play athletics against Baylor anymore. They are not good enough for us.

This.  And, if you sleep with dogs long enough, you will eventually get fleas.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2017, 09:35:54 AM
not really a good analogy either considering the punishment that was given to penn state

that issue was addressed and dealt with which is unlike the baylor situ

You mean the punishment that was rescinded because the NCAA didn't want to get sued, that punishment? The NCAA had to walk back punishing a university that enabled a chronic child rapist who did his crimes in the football facility. There are university officials facing criminal charges over this and the NCAA couldn't adequately punish them, but you guys want the Big 12 to stick their necks out :lol:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 09, 2017, 12:01:16 PM
not really a good analogy either considering the punishment that was given to penn state

that issue was addressed and dealt with which is unlike the baylor situ

You mean the punishment that was rescinded because the NCAA didn't want to get sued, that punishment? The NCAA had to walk back punishing a university that enabled a chronic child rapist who did his crimes in the football facility. There are university officials facing criminal charges over this and the NCAA couldn't adequately punish them, but you guys want the Big 12 to stick their necks out :lol:

yes that punishment.  at least they acknowledged the rough ridin' problem and addressed it.  sure, much of it was rescinded but they were judged and punished which is a million times more than any entity has done to address the situation at baylor.

look- you've gone so far and i know you aren't coming off the ledge on this one but surely you aren't so myopic that you think that penn state would sue the ncaa.  because i refuse to believe that you think that, unless it's just a prank you're pulling?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on February 09, 2017, 01:29:25 PM
not really a good analogy either considering the punishment that was given to penn state

that issue was addressed and dealt with which is unlike the baylor situ

You mean the punishment that was rescinded because the NCAA didn't want to get sued .... the NCAA couldn't adequately punish them, but you guys want the Big 12 to stick their necks out :lol:

yes that punishment.  at least they acknowledged the rough ridin' problem and addressed it.  sure, much of it was rescinded but they were judged and punished which is a million times more than any entity has done to address the situation at baylor.

look- you've gone so far and i know you aren't coming off the ledge on this one but surely you aren't so myopic that you think that penn state would sue the ncaa.  because i refuse to believe that you think that, unless it's just a prank you're pulling?

So, the NCAA just walked back the sanctions because they felt it was the "right thing to do?"  Not sure where you are coming from on this one.  Something had to motivate their action.

In addition, it still stands that the NCAA walked back on PSU.  If that is the case, why go bigger as a conference against Baylor.  I guess you can believe that BU will take the moral high ground (for once) and not do something utterly slimy (for once) and not sue the livin' crap out of the conference and its member institutions for over-stepping their authority concerning an issue which they have no legal standing to pursue.

I mean, I guess you can believe that about Baylor.  However, their past record would indicate rather strongly that it might not be the best route to put your trust in.  Sort of like ol' Joe Stalin trusting Hitler over the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact.  All indications were that Adolf had issues with living up to his word when it came to international agreements, sort of like BU has an issue when it comes to taking responsibility when it comes to the safety and well-being of its non-football playing students.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2017, 01:31:08 PM
You guys act like Baylor winning a lawsuit against the Big 12 would be the end of the world. I don't really care what sort of severance package they end up with as long as they are gone.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on February 09, 2017, 01:39:33 PM
you do realize that a judge laughed at the attemped lawsuit that penn state filed, don't you?

the sanctions weren't reduced because the ncaa was scared of a bullshit lawsuit from one of its members who essentially themselves give the ncaa full reign over
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on February 09, 2017, 11:33:59 PM
NCAA sanctions are stupid. Real people were hurt, real people should be prosecuted.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2017, 09:46:52 AM
I don't want Baylor kicked out.  Every conference needs a heel
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on February 22, 2017, 03:50:54 PM
I guess this goes here.  Apparently, Texas is going to try and pass a ton of laws to deal with the rape problem on campuses, with specifics to deal with Baylor and its special issues.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/higher-education/2017/02/21/school-staffcould-fined-jailed-aggressive-push-fight-campus-rape-spurred-baylor-scandal (http://www.dallasnews.com/news/higher-education/2017/02/21/school-staffcould-fined-jailed-aggressive-push-fight-campus-rape-spurred-baylor-scandal)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 25, 2017, 06:55:34 PM
 :sdeek:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/baylor-womens-coach-says-parents-concerned-about-sexual-assault-scandal-should-be-knocked-right-in-the-face-002940857.html
Baylor women's coach has strong words for parents concerned about sexual assault scandal
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 25, 2017, 07:21:20 PM
:sdeek:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/baylor-womens-coach-says-parents-concerned-about-sexual-assault-scandal-should-be-knocked-right-in-the-face-002940857.html
Baylor women's coach has strong words for parents concerned about sexual assault scandal

It's a cult.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 26, 2017, 09:27:55 AM
She is just saying what they all think.  Joe did nothing wrong
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on February 27, 2017, 09:18:48 AM
Knock them right in the facey!
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TheHamburglar on February 27, 2017, 09:32:24 AM
Everyone is mad about her "knock them in the face" comment, but her dismissive "this happens everywhere to the same degree" comment was 100 times worse. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Joker on February 27, 2017, 09:34:38 AM
Quote
“I work here every day. I’m in the know, and I’m tired of hearing it. This is a great institution. The problems we have at Baylor are no different than the problems at any other school in America, period. Move on. Find another story to write.

Gotta love the "well, everyone else is raping people, too!!" argument.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 27, 2017, 09:44:47 AM
Everyone is mad about her "knock them in the face" comment, but her dismissive "this happens everywhere to the same degree" comment was 100 times worse.

I'm not sure about that.  All colleges use the "everyone is doing it" excuse.  Good lord every Karl in my office was saying that for the past month about their runaway basketball program.  I think her saying you should beat up people who may not want their daughters at rape U is pretty over the top.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: TheHamburglar on February 27, 2017, 10:05:04 AM
Everyone is mad about her "knock them in the face" comment, but her dismissive "this happens everywhere to the same degree" comment was 100 times worse.

I'm not sure about that.  All colleges use the "everyone is doing it" excuse.  Good lord every Karl in my office was saying that for the past month about their runaway basketball program.  I think her saying you should beat up people who may not want their daughters at rape U is pretty over the top.

Her "it's happening everywhere else" comment was pre-meditated and the purpose of her making comments.  I think her "knock'em in the face" comment was spur of the moment and nothing more than a "knock some sense into 'em" saying.  She didn't really mean punch them.  She really did mean and believe this type of stuff happens everywhere and we need to move on.  She's saying this when within the last month it's come out a female team coach, and colleague of hers, went up the football coach saying a player of their's reported being sexually assaulted by football players, with a list of player names, and the head FB coach responded with "what was she doing with those guys, those are some bad dudes."  It's not so much she said it, it's that she said it in a way she actually believes at most schools if someone in her position reported a sexual assault to another coach, that coach's first reaction would be to ask "why was she with my bad dudes?"

She also played the "I'm a coach here, so I know more than you" card, which also shows she's rough ridin' nuts and brainwashed.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on February 27, 2017, 10:34:39 AM
NCAA needs to go one way or the other. If they aren't going to drop something serious on Waco, they should just go ahead and apologize for the death penalty on SMU.
Title: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 27, 2017, 10:37:48 AM
Yes, most all colleges are having similar issues.   

But nobody to my knowledge is having issues of the size, scope and depth of Baylor, with layers of cover up. 




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 27, 2017, 04:01:14 PM
All of what Mulkey said was terrible.  The mic drop at the end indicated how tone deaf she is and how f'n weird Baylor people are for thinking that was awesome.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 27, 2017, 05:54:59 PM
I hope Baylor goes down in a fire. Kim has obviously never been the victim of sexual assault. If she were a decent person she'd leave a school that has tolerated it. She's obviously a good coach. And could have any job she wanted. Instead she'd like to be awful and defend a rape culture. What an awful person.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: WildcatPower on February 27, 2017, 11:17:18 PM
All of what Mulkey said was terrible.  The mic drop at the end indicated how tone deaf she is and how f'n weird Baylor people are for thinking that was awesome.

And that's why I been wanting/hoping that the NCAA will drop the hammer on them on something worse than Penn State got. I'm talking about SMU levels type of a hammer.

Baylor's been acting arrogant and acting like they're invincible/untouchable.

Drop.

The.

rough ridin'.

Hammer.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on February 28, 2017, 06:14:26 AM
All of what Mulkey said was terrible.  The mic drop at the end indicated how tone deaf she is and how f'n weird Baylor people are for thinking that was awesome.

And that's why I been wanting/hoping that the NCAA will drop the hammer on them on something worse than Penn State got. I'm talking about SMU levels type of a hammer.

Baylor's been acting arrogant and acting like they're invincible/untouchable.

Drop.

The.

rough ridin'.

Hammer.
Not.

Going.

To.

Happen.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on February 28, 2017, 07:59:04 AM
Some Texas House Reps want the Texas Rangers to do a Criminal investigation now. Would love to see Briles and his ilk get rung up on at least some obstruction charges.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 28, 2017, 08:17:43 AM
Took me a second to realize it wasn't the baseball team.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Joker on February 28, 2017, 09:49:25 AM
Took me a second to realize it wasn't the baseball team.

Yeah, I had a brief WTF moment on that one.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18783018/lawmaker-asks-texas-rangers-investigate-baylor-sexual-assault-scandal (http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18783018/lawmaker-asks-texas-rangers-investigate-baylor-sexual-assault-scandal)

Quote
What has happened here in Waco, what happened at Baylor, is so far different from any university in the state," Gutierrez said.

Mulkey would disagree with Mr. Gutierrez regarding this statement.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on February 28, 2017, 10:36:45 PM
Since Mulkey is so "in the know," I wonder if she knew that Travon Blanchard had been beating the crap out of his girlfriend for a year?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on February 28, 2017, 10:50:57 PM
Also I never put together why the baseball team was named that.

http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/18774890/kim-mulkey-baylor-bears-expresses-regret-comment (http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/18774890/kim-mulkey-baylor-bears-expresses-regret-comment)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on March 02, 2017, 03:02:35 PM
http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/In-1-page-letter-Briles-denies-cover-up-calls-for-more-transparency-415231143.html
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on March 02, 2017, 03:23:37 PM
Also, I will admit the first tweet I saw with the Texas Rangers investigating the Baylor situation I had a thought of "why is the baseball team getting involved with this?"

:embarrassed:  :)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: cfbandyman on March 02, 2017, 04:05:28 PM
:lol: at all the Texas Rangers confusion. Pretty great. Understandable confusion.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 02, 2017, 05:16:04 PM
I mean no disrespect by making this observation, but Kim really does her self up quite well for games. Her press conference where she apologized is quite a different look.

Also good for her for this press conference.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 02, 2017, 05:16:42 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 02, 2017, 10:13:50 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.

Yeah, ya think.

She's the female version of Briles
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 02, 2017, 10:19:02 PM
Do you believe that she turned a blind eye to serial assault? She may have, I have no idea. I'm sure Prince Fielder will get to the bottom of it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T377A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Cire on March 03, 2017, 05:49:11 AM
Also, I will admit the first tweet I saw with the Texas Rangers investigating the Baylor situation I had a thought of "why is the baseball team getting involved with this?"

:embarrassed:  :)


Same
Asked myself why that would happen at least twice before realizing



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 03, 2017, 08:13:17 AM
Hopefully Chuck can fix this.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on March 03, 2017, 09:48:18 AM
I have a spring break story involving a Texas Ranger wherein a local drug dealer stole his service pistol.  I was questioned by the police over this and I yelled at them for knowing who the local drug dealer was but not having arrested him.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on March 03, 2017, 09:49:08 AM
What position did he play?  Oh wait....
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 03, 2017, 12:19:16 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.

The tears, red eyes, and bags are pretty decent indicators of her sincerity.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on March 03, 2017, 12:37:02 PM
Sincerity for the victims or sincerely concerned she might forever be associated with Briles and be black balled from getting another decent coaching gig?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 03, 2017, 12:43:02 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.

The tears, red eyes, and bags are pretty decent indicators of her sincerity.
It's the first time I've ever seen her without make up. It could have been just that is distraught about all of this or it could have been contrived. Or it could have been vanity and not wanting to be up there and make up streaming. I said good for her for making this press conference happen. But I am cynical about some things. Just making observations. Not accusing her of anything but giving a good presser with a great message. I'm sure it wasn't easy.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 03, 2017, 12:43:31 PM
Sincerity for the victims or sincerely concerned she might forever be associated with Briles and be black balled from getting another decent coaching gig?
Meh. She'll never leave Baylor.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 03, 2017, 01:14:16 PM
Sincerity for the victims or sincerely concerned she might forever be associated with Briles and be black balled from getting another decent coaching gig?
Meh. She'll never leave Baylor.

Correct, and if she ever did she wouldn't get black balled for that.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on March 03, 2017, 01:28:42 PM
One ugly women!
https://twitter.com/NickCanizales
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 03, 2017, 01:30:10 PM
Or an older women in a very stressful line of work.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on March 03, 2017, 01:44:50 PM
Or an older women in a very stressful line of work.
Not a good idea for your career to appear in public looking like that.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 03, 2017, 06:48:09 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.

The tears, red eyes, and bags are pretty decent indicators of her sincerity.

Given that you fell for Briles' act (remember when you said he was "adorable"?), maybe you should be pretty cautious about declaring someone from Baylor to be sincere.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 03, 2017, 09:08:29 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.

The tears, red eyes, and bags are pretty decent indicators of her sincerity.

Given that you fell for Briles' act (remember when you said he was "adorable"?), maybe you should be pretty cautious about declaring someone from Baylor to be sincere.

You're such a stupid crap bag, steffy.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 03, 2017, 09:34:37 PM
Steffy, don't include me in anything you quote again. Thank you
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 03, 2017, 10:16:26 PM
And of course that could have been on purpose to make her seem more sincere.

The tears, red eyes, and bags are pretty decent indicators of her sincerity.

Given that you fell for Briles' act (remember when you said he was "adorable"?), maybe you should be pretty cautious about declaring someone from Baylor to be sincere.

You're such a stupid crap bag, steffy.

Now, see, THAT was sincere.  I can tell by your tears and red eyes.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 03, 2017, 10:20:42 PM
The eff did I just say? I even said thank you. I don't know if I'm going to be able to get over this and move on with my life Steffy. :(
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 04, 2017, 10:40:20 AM
She's sincere because she got called out.  She gives zero Fuchs about what happened on campus.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 04, 2017, 03:52:40 PM
The eff did I just say? I even said thank you. I don't know if I'm going to be able to get over this and move on with my life Steffy. :(

I wasn't giving you crap SDK, it was MIR I was after.  There is history there...and he has thin skin (can dish but can't take).

I don't think Mulkey was being sincere, but peace anyway
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 04, 2017, 05:27:05 PM
The eff did I just say? I even said thank you. I don't know if I'm going to be able to get over this and move on with my life Steffy. :(

I wasn't giving you crap SDK, it was MIR I was after.  There is history there...and he has thin skin (can dish but can't take).

I don't think Mulkey was being sincere, but peace anyway
I was just funning around. :)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 04, 2017, 10:40:01 PM
The eff did I just say? I even said thank you. I don't know if I'm going to be able to get over this and move on with my life Steffy. :(

I wasn't giving you crap SDK, it was MIR I was after.  There is history there...and he has thin skin (can dish but can't take).

I don't think Mulkey was being sincere, but peace anyway
I was just funning around. :)

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 04, 2017, 10:43:12 PM
The eff did I just say? I even said thank you. I don't know if I'm going to be able to get over this and move on with my life Steffy. :(

I wasn't giving you crap SDK, it was MIR I was after.  There is history there...and he has thin skin (can dish but can't take).

I don't think Mulkey was being sincere, but peace anyway

 :lol: okay steffy, history pfft
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 05, 2017, 08:45:27 AM
The eff did I just say? I even said thank you. I don't know if I'm going to be able to get over this and move on with my life Steffy. :(

I wasn't giving you crap SDK, it was MIR I was after.  There is history there...and he has thin skin (can dish but can't take).

I don't think Mulkey was being sincere, but peace anyway
I was just funning around. :)

 :thumbs:
Don't take that as support of your post. I strongly disagree. But we all have an opportunity to share our thoughts here and I'm glad you get to share yours.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 05, 2017, 10:17:45 AM
eff her and her nonsense apology.  Saying things are being fixed?  Saying it's being fixed aggressively?  Come on, no one believes that.  To say you've failed the victims is one, and not recognized the continued failure from the institution and fan base shows how out of touch the cult is with reality. And to hedge with saying that people sending their kids to you know something is different is nothing different then her first statement minus the punch in the face part.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: kso_FAN on March 14, 2017, 07:42:55 AM
Welp.

https://twitter.com/kevinoncfb/status/841497892993015808
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Joker on March 14, 2017, 07:48:28 AM
Looks like they are trying to play it on the safe side this time.

Quote
An unnamed school official made sure to note that the texts “were sent to an individual who was an adult under Texas statute,” for what that’s worth.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/14/report-baylor-fires-football-staffer-for-sending-inappropriate-texts-to-teenager/?utm_content=buffer25967&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer (http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/14/report-baylor-fires-football-staffer-for-sending-inappropriate-texts-to-teenager/?utm_content=buffer25967&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 14, 2017, 08:23:44 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on March 14, 2017, 08:47:35 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

Are you suggesting a baptism by fire?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 14, 2017, 09:24:39 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

Are you suggesting a baptism by fire?

the opposite.  drain the area of oxygen.  no more fire. 
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on March 14, 2017, 09:50:06 AM
These people need answer to their Almighty God.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 14, 2017, 09:52:20 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

MIR is setting a record for the number of times being wrong in one thread.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MadCat on March 14, 2017, 10:53:19 AM
The place is infested with the spirits of the Branch Davidians.  You know, they are making a Stephen King series on Hulu called Castle Rock.  Someone could make a non-fiction version called 'Waco'.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 15, 2017, 12:55:10 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

Since Starr, McCaw, Briles and those other people were fired they certainly can't be accused of inaction.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 15, 2017, 01:00:46 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

MIR is setting a record for the number of times being wrong in one thread.

Interesting observation given you are basing this off of literally nothing having to do with anything that happened at Baylor. Two years ago I said Briles was adorable on Highly Questionable, didn't say a damn thing about what Baylor did or didn't do. Meanwhile you have been taking a victory lap but we're still waiting for the information about the extra benefits and the PEDs that you insisted Briles would get busted for.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 15, 2017, 07:21:29 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

Since Starr, McCaw, Briles and those other people were fired they certainly can't be accused of inaction.

no one accused anyone (except the ncaa) of inaction
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Steffy08 on March 15, 2017, 10:45:30 AM
this is why MiR's "the people responsible are all gone, you're punishing the wrong people" is wrong
what they have down there is a culture extending beyond a coaching staff or UP and it should be extinguished

Since Starr, McCaw, Briles and those other people were fired they certainly can't be accused of inaction.

no one accused anyone (except the ncaa) of inaction

MIR is one of the best at re-creating history.  I guess when you are wrong that much, and never admit it, you get lots of practice.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 15, 2017, 12:06:11 PM
well, MiR is right- baylor did fire some people.  i just don't think that they went far enough

the 2003 stuff was terrible and they were punished appropriately
today's ncaa has lost all power it once had and can't or won't do anything to punish programs who break the rules
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: catastrophe on March 15, 2017, 12:45:37 PM
The higher-ups at the NCAA know the NCAA is on the verge of becoming obsolete/irrelevant, so they are definitely trying to avoid rocking the boat.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 15, 2017, 12:47:03 PM
doing nothing further solidifies their worthlessness

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 15, 2017, 01:25:59 PM
doing nothing further solidifies their worthlessness
nailed it
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 15, 2017, 01:29:14 PM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 15, 2017, 11:01:18 PM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better.

You want them sanctioned because their fans are fans? There isn't a college fan base in the country that wouldn't behave like Penn State, Baylor, KU, or USC fans would. I know it's cool on here to not care but many college sports fans view their school/program with the same reverence as they would a family member. When an institution behaves reprehensibly there will always be a sector of fans that will deny and obfuscate, after all the school they've devoted most if not all of their lives to could never behave in such a way. These people will always be the most vocal because they have the strongest feelings about their school.

