Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4615795 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15845
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9400 on: April 17, 2014, 04:49:31 PM »
TownieCat- Royals/Yanks sunday June 8, lets go.

 :driving:
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19734
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9401 on: April 17, 2014, 05:06:20 PM »
midwest yankee fan is the worst fan

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9402 on: April 17, 2014, 06:12:19 PM »
midwest yankee fan is the worst fan

Any Midwest, never-lived-in-(insert city), (insert team) fan is the worst. 

The fact that your dad's mailman's childhood's friend's favorite team is the (insert team) doesn't count.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3755
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9403 on: April 17, 2014, 06:27:00 PM »
Cain to the DL :curse: Another reason I wish they'd kept Bonifacio. I don't trust Dyson playing full time

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9404 on: April 17, 2014, 06:50:49 PM »
Cain to the DL :curse: Another reason I wish they'd kept Bonifacio. I don't trust Dyson playing full time

An outfielder goes on the DL and we fill his roster spot with yet another pitcher (Justin Marks). So now we have 13 pitchers.  :dunno:

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19734
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9405 on: April 17, 2014, 07:04:02 PM »
from the foul ball last night?

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3755
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9406 on: April 17, 2014, 07:06:57 PM »
from the foul ball last night?

They're saying a groin strain

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9407 on: April 17, 2014, 07:08:59 PM »
Cain to the DL :curse: Another reason I wish they'd kept Bonifacio. I don't trust Dyson playing full time

An outfielder goes on the DL and we fill his roster spot with yet another pitcher (Justin Marks). So now we have 13 pitchers.  :dunno:

We already had Dyson on the roster.   :dunno:

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19734
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9408 on: April 17, 2014, 07:10:39 PM »
oh jfc lorenzo

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9409 on: April 17, 2014, 07:12:48 PM »
Alright.  Lead off triple. 

Who wants to wager we don't get him home?

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9410 on: April 17, 2014, 09:49:05 PM »
I'm purple down

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39127
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9411 on: April 18, 2014, 01:47:13 AM »


KKKKKKKKKKKK

 :Wha:

Offline slucat

  • GIRL ALERT, GIRL ALERT
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 706
  • This SLU, not the city
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9412 on: April 18, 2014, 08:29:58 AM »
TownieCat- Royals/Yanks sunday June 8, lets go.

I think I'll be there with four others...or atleast some game that series.  My mom and her BF are die hard yankee fans.

Your mom and mom's bf sure do sound like great people. I'll high five them if I see them in the parking lot.

I will respectfully disrespect the hell out of slumom and slumom's BF. Yankees fans are the worst.



Yankees fans are such dorks  :lol:





Life long NY'ers dorks...slumom BF is like 60+ and goes to a couple Yank games every year.  It is actually cost effective for them to come to KC for games, as opposed to going to the new stadium in NYC.  As a little bitty slu, I was in love with Reggie Jackson, I would chant his name at the TV even after he had retired (granted I was like 4).  Mr. October  :love:

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9413 on: April 18, 2014, 08:34:16 AM »
man guys were so good!
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9414 on: April 18, 2014, 08:36:33 AM »
Hottest team in baseball?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16749
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9415 on: April 18, 2014, 08:45:01 AM »
feels like we've had a power surge and we're still in last place in home runs, with the second to last team having twice as many as us

.500 though keep it rollin' :dance:

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9416 on: April 18, 2014, 08:49:52 AM »
winning! yeah!
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline PIPE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Always a pessimist
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9417 on: April 18, 2014, 09:53:19 AM »
SHould I have a little bit of excitement over the sweep of the Astros, or are they really bad and we just swept a really bad team :dunno:
Awaiting the inevitable KITN

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29144
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9418 on: April 18, 2014, 10:11:10 AM »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9419 on: April 18, 2014, 10:12:31 AM »
Who's going tonight? :Woot:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51456
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9420 on: April 18, 2014, 10:36:07 AM »
Who's going tonight? :Woot:

anyone who wants to.  stack of freebies at the gym

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9421 on: April 18, 2014, 10:49:37 AM »
SHould I have a little bit of excitement over the sweep of the Astros, or are they really bad and we just swept a really bad team :dunno:

Being a good team means not losing to shitty teams. Last year they lost 2 of 3 in Houston during their big slide in May.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39127
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9422 on: April 18, 2014, 10:49:53 AM »
so we obviously needed to sweep the astros, but how many of you actually thought we would get it done? i thought we would drop 1 for sure.

NOPE

 :excited:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39127
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9423 on: April 18, 2014, 11:36:40 AM »
CONFIDENCE RISING!  :drool:

1. Atlanta <-- get a dome you humid racists
2. Oakland <-- i like their color scheme BUT THAT'S ALL I LIKE ABOUT THEM!
3. Milwaukee <-- their airport has a "recombobulation area" lol
4. LA Dodgers <-- KIM CARNES ALERT!
5. St Louis <-- where's your soccer team? clap, clap, clapclapclap
6. NY Yankees <-- how good are they going to be this year? kind of a mystery team imo
7. Google <-- it must be so expensive and stressful to live there, i can't imagine going to a baseball game
8. Detroit <-- they will finish 2nd in the AL Central this year. boom roasted
9. Seattle <-- tough division, they will finish 4th
10. House of Cards <-- should be a great battle with ATL throughout the year for the NL East
11. LA Angels <-- the Orlando of California, gross
12. MinnesOta <-- they will finish 5th in the central this year
13. Pittsburgh <-- step back this year after a fantastic 2013
14. Cincinnati <-- do you guys realize how close Cincinnati is to Kentucky? man. it's basically in Kentucky
15. Colorado <-- great place to watch a game but the team will just never do anything, and terrible color scheme/logo
16. Chicago White Sox <-- boner alert, this team will finish 3rd in the AL Central
17. Texas <-- what happened to them? they only have 8 HRs so far
18. NY Mets <-- remember the King of Queens? why didn't he just divorce her? good grief
19. Toronto <-- the soccer team will average more fans per game than the Blue Jays this summer
20. The Wire <-- do you guys think Chris Davis is a huge piece of crap? i think he probably is
21. Kansas City <-- it's almost like every other team in the central pulled their pants down around their ankles and challenged the Royals to a race, and the Royals were like, hmmm maybe we should pull our pants down too to make it fair? idk
22. Racist Mascots <-- 4th in the AL central, gtfoomf with your clouds and rust belt racist mascot hats
23. Boston <-- world series champs have played a tough early schedule. i expect them to take the east this year
24. Miami <-- nice stadium or whatever but pretty much woof at the entire history of this franchise, except Dontrelle Willis  :love:
25. Philadelphia <-- nope, you suck
26. San Diego <-- Kim you are on the wrong bandwagon because San Diego is more punchless than the Royals
27. Tampa Bay <-- i wish we had Joe Maddon and his glasses
28. Chicago Cubs <-- "i love turtlenecks and being a douchebag and talking about minivans" - goEMAW.com
29. Houston <-- thanks for the home runs, houston  :cheers:
30. Arizona <-- why do they suck? why does Mark Trumbo play for them? why does anybody play for them? weird team

Offline Bloodfart

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5663
  • I don't run out of gas.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #9424 on: April 18, 2014, 12:04:15 PM »
 :pbj: