Author Topic: The Trump Candidacy  (Read 434278 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1075 on: February 11, 2016, 03:46:14 PM »
Ugh, that sounds awful.  :frown:

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1076 on: February 11, 2016, 04:37:00 PM »
I'm not sure I'd prefer any of them to be prez, but I think the ideal for debates would be Hillary vs Bush with Trump as independent. Trump would destroy Hillary (or at least get a really great sound byte / reaction) and the Bush/Trump exchanges would be mildly entertaining as well.

Would practically guarantee a Clinton presidency tho. :frown:

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1077 on: February 11, 2016, 04:43:06 PM »
I'm not sure I'd prefer any of them to be prez, but I think the ideal for debates would be Hillary vs Bush with Trump as independent. Trump would destroy Hillary (or at least get a really great sound byte / reaction) and the Bush/Trump exchanges would be mildly entertaining as well.

Would practically guarantee a Clinton presidency tho. :frown:

If we're talking pure comedy gold I think you want a Bernie, Trump, Jeb stage. I am imagining Bernie calling Jeb low energy, Bush calling Bernie a white haired ninny muggins, and Trump just watching making one of his six default facial expressions.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1078 on: February 11, 2016, 04:51:24 PM »
I'm not sure I'd prefer any of them to be prez, but I think the ideal for debates would be Hillary vs Bush with Trump as independent. Trump would destroy Hillary (or at least get a really great sound byte / reaction) and the Bush/Trump exchanges would be mildly entertaining as well.

Would practically guarantee a Clinton presidency tho. :frown:

If we're talking pure comedy gold I think you want a Bernie, Trump, Jeb stage. I am imagining Bernie calling Jeb low energy, Bush calling Bernie a white haired ninny muggins, and Trump just watching making one of his six default facial expressions.

I don't think you appreciate how great Trump is with women.

Edit: in a Trump/Clinton debate you can expect at least one bathroom joke.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64040
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1079 on: February 11, 2016, 04:56:25 PM »
Ninny muggins? Is this code for jew?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30426
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1080 on: February 11, 2016, 05:00:04 PM »
Trump called Jeb low energy not Bernie
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1081 on: February 12, 2016, 08:38:56 AM »
Trump called Jeb low energy not Bernie

Exactly. That's why I think it would be hilarious for Bernie to pick up the standard and reinforce an already existing "doubt inducer" in the american voter's mind. Not to mention that Jeb can't make it through one thought with out stumbling over his words somewhere. Better yet, if you did a drinking game where you drank every time a word was mispronounced in a debate involving Bernie and Trump you'd be wasted 20 minutes in.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1082 on: February 12, 2016, 09:17:12 AM »
No surprise here. Trump isn't really a conservative.

http://www.youngcons.com/donald-trump-puts-blame-for-gop-betrayals-on-conservatives/

Quote
Shapiro is a rather sharp dude, and I think he’s on to something here.

I believe it’s critical for conservatives to stop equating “being angry, loud, and obnoxious,” with “being conservative.”

Anyone can be a loud, brash, Type-A personality. That’s not limited to the realm of politics or conservatism.

We need to be going after candidates who actually stand on principle, who know the Constitution, or at the very least, are able to articulate the conservative position on issues and why they agree or disagree.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1083 on: February 12, 2016, 09:26:38 AM »
I'm pretty convinced that 80% plus of Trump supporters are just republican trolls trying to get under democrats' skins.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1084 on: February 12, 2016, 10:10:52 AM »
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/698173115193372673

Our guy is out here just crushing the "true conservatives".

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1085 on: February 12, 2016, 10:15:07 AM »
No surprise here. Trump isn't really a conservative.

http://www.youngcons.com/donald-trump-puts-blame-for-gop-betrayals-on-conservatives/

Quote
Shapiro is a rather sharp dude, and I think he’s on to something here.

I believe it’s critical for conservatives to stop equating “being angry, loud, and obnoxious,” with “being conservative.”

Anyone can be a loud, brash, Type-A personality. That’s not limited to the realm of politics or conservatism.

We need to be going after candidates who actually stand on principle, who know the Constitution, or at the very least, are able to articulate the conservative position on issues and why they agree or disagree.

It's almost like working class Pubs are tired of voting against their own economic self interest. If you think your average white worker class voter cares what Buckley's idea of conservatism is, you're wrong.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1086 on: February 12, 2016, 10:16:36 AM »
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/698173115193372673

Our guy is out here just crushing the "true conservatives".

Those numbers seem way off. Real Clear Politics numbers:

Trump: 29.5%

Cruz: 21 %

Rubio: 17.8%

Carson: 7.8%

Bush: 4.3%

Kasich: 4%

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html


Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1087 on: February 12, 2016, 10:20:38 AM »
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/698173115193372673

Our guy is out here just crushing the "true conservatives".

Those numbers seem way off. Real Clear Politics numbers:

Trump: 29.5%

Cruz: 21 %

Rubio: 17.8%

Carson: 7.8%

Bush: 4.3%

Kasich: 4%

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html

Well it's the first poll taken after NH..so I'm assuming Trump got a very nice boost from that.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40526
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1088 on: February 12, 2016, 10:24:17 AM »
yarddog just struggles with anything poll related.  it's like a mental block with him.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1089 on: February 12, 2016, 11:29:49 AM »
yarddog just struggles with anything poll related.  it's like a mental block with him.

I struggle with the idea that calling 400 people on the phone allows you to deduce with exact numbers how hundreds of thousands of people will vote.

That being said Real Clear Politics and Five38 tend to have the most accurate polls.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1090 on: February 12, 2016, 11:33:03 AM »
yarddog just struggles with anything poll related.  it's like a mental block with him.

I struggle with the idea that calling 400 people on the phone allows you to deduce with exact numbers how hundreds of thousands of people will vote.

That being said Real Clear Politics and Five38 tend to have the most accurate polls.

The same 538 who has been claiming for 6 months that Trump couldn't get this far? 538 has good stuff sometimes, but Nate Silver's ability to predict things is vastly overblown.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40526
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1091 on: February 12, 2016, 12:01:03 PM »
yarddog just struggles with anything poll related.  it's like a mental block with him.

That being said Real Clear Politics and Five38 tend to have the most accurate polls.

neither rcp nor 538 conducts polls, for anyone following along at home.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40526
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1092 on: February 12, 2016, 12:01:56 PM »
The same 538 who has been claiming for 6 months that Trump couldn't get this far?

that's not an accurate account of 538's trump prediction history.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30426
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1093 on: February 12, 2016, 12:13:25 PM »
Looks like bush spending huge amounts of money in New Hampshire bought him some healthy increases in support.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64040
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1094 on: February 12, 2016, 12:29:01 PM »
I also enjoy the yard dog/poll saga, sys
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1095 on: February 12, 2016, 12:45:02 PM »
yarddog just struggles with anything poll related.  it's like a mental block with him.

That being said Real Clear Politics and Five38 tend to have the most accurate polls.

neither rcp nor 538 conducts polls, for anyone following along at home.

You are correct, I misspoke though you knew what I meant. Both provide information from existing polls as well as a grading system on which polls to trust. I trust the analysis that those two companies provide of the polls that are out there.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40526
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1096 on: February 12, 2016, 01:09:40 PM »
I trust the analysis that those two companies provide of the polls that are out there.

 :emawkid:
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14960
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1097 on: February 12, 2016, 01:40:09 PM »
LOL

I love yarddog.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1098 on: February 12, 2016, 01:56:38 PM »
The same 538 who has been claiming for 6 months that Trump couldn't get this far?

that's not an accurate account of 538's trump prediction history.

Yea you're probably right, I remember in the summer Nate gave Trump like a 5% chance. So I've always thought he undervalued Trump's chances. 

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Candidacy
« Reply #1099 on: February 12, 2016, 02:29:58 PM »
The same 538 who has been claiming for 6 months that Trump couldn't get this far?

that's not an accurate account of 538's trump prediction history.

Yea you're probably right, I remember in the summer Nate gave Trump like a 5% chance. So I've always thought he undervalued Trump's chances.

Was anyone last summer giving Trump a better than 5% chance?