If something like this happened at K-State I would be furious if others attributed the viewpoint and behaviors of kstatefans.com posters to the culture of Kansas State University. It's a bullshit trick to lord some superiority complex over others. We have many people who would respond the exact same way.

I would like to know from you or anyone else what the NCAA can do to fix the issues at Baylor. I view the issue at Baylor as one of how women are viewed and treated, and I don't think that issue is at all unique to Baylor even though I do think the private and highly religious culture feeds the issue even more than at a public university. So if you view this as the issue tell me how the NCAA or the Big 12 Conference fixes that? My issue with nearly everyone posting about this is that what people really want is punishment and not something truly cultural changing that makes Baylor University a safer place for women.
Title: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Tobias on March 15, 2017, 11:23:30 PM
that last sentence is very spot-on and frankly bothers the hell out of me.  the underlying "oh good baylor will suck now" sentiment that MANY express under the guise of truly giving a crap is very gross
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 15, 2017, 11:47:54 PM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better.

You want them sanctioned because their fans are fans? There isn't a college fan base in the country that wouldn't behave like Penn State, Baylor, KU, or USC fans would. I know it's cool on here to not care but many college sports fans view their school/program with the same reverence as they would a family member. When an institution behaves reprehensibly there will always be a sector of fans that will deny and obfuscate, after all the school they've devoted most if not all of their lives to could never behave in such a way. These people will always be the most vocal because they have the strongest feelings about their school.

If something like this happened at K-State I would be furious if others attributed the viewpoint and behaviors of kstatefans.com posters to the culture of Kansas State University. It's a bullshit trick to lord some superiority complex over others. We have many people who would respond the exact same way.

I would like to know from you or anyone else what the NCAA can do to fix the issues at Baylor. I view the issue at Baylor as one of how women are viewed and treated, and I don't think that issue is at all unique to Baylor even though I do think the private and highly religious culture feeds the issue even more than at a public university. So if you view this as the issue tell me how the NCAA or the Big 12 Conference fixes that? My issue with nearly everyone posting about this is that what people really want is punishment and not something truly cultural changing that makes Baylor University a safer place for women.

A lot of what you're saying can fit with in the themes of my post.  First we've discussed how rules from the NCAA's arsenal.  It isn't a stretch to say Baylor had zero institutional control when it allowed it's football team to run rampant on the community.  I found this nice piece from George Mason on the "lack of institutional control" charge that shows it's pretty non-descriptive on what's required.  GM (http://www.gomason.com/sports/2011/1/6/205072664.aspx) And this from the NCAA.  NCAA (http://www.ncaa.org/enforcement/enforcement-process-charging)
I fully grant that the lack of institutional control has previously only been used in cases of recruiting and competitive advantage.  But this is the type of nightmare scenario where the NCAA must find ways to apply rules in new ways, and if needed stretch them to the last letter in the rule.  I would point to the NCAA's bylaws on ethical conduct (http://www.ncaa.org/governance/committees/committee-sportsmanship-and-ethical-conduct) and see there is room there to say that Baylor not just violated those rules but flaunted them for some time and obstructed necessary investigations.  The  Big 12 also has bylaws (page 43) (http://www.big12sports.com/fls/10410/pdfs/handbook/ConferenceHandbook.pdf) which could have the necessary elastic verbiage to confront this unprecedented issue.


I appreciate your comments that a lot of fan bases would react this way.  But I feel that many wouldn't, and most would not if they were given a better signal from the university Admin (regents, deans, faculty) to say this is wrong what has happened, and we will have an open and honest discussion about what happened.  I'm not sure where this lies between Baylor's reaction and Duke's reaction after the LAX scandal.  But what we know is that the personnel at Baylor conducted their investigations in darkness, hid evidence, sequestered reports, and created conspiracy theories impede legitimate investigations.  At that point we so altered what a fan bases reaction could be, it's hard to say how things could have played out if there was proper work done.  It reminds me of Trump fans believing anything that comes from his mouth instead of the hard work from the 4th estate and even our own intelligence services.  I agree there are certain cultural influences that make this an uphill battle.  But that work doesn't need to be hindered by men like Starr tearing up the tracks in front of the investigation's train. 

Finally I think every responsible party has failed the women of Baylor.  The justice system failed by not adequately investigating the team and punishing all involved.  The school is pretty obvious too.  The conference and the NCAA failed by not caring enough about the "amateur sportsmanship" which is supposed to be the bedrock of their organization.  After Penn State they should have included direct language about various types of abuse and made it black letter that your institution must help control these types of situations as well.  But they should have stepped in and stretched sportsmanship to include not raping the crap out of your fans.  If the school can't control a player then they shouldn't have that player.  If the school can't control a football team, they shouldn't have a football team.  With the issues at play, and the info that had to be out there, I have no qualms about players who didn't report these abuses losing a year to transfer out of the program.  Players directly involved with the attacks and cover ups should be done playing forfeiting their remaining eligibility.  Players who cooperate with an investigation can earn their status back by assisting in any investigations and completing any courses the title ix office deems necessary.  With Baylor covering this up at an institutional level it's clear they are not responsible enough an athletics department.  All of the administrators or coaches involved in the cover up should lose their jobs and be hit with a show cause.  I'm not sure if that even goes far enough and if a school like Baylor shouldn't just lose it's entire athletics program. Of course the outside players and coaches should be allowed to transfer without penalty of wait times. 
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on March 16, 2017, 12:27:31 AM
If KSU did this I would stop attending games of any sort. I hope there are Baylor fans that feel the same way.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 16, 2017, 06:33:30 AM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better.

You want them sanctioned because their fans are fans? There isn't a college fan base in the country that wouldn't behave like Penn State, Baylor, KU, or USC fans would. I know it's cool on here to not care but many college sports fans view their school/program with the same reverence as they would a family member. When an institution behaves reprehensibly there will always be a sector of fans that will deny and obfuscate, after all the school they've devoted most if not all of their lives to could never behave in such a way. These people will always be the most vocal because they have the strongest feelings about their school.

If something like this happened at K-State I would be furious if others attributed the viewpoint and behaviors of kstatefans.com posters to the culture of Kansas State University. It's a bullshit trick to lord some superiority complex over others. We have many people who would respond the exact same way.

I would like to know from you or anyone else what the NCAA can do to fix the issues at Baylor. I view the issue at Baylor as one of how women are viewed and treated, and I don't think that issue is at all unique to Baylor even though I do think the private and highly religious culture feeds the issue even more than at a public university. So if you view this as the issue tell me how the NCAA or the Big 12 Conference fixes that? My issue with nearly everyone posting about this is that what people really want is punishment and not something truly cultural changing that makes Baylor University a safer place for women.

It would appear that the folks at Baylor are unwilling to change so they needs some more forceful persuasion
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Missouriscribe on March 16, 2017, 07:13:16 AM
I think when the evidence is as damning that an institution would from the top down, allow that much widespread law-breaking, the death penalty would stop other universities from considering doing the same in the future. 

Otherwise, why wouldn't a school set up another situation like that?  How is Baylor not better off than they would have been?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2017, 07:47:09 AM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better.

You want them sanctioned because their fans are fans? There isn't a college fan base in the country that wouldn't behave like Penn State, Baylor, KU, or USC fans would. I know it's cool on here to not care but many college sports fans view their school/program with the same reverence as they would a family member. When an institution behaves reprehensibly there will always be a sector of fans that will deny and obfuscate, after all the school they've devoted most if not all of their lives to could never behave in such a way. These people will always be the most vocal because they have the strongest feelings about their school.

If something like this happened at K-State I would be furious if others attributed the viewpoint and behaviors of kstatefans.com posters to the culture of Kansas State University. It's a bullshit trick to lord some superiority complex over others. We have many people who would respond the exact same way.

I would like to know from you or anyone else what the NCAA can do to fix the issues at Baylor. I view the issue at Baylor as one of how women are viewed and treated, and I don't think that issue is at all unique to Baylor even though I do think the private and highly religious culture feeds the issue even more than at a public university. So if you view this as the issue tell me how the NCAA or the Big 12 Conference fixes that? My issue with nearly everyone posting about this is that what people really want is punishment and not something truly cultural changing that makes Baylor University a safer place for women.

It would appear that the folks at Baylor are unwilling to change so they needs some more forceful persuasion

I've never once said that they don't, I just don't think the NCAA or the Big 12 are the entities to do that. Their issue isn't limited to simply an athletics issue so why rely on an athletics institution to provide the remedy? edn is talking about a lack of institutional control and I don't disagree but again that hits at punishment, not reform.

I've said before that this should be handed by their accrediting organization and the state of Texas and the federal government if they are receiving funds from these agencies. FWIW the accrediting organization has chimed in and they did less than the Big 12 did.
http://www.educationdive.com/news/baylor-louisville-placed-on-accreditation-probation/431849/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/12/11/accreditation-group-gives-warning-to-baylor-university.html
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 16, 2017, 08:33:35 AM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better.

You want them sanctioned because their fans are fans? There isn't a college fan base in the country that wouldn't behave like Penn State, Baylor, KU, or USC fans would. I know it's cool on here to not care but many college sports fans view their school/program with the same reverence as they would a family member. When an institution behaves reprehensibly there will always be a sector of fans that will deny and obfuscate, after all the school they've devoted most if not all of their lives to could never behave in such a way. These people will always be the most vocal because they have the strongest feelings about their school.

If something like this happened at K-State I would be furious if others attributed the viewpoint and behaviors of kstatefans.com posters to the culture of Kansas State University. It's a bullshit trick to lord some superiority complex over others. We have many people who would respond the exact same way.

I would like to know from you or anyone else what the NCAA can do to fix the issues at Baylor. I view the issue at Baylor as one of how women are viewed and treated, and I don't think that issue is at all unique to Baylor even though I do think the private and highly religious culture feeds the issue even more than at a public university. So if you view this as the issue tell me how the NCAA or the Big 12 Conference fixes that? My issue with nearly everyone posting about this is that what people really want is punishment and not something truly cultural changing that makes Baylor University a safer place for women.

When this sort of thing happens at a school, they should just get rid of football (or whatever sport is the culprit) entirely. I would want K-State to eliminate football if the team were raping women left and right because the school thought the program was important enough that there shouldn't be consequences.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 0.42 on March 16, 2017, 09:44:08 AM
For me, it's clear that the powers in Baylor did no where near enough to fix the issues at Baylor.  Firing a lame duck coach, getting rid of his buddy AD, and removing the figure head Starr was "something" just for appearance sake.  If they had actually worked for real change they wouldn't have one of their premier program's coaches saying to fight people if they questioned the legitimate issues going on down there (and that super weird uncomfortable apology later).  You see their fan base is still attached to the culture they've created and it's not getting better.

You want them sanctioned because their fans are fans? There isn't a college fan base in the country that wouldn't behave like Penn State, Baylor, KU, or USC fans would. I know it's cool on here to not care but many college sports fans view their school/program with the same reverence as they would a family member. When an institution behaves reprehensibly there will always be a sector of fans that will deny and obfuscate, after all the school they've devoted most if not all of their lives to could never behave in such a way. These people will always be the most vocal because they have the strongest feelings about their school.

If something like this happened at K-State I would be furious if others attributed the viewpoint and behaviors of kstatefans.com posters to the culture of Kansas State University. It's a bullshit trick to lord some superiority complex over others. We have many people who would respond the exact same way.

I would like to know from you or anyone else what the NCAA can do to fix the issues at Baylor. I view the issue at Baylor as one of how women are viewed and treated, and I don't think that issue is at all unique to Baylor even though I do think the private and highly religious culture feeds the issue even more than at a public university. So if you view this as the issue tell me how the NCAA or the Big 12 Conference fixes that? My issue with nearly everyone posting about this is that what people really want is punishment and not something truly cultural changing that makes Baylor University a safer place for women.

It would appear that the folks at Baylor are unwilling to change so they needs some more forceful persuasion

I've never once said that they don't, I just don't think the NCAA or the Big 12 are the entities to do that. Their issue isn't limited to simply an athletics issue so why rely on an athletics institution to provide the remedy? edn is talking about a lack of institutional control and I don't disagree but again that hits at punishment, not reform.

I've said before that this should be handed by their accrediting organization and the state of Texas and the federal government if they are receiving funds from these agencies. FWIW the accrediting organization has chimed in and they did less than the Big 12 did.
http://www.educationdive.com/news/baylor-louisville-placed-on-accreditation-probation/431849/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/12/11/accreditation-group-gives-warning-to-baylor-university.html

SACS isn't gonna do crap. They never do. The state of Texas can't do that much because Baylor's private, not to mention our legislature is run by reactionary morons who are just as liable to blame the victim as they are to actually step up enforcement on Baylor. The feds aren't gonna do crap because Baylor's private + Trump doesn't give a eff about the welfare of women. So who exactly is supposed to police Baylor here? Because they sure as crap have demonstrated that they can't do it themselves. While I agree with you in that the narrative surrounding this conversation is gross and is not actually centered on making Waco a safer place for women, I think we can both agree that there's a serious cultural issue there that needs to be addressed. That's not gonna happen if any agency who could conceivably step in and force a change at Baylor keeps punting responsibility for enforcement to someone else.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 16, 2017, 09:44:41 AM
when winning at all costs becomes the priority of the university, you get rid of the incentive to win.  this isn't rocket science, good God.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on March 16, 2017, 10:22:42 AM
Take a portion of the 25% of funds being withheld and fund more positions either within Baylor, the Big 12, or each institution to help with title IX training and compliance.  While Baylor is far and away the most egregious offender, there is pretty clear evidence at KU, K-State and elsewhere that Universities either don't know enough or just aren't following the proper procedures.  Once Baylor does whatever they need to do to stop the funds from being withheld, the rest of the schools split the costs. 

^I think there is a minuscule chance of that happening because it may open the Big 12 to lawsuits that are currently contained to member institutions but I would like to see it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2017, 10:58:26 AM
when winning at all costs becomes the priority of the university, you get rid of the incentive to win.  this isn't rocket science, good God.

I'm starting to think that some of you aren't reading anything about what's happening there or you're just too stuck on your own point to see anything else. I just posted a link that stated 17 out of the last 125 reported incidences on their campus involves football players, yet you RATM and ChiCat are still looking for solutions within athletics. WTF does "winning at all costs" have to do with the other 90% of these cases? You keep mentioning football but refuse to acknowledge all those football decision makers are long gone. What about the other 90%, guys?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 16, 2017, 11:02:01 AM
Are the perpetrators of the other 90% of the cases getting charged with crimes, or is the school trying to cover those crimes up, too?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 16, 2017, 11:15:06 AM
Also, when a football team that composes 0.5% of the student population is involved in 14% of the reported incidences campus-wide, I think there is probably a pretty significant problem with that program.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2017, 11:15:33 AM
Are the perpetrators of the other 90% of the cases getting charged with crimes, or is the school trying to cover those crimes up, too?

The honor code permits accusers to be subjected to discipline.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2017, 11:17:43 AM
Also, when a football team that composes 0.5% of the student population is involved in 14% of the reported incidences campus-wide, I think there is probably a pretty significant problem with that program.

Not 14% 10% I'd be willing to bet that football players outpace the general student population on most campuses when it comes to assault, football culture.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 16, 2017, 11:18:12 AM
Also, when a football team that composes 0.5% of the student population is involved in 14% of the reported incidences campus-wide, I think there is probably a pretty significant problem with that program.

Not 14% 10% I'd be willing to bet that football players outpace the general student population on most campuses when it comes to assault, football culture.

17/125 is 14%. If a football player were 10 times more likely than a regular student to commit a crime, you would expect 5% of the crimes to be committed by them. The football players are 30 times more likely to be criminals at Baylor than the general student population.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 16, 2017, 11:22:01 AM
well i guess it's time to throw our hands up and conclude that there's just nothing we can do

and the focus on athletics, specifically football, on this football board, isn't so weird.  but if you want to deliver the message to the hell of a lot more than 17 families affected by football players actions that punishing the football program won't help fix their problem, go for it.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 16, 2017, 12:01:34 PM
MiR I think you're a bit off track with what people want.  I think many posters here have said the admin that covered these things up, including those who pushed honor code violations are part of a larger conspiracy to conceal a felony and should be criminally liable.  Yes Title IX offices should be involved for the other 90% of issues.  But when one specific body of schools citizens is directly responsible for 10%(!) of cases they should be smashed, same as if it were a frat raping the hell out of campus.  I don't recall your response to the SAE thread here, but wouldn't you support the frat being kick off campus/dissolved when they have repeated violations? 

Further I think that when a premiere face of your institution is given the death penalty that sends a clear message to johnny frat guy that if well recognized football player can't get away with it, he is probably going to get it too, and maybe worse since he doesn't have that football association for protection. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on March 16, 2017, 01:34:42 PM
MiR I think you're a bit off track with what people want.  I think many posters here have said the admin that covered these things up, including those who pushed honor code violations are part of a larger conspiracy to conceal a felony and should be criminally liable.  Yes Title IX offices should be involved for the other 90% of issues.  But when one specific body of schools citizens is directly responsible for 10%(!) of cases they should be smashed, same as if it were a frat raping the hell out of campus.  I don't recall your response to the SAE thread here, but wouldn't you support the frat being kick off campus/dissolved when they have repeated violations? 

Further I think that when a premiere face of your institution is given the death penalty that sends a clear message to johnny frat guy that if well recognized football player can't get away with it, he is probably going to get it too, and maybe worse since he doesn't have that football association for protection. 

yeah it's really weird.  he's accusing myself and others of getting lost on our point and yet i'm not sure he has one
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on March 16, 2017, 03:24:02 PM
Further I think that when a premiere face of your institution is given the death penalty that sends a clear message to johnny frat guy that if well recognized football player can't get away with it, he is probably going to get it too, and maybe worse since he doesn't have that football association for protection.

So, in other words, so if someone is deemed important or well known, they deserve a harsher punishment than some average person?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ChiComCat on March 16, 2017, 04:08:12 PM
when winning at all costs becomes the priority of the university, you get rid of the incentive to win.  this isn't rocket science, good God.

I'm starting to think that some of you aren't reading anything about what's happening there or you're just too stuck on your own point to see anything else. I just posted a link that stated 17 out of the last 125 reported incidences on their campus involves football players, yet you RATM and ChiCat are still looking for solutions within athletics. WTF does "winning at all costs" have to do with the other 90% of these cases? You keep mentioning football but refuse to acknowledge all those football decision makers are long gone. What about the other 90%, guys?

I don't think the problem can be solved completely within athletics.  The problem is definitely university wide as seen with K-State mishandling the problems at the frat houses.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2017, 05:07:09 PM
MiR I think you're a bit off track with what people want.  I think many posters here have said the admin that covered these things up, including those who pushed honor code violations are part of a larger conspiracy to conceal a felony and should be criminally liable.  Yes Title IX offices should be involved for the other 90% of issues.  But when one specific body of schools citizens is directly responsible for 10%(!) of cases they should be smashed, same as if it were a frat raping the hell out of campus.  I don't recall your response to the SAE thread here, but wouldn't you support the frat being kick off campus/dissolved when they have repeated violations? 

Further I think that when a premiere face of your institution is given the death penalty that sends a clear message to johnny frat guy that if well recognized football player can't get away with it, he is probably going to get it too, and maybe worse since he doesn't have that football association for protection.

I'm fine with your first paragraph, I completely disagree with the second one. Are you saying a football program being punished will prevent some dude from sexually assaulting some poor girl? I don't think measuring of choices and consequences generally come into the thought process of a rapist.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2017, 05:08:38 PM
when winning at all costs becomes the priority of the university, you get rid of the incentive to win.  this isn't rocket science, good God.

I'm starting to think that some of you aren't reading anything about what's happening there or you're just too stuck on your own point to see anything else. I just posted a link that stated 17 out of the last 125 reported incidences on their campus involves football players, yet you RATM and ChiCat are still looking for solutions within athletics. WTF does "winning at all costs" have to do with the other 90% of these cases? You keep mentioning football but refuse to acknowledge all those football decision makers are long gone. What about the other 90%, guys?

I don't think the problem can be solved completely within athletics.  The problem is definitely university wide as seen with K-State mishandling the problems at the frat houses.

My sincerest apology
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 17, 2017, 12:06:22 AM
So, in other words, so if someone is deemed important or well known, they deserve a harsher punishment than some average person?
Yes that is exactly what I posted.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 17, 2017, 12:16:59 AM
MiR I think you're a bit off track with what people want.  I think many posters here have said the admin that covered these things up, including those who pushed honor code violations are part of a larger conspiracy to conceal a felony and should be criminally liable.  Yes Title IX offices should be involved for the other 90% of issues.  But when one specific body of schools citizens is directly responsible for 10%(!) of cases they should be smashed, same as if it were a frat raping the hell out of campus.  I don't recall your response to the SAE thread here, but wouldn't you support the frat being kick off campus/dissolved when they have repeated violations? 

Further I think that when a premiere face of your institution is given the death penalty that sends a clear message to johnny frat guy that if well recognized football player can't get away with it, he is probably going to get it too, and maybe worse since he doesn't have that football association for protection.

I'm fine with your first paragraph, I completely disagree with the second one. Are you saying a football program being punished will prevent some dude from sexually assaulting some poor girl? I don't think measuring of choices and consequences generally come into the thought process of a rapist.

I'm not saying it's quite that linear.  I'm sure johnny frat guy isn't dropping roofies in drinks and then slapping them out of a girls hand when he remembers that a football player got kicked out of school and run by the local PD.  It's about creating a culture of no tolerance.  That actions have consequences (which they obviously didn't for a long time at BU) and that women will be respected, listened to, and crimes against them prosecuted where necessary.  This won't solve every issue, but the people who prey on women will get the message that their predilections will not be tolerated.  I really think that harsh punishments will help to deter the next Brock Turner eff face from going to *your* school if your school takes sexual assault seriously. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Joker on March 17, 2017, 09:38:38 AM
Of course sexual assault should be taken seriously.  But, to MIR's point, I don't think many sexual predators are considering punishments or even the campus culture.  It's a bit of a stretch to assume that predators would choose a particular school because they view the campus culture as more conducive to preying on women.

This is only one study, but I'm guessing one would find similar results elsewhere.

Quote
The findings suggest that 76% of active criminals and 89% of the most violent criminals either perceive no risk of apprehension or are incognizant of the likely punishments for their crimes.

http://www.businessinsider.com/do-criminals-think-about-getting-caught-before-committing-a-crime-2011-9 (http://www.businessinsider.com/do-criminals-think-about-getting-caught-before-committing-a-crime-2011-9)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Emo EMAW on March 17, 2017, 12:59:15 PM
We are talking about a culture that perceives winning as more important than anything else...that is dangerous. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: ednksu on March 17, 2017, 01:54:37 PM
Of course sexual assault should be taken seriously.  But, to MIR's point, I don't think many sexual predators are considering punishments or even the campus culture.  It's a bit of a stretch to assume that predators would choose a particular school because they view the campus culture as more conducive to preying on women.

This is only one study, but I'm guessing one would find similar results elsewhere.

Quote
The findings suggest that 76% of active criminals and 89% of the most violent criminals either perceive no risk of apprehension or are incognizant of the likely punishments for their crimes.

http://www.businessinsider.com/do-criminals-think-about-getting-caught-before-committing-a-crime-2011-9 (http://www.businessinsider.com/do-criminals-think-about-getting-caught-before-committing-a-crime-2011-9)

Using stats about "criminals" in a specific type of crime thread is pretty useless. 

Even stuff like this that broadly speaks about sexual violence isn't great. 
http://studenthealth.emory.edu/hp/respect_program/understanding_the_perpetrator.html
Men are more likely to commit sexual violence in communities where sexual violence goes unpunished. (National Sexual Violence Resource Center, 2004)
And that study is talking about a broad generalization about sexual violence/rape/honor codes/punishments across the world, not johnny frat boy.

But it's not hard to find some trends in how assaults occur, even if we don't get a great profile about the individual rapist.  Society tolerating it and not valuing a woman's complaints is key to allowing the culture to flourish.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Kat Kid on May 17, 2017, 03:16:41 PM
Burn it down.

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on May 17, 2017, 03:17:53 PM
How could a Christian based university let this happ............. wait never mind.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: That_Guy on May 17, 2017, 03:18:20 PM
So when is something actually going to happen to Baylor University for all this?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Gooch on May 17, 2017, 03:20:07 PM
NCAA wise never, unless it is self imposed. Monetarily they are going to pay through the nose from civil judgments.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on May 17, 2017, 03:39:56 PM
People really don't give a crap. I saw Ken Starr on the news the other day being interviewed about Trump and Comey. It was either Vice or ABC News. I wondered if they had any clue as to what he's been up to these days.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: yoga-like_abana on May 17, 2017, 04:55:53 PM
Burn it down.

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html)
not even surprising anymore  :frown:
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Tobias on May 17, 2017, 08:14:08 PM
god damn
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on May 17, 2017, 08:26:51 PM
People really don't give a crap. I saw Ken Starr on the news the other day being interviewed about Trump and Comey. It was either Vice or ABC News. I wondered if they had any clue as to what he's been up to these days.
We give a holla to our sister Baylor bears
gE cares if don't nobody else care
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: scottwildcat on May 17, 2017, 08:30:29 PM
So when is something actually going to happen to Baylor University for all this?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Never
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on May 17, 2017, 08:47:25 PM
Burn it down.

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html)

I remember hearing rumors about this last summer when everything was coming out. Heard at the time there might be video of it. Burn that school to the ground with all the people that let this happen.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 03, 2017, 01:59:13 PM
holy crap

http://deadspin.com/report-then-baylor-regent-calls-female-students-perve-1796577774
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Brock Landers on July 03, 2017, 02:26:29 PM
holy crap

http://deadspin.com/report-then-baylor-regent-calls-female-students-perve-1796577774

Neal "Buddy" Jones seems like he sucks.

If only those Perverted Little Tarts hadn't been drinking they wouldn't have been raped!   :flush:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: slackcat on July 03, 2017, 06:50:58 PM
A true shitass.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on July 03, 2017, 08:28:00 PM
holy crap

http://deadspin.com/report-then-baylor-regent-calls-female-students-perve-1796577774

Neal "Buddy" Jones seems like he sucks.

If only those Perverted Little Tarts hadn't been drinking they wouldn't have been raped!   :flush:

BSOP.  (Baylor Standard Operating Procedure)

Once again reminds me why I should hate Ann Richards, if for no other reason.  She used her leverage as governor to put BU in the conference when it formed, and kept TCU out.  No matter what issues I have with TCU, they have yet to show they can even approach to stoop to every day BSOP levels.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 03, 2017, 09:02:35 PM
If we absolutely had to take a private Texas school, I'd have preferred Rice.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: SdK on July 03, 2017, 09:31:23 PM
Rice is a good academic school.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: SkinnyBenny on July 04, 2017, 10:51:34 AM
70,000+ seat stade :love:
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 04, 2017, 01:09:39 PM
 Is it a church school because nty on those nuts
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 05, 2017, 08:13:37 AM
Is it a church school because nty on those nuts

nope
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: PurpleOil on July 05, 2017, 09:49:39 AM
Burn it down.

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html)

Yep, that school and the nut jobs that go there are a lost cause. They didn't belong in this conference back when it was formed and they damn sure don't belong in here now.

Seriously, out of all the colleges in Texas, why are we having to be associated with one that has trouble treating women as something other than property?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on July 05, 2017, 04:24:28 PM
Burn it down.

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html (http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/baylor-hit-with-th-title-ix-lawsuit-plaintiff-alleges-gang/article_1b391c59-1722-5532-9c3b-058b07850249.html)

Yep, that school and the nut jobs that go there are a lost cause. They didn't belong in this conference back when it was formed and they damn sure don't belong in here now.

Seriously, out of all the colleges in Texas, why are we having to be associated with one that has trouble treating women as something other than property?

Because their awful governor at the time would not politically allow UT and aTm to exit the SWC and join with the Big 8 without taking Baylor along.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on July 16, 2017, 12:10:19 PM
Not sure where to put this.  All I know, I am interested in the fact that Bill is writing a children's book.  I would be truly frightened to consider the subject of a children's book written by Briles. http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article161641323.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article161641323.html)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on July 16, 2017, 05:50:10 PM
"Row the Boat and Keep sawing Logs."  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fforum%2FSmileys%2FgoEMAW%2FLove.gif&hash=6c7aa3394b1a0751c9b06f770c85d7267881ee5e)
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on August 05, 2017, 05:37:30 PM
When you think you got away with it, but reality hits....

https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/893887440569589760
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 06, 2017, 09:32:02 AM
The worst thing is, after they completely sleazed out (again) they hire a guy who is generally regarded as a good dude. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: star seed 7 on August 06, 2017, 11:37:49 AM
hiring a good person is the worst part of the baylor scandal?
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pvegs on August 06, 2017, 12:17:37 PM
i didn't realize how fat he is. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: LeggoKatZ on August 06, 2017, 02:19:35 PM
i didn't realize how fat he is.

He also looks really short. 
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: DKmode500 on August 06, 2017, 07:23:44 PM
Not sure if serious, but that's not matt rhule.  :ROFL:. Assistant AD i think. Still hilarious video. His post getting laid out interview is a gem as well
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 07, 2017, 09:52:14 AM
hiring a good person is the worst part of the baylor scandal?

Poor choice of words.   It's what they do, tho.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: manpow5 on August 09, 2017, 01:09:21 PM
I don't think snyder is as holy as you all think! He's defacing government property!

https://www.diehards.com/kansas-state/bill-snyder-defacing-federal-property-autograph-kansas-state/amp
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 09, 2017, 01:12:45 PM
That's adorable.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Trim on August 09, 2017, 01:24:02 PM
That reminds me of when Frank had an ethical dilemma about signing something:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F05%2FIMG_0370.jpg&hash=1d76c4d8b9507a0de6fee5ba34f13f7fd65b5eef)
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: The Big Train on August 11, 2017, 12:45:07 PM
https://twitter.com/mwatkinstrib/status/896054373070929920
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 11, 2017, 01:48:37 PM
uh oh
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: deputy dawg on August 15, 2017, 12:03:12 PM
Bastards apparently managed to avoid drug testing for football players on top of everything else:
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/20342799/baylor-bears-avoided-random-drug-testing-according-book
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: pissclams on August 15, 2017, 01:16:38 PM
i always thought pepper hamilton was a dude
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: 0.42 on August 15, 2017, 01:50:42 PM
Bastards apparently managed to avoid drug testing for football players on top of everything else:
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/20342799/baylor-bears-avoided-random-drug-testing-according-book

Meh, don't have a problem with this. Baylor can burn for everything else tho.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Big Sam on August 15, 2017, 06:49:32 PM
Mods, can we change this thread title to "Briles is a > Piece of hullabaloo than Snyder (and virtually every other coach in history)"?

Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Institutional Control on February 24, 2022, 02:30:59 PM
Art Briles is back in the game.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 24, 2022, 02:56:47 PM
Can we acknowledge that Briles is a sack of crap but also acknowledge that this is a good hire for Grambling?
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Institutional Control on February 24, 2022, 07:10:36 PM
Can we acknowledge that Briles is a sack of crap but also acknowledge that this is a good hire for Grambling?
Maybe best decision Hue has ever made.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: KITNfury on February 25, 2022, 12:03:04 AM
He would be a good hire for pretty much every school if he wasn't a sack of crap.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on February 26, 2022, 12:18:01 AM
I'll still stick with what I'll said a few years back when certain posters were worshiping him as a clever top P5 coach.  He's a cheating sack of crap who doesn't know how to win without cheating.  Pretty sure they booted his ass out his last coaching job, due to cheating.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 26, 2022, 01:40:56 AM
He's still never been accused of cheating by anyone who isn't a fan of another Big 12 or Texas based football program. You would think that with all the scrutiny he was under, if the investigations found he was cheating his ass off, that would have been uncovered.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on February 26, 2022, 01:38:42 PM
Yea that's why no college AD in this country and Canada would not hire him up till now.  BTW, Grambling is a small FCS college with a coach that was a supporter of Briles before he was fired from Baylor.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 26, 2022, 01:46:52 PM
He was cheating at his high school job.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on February 26, 2022, 02:02:19 PM
Once a low-life sack of crap, always a low-life sack of crap.
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on February 27, 2022, 12:04:46 PM
Guess Briles hiring isn't final:
                                                                                                                                                                                                       https://www.thenewsstar.com/story/sports/college/gsu/2022/02/26/art-briles-grambling-state-hiring-university-of-louisiana-system-board-offensive-coordinator/6939888001/
Title: Re: Briles > Snyder
Post by: MakeItRain on February 27, 2022, 08:53:48 PM
If they nix that hire it would be a pretty horrible look for the board of regents. That doesn't mean they won't, that particular bor has a history of screwing Grambling. They allowed a sexual misconduct scandal to fester at LSU for nearly a decade. They haven't done a damn thing about Will Wade. If they choose to punish Grambling football while allowing LSU to do whatever the eff they want, it will look very badly, but like I said, that hasn't stopped them before.
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: CHONGS on February 28, 2022, 05:50:19 PM
Welp he gone
Title: Re: Briles &gt; Snyder
Post by: Katpappy on February 28, 2022, 08:57:56 PM
Welp he gone

Yep, the first five minutes was enough for me:
https://youtu.be/75lVmJ7o8G